TED Community » David Bismark

Sign in to send David an email »

About Me

David Bismark received his PhD in Verifiable Electronic Voting from the University of Surrey in Guildford, UK in 2011 and holds MSc and BSc degrees from the same university. His research interests include poll-station and remote electronic voting and its verifiability and transparency. In the summer of 2010 he was invited to give a talk about his research at TED Global in Oxford, UK. He has acted as an expert on electronic voting and new voting technologies in election missions organised by an international organisation.

David is the founder and CEO of Swedish book publishing firm Recito Förlag AB, a game changer in the country's publishing industry. Focusing on high quality short runs for the past decade, the company and its services fit right into the modern author's toolbox. David writes and lectures about the future of the book as well as the impact of social media and the Internet on the publishing industry, the author and the reader. The company he leads has challenged business and revenue models of one of Sweden's most revered industries and of this he can feel only proud.

His hobbies are long distance running and sharing funny pictures of his cat (which, incidentally, is why they invented the Internet).

Location:
Sweden, Stockholm
Current organization:
Recito Forlag AB
Gender:
Male
I am:
Consultant, Entrepreneur, Project manager, Technologist, Writer/Editor
Languages:
Swedish, English, German
My website links:
Blog about E-voting
Universities:
University of Surrey, UK, National Defence College, Stockholm
TED conferences attended:
TEDActive 2013, TEDGlobal 2012, TEDActive 2012, TEDGlobal 2011, TEDGlobal 2010
Member Picture Member Picture Member Picture Member Picture Member Picture

TEDCRED 200+ TED SpeakerTED Attendee

More About Me

I'm passionate about

Elections - they should be verifiable. Creativity - everyone should be allowed and encouraged to create. Freedom - of information and speech, constantly under attack all around the world.

Comments

  • TEDCred score: +201 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.

  • A reply on Talk: David Bismark: E-voting without fraud

    Apr 20 2012: The voting receipt DOES NOT say who you have voted for - that is the secret to making the system both verifiable AND secret! :-)

  • A reply on Talk: David Bismark: E-voting without fraud

    Apr 20 2012: Hi - sorry I only just saw this (wish you had e-mailed me and I would have helped you much faster!). That paper is very old by now so there are better ones describing PaV, go to pretavoter.com for those.

  • A reply on Talk: David Bismark: E-voting without fraud

    Apr 20 2012: The voting receipt DOES NOT say who you have voted for - that is the secret to making the system both verifiable AND secret! :-)

  • A reply on Talk: David Bismark: E-voting without fraud

    Apr 20 2012: Hi Bev (although I'm guessing you are not actually Bev Harris)

    1. Verifying your own vote is only one part in the verification chain, verifying all the votes (the pool as you call it) is also part of the chain.

    2. I am sorry, I have no idea what you mean with this analogy

    3. The point of an end-to-end verifiable system like the ones I talk about in this TED Talk is that not even the people running the server can change any votes or get away with cheating.

    4. The system I am talking about is not primarily aimed at battling the problem of voter registration - it doesn't weed out made-up names. But just because fixing the problem of voting doesn't fix the problem of voter registration doesn't mean we shouldn't do it - and we should fix the problem of voter registration too!

    5. As in 3. above, the point of an end-to-end verifiable system is to make sure that not even an administrator or a cable can cheat without getting found out!

  • A reply on Talk: David Bismark: E-voting without fraud

    Apr 20 2012: Hey Dmitry! I am guessing from your name and your disbelief in politicians that you are Russian - might that be correct?

    You are right though, there will always be those who want to cheat. And those who cheat are not going to start using one of these verifiable systems where cheating is impossible (it will always be found out). So it is up to us the people to make them use it! (By the way, the way of cheating you describe has been considered in the research field but I didn't have time to go into that much detail in my talk - thanks for bringing it up!)

  • A reply on Talk: David Bismark: E-voting without fraud

    Apr 20 2012: Thank you Mr Busby! I really loved the conversations on here and explaining more of the details that deal with most of the concerns that people have (those tend to turn up in the research community as the years pass, so we've dealt with most) but I'm afraid the conversation was rather ruined by a couple of trolls. :-(
  • +1

    A reply on Talk: David Bismark: E-voting without fraud

    Apr 20 2012: The verifiable systems that I am talking about do not print a receipt that says what the vote is, so you cannot use it against the voter. The Brazilian system that you are referring to is NOT verifiable I'm afraid so it has all the weaknesses that I describe in the talk. Thanks for joining the conversation!
  • +1

    A reply on Conversation: Would you rather be an information producer, propagator, or consumer?

    Feb 23 2012: Absolutely, we are all consumers, curators and creators!

  • A reply on Conversation: Would you rather be an information producer, propagator, or consumer?

    Feb 23 2012: So I need to defend my stance that humanity is more important than individuals! :-)

    Roy, I might have corrected your "Mr Bismark" and said "It's actually Dr Bismark". But I consider my own achievements and my own understanding of the world small, random and inconsequential. It is my part in the network as a whole that makes me important.

    I am mortal and I will one day perish. Therefore, I consider myself valuable (to myself at least!) for only the brief period that I can work on this earth - but I consider the evolution and learning of the human race to be eternal and thus more important than myself.

    In the analogy of the human race being a giant brain, or human network, I as an individual, provide only a miniscule proportion of the total computing power and a tiny bit of the total memory. It is more important to the human race that there is diversity than it is to it that one individual, me, is around.

    To the individual, me, being alive is paramount, of course.

  • A reply on Conversation: Would you rather be an information producer, propagator, or consumer?

    Feb 23 2012: Heather - are there any (contemporary) books (or papers) that you would recommend on the subject?
Load 10 more Comments (Showing 1 - 10 of 148)

Favorite talksSee all »