Apr 29 2011: I trust none one and everyone.. There is no “one source” to use when gathering information. We all nee to see all possibilities and trust our own conclusions base on different views of the same topic from different media and people.
If possible, I´ll check the information going to the place my self.
In other words, I will take my opinion over every other, but only after gathering all information from all sources and deciding who to trust.
Apr 28 2011: I personally, think that there should not be limits to science. I hate seen animals dying just because we don’t know how to cure them. For me, letting a live go, just because its wrong to find a cure is anti-ethic.
Let me be clear, if by messing with my dead body they save even ONE living creature, so be it!
Religios people mess with science people because they don’t understand them or what they do (in most cases). Still they are separate thing that should never be compared.
Apr 28 2011: I think there is no “one solution” way.
-Like in surgery, you need not only the surgery, but a lot of pain killers, antibiotics, constant watch, restore fluids, and so on…
A lot of things have to be done, in the right amount, to make a change. And still, too much of one thing might kill the entire idea.
-So, and this will sound wrong, I also don’t believe in changing everything and implementing all at once. Cause it would get rejected or just ignored.
-You try giving your dog a pill, new food, a bath and a toy, and it might reject everything at once. But introducing one by one the pill, the food, the bath and the toy, waiting for him to get use to one element, before introducing the next one, which might be accepted smoothly .
TEDCred score: +0.10 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A comment on Conversation: Who do you trust more to help you understand world events, the press, politicians or your friends/family, or someone/something else? Why?
If possible, I´ll check the information going to the place my self.
In other words, I will take my opinion over every other, but only after gathering all information from all sources and deciding who to trust.
A comment on Conversation: Praise the Lord and Pass the Stem Cells: The Balance Between Religion and Science
Let me be clear, if by messing with my dead body they save even ONE living creature, so be it!
Religios people mess with science people because they don’t understand them or what they do (in most cases). Still they are separate thing that should never be compared.
A comment on Conversation: Changing our lifestyle or the energie to solve environment problems?
-Like in surgery, you need not only the surgery, but a lot of pain killers, antibiotics, constant watch, restore fluids, and so on…
A lot of things have to be done, in the right amount, to make a change. And still, too much of one thing might kill the entire idea.
-So, and this will sound wrong, I also don’t believe in changing everything and implementing all at once. Cause it would get rejected or just ignored.
-You try giving your dog a pill, new food, a bath and a toy, and it might reject everything at once. But introducing one by one the pill, the food, the bath and the toy, waiting for him to get use to one element, before introducing the next one, which might be accepted smoothly .