Members Peter Law

About me

Member picture
  • More about me

  • Comments

  • TEDCred score: -325

    TEDCred gives you a total score on all your comments on TED.com.

  • A comment on Talk: Richard Dawkins on militant atheism

    4 days ago: Much is made of evolution being science, or "Smart" as RD puts it, but is it ?
    1. We started from a Big Bang where nothing (call it a singularity if that sounds more scientific) exploded into everything. The First Law states that this is impossible.
    2. Gas heading outwards from the centre gravitated into stars, planets etc. The Gas Laws state that this is impossible.
    3. These stars etc formed into rotating systems with axial spins & orbits going every which way. Conservation of Momentum Laws state this is impossible.
    4. All evidence points to life only coming from life,
    5. Everything obeys the Law of Entropy, including humans who can input energy (& intelligence) into ourselves all to no avail.
    6. We understand a little of DNA, but really have no idea how dividing cells produce body parts, let alone novel body parts for evolution.
    Why is this science not subject to scientific norms?
  • -2

    A comment on Talk: Al Gore warns on latest climate trends

    Nov 8 2009: "Mainstream news organizations have begun reporting on scientific research that suggests that global warming may not be caused by man and may not be as dire and eminent as alarmists suggest.....the BBC's climate correspondent Paul Hudson reported, the warmest year recorded globally "was not in 2008 or 2007, but 1998." It's true, he continued, "For the last 11 years, we have not observed any increase in global temperatures." (BBC News on Oct. 9)
    Of course we need to conserve energy etc. but that was always the case. This scare is a scam by governments to gain more power over their people.

    Check out ( http://www.olivetreeviews.org/radio/mp3/ ). Go to the 1st. hour of Oct. 24th. If you dont want the whole hour then home in on Lord Christopher Monckton about 15-20mins in. He only speaks for 4mins., but it's well worth listening.
  • A comment on Talk: Gordon Brown: Wiring a web for global good

    Nov 7 2009: This World Government thing is a little more advanced than Gordon is letting on. Could the Copenhagen climate meetings this December be the excuse to implement the plan ?

    "Mainstream news organizations have begun reporting on scientific research that suggests that global warming may not be caused by man and may not be as dire and eminent as alarmists suggest.....the BBC's climate correspondent Paul Hudson reported, the warmest year recorded globally "was not in 2008 or 2007, but 1998." It's true, he continued, "For the last 11 years, we have not observed any increase in global temperatures." (BBC News on Oct. 9)

    Check out ( http://www.olivetreeviews.org/radio/mp3/ ). Go to the 1st. hour of Oct. 24th. If you dont want the whole hour then home in on Lord Christopher Monckton about 15-20mins in. He only speaks for 4mins., but it's well worth listening.
  • A reply on Talk: Richard Dawkins on militant atheism

    Nov 5 2009: My career has been mostly in engineering design. I see in nature the most amazing and complex design. I look for the designer. We are basically machines, the atoms of our body are not "alive"; even a corpse with all the atoms present and correct is not alive. Life is something else; injected from outside if you like.
    I cannot believe that we came from the chance mixture of atoms in a puddle, which developed a self replicating machine, which by fortuitous mistakes eventually emerged as mankind. The only hard evidence we have is the fact that we are here, we are capable of diversity; and we have buried bones which we can line up.
    My other option is an engineer of infinite power who came and introduced himself and pointed us to the workshop manual.
    Seems so logical; but lots don't agree.
  • A reply on Talk: Richard Dawkins on militant atheism

    Nov 5 2009: Hi Abd, sorry if I was abrupt, I'd just come in for lunch and noticed your post. Time waits for no man.
    We know that for each argument there is a counter argument. eg Gilgamish does pre-date Genesis because Genesis was compiled from earlier writings, and the fact that it has similarities is not surprising IF the flood etc really did occur. However trying to nail down the truth from so far back can be a matter of who you believe; so it has as much to do with faith as hard data.
    I accept there seems to be an inconsistency between our free will, and God knowing what will happen. I put it down to God knowing what decisions we will make via our free will. Certainly you and I can choose whether to believe or not. Look at it from God's perspective, it must be like you or I trying to explain the stock market to our goldfish.
Favorite talks  
  • This member doesn't have any favorite talks yet.
Favorite themes  
  • This member doesn't have any favorite themes yet.
Favorite speakers  
  • This member doesn't have any favorite speakers yet.
Favorite members  
  • This member doesn't have any favorite members yet.