Peter Schoen

Melton, Australia

Someone is shy

Peter hasn't completed a profile. Should we look for some other people?

Comments & conversations

218280
Peter Schoen
Posted over 1 year ago
Allan Adams: The discovery that could rewrite physics
Done, And as I suspected there is very little data in support of such pseudo science, and what's more what little data there is, there is one that I would recommend you consider as to why the following data should exist. In short - An Astronaut is NOT an Astrophysicist, but rather just a specialized Pilot, an unemployed Pilot at that. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Noetic_science
218280
Peter Schoen
Posted over 1 year ago
Patricia Burchat: Shedding light on dark matter
Anyone who has the need to refer to "Dark Matter" & "Dark Energy" actually demonstrates to me those individuals have a complete lack of understanding on the theories dealing with "Mass/Energy" and how it's closely related to General Relativity & Special Relativity - Involving all Densities from Particles to local NEAR-Vacuum which also eventually includes the Inter-Galactic NEAR-Vacuum..
218280
Peter Schoen
Posted over 1 year ago
Allan Adams: The discovery that could rewrite physics
The Universe as a wave function is not a new one, and in fact may be the best model yet. There is one concern of mine when anyone refers to Multi-Universes or Parallel-Universes, and the concern is the term is somewhat contradictory, Contradictory because to refer to the Universe is actually referring to everything, and well with that in mind what's actually being conveyed is multi-everything's or parallel-everything's. I know- I know, even some well known Showmen Physicists have been known to utter this contradiction, which to me shows a rather flawed reasoning, and thus what they have to convey can be somewhat skewed and or inaccurate. Yeah I know - strong words for such a minor infraction, but an infraction is an infraction, and such infractions hints a somewhat corrupted logic, thus the information conveyed needs a great deal of scrutiny..
218280
Peter Schoen
Posted over 1 year ago
Allan Adams: The discovery that could rewrite physics
The Universe presents itself based upon non contradictory constructs. On this basis alone when we seek answers, non contradictory answers can be provided by "The Universe" Can you claim the same with your Gawd? What's the bet, even if I point out contradictions, your conviction will not change - mind you, if there is any shred of intelligence within your mind, you just may come to your senses..
218280
Peter Schoen
Posted over 1 year ago
Allan Adams: The discovery that could rewrite physics
Oh - I see, you are referring to a child's book going by the name of "The Bible" a book that to this day still deceives individuals who are unable to recognize the many contradictions conveyed therein, for example the claim to creation, and no doubt it's very own creation of it's self, it's claim to know everything for example ones thought, and yet the children's story book has that know it all to flood swipe humans to the brink of extinction, hell it even has this so called know it all, resorting to diddling some girl, just in order to insure the right DNA seeds the girl, I am amused as to why that all knowing shiester just didn't dig into what it should have known, seeing its suppose to know every thought of ours, so - Am I right or is your shiester based upon some other children's book?
218280
Peter Schoen
Posted over 1 year ago
Allan Adams: The discovery that could rewrite physics
Sorry Suzana, but you're assumption of the hidden, has no basis - well unless ones education hadn't provided the means of how to use a powerful human tool, where if it hasn't been interfered with and or destroyed by religious indoctrination, it provides the user with the ability to recognize contradictions, and what's more once discovered act upon it, by simply dismissing the contradictory information and the information's source. Alas - you have conveyed yourself to be mystified and well - when one is mystified, it is usually by way of lacking information "data" thus "hidden" for example - your remote control sends pulses of light to your TV, and to the ignorant the remote is deemed as magic or supernatural, and if you never consider to video the operation you would remain forever ignorant of the "hidden" infra-red pulses of light, light which is beyond being detected by the human eye, but not by other means, thus only hidden to those who don't challenge, and seek appropriate information. My point is that MAIN STREAM science has removed all mysteries - nothing is really hidden anymore, and thus we're at the stage of confirmation - mind you there is only one mystery and that's the unification of Quantum Mechanics with General Relativity, but I must stress - That's mainstream's problem, as I am pretty confident I know why Quantum Mechanics is at odds with General Relativity, thus it's just a matter of my Data being distributed..
218280
Peter Schoen
Posted over 1 year ago
Allan Adams: The discovery that could rewrite physics
Yep - All our waffling points to much the same conclusion I guess - meaning we cant have "nothing" contradict itself and be something, thus the Universe or EVERYTHING "one way or another" has and always will exist. Likewise "something" and for that matter "anything" must always remain and represent as else if change to it is necessary in presenting itself as part of the Universe's representation?
218280
Peter Schoen
Posted over 1 year ago
Allan Adams: The discovery that could rewrite physics
So what you're telling me is - You're are unable to refer to The Entire Universe" is this correct? As for Infinite, Infinite is a contradiction, a contradiction because it assumes eventually nothing left to account for, can be made to be something to account for, that is if The Universe is indeed infinite, and thus must continue to accrue something from what essentially should be nothing, to which if that were indeed possible then yes the Universe could be said it is indeed infinite on that premise alone. Only problem is all of the laws of physics are based upon non contradiction, which basically means we must ignore such contradictory constructs or logic, contradictions such as infinite or handling nothing as if its something, all because of an assumption that the universe is constantly creating something from nothing - Just in order it is infinite, don't get me wrong, the universe will always exist but that doesn't mean its a system of infinite proportion, but rather its everything that exists right now, and as to how it existed previously to what ever it shall continue on to whatever form, shape or state.. And No! Infinite to me is a very simple construct, a construct that I have understood since a boy, and thus don't find in the least beyond my abilities..