18:57 Posted: Oct 2012
Views: 446,721 | Comments: 114
20:40 Posted: Aug 2012
Views: 1,083,351 | Comments: 396
21:02 Posted: Oct 2012
Views: 5,960,205 | Comments: 993
19:04 Posted: Mar 2012
Views: 4,587,259 | Comments: 759
16:51 Posted: Dec 2011
Views: 1,017,709 | Comments: 162
TEDCred score: +6.00 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A reply on Conversation: Telling the truth: are there limits?
Do not misread me : I am convinced that honesty is an important value, and as you say, that it is the best policy on a daily basis. But there are some cases when doubt is legitimate. I found out that the question was already analyzed ages ago, but that the answer is not absolute : ie, there are some (extreme) cases where lying is legitimate. Your message is a good reminder that such situation is very rare and should be handle on a case to case basis.
A reply on Conversation: Telling the truth: are there limits?
A reply on Conversation: Telling the truth: are there limits?
However, there seem to be slight differences between both :
- lying is a deliberate act, while being lazy is more inaction than action
- lies outcomes are not accidental, but usually chosen (and explaining the lying action).
This passiveness and unplanned consequences may explain that laziness is perceived as less "evil" than a lie.
Now, lies (usually asserted as evil) may be done while positive consequences as a target : hiding someone from being hurt, for example. I was trying to point out the moral dilemma between the wrongness of lying compared to the goodness of the outcome. I do not see cases where that apply to laziness to extend your parallel in this rare case, however... Any idea ?
A reply on Conversation: Telling the truth: are there limits?
That argument seems quite flawed to me : you claim that "Truth is neutral", so associating "truth" to positivity is as flawed as associating it with negativity. Why should one opinion be better than the other ? You could apply the same positive/negative people distinction based on any belief then.
And "Honesty" is not "Truth". Truth is not only expressed by facts : our perception is involved, our communication too, or way to represent the world... The sentence "Green is a beautiful color" is true for some people and false for other.
A comment on Conversation: Telling the truth: are there limits?
http://wordyenglish.com/lit/language_and_human_nature.html
Feel free to comment it.
A reply on Conversation: Telling the truth: are there limits?
A reply on Conversation: Telling the truth: are there limits?
I won't tell a dying woman that her son was just killed in an accident, if asked, I would blatantly lie to her saying he's ok, because I want her to be in peace for her last minutes. I may stay silent about some facts when the one who committed them shows repentance.That is my point of view, and I can understand that people can disagree. I just consider that following basic rules is not adapted to all situations, and that choices are required in such cases. At times, governments themselves had dark times and speaking the truth made dramas occur. So I care more about outcomes than on rules to feel ok with my conscience.
A reply on Conversation: Telling the truth: are there limits?
Truth is indeed not that objective : facts are subject to our perception flaws, and things are even worse when we enter the field of our thoughts, feelings, etc. And thereafter, the fact of hiding/distorting our perception of Truth is another point : it it is done with a positive intent, is it morally acceptable or not ?
A reply on Conversation: Telling the truth: are there limits?
A comment on Conversation: Passwords can become 70% more Effective
So, the critical part is the choice of the password : dictionary attacks can find out all common passwords (from "123456" to any known language word), and brute-force attacks can find out all short passwords. So just use long enough passwords, as pointed out by Kitty...