I am a Biologist currently working on getting my PhD in Genetics (defense in first two weeks of August, 2012) at the University of Sao Paulo. My main interests are the fight against illegal wildlife trade and the application of forensic science to wildlife related crimes. I have been working as a volunteer biologist for the ngo SOS FAUNA since 2007 learning about the illegal wildlife trade in Brazil. In February 2012 I launched FREELAND Brasil, an independent arm of FREELAND Foundation (www.freeland.org), and its mission will be to fight wildlife trafficking through the incubation of initiatives with the same mission - such as the Brazilian Independent Wildlife Forensic Genetics Laboratory - my main career goal, the development of research projects, educational material, courses and workshops, the establishment of partnerships between law enforcement, environmental and customs agencies, non-profit organizations, politicians and other sectors from society. Through FREELAND Brasil my colleagues and I will be able to develop projects intended to understand more about wildlife trafficking in Brazil and south america, raise relevant information and promote education and awareness efforts. Wildlife trafficking in Brazil assumes many forms: biopiracy, the trade to supply zoos and collectors, the trade of religious and luck charms and souvenirs, the timber trade and the pet trade. I have been working more closely with the illegal pet trade, which targets small mammals, reptiles, amphibians and mainly song birds, parrots and macaws. Not only I have learned about the trade itself and issues related to the rehabilitation and responsible release of the seized fauna, but I joined the police in investigations, on the ground raids and seizures, and I did research field work in the regions where the animals are collected to develop an in-depth understanding of this problem. In these field work trips I got in contact with isolated rural communities, usually the first ones to take the animals from nature. There is a severe lack of education, health facilities, stable sources of income, and overall social inclusion programs. Wildlife trafficking is not a crime described in the Brazilian law, so no one can be prosecuted for this crime. They are prosecuted for transporting and owning animals without permits, which are only misdemeanors. This means that wildlife trafficking is highly profitable, with the ever growing demand for wild pets, and very little is at stake if the dealers are caught by the police.
I am currently working on 4 main projects:
1. the PhD and population genetics studies intended to understand where animals are being taken from, both to help with prevention and to help guide releasing efforts;
2. the releasing of a group of 62 blue-fronted amazons being rehabilitated at SOS Fauna since 2006;
3. returning over 1800 peruvian canaries seized in Brazil to Peru, where they are an endemic subspecies. They are currently under the care of SOS Fauna;
4. the setting up of a small independent not for profit wildlife forensics laboratory in Brazil
Wildlife, Forensics, Science, DeRose Method, Swimming, good music and books, true friends, stray dogs, animals, the sea...
We must spread the need for the development of Wildlife Forensics, so that we can have scientific data as evidence to be used in legal processes. Crimes against wildlife are nowadays comparable to illegal drug and gun trade, and we are far from winning this fight. A Wildlife Forensics Lab in a mega diverse and mega exploited country such as Brazil would give the legal system tools to make legal decisions based on scientific evidence, what would help the full prossecution of such cases, making wildlife trafficking more difficult and certainly less profitable.
Science, Wildlife, Sports, whatever you would like to!
swimming, making "brigadeiro, teaching, kicking doors down
My TED story couldn't have began in a better way: I attended the 2009 conference at Long Beach and gave a talk at TED University! I also had the honor of being selected as one of the 2010-2012 TED senior fellows. And on TED 2010 I also gave a TEDU talk which made it to TED.com. The repercussion was instant. Having a talk on TED.com spread the problem of illegal wildlife trade in Brazil and the issue of what to do with the seized animals. I know that these are the high points of my professional life until today. Also, being at TED and Interacting with so many people amazing people,who are so accomplished and are still wanting to accomplish gave me even more hope and energy to keep on with my project of saving the world (!). The TED experience was a unique and special experience which I will always treasure and cherish.
14:56 Posted: Jun 2012
Views: 422,303 | Comments: 124
16:46 Posted: Feb 2012
Views: 806,019 | Comments: 758
18:28 Posted: Mar 2011
Views: 2,672,837 | Comments: 491
07:01 Posted: Mar 2011
Views: 326,075 | Comments: 224
17:01 Posted: Jun 2011
Views: 387,380 | Comments: 207
TEDCred score: +1906.30 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A comment on Conversation: Will the Belo Monte Dam project on the Amazon River cause more harm to the environment or will it be a good source of energy for Brazil?
Two comments that didn´t fit in the previous post:
Belo Monte was estimated to custo approx 8 billion dollars and it is now at 14 billion dollars. It is a money machine and prices charged higher than market prices are just going down corruption drains.
Laslty, concerning the cost of renewable energies: I recently read somewhere that the only reason why oil based energy sources are so competitive is because they are heavily subsidized. If reweable sources received the smae kind of incentives, they would probably be very competitive as well.
A comment on Conversation: Will the Belo Monte Dam project on the Amazon River cause more harm to the environment or will it be a good source of energy for Brazil?
I think many great points were covered in this conversation so I am not going to repeat arguments. But I do think there are some crucial things we have to think about here. First, Brazil has been playing a dangerous game of doing one thing and then manipulating numbers to seem like a different thing. Our gov claims that inflation is under control when we know it is not, but they manipulate number to look that way (Financial Times has an article on this). The same happens to the environment; Gov swears that impacts of Belo Monte are minor both to biodiversity and to indigenous people, while any minimally informed person knows this is a blunt lie. There is a concern to play good guys for the international community while doing the oposite here. So yes, Belo Monte will have a major impact. Another issue is why it is being built there. Of course we need progress and energy, but it is a trade here. Energy for the population and some environmental impact? May be ok. However, in this case, it is not energy for rural communities, it is for minning industries. And not a minor environmental impact, it is huge, and plus the social impact. Do we really want to make this choice?
Thirdly, the social impacts are not just the direct ones. The construction itself brought approx 28 thousand workers to an otherwise small town. Just see what happened to Tucurui after they had a hydroeletric powerplant built there. Huge unemployment after construction was over, not enough schools and hospitals, diseases and pregnant teenagers. Also, look at Brazil´s wastes on old transmition lines. Some say it is around 50% of the production. Lastly, let´s just look at who is behind this billion dollar contract. Oddly enough the same companies who fund political campaigns and paid (and have been paying) travels to politicians and much more. This is just an economic game for them. They helped put politicians on power, now they get there share.This is much more than just energy needs.
A comment on Talk: Allan Savory: How to fight desertification and reverse climate change
A comment on Talk: Nina Tandon: Caring for engineered tissue
A comment on Conversation: How should we preserve global relevant resources?
I quickly went through the thread, but did not read every single comment, so I am sorry if I am repeating something that was already said. There is so much to this issue, environmentally and politically. Of course forests like the amazon should be protected at all costs, as should the oceans, the true "Earth's lungs". But it is meaningless to protect the last few healthy environments in the world, and keep our developing countries still developing countries, only so that north americans, europeans and others (who already destroyed almost all of their natural resources) can keep on having their predatory highly consumptive life style. It is time that, yes, we protect our resources, but they should change their goals in life as well: SUVs, thermoelectric plants, air conditioning on day and night, buying more objects, more clothing, new iphones and ipads every year... This behavior should change as well... As to internalization: in an ideal world, this would be a great idea. In our world, ruled by economic interests, it is just not doable.
A comment on Talk: Marcin Jakubowski: Open-sourced blueprints for civilization
A reply on Talk: Sarah Kay: If I should have a daughter ...
A reply on Talk: Sarah Kay: If I should have a daughter ...
Obrigada for your kind reply. Do try to read more Pessoa, I think you will particularly like Alvaro de Campos heteronym. Very secluded, dark, but yet beautiful.
Here is what I cannot agree - 1) poetry should have rigor. Art is about feeling, and poetry is about putting feelings in words. Feelings don't need rigor. It is like saying Rachmaninoff had too much feeling in his music. Rigor has to do with the style and not with the art form itself. When you try to enclose art, you try to enclose feelings, and for me this is a paradox....
2) poetry should be related to solitude, seclusion and maybe darkness. It can be. Then it will give wings to our deepest most difficult feelings. But what about poetry of love and joy? Are you willing to argue that all the poetry about beauty, love, joy, nature, sex is all crap?
A comment on Talk: Eric Berlow: Simplifying complexity
A reply on Talk: Sarah Kay: If I should have a daughter ...
Cheers.