Two edits here. "14 billion years" and "13 billion years" refer to the same quantity: the time elapsed since the CMB  [Cosmic Microwave Background] was emitted. I bizarrely rounded differently in my head on the fly. In fact, the Big Bang took place about 13.798 +/- 0.037 billion years ago. 

(Aside: Those error bars should knock your socks off — determining the age of the cosmos with that accuracy by just looking at the night sky today is like you looking at me in this video and deducing my age in the video to within a couple of hours — that's insane!! Sherlock Holmes has nothing on cosmologists.)

The second edit is a cognitive slip that's all too common, and I could kick myself for perpetuating it: The "size" of the observed universe — the distance to the stuff that emitted the currently visible CMB 13.8 billion years ago — is not in fact 13.8 billion light-years. It's actually much larger — about 46 billion light-years — because the universe has continued to expand since the CMB was emitted. The stuff that emitted the CMB light we are just now seeing is thus much farther away.

"BICEP2 Press Conference"

2014 március 17-én, fizikusok egy csoportja izgalmas bejelentést tett: perdöntő bizonyítékot találtak az univerzum inflációs modellje mellett, mely az ősrobbanás elméletét támasztja alá. De mit jelent ez egy nem-fizikus számára? A TED Allan Adamst kérte fel arra, hogy rögtönzött előadásban ismertesse röviden az eredményeket. Az előadás illusztrációit Randall Munroe készítette az xkcd-től.

A felfedezés, mely átírhatja a fizikát

Watch next