Byron Lee

Someone is shy

Byron hasn't completed a profile. Should we look for some other people?

Comments & conversations

Noface
Byron Lee
Posted over 2 years ago
Is it possible to create energy from thin air?
Energy cannot be created or destroyed. But course it's possible to accumulate energy using thin air, the problem you will have is getting the finance to do it. Fossil fuels controls the monetary system, rendering all other forms of RELIABLE emission and source free energy supply development impossible to aquire finance.
Noface
Byron Lee
Posted over 2 years ago
What do you say about Free Energy proposals from Nikola Tesla?
Christov.. until we wake up and understand that energy is a root based necessity of life, that it's current source for enhancing our lifestyle is saleable and linked to a system of money creation, which is used as a means of control of the people, all the systems that are intergrated to enables governments to govern, the education systems, the media and the planetary resources subtly brainwashing people into beleiving that without money nothing is possible, and that an emission free energy source does not exist.... all controlled by the fossil fuelled monetary system. Of course it's worth spreading the truth but we have to wake up to whats going on.
Noface
Byron Lee
Posted over 2 years ago
What do you say about Free Energy proposals from Nikola Tesla?
The fossil fuelled energy based monetary system will never allow for free energy, they just would not fund it's development and niether will any government involved in the borrowing of any monetary matters. You see we are all too dependent on fossil fuels, and therefore basing our monetary system incognito on fossil energy means it controls every aspects of our unsustainable high consumption first world standards of living, money controlled lives. In other words energy is a necessity for first world standard of living, the sale of fossil fuelled energy as a source creates the money for the system, using money as a control mechanism for the control of every system in society means it would be virtually impossible to develop a free energy system. Thats the real problem we have, a fossil fuelled based monetary creation system.
Noface
Byron Lee
Posted over 3 years ago
Nikola Tesla's Energy Innovations
[cont] NOW what’s NOT being pushed or taught in our universities is cold kinetics, (the death to fossil fuels, and nuclear energy,) what they don’t want us to know and go to great length to avoid is the idea of cold kinetics.Unlike converting heat based sources to mechanical energy, the source of cold kinetics is gravity, refer it to space time if you want, it’s the effect of gravity and time that is the energy source, and this source is perpetual for all our world energy needs and more, not only is this source more reliable than all of the currently used energy sources available at present put together, there is absolutely no pollution of any sort from this fuel.This is what we are dealing with when it comes to energy GREEEEEED!!!! Without a care for the health of the people or the planet. You have a choice using the profits you have now to invest in new reliable harmless technologies like pnuemakinetics To replace fossil and nuclear, Keep your hard earned wealth, bank it and shutdown the fossil and nuclear industries. Or you can deal with nature I am sure mother nature have no use or care for money and neither will we when nature inflicts so much damage it tears out the structure of your first world standard and reduces your monetary system to worthlessness. Yes clean drinking water sells at $5000 per litre.we recently saw a very tiny glimps of the power of nature although not climate change related, in Japan look what havok that caused how much wealth was lost in an hour??
Noface
Byron Lee
Posted over 3 years ago
Nikola Tesla's Energy Innovations
[continued] For inventors we shall obstruct, and by using our wealth and influence make it virtually impossible for them to patent, manufacture, or sell such oil threatening devices. For innovators who have investment we can also use our vast wealth to influence their bankers and in more determined cases using the government to legislate tax burdens on whatever profit they the government will lose. Or use the media to uncover and exaggerate minor flaws in their character to discredit in order for them not to get recognised and taken seriously. For universities and places of learning, we will fund them to push the thermodynamics and relativity theory systems. In order to brainwash the students into believing that the only way to create useable mechanical energy is by creating a source of heat, students will not get any degrees unless they accept and conform to this idea when referring to energy, reason to push these systems as there is always a loss to entropy, as heat energy cannot be 100% recouped, fits perfect into their mathematical calculations and there is no doubting mathematics.. (As if every type of dynamic energy has heat as its source), you will be dismissed as a loon if perpetual motion is mentioned. Or if it is suggested that gravity is a force that can be used to generate energy full cycle. Why?… the maths don’t add up, the maths always subtract from what you started with due to friction and entropy. This is a fact that even I have to accept, using the thermodynamics and relativity systems with mathematics as it‘s law, there is no getting around this fact. That is why it is being taught in universities. Oh dear what can we do about global warming? We will use our wealth, and influence to try and disprove or put off action until the oil runs out, we fund enough scientist to help us disprove it is happening. The dammed greens we perhaps should fund something of theirs to keep them quiet , [scenario ends] The problem is not a lack of innovation.
Noface
Byron Lee
Posted over 3 years ago
Nikola Tesla's Energy Innovations
This is really what we are dealing with when it comes to energy production... Put yourself in this scenario, you buy a plot of land with the intension of building a house on it, whilst drilling your foundations, you find a sea of thick pungent flammable liquid underground, totally no good to you for the proposed purpose the land were bought for. Now your government wants to pay you $80 a barrel for that stuff, you work out your cost per barrel and find you are left with $50 clear profit per barrel and there seems to be an endless supply of $50 barrels. After 10 years of barrel filling, a total of 100 million barrels had been sold. netting $5 billion of clear profit, and checking the reservoir level it seems we have only just scratched the surface there is at least another 50 years of barrel filling remaining and as the demand for it keeps increasing, you obviously look for more efficient ways of increasing the supply for the demand with less cost. The government also makes a tidy profit from this stuff after refining and sold as fuel for transport it is taxed aggressively, and the surplus barrels are sold to other non oil producing countries for $90 a barrel. Wow this is ours and our countries government main wealth creation industry, and as wealth has its roots based on energy we will base our monetary system on oil. Now that we have made this the number one asset to our countries economy how do we protect it? Simple we already have the government onside in our pockets as they are too dependent on it, meaning the people will revolt against them if they attempt to cut back or hike the price on its use for transport heating, manufacturing ECT. so we can invest a mere $1billion dollars looking for potential threats to our industry from reliable alternative fuels that will wipe out our industry within the next 20 years, and the biggest threat of course is likely to come from inventors, innovators, universities, places of learning.