12:45 Posted: Oct 2011
Views: 938,159 | Comments: 289
16:54 Posted: Oct 2011
Views: 1,774,714 | Comments: 916
19:25 Posted: Sep 2010
Views: 591,522 | Comments: 404
20:23 Posted: Oct 2010
Views: 596,272 | Comments: 356
16:26 Posted: Jul 2010
Views: 2,207,580 | Comments: 441
TEDCred score: +10.00 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A reply on Conversation: Is peak oil a hoax? Can it be debunked?
The argument of abiotic oil theory is followed by Dr. J.F. Kenney – who has studied under Vladilen Krayushkin. Kenney stated in one interview that „alone to have produced the amount of oil to date that (Saudi Arabia’s) Ghawar field has produced would have required a cube of fossilized dinosaur detritus, assuming 100% conversion efficiency, measuring 19 miles deep, wide and high.“ – which is absurde.
http://www.studien-von-zeitfragen.net/Zeitfragen/Petroleum/petroleum.html
I strongly agree that we must pursue alternative - clean energy technolgies, but oil will still play major role in many years to come.
A comment on Conversation: Is peak oil a hoax? Can it be debunked?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904060604576572552998674340.html
In my opinion - panic scenarious about the world running out of oil are wrong, but in the other hand the price of oil is going to continue to fluctuate - Big Oil is eager in sustained high oil prices.
The Peak Oil theorists rests on conventional Western geology textbooks and central story is biological origin - algae, fossilized dinosaur remains and other biological residue which are in finite supply.
On the other side there is abiotic theory, and is far more reasonable: oil is formed deep in the earth, formed in conditions of very high temperature and very high pressure. ‘Oil is a primordial material of deep origin which is transported at high pressure via ‘cold’ eruptive processes into the crust of the earth,’ concluded by Prof. Vladimir Porfir’yev