david bramson

Someone is shy

David hasn't completed a profile. Should we look for some other people?

Comments & conversations

Noface
david bramson
Posted almost 2 years ago
An idea to absorb the carbon dioxide in the air
peter on my farm i have a one acre pond with a 1/4 hp airaetor bubbling from the deepest point 10 ft in the summer the surface temperatre can reach 80 f degrees without the aerator with the aerator on the temperature rarely gets above 75 f degrees since ocean surface temperatures pacific have been blamed for most of the extreme weather in the united states and very little fresh water gets to these mid ocean hot spots i think working on temperature control will be a lot more productive than trying to control an otherwise good gas by enforcng draconian economic controls on our entire economy. and then we can discuss the shaky scientific data that warming is really happening, or how to control chinas coal fired energy i read a nathan myrvold article on pumping sulphur dioxide up 100000 ft over the north pole to eat the carbon dioxide shield in place like mt pinotubo did when it erupted in 1990 both methods have the avantage of being quickly and easily regulated to maintain goal temps
Noface
david bramson
Posted about 2 years ago
An idea to absorb the carbon dioxide in the air
th problem with co2 is that it is causing gloal warming, which can be corrected easily and cheaply anchor barges over the deepest trenches of the oceans wih either solar or nucclear bpower generators on board. also on board a battery of air compressors that will pump air down 500-1000 feet and roil the surface water with cooler water from below. the deeper water will continue to cool the upper layers of water and air lower global temperatures easilyby 2 degrees or more can be easily regulated tomaintain a goal temperature and be relatively pollution free in operaton
Noface
david bramson
Posted about 2 years ago
Gay Marriage Rights
The government gains if a stable household is established period regardless if it can procreate or not. That is the reason for the tax breaks and other advantages given in law to families. It costs a society less per person to have more families than singles in its population mix They will be able to adopt and raise children We have more than enough in orphanages and foster care...
Noface
david bramson
Posted about 2 years ago
Gay Marriage Rights
Government does not belong in the marriage business. That is for religion, church, or non-government social groups to control. Marriage is a religious term long before it is a legal one. The legal governmental interests can be covered in Civil Union legislation which should be available to any two consenting adults regardless of sexual orientation.. By eliminating the word marriage we can build law for families that will be more realistic to the country's needs and less pushed out of balance by political considerations.
Noface
david bramson
Posted about 2 years ago
How would you feel if the government carried out a serious ban on guns?
That is the reason population density is the way to allow some control, if wanted by the majority, to be imposed. I live in an area on the outer fringe of rural slowly being encroached by suburbia. I describe it as 'ruburbia' It takes a sheriff 20 minutes to respond to an emergency call. i feel in my case a gun is necessary even an assault rifle with a large clip, but concealed carry is not a must
Noface
david bramson
Posted about 2 years ago
How would you feel if the government carried out a serious ban on guns?
gun control should be based on population density. whats right for new york city or chicago is not right for rural nebraska any governing body thats population is over a certain numerical density can set up its own gun control laws implimentation could be the same as speed limit signs.if it takes law enforcement over 30 minutes to respond to emergency calls you cannot expect citizens to remain unarmed all kinds of practical data can be added to population and emergency response time to allow the governing body to legislate some level of gun control on an opt in basis. the default must be NO gun control