G. Srinivasan

Kotagiri,nilgris, India

Someone is shy

G. hasn't completed a profile. Should we look for some other people?

Comments & conversations

Noface
G. Srinivasan
Posted about 2 years ago
Truths and Facts. Does Science prove anything?
Nothing else but science, only science and all of science if you define science as the application of axiomatic logic where self similarity as the operational mode exists. It means that it is untouched by human imagination let loose.
Noface
G. Srinivasan
Posted about 2 years ago
Truths and Facts. Does Science prove anything?
Exactly what I feared, Faith and belief creeping in, surely throws out absolute objectivity with all its derivatives or tools . The principle of self similarity contains geometries of every kind from which the most elegant PHO state (which Physics has yet to find) was derived thousands of years before western man started organised articulation. Amen
Noface
G. Srinivasan
Posted about 2 years ago
Truths and Facts. Does Science prove anything?
Nilesh, this is the reply to your comment. You are analysis raises a cardinal point that defines facts in reality unambiguously through Sankhyan logic. Only cyclic changes can be detected. The instant at which it is detectable is the point at which a changing parameter is STOPPED as when two particles collide at a POINT in space and then reverse. The detection of the next stationery point after completion of the following cycle of interaction. This interval between the two events has a bearing in Physics. Since there is movement during the interval between two collisions it cannot be measured or detected and gave rise to the principle of uncertainty. Further since detection was only at the colliding points, that time intrval created the concept of the quanta. That interval between counts gave the concept of a wavelength (displacement ) and became the frequency in a larger time interval or cycle. In Sankhya space is a continuum as a sea of elemental components but its detect ability was PERIODIC as explained above. Lacking a an axiomatic theory, the experimental discoveries were literally converted into a process of discontinuities. It is like inferring that air is qaantised medium because we can only hear discrete claps. . The so called quanta or Planck's constant contains in fact 9E16 interactive counts merged into a that cycle but Sankhyan axiomatic derivation quantifies the REAL individual interaction in space as having an inertial delay or mass as 1.3 E minus 51 kgs of mass. This large hidden interactive state contributes to explaining the anomalous dark matter/ energy findings. More important there is no need for dimensionality as the process counting interactions is ONLY a relative or RATIO of comparison for the fundamental components in space do never change or disappear.Hence the most elegant concept of conservation is derived by equating ONLY INTERACTIVE COUNTS DIRECTLY and not through a process of dimensional conversion.
Noface
G. Srinivasan
Posted about 2 years ago
Truths and Facts. Does Science prove anything?
While science is a logical derivation to name a rational process of cause and effect that all phenomena is acknowledged to follow, had of necessity to depend on numerical logic to be precise. Primarily, while religion too professed to understand and define the same manifestation process, its emphasis on a preordained logic, led the scientific researcher to counter it with an accurate proof, which mathematics was supposed to do. But the rub was the mathematical process itself. In order to solve complex problems, a shortcut was introduced that led to an approximation at instantaneous levels, which took away the rationality of numerical logic. It is a fact that experimental discoveries achieved extraordinary insight into natures ways but converting the same into profound theoretical principle met its nemesis in uncertainty and inaccuracy that could be resolved only through statistics , a name for averaging out inaccuracy. Intellectual clarity based on absolute objectivity could have saved the day, but the mad rush to fame and name has left the acme of a scientific theory of theories bereft and orphaned. Its not too late for Sankhya has what science today deserted and it can bring in a paradigm shift to gain the Shangrilla that humanity deserves so badly.
Noface
G. Srinivasan
Posted about 2 years ago
Truths and Facts. Does Science prove anything?
Absolutely correct. Reality, the universe we live in, continues to churn out facts relentlessly every instant but humanity that came into existence as a by product of natures balancing process does not have the intellectual clarity to see that their illogical ruminations only lead to stress and suffering. But the positive process of recognizing natures ways will aid humanity to exist as nature intended like everything around humans do. Every independent human mind can and does go off at a tangent unless the proving process drives them back on the rails. Why? Natures process of life and living is a gift to enjoy the bounties of nature but naive humans think there is total freedom to do so. Unfortunately there is only one law, rule, mode of action, governed by axioms , that can give humans the utopia they deserve as nature intended and unless that single law is understood, proved and followed there is no escape from the dungeons of despair they have landed themselves in.
Noface
G. Srinivasan
Posted about 2 years ago
Truths and Facts. Does Science prove anything?
Sure I will email you John. Can you send an email to gsvasktg@gmail.com .Late Bill Muller was a good friend after we met at Hanover Gravity energy conference in 86. Both us gave a talk (actually my son did) ) on the energy conversion processes and of the anomalies in the concept of the gravity field in Physics, specifically relativistic shortfalls in logic. My website has been linked to his website for years. Physics not being based on axioms has missed the bus on the potential domain where billions of interactions take place simultaneously or within the same cycle. Bill recognised this fact as the cause of the magnetic phenomena and used it in his device. All movement of any kind is a conversion of potential and kinetic phases to attain instant balance but even today Physicists arw ignorant that the potential is just the simultaneous activity . Cheers
Noface
G. Srinivasan
Posted about 2 years ago
Truths and Facts. Does Science prove anything?
You are one of the few that has looked at the web seriously and offered a considered comment. Your perceptive comment "resolve questions completely independent of standard science." has been done in Sankhya perfectly. I am trying really desperately to get Physicist to at least give ONE serious look putting aside there bias for anything Vedic. But I don't seem to know how to awaken their curiosity. Let me pose an extremely serious question."has any scientist or intellectual heard of a theory based on ONLY axioms". I can vouch it cannot and could not have been and so must you.. Next we all know for the past hundred years at least , the entire Physics community has been hunting for the source of the perpetual dynamic power in the Universe and they have come up with no answer. Now I have laid bare an extraordinary algorithm from Sankhya that gives the formula called the Perpetual Harmonic Oscillatory or PHO or the three Gunas in Sanskrit as the eternal motivator of ALL FORCES IN THE UNIVERSE. The proof is also open to all to see if they would that from this PHO state all the Particulate states have been derived without ANY EXTERNAL, EXPERIMENTAL or EMPIRICAL inputs . The Proton, Neutron, Electron, and Neutrino (unknown to Physics yet,) and the fundamental gravitational quantum with 10 digit numerical accuracy and matches Physics findings in all these years. What more can be laid on the table for sincere Physicists to see and take it forward. Vedas, Hindus, Orient, India , are words that the occidental world despises openly and with the money power that rules the ivory tower not a single serious paper of mine on Sankhya has seen anything but the waste paper basket. So I am compelled to point to Sankhyan excellence all the time. I have two proofs . The solar eclipse experiment that says CERN is blundering. A over unity motor I have built to prove energy concepts are in error.
Noface
G. Srinivasan
Posted about 2 years ago
Truths and Facts. Does Science prove anything?
I point it out every time because there is a scientific theory based on axioms that DERIVES itself , which is UNHEARD of in any scientific derivation. Even though it has been on the web for 20 years the same inane bleating about the wonders of a defunct physics being pontificated by the one and all is the reason. Scientists are supposed to be intellectually flexible to see understand new findings but imentalobstinacy seems to be the rule. Why don't you delve into that website and understand the PERPETUAL HARMONIC OSCILLATORY STATE is initiator of gravitational acceleration and the so called 4 forces of the standard model belongs to fairy tales
Noface
G. Srinivasan
Posted about 2 years ago
Truths and Facts. Does Science prove anything?
Space has a matter density of 3.6E-25 kgs /cub. meter. Its an axiomatic derivation. So none can reject it. iThere is an axiomatically derived mass factor in space that is 1.3E minus 51 kgs (planck's constant h / C^2 is an approximation) . Next Light does not travel in space like a plane or a car but transmigrates from node to node ( like a worm) when the perpetual harmonic oscillatory state of balance is upset. It transfers from a higher count rate (frequency) to a lower one) . Third all light as transmigration of interactive stresses as pressure from a distant stellar body MUST have a higher frequency count. Hence all light from distant sources are BLUE shifted NOT red shifted. Hence around all stellar bodies where the gravitational acceleration will be constant the oscillatory frequency of the stress wave of light will be algebraically altered by the addition and subtraction of the stress waves around the body. It will and must curve -no more a straight line of Euclidean origins..It is exactly llike air around the earth and that will happen in space too --this example is to simplify understanding. Scientists must correct aberrations created by ill formulated experiments. As a proof see the total solar eclipse experiment where a balanced wooden rod was spun 180 degrees to the opposite side by the ecliptic transition, thus confirming Maurice's experiments with pendulums. I have built a gravity converter generator that has unusual energy conservative properties that stares Physics in its face on its energy conservation laws.'. A paradigm shift in Physics is a must if mankind is to take advantage of natures positive laws. See http://www.kapillavastu.com/index.html and the eclipse experiment that says the Cern tunnel is a needless waste of people's money in trying to prove the obvious. Further as a clinching last word the so called limiting velocity of light is exceeded by the Neutrinos ALL the TIME.
Noface
G. Srinivasan
Posted about 2 years ago
Truths and Facts. Does Science prove anything?
There is no theory nor science in nature. Only a real process of cause and effect on one eternally existing elemental thing that formed into many. Its the egotistical human species that took to rumination when their belly was full to get out of that boredom. Out of that boredom rose the anxiety to find away to escape nature's sudden acts of balance as catastrophes ostensibly aimed at homo-sapiens. Then lo and behold rose theories from the mightiest of egotists that sang the song of revengeful religion headed by an un-relenting being that punished the sinners but ignored the others. Straightaway the rules of inequality was propagated and spread like wild fire to create the" haves and havenots" . It then became a mathematical fact that the massive became the haves and the lighter ones the "havenots". We haven't lost that loving feeling it has been only sublimated towards the "haves" . Then the tables were turned by the" havenots" on the "haves". . Then they lured the " haves" through experiments of illusion called deceit to force the " haves" to part with what they loved. It was like magic when it succeeded beyond imagination. So it was called science or the laws of deceit.