Science, Education, Languages, Free Speech, Freedom of Information, Privacy Rights
Anything but soccer, really.
being modest.
15:48 Posted: Jun 2009
Views: 913,146 | Comments: 199
15:53 Posted: Jun 2009
Views: 394,176 | Comments: 98
20:45 Posted: Feb 2009
Views: 1,552,710 | Comments: 443
05:58 Posted: May 2009
Views: 999,461 | Comments: 522
18:50 Posted: Feb 2009
Views: 1,679,048 | Comments: 315
TEDCred score: +22.10 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A comment on Talk: Eric Whitacre: A choir as big as the Internet
A comment on Talk: Philip K. Howard: Four ways to fix a broken legal system
I have to admit I had to laugh very hard when I heard Philip's remark on the idiots. Hahaha. Sadly, that's so true.
Thank you for sharing this, Mr. Howard.
On a related note: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/barry_schwartz_on_our_loss_of_wisdom.html Barry makes similar points... we have to wake up.
A reply on Talk: David Cameron: The next age of government
That's not to say there were no good points in this talk, but from my perspective, the huge amount of hypocrisy involved in that 'power to the people' statement made by a representative of a government (which, like other govs, is using the boiling frog strategy to strip the citizen of their last bit of privacy) disgusts me.
Ironically it's this information revolution that exposes on a daily basis just how hypocritical these puppets, pardon, politicians are.
Edit: @Peter: "do you really think everybody can decide whether for instance the war in afghanistan is a good plan?" See, the question is whether it's better to have those few who profit from it decide [e.g. the arms industry] or those who pay for it [i.e. the citizen]. Townhall meetings are attended by a small sample of the population, and a very select sample at that, so they're not representative. Besides, even less are hellbent on sending their children off to war.
A comment on Talk: Jamie Heywood: The big idea my brother inspired
Of course there are some methodological issues with this way of doing things, but I think this is a wonderful step forward. The more information is made available to the public, the better. If only one company were to be able to see and get to play with the data, I'd worry about privacy issues, but this way people know what they're doing and receive immediate feedback. Thumbs up, Jamie.
A reply on Talk: Peter Eigen: How to expose the corrupt
I doubt religion is a path to morality.
Either you adhere to certain moral or ethical standards, or you don't.
At best, it's the community around you that en- or discourages this.
I'll quote Christopher Hitchens and pose this challenge:
"…can you name me a single moral action performed or moral statement uttered by a person of faith that couldn’t be just as well pronounced or undertaken by a civilian?"
A comment on Talk: Clay Shirky: Institutions vs. collaboration
A reply on Talk: David Deutsch: Chemical scum that dream of distant quasars
A reply on Talk: Larry Burns on the future of cars
A reply on Talk: Jonathan Haidt: The moral roots of liberals and conservatives
A comment on Talk: Craig Venter: On the verge of creating synthetic life