19:21 Posted: Aug 2012
Views: 1,060,102 | Comments: 348
15:15 Posted: Mar 2012
Views: 1,668,004 | Comments: 682
17:10 Posted: Dec 2009
Views: 219,357 | Comments: 205
16:14 Posted: Jul 2008
Views: 418,913 | Comments: 118
19:15 Posted: Sep 2007
Views: 1,247,249 | Comments: 507
TEDCred score: +10.60 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A comment on Talk: Markham Nolan: How to separate fact and fiction online
A comment on Talk: Jeff Smith: Lessons in business … from prison
A comment on Talk: Lemon Andersen performs "Please don't take my Air Jordans"
A comment on Talk: Bobby Ghosh: Why global jihad is losing
I've been telling people this for years, I'm glad there's finally a video to this point - now I can rub it in their faces, ha.
A comment on Talk: Maz Jobrani: A Saudi, an Indian and an Iranian walk into a Qatari bar …
A comment on Talk: Ben Saunders: Why bother leaving the house?
A comment on Talk: Marcus Byrne: The dance of the dung beetle
A comment on Talk: Adam Davidson: What we learned from teetering on the fiscal cliff
A comment on Talk: Israel and Iran: A love story?
A reply on Conversation: Is Nationalism a 21st Century Ethic - Isn't Nationalism more like Racism or Sexism than Patriotism?
Nationalism is not a movement based on self-determination. That is the least of its function, most of American and Eastern European history does not occur within the short moments of their independence, but in the running of the country. Was Bosnia engaging in self-determination when they engaged in ethnic cleansing (as this was publicly stated), was America engaged in self-determination in Vietnam, Korea, the bombing of Japan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Cold War, Cuba and countless South American coups? History doesn't end with the declaration of independence, it continues and those justifications for its existence become increasingly twisted.
Self-determination was the justification of the Nazi Party in sparking World War 2, (before they went on about Jews), that German speaking peoples of the Rhine and other countries were repressed and mistreated and needed to be liberated and brought under a strong independent Germany, that cast off the economic, political, and military restrictions and hardships put on them by Europe and the United States. To challenge foreign powers, and lead their own destiny, and people liked it. But as we know German people under one nation wasn't the end of it.
We shouldn't forget about the negative aspects of history, because they don't suit our political beliefs. That's the point of learning history in the first place, to make better judgements. Nations states and self-determination aren't the ideas expressed by European scholars in fancy libraries, they have become dirty with blood, war, and genocide, and cannot be assumed to be merely positive social forces.
A better alternative is to realize the need for self-determination, a working fair government that doesn't marginalize a people, and further realize this does not come from separation from government but a new style of governance and concept of citizenship. Making your own country doesn't guarantee better governance, as South Sudan now know