TED Community » Lucianne Walkowicz

About Me

Lucianne Walkowicz studies the inscrutable faces of the stars for clues to the inner workings of their hearts. She got her taste for astronomy as an undergrad at Johns Hopkins, testing detectors for the Hubble Space Telescope’s new camera (installed in 2002). She also learned to love the dark stellar denizens of our galaxy, the red dwarfs, which became the topic of her PhD dissertation at University of Washington. Nowadays, she works on NASA’s Kepler mission, studying starspots and the tempestuous tantrums of stellar flares to understand stellar magnetic fields. She is particularly interested in how the high energy radiation from stars influences the habitability of planets around alien suns. Lucianne is also a leader in the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, a new project that will scan the sky every night for 10 years to create a huge cosmic movie of our Universe. When her head isn’t in the stars, she draws comics, runs long distances, and brings the house down at karaoke.

Location:
United States, Brooklyn, NY
Current organization:
Princeton University Department of Astrophysical Sciences
Past organizations:
UC Berkeley Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Astronomy Department, Johns Hopkins University
Current role:
Astronomer
Gender:
Female
Areas of expertise:
stellar activity, planetary habitability
Member Picture

TEDCRED 50+ TED SpeakerTED FellowTED Attendee

Comments

  • TEDCred score: +79.80 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.

  • A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Look up for a change

    Feb 23 2012: and that was an incredible technological challenge just to get there and grab some rocks and return alive. One of the major motivators for there to be a moon base is for mining, but we're a long way away from being able to do that. Even if you only sent a robot and not humans with all their pesky needs for food, water and air (things that other planets don't have!), it's very hard to actually (for example) dig a deep hole. The Mars rovers do most of their experiments with a tiny drill (think something you might have in your garage) and a scraping tool, not the kind of major machinery you'd need to extract anything in large quantities. In short, the potential is there, but we're a long way from bringing that into reality.
  • A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Look up for a change

    Feb 23 2012: Hi Rider,

    I'll take a crack at both your questions-- 'cause hey, I'm a dark sky lover too! :)
    Air pollution is still an issue in that haze can still make the atmosphere more opaque than it would be otherwise, and indeed the fact that our planet has an atmosphere at all causes some distortion (which we see as twinkling of stars-- not a big deal if you're just gazing at the sky with your eyes, but it's an issue for astronomers, which is part of why we put telescopes in space). However, that haze itself is not all that thick-- it's primarily a problem because when there's junk in the air, it's like having many teeny tiny mirrors for light to bounce off of, so if there's a lot of ambient light around it scatters off the haze in all directions, including into your eyes. Because there's so much more of that scattered light than the light actually coming from the stars, it ends up being all we see. Even if there were NO air pollution, though, light pollution would still be a problem, because the light can scatter off of things that are naturally in our atmosphere, like water (which is why the stars seem so clear on cold, dry nights).

    On to your question about resources! Way back when, our whole solar system (the sun and all the planets, comets, asteroids, etc. included) formed from the same cloud of gas that collapsed and condensed into the stuff we have today. All bodies in the solar system therefore have the same kinds of things on them, just in varying proportion-- so here on Earth, we have lots of rock and metal and a little bit of the "light" elements like hydrogen and helium, whereas some of the other planets, like Jupiter, have much more light stuff like hydrogen and helium than we do. My point being that the elements we need are everywhere, but actually mining them is really hard. Keep in mind that we have only put human feet onto one other body in the solar system, the moon-- (continued)
  • A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Look up for a change

    Feb 22 2012: Thanks for the kind words, Michael, and thank you for writing to your local paper! If you want to check out specific solutions to outdoor lighting issues, look at the resources at www.darksky.org.
  • +1

    A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Look up for a change

    Feb 22 2012: Thank you for sharing your story Audrey! I am so glad to hear that there are people out there acting to make positive changes. I absolutely agree that the necessary changes are there to be made, with intelligent design choices based on existing technology. The way we expend energy on outdoor lighting right now is akin to turning on all our air conditioners in a heat wave and then opening our windows so the cool air goes outdoors!
  • +3

    A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Look up for a change

    Feb 22 2012: Kristian, the picture is not "fake", it is a composite of multiple photographs taken by satellite. If you would like more information, check out some of the explanation here: http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap001127.html
  • +2

    A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Look up for a change

    Feb 22 2012: Hi Anant,
    Light doesn't really "settle", per se-- light pollution is caused by light scattering in our atmosphere. So if you turn off the light, there's no more light scattering around. It would take a little while for your eyes to adjust to the dark, but then you'd be able to see again. It's funny, although we don't have eyes that are ideal for darkness the way that nocturnal mammals do, we are actually capable of seeing better in darkness than most of us realize-- we just never really have the chance!
  • A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Look up for a change

    Feb 21 2012: Mary, I remember seeing the Milky Way and thinking "What is that really long cloud?!" and then "OH WOW".

    I love the idea of a controlled blackout! It would be amazing if there were citywide stargazing nights where everyone took a minute to look up!
  • A comment on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Look up for a change

    Feb 19 2012: Hi all,
    If you're looking for more information, there's tons of good resources on the International Dark-Sky Association's website: http://www.darksky.org/
    Happy stargazing!
  • A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Look up for a change

    Feb 19 2012: I remember all my dishes being smashed all over the floor, so I'm glad one of us has a positive memory of that quake!
  • +2

    A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Look up for a change

    Feb 19 2012: Hi Stephen,
    The challenge to preserving the dark night sky isn't a lack of solutions, it's a lack of awareness, so my goal in this talk was to remind people that the night sky has value, that it's something worth preserving. As for many problems, the right solution is likely to be different for different people's needs. Directed lights, as you mention, are one such solution! If you'd like more information, go check out the International Dark Sky Association's website: http://www.darksky.org/
    Happy stargazing!
Load 10 more Comments (Showing 1 - 10 of 60)

Favorite talks

This member doesn't have any favorite talks yet.