WORK
- I am an Innovation Manager at a major retail company in Portugal. I conduct brainstorming sessions, help to create a creative climate among employees, help put together a yearly innovation book, manage the company's yearly innovation prizes, among many other things
- Before being Innovation Manager, and still at Sonae, I was an IT project manager, having helped to create some very interesting and distinctive marketing systems for POS promotions.
- I used to be a programmer at Fidelity Investments International (UK), then project manager. I excelled in Interactive Voice Response systems, both with touch-tones and speech recognition.
TED:
- I am now a co-organizer of the 2012 edition of TEDxO'Porto, in Portugal.
- I was part of the team that organized TEDxO'Porto 2011
EDUCATION:
- I graduated from the University of Aveiro, Portugal, with Physics Engineering. I spent the last year in the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, with a project whose aim was to nullify the Earth's magnetic field in a small volume using Helmholtz coils.
- I am a keen learner and have attended many different training sessions on many different subjects, mainly for professional reasons.
Helping making people happy! Making a difference!
Books, travelling, photography, ideas, cinema, music.
Innovation: new concepts, new ideas, brainstorming.
Books, ideas, people and cultures, causes, environment, politics, history and science.
Love cooking! - only privately though.
I had been following TED talks on the internet since 2006 and then I met a co-worker to whom I didn't speak very much who said she was part of TEDxO'Porto's organizing team. I immediately knew I wanted to take part!
Very soon I entered the team that organized TEDxO'Porto in 2011 - it was a fantastic day, that really made the difference for many people. I made good friends and it literally changed my life since.
Now I'm a co-organizer of TEDxO'Porto 2012 and am really excited about attending this event!
12:08 Posted: Mar 2012
Views: 784,607 | Comments: 393
15:15 Posted: Mar 2012
Views: 1,467,553 | Comments: 323
19:16 Posted: Mar 2012
Views: 1,082,754 | Comments: 168
TEDCred score: +2176.70 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A comment on Talk: Kees Moeliker: How a dead duck changed my life
I have yet to see a talk that is even half as weird as this one and that made me wonder so much about what is considered normal in the animal kingdom! Extremely highly recommended!
A comment on Talk: Catarina Mota: Play with smart materials
A comment on Talk: Shane Koyczan: "To This Day" ... for the bullied and beautiful
A comment on Talk: Ludwick Marishane: A bath without water
A reply on Talk: Jon Ronson: Strange answers to the psychopath test
A reply on Talk: Jon Ronson: Strange answers to the psychopath test
Since then I read the book, which is also quite interesting and informative. It is far more the report of an adventure and Jon Ronson never tries to pretend to be something he is not - and definitely not an academic dissertation on the subject.
Throughout the book he ponders about this over eagerness of the pharmaceutical industry and many professionals in the field to diagnose people who otherwise would just seem quirky, awkward, stressed out, intense or such as mentally ill. He himself suffers from a range or social ineptitude challenges that are clearly listed and described in DSM-IV as some kind of mental illness.
I don't think you'd need a "pro" to tell you that, do you? Or perhaps you actually *need* a non-pro to do so!
A reply on Talk: Quixotic Fusion: Dancing with light
A comment on Talk: Reggie Watts disorients you in the most entertaining way
A comment on Talk: Tali Sharot: The optimism bias
I could be a "realistic" person, however... that's just not realistic. No one can really be realistic because to be so, one needs to be in possession of all the possible information and take it in unemotionally, withhold judgement and take a lot of time making decisions on just about everything in one's life.
I think the way to be is a mix of all of these, depending on the subject, on how one's feeling, who one is talking to, one's perspectives, etc. If you agree with this, it's up to you to decide the right amount of which and in which circumstances.
A reply on Talk: Sherry Turkle: Connected, but alone?
When I'm with other people I devote my attention to them and don't spend my time texting other people, surfing the net, twitting or updating my Facebook status. I don't spend my Christmas dinners sending our dozens or hundreds of texts to everyone I know, in the hope of receiving a little nugget from someone while foregoing interactions that could give me a lot more. I don't interrupt a conversation I'm having at lunch with colleagues just because someone calls me. (If a person interrupted me during such a conversation no one would enjoy it; if a person calls me and I take the call why don't I blame myself for the rudeness? Is taking a new call more important than continuing the current conversation? Aren't thus these messages from far some kind of queue-jumpers for my attention?)
While it may seem like I'm some sort of Luddite, I assure you I'm an optimistic user of technologies. My point is that these things have a time and place and that, short of emergencies, we should by all means resist any forms of communication that would divert our attention from someone in front of us to someone far away.