I'm a programmer/entrepeneur/artist living in Phoenix, AZ (USA). I am self employed building web applications for startup companies. I'm primarily interested in psychology, anthropology, and computer science. Currently my favorite hobby is paragliding.
Empowerment of the individual.
There is no such thing as darkness, it is only the absence of light.
Teach me something you know well. Inspire me. Ask me questions about programming and computer science.
I want to watch and be influenced by people who are actively doing positive things in the world. One of the first talks I watched was Ken Robinson's "Do Schools Kill Creativity?" His delivery is jaw dropping. If you want to be a master speaker, do what he does. And the crux of the speech is a crucial issue which is holding back our society.
This member doesn't have any favorite talks yet.
TEDCred score: +0.50 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A comment on Talk: Daphne Bavelier: Your brain on video games
Also, life seems to naturally throw these kinds of problems at us. If you're hell bent on making a video game, consider an AR game that quizes you about real facts that you actually care about. Like the names of the people you just met.
A reply on Talk: Daphne Bavelier: Your brain on video games
A reply on Conversation: We're making a small change to TED Conversations
I agree that serious discussion is hard to find. However, I would define "serious discussion" as that which leads to action. Generally the distinction happens when a conversation becomes not about whether to act, but logistics, what and how. A team of competent individuals might have such a conversation, and you might find those individuals here.
Good luck to you, sir!
A reply on Conversation: Do you believe that our future is bright, if yes, why and if not, why not?
The point of solving small problems, for the individual and for the society, is to free yourself to look further. When you have a big problem, rejoice! You stand on the shoulders of giants. Language and technology are both tools of abstraction. They separate us from nature but also give us power over it. The disconnection we all feel is a consequence of that power and separation.
Most people are not aware of the basic principles which guide their lives. They are not mature enough to spend 10 minutes alone meditating, much less a lifetime. They've forgotten how to play, I think, to really be consumed by their curiosity of the experience they find themselves in. Who are you, and what really matters in your life? And how can you be jealous of a robot? [laugh]
Viktor E Frankl was a Jewish psychologist imprisoned in a Nazi death camp. His book "Man's Search For Meaning" is a very interesting read. It is that search, more than anything, that defines us. And our answers are more important than all than all the gold in the world. But perhaps not so important as continuing to ask the question.
A comment on Talk: Vicki Arroyo: Let's prepare for our new climate
It seems to me, there's a lot of people now who are aware of climate change and want to do something about it. However, there seems to be a split in the information available.
On the one hand you have information which confirms the effects of climate change. Some of these are scientific and data intensive, hard for the layman to access. Rarely is there any conclusion which is actionable to the individual, or which even suggests a government policy that would be effective.
On the other hand, you have political or corporate propaganda urging the consumer to buy something or vote for someone. The message here is usually based on fear or desire to nurture, and it's dubious whether the products or political candidates in question will have any positive effect on the situation.
What's needed is a bridge between knowledge and action. We need a comprehensive model which shows the interaction between environmental issues and the economic engine which fuels our civilization. From that model we can then explain the WHY behind a certain solution.
A year or more ago, I listened to another TED talk which concluded that the necessary steps for curbing climate control were not actionable at the individual level, that government policy was the effective route. The speaker advocated that as an individual, the best thing you could do was gather public support and put pressure on lawmakers to enact relevant policies. But how does one know what policies are effective? You can't unless you understand the model. And that's what needs to become coffee table conversation, so we can finely tune our bullshit detectors, and hold our leaders accountable for real solutions.
The site for Vicki's organization seems to be a good starting place for exactly that:
http://www.georgetownclimate.org/