I am 64, retired, and a conservative, especially when it comes to big business overeaching the bounderies of sound ethics.
I am passionate about our Constitution and our need for smaller government.
We must always maintain a guileless transparency in all things we do, thus saving the energy that it would take to cover lies within lies, while cavorting through personal Territorial Imperatives. It would seem that while marketing sometimes appears clever and/or cute, we are supporting the mechanism lieing when we buy into the purchase of those products or services. Our culture now reflects the intent to lie and deceive at every turn, in trying to hide our true natures because it would appear that we do not trust ourselves to think clearly and logically. We have become slaves to our greed to have things, meaningless objects, as if we are babies clinging to the breast in dire hope that this may be the only sustanence available. It is becoming obvious, that when a populace realizes its cuture is dying, these aspects of our true nature will become more pronoounced, which is a sad commentary on the nature of numanity. We must strive to become more aware of our true nature.
The economy and politics
determing the nature of intent
This member doesn't have any favorite talks yet.
TEDCred score: +1.00 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A comment on Talk: Eric Dishman: Health care should be a team sport
But instead of communicating with each other it is like they all are sperated entities working from different perspectives, like the three blind men asked to describe and elephant by touch. Each one comes up with a different concept. And, this has been going on for over six months or more.
This gentleman's concept is a great next step in our health care, and I'll certainly buy into it as soon as it becomes available.
A comment on Talk: Kevin Slavin: How algorithms shape our world
I do see problems in the future that we will see coming but won't know how to stop, because the avalanche of this new technologies has us enthralled, until we are jailed by our own, " I ROBOT ", for being a little too emotional for our own good.
Machines should not govern human nature even if their Algorithms allow them to do so. We would like to think that our knowledge of psychology has us all figured out to the point that the CIA and Clandestine organizations can manipulate us at will, but when machines can do this in the absence of feelings for the outcome, this will be just like Will Smith's movie, "I ROBOT" !!
There comes a time when humans must not make themselves subservient to the unfeeling, least we become cannibals of our own spirit. At some point we will need to bring "The Three Rules of Robotics into the frame of human existence. Because of the market crash of the dueling computers, it is now becoming evident that this should be given serious consideration.
If our machines can think faster than we, even at our smartest, we will need to find a way to protect ourselves from that encroachment upon our abilities !!!
A comment on Talk: Marc Goodman: A vision of crimes in the future
Sorry TED, this comes off as pure BS. How about getting the NRA up there on stage to speak about how old ladies save themselves by shooting rapist dead upon his second attack in two days. Lets have some balance, and try not to put out hysteria.
There are always going to be bad guys to deal with in society, that is just the name of the game within which we operate.
Remember all you posters and TED people; What this speaker did not mention was that terrorist, do not live in a vacuum, and that righteous indignation can take many forms when a society and people are attacked as the United States seems to think it can do with impunity.
The terrorist activities around the world are in direct proportion to how out of whack are our societies. The greater the provocation by governments the greater will be the attacks by terrorist organization.
WHAT MOST DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT WE SEEMINGLY HAVE MORONS RUNNING OUR MILITARY MACHINE SPEWING SELF RIGHTEOUSNESS AS THEIR ONLY SUPPORTING ARGUMENT !!!
A comment on Talk: Auret van Heerden: Making global labor fair