TED Community » Abhijeet Sai Dasari

Sign in to send Abhijeet Sai an email »

About Me

I'm a science freak who want to know everything he can...

Location:
India, Hyderabad
Gender:
Male
I am:
Student
Member Picture

More About Me

I'm passionate about

Everything in this nature!!

Talk to me about

Science of any kind and especially astronomy, theoretical physics.

Comments

  • TEDCred score: +0.30 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.

  • A comment on Conversation: If you can remove one word from the world and all of humanity what would you remove?

    Aug 23 2011: corruption....because i'm from INDIA!!

  • A reply on Conversation: Is it really possible to convert Sound Energy to Electricity for our conventional uses?

    Aug 23 2011: lol !! that would definitely annoy the person shouting at you!!

  • A reply on Conversation: Is audible understanding better than the visual understanding?!

    Jul 1 2011: Thanks for your comment!!

    First of all, i need you to be more specific on your opinion that audible understanding is much better than the visual understanding.(In what way do you mean it?)

    Secondly, i want you to know that every child in our country is not capable to have a skill of developing visual reference in his mind when a teacher is explaining it to him.Most of them get confused when we implement a 3D drawing into a sheet of 2D paper.This results in the deterioration of his interest towards the subject.Moreover it is difficult to imagine some strange 3D drawings and few of the physics' topics( vectors like stuff ) to most of the people in 3D, so these smart classes train them how to visualize the concept that they are teaching, for better understanding by showing them few animations that how this concept really works!!
    As i have already told you that visual understanding is better than audible, it becomes easier for a student to memorize a picture which he had seen during a class and build up his sequence in detail rather than trying to memorize a speech on the topic which is pretty difficult to hang on with!!

    Finally, great inventors evolved from great observations not great speeches!!
  • +1

    A reply on Talk: Patricia Burchat: Shedding light on dark matter

    May 18 2011: yeah!! you sound completely..right!! i still cannot understand..the QM equations in the existence..as im still 17!! i need to plunge into the depth of it to understand them completely!! i appreciate your comments..and i would like to know your perspective..on this!!

  • A comment on Talk: Patricia Burchat: Shedding light on dark matter

    May 7 2011: i would also like to add..a brief view of mine on the very principle behavior of the DARK ENERGY .If dark energy is so powerful that it expands the space between the galaxies...then why wouldn't it act between two matter particles or two individual atoms themselves?If dark energy is THE primordial reason for the prediction of the BIG CHILL..then why didn't it really..outrun the gravity during the formation of the stars and galaxies in the early times after the big bang? I think the working of this energy is different at different scales..as the gravity does.. So there are quiet a few similarities between the dark energy and gravity which can possibly explain its solution.Moreover..according to the M-theory..the gravity is being carried by particles called gravitons..which can quietly pass through the spatial fabric..explaining the effect of the gravity across large distances..so the dark energy can carried by a type of particle that can be a type of ANTI to graviton..and it might also..exhibit a few similarities in that way..but act inversely to graviton!!

    Affixing to my previous comment..as dark energy makes up 70% of the total universe..there should be a catastrophic event after the big bang or during it which might have triggered the birth to this weird energy ( Because it is not among the fundamental energies i reckon..) and according to my view and knowledge..such a catastrophic event after the big bang so..immense that might have triggered the birth is the annihilation of matter and antimatter in the early stages...there might be a loop hole in the annihilation which we might not have explained yet..and i think that holds the key for the answer to dark energy and dark matter.(I previously said that dark matter was also created by this fashion..and i think there can be the possibility of creation of matter and energy at the same time but in different proportions)

  • A comment on Talk: Patricia Burchat: Shedding light on dark matter

    May 7 2011: From a few weeks..I'm struggling to answer few questions..what she had addressed in this talk.I have read a few comments that really..inspired me..in observing the different perspectives of people on this topic.
    Now as i told from a few weeks i have been going through the web..reading the..pages which highlighted this topic.I got accepted on the very fact of the existence of the dark matter by this picture...
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/bigphotos/12956007.html
    This picture had really shown the convincing proof for the existence of the dark matter.
    However i got puzzled and wondered thinking on what might have really created this dark matter in our universe!!?? Persuading this thought i again went through different kinds of websites..but more of WIKI..and got some really interesting theories in my mind which could possibly might explain the existence of the dark matter.A few seconds after the big bang...i read that there was the creation of equal amounts of matter and antimatter..which got annihilated..resulting in a huge crisis..but due to the difference in the interactions of antimatter from that of the matter particles...few lucky matter particles survived to form such a massive universe.So, in spite of such a huge crisis after the big bang..it is not right to think that nothing had happened there except of the annihilation..i strongly believe that these annihilations..might have triggered a phenomenon which might explain the formation of the dark matter.
    I think the clue is there when we rethink the idea of formation of matter and its composition!! (I'm not saying that the present idea is totally..wrong..but i mean that few changes MIGHT be necessary to explain the dark matter).
    you can go through this idea by having a brief look on wiki pages..like this
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryogenesis
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leptogenesis_(physics)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Big_Bang

Favorite talksSee all »