Apr 1 2013: There seem to be some government support for drug companies working on 'orphan drugs' (those for very rare conditions). This news article has some information: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-21032362
Mar 15 2013: Grace, could you give your definition of the word 'organic' in this context? You do not appear to be using it in a way I am familiar with.
Mar 3 2013: Let’s think what it would mean to think without presumptions. At it’s most extreme it would seem to mean “to think only using ideas that are logically justified”. The problem then becomes “Which ideas can be logically justified?”.
There are certain things that we (nearly?) all agree on and depend on as the foundation of out thinking, yet I am unsure can be proved logically from the available evidence. Certainly I would not know how to prove them. For example, “The physical world I experience is real”. I could in theory be a brain in a tank being given artificial stimulation to mimic the real world – or a computer simulation of a brain also being stimulated.
The possibilities seem endless. If that is the case then the process of thinking even a simple thought without presumption would be equally endless and therefore impossible on practical grounds.
Mar 1 2013: I suggest the translation "language learning in the natural environment" or maybe "language learning among native speakers". Though I can't be sure that captures the phrase exactly.
Feb 27 2013: It would be interesting to know how widespread these behaviors are in other primates. If all/most others behave in the same way it would add wight to the idea of an ancient origin of the different approaches to gain and loss.
Taking a wider view, I wonder if similar experiments could be done with some none-primate species. Dolphins, octopuses and certain birds all might have enough intelligence.
TEDCred score: 0.00 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A reply on Talk: Francis Collins: We need better drugs -- now
A reply on Talk: Mark Shaw: One very dry demo
A reply on Conversation: Mention one scientific theory you think needs adjustment. Why do you think that way?
A comment on Conversation: Can we think without any presumptions?
There are certain things that we (nearly?) all agree on and depend on as the foundation of out thinking, yet I am unsure can be proved logically from the available evidence. Certainly I would not know how to prove them. For example, “The physical world I experience is real”. I could in theory be a brain in a tank being given artificial stimulation to mimic the real world – or a computer simulation of a brain also being stimulated.
The possibilities seem endless. If that is the case then the process of thinking even a simple thought without presumption would be equally endless and therefore impossible on practical grounds.
A comment on Talk: Jon Ronson: Strange answers to the psychopath test
A reply on Talk: Sugata Mitra: Build a School in the Cloud
A comment on Talk: Laurie Santos: A monkey economy as irrational as ours
Taking a wider view, I wonder if similar experiments could be done with some none-primate species. Dolphins, octopuses and certain birds all might have enough intelligence.