Budimir Zdravkovic grew up on the streets of Former Yugoslavia. Even as a young boy, it was apparent that he was talented at having talent. His lyrics and rhymes spread like wildfire as he became notorious at house parties and family birthdays for imitating television pop artists and screaming his lungs out while throwing lego pieces at everyone.
At the tender age of 7 he was already able to h...it moving targets with rotten pears from building roof tops. Budimir`s fresh and innovative style of writing brings a whole new perspective that challenges current notions of rocket science and aerodynamics.
At the age of 9 he arrived in Toronto, Canada and he didn`t have a hair cut until the age of 11 when he quickly became influenced by musicians like Metallica, Red Hot Chili Peppers and Sheryl Crow. You can still see these influences surface even today when he does stuff.
Budimir quickly came to be known as Budimir Zdravkovic among Canadians and Americans in 2003 when he left to live in NY and study university. Even to this day many remember his name.
A legend, a man, an artist, an activist and most of all a friend to some people. Budimir will continue to inspire thoughts and words in different people and situations.
Reading, writing, literature, research, philosophy, comedy.
Jean Paul Sartre, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Issac Asimov, Albert Camus, Noam Chomsky, Emma Goldman.
Anything you wish. I can`t guarantee I will always listen though.
Match stick puzzles.
I like the videos TED has to offer.
This member doesn't have any favorite talks yet.
TEDCred score: +21.50 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A reply on Conversation: Could mirror neurons be involved in our ability to mimic facial expressions?
This is a very interesting article, can you tell me where I can find it? It makes an argument I've made on few occasions while arguing labor and politics with people, however I don't have any empirical support. If this paper presents empirical support I would love to read it.
A comment on Conversation: Could mirror neurons be involved in our ability to mimic facial expressions?
A reply on Conversation: What brand is your child?
So either a pimp or a biochemist like his old man would be ideal for my child. Biochemists are essential for the pimping industry although it may not seem very obvious at first. Certain sex workers have evolved in such a way that their aids receptors have fallen off so they are for all practical purposes immune to aids, the aids virus cannot get in there. these are in pimp language very "competitive hoes" they never get sick, to make an analogy it's like having union workers with lizard like regenerative capacities. Assume a union worker severs his hand in an accident the company doesn't have to worry about that because he can regenerate his arm after a few days. So where do biochemists come in, they are needed to screen such sex workers and identify the marker for the aids receptors and work in collaboration with pimps to make wise business decisions,
A comment on Conversation: What brand is your child?
As for branding that's easy, I'm gonna tattoo a bar code on the back of his neck when his mother, a sailor loving bar wench, gives birth to him
A reply on Conversation: Is Faith inherently irrational?
A reply on Conversation: Is Faith inherently irrational?
A reply on Conversation: Is Faith inherently irrational?
A reply on Conversation: Is Faith inherently irrational?
I think there are numerous ways we can also define real, and discussing the nature of reality is quite a complicated debate but at the very least we can place confidence in available evidence and fact because it is useful to do so, what we can do and achieve is dictated by fact, not by celestial orders or other things we imagine might exist.
A reply on Conversation: Is Faith inherently irrational?
A reply on Conversation: Is Faith inherently irrational?
Gabo, that's great that you are stubbornly persistent with this, but "faith is inherently irrational" is a false statement. Maybe the statement "some faith is inherently irrational" makes more sense according to the English language. If you wanna make a distinction in such a way that you either have faith or rationality, the two words meaning two opposites that are mutually exclusive then you can redefine faith as the OP did but that is not how it has been traditionally used in academic and philosophical literature, and this new definition reflects an politically ideological distinction, which in my opinion is much closer to the "trickery" you are accusing me of.