I anxiously await what the future holds. Thought is free so have more.
Enjoying this life and the survival / evolution of the species. Thinking of ways that could be, if only we can make it that far. Colonizing space soon. Living life freely and the course of music
Here is another something. Attempt to get the major retailers to take fire detectors off their shelves, at least in some areas, so that the fire department can sell them and produce capitol. Of course this would have to be a voluntary commitment to by the retailers. Seems like something that could bring along some great PR. Great for the ares with volunteer fire departments.
The thing you most feel to say.
12:45 Posted: Oct 2011
Views: 938,774 | Comments: 289
18:24 Posted: May 2011
Views: 501,341 | Comments: 157
10:25 Posted: Apr 2011
Views: 438,920 | Comments: 126
TEDCred score: +11.60 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A reply on Talk: Ed Boyden: A light switch for neurons
A comment on Talk: Brian Greene: Is our universe the only universe?
That being said I will pose one question at this time.
When the Bang part of the big bang was spoken of, the "fuel" existing in such an efficient state that it would continue to 're-explode' causing multiple universes, as the premise.
With the sphere being the most efficient freestanding shape, why would it be thought that the universes would be anything but inside one another? If the bang exploded space outward, in at least three dimensions, the most efficient way would be equally outward in all dimensions. A temporal difference in explosions would lead to the second explosion moving towards the first in all directions simultaneously at the same speed, just one step behind. Therefore, foregoing an increase in energy of the bang, the universes would not 'bump into one another', but instead chase each other with an ever increasing lead.
The temporal difference being caused by the difference of energy from one explosion to the next, liken it to the change in radius if it helps. The more explosions the total less energy, the less energy the further from the initial point of expansion, leading to larger gaps between the universes.
The total energy of the universes would be decreasing as well if the explosion was on the 'surface' of the fuel, with decreasing surface area the total energy of the universes would also decrease. Unless of course the fuel is more dense toward the center, then there could be a density to surface area ratio that would allow the proceeding universes to remain at the same total energy, if the surface energy density was in a direct and equal inverse proportion to the reduction in radius.
Then again at that point it may not be energy, exuded from that Bang, but instead a force that aligns energy.
A comment on Conversation: What does the Pharmaceutical Industry need to do to truly bring better medicines to patients?
A comment on Conversation: Fill in the Blank - If I knew I could not fail I would ___________ ?
A comment on Conversation: How does one not acquiesce to suffering?
A comment on Conversation: In ten words or less, what is a question no one (yet) knows the answer to?
A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Finding planets around other stars
A reply on Talk: Lucianne Walkowicz: Finding planets around other stars
A reply on Conversation: There are currently under utilized technologies that hold solutions to many world's problems. How do we identify these technologies?
A comment on Conversation: What have you learnt from watching TEDTalks?