Religion, God, Technology, Society, Politics, Organisations, Psychology etc.
Have developed a framework for understanding various systems in a systematic manner. It speaks of Organisation Systems, Technological Systems, Bio Systems, Religious Systems, Cosmic Systems. All these systems have symmetry and also are Hierarchical systems.
Consciousness, Cosmic Programming, Quantum Mechanics, Religion
Consciousness, Cosmic Programming, Quantum Mechanics, Religion
This member doesn't have any favorite talks yet.
TEDCred score: +1.00 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A reply on Conversation: Can we judge the personality of a person based on the way he drives ??
A reply on Conversation: Schrödinger's Cat: Quantum Superposition and Collapse of the Wave Function
A reply on Conversation: Schrödinger's Cat: Quantum Superposition and Collapse of the Wave Function
I sometimes have a gut feeling that as in case of RDBMS databases, information in different databases are entangled, similarly our consciousness and spirit being in different dimensions altogether are having their references here which means they are entangled here whereas their existence is somewhere else...
I agree with you, We can be in more than one place/universe. Yes we can.
Compare a Computer (Technological System) to your self (Human System).
1. Your Body= Hardware=Matter (PHYSICAL FORM)
2. Your Mind = Software = Consciousness (ENERGY)
3. Your Soul = Power Source = Spiritual Energy (ENERGY)
Now there is no fourth component I have been able to find so far.
Now according to you and also according to my thinking,
1.The body is here in this Universe
2. The mind is in some different world, not in our brain. Our brain is having a reference or access to it.
3. The Spirit is the primary current and again is in some other universe entangled to our body.
Share your views :)
A reply on Conversation: Can we judge the personality of a person based on the way he drives ??
A reply on Conversation: Schrödinger's Cat: Quantum Superposition and Collapse of the Wave Function
A reply on Conversation: Schrödinger's Cat: Quantum Superposition and Collapse of the Wave Function
The girl is certain but until and unless she renders her potential opinion kinetic, the wave function would not collapse and the results would not be classical in nature. i.e. you are having a business plan in you mind for the past 10 years and have not executed it (Superposition), it aint a part of the classical world, it is when you decide to get into the business, you collapse the wave function.
A reply on Conversation: Change Management: Forced Change OR Free Will ?
Its motion. It follows two motions.
1. Rotate (Own Axis)
2. Revolve (Solar System)
Therefore according to me, a person has to improve and change at two levels.
1. Rotation - Personal Change or Improvement
2. Revolve - Social Change or Improvement
Both need to be done parallel as the earth does.
:)
A reply on Conversation: Schrödinger's Cat: Quantum Superposition and Collapse of the Wave Function
A reply on Conversation: Schrödinger's Cat: Quantum Superposition and Collapse of the Wave Function
* The law would be in a state of superposition in context to any observer until and unless someone commits a murder.
* All stakeholders of the process, The Judge, The Murderer, The Witness would be the observers in context to the law.
BEFORE I COMMIT A MURDER
* The law is in superposition state for me "ANHAD IS MURDERER OR ANHAD IS NOT A MURDERER"
I COMMIT THE MURDER
* The wave function collapses for me "ANHAD IS A MURDERER"
A Boy and Girl
* Boy proposes
* Girl does not respond.
* Boy is in a superposition state "SHE LOVES ME" OR "SHE DOES NOT LOVE ME", Yes OR No.
* Girl says Yes, Wave function collapses.
* Girl says No, Wave function collapses.
A reply on Conversation: Schrödinger's Cat: Quantum Superposition and Collapse of the Wave Function
Answer:
-----------
Gerald and Natasha, Friend I do not know what you people are doing rite now which means I am not able to observe and therefore for me you guys are in a state of superposition.
POINT 1
* The operator which I would use would be OR not AND.
* I cannot say that Natasha is watching TV AND sleeping but I can definitely say Natasha is watching TV OR Sleeping OR Laughing OR Eating.
POINT 2
* It is wrong to say that the cat is dead and alive simultaneously. We should say cat is dead or alive.
* When we open the box and make an observation, the possibilities collapse and we get a reduced singular result.
* Which means, one of the possibilities is having a probability of being closer to truth.
* At every smallest fraction of time, wave function collapse and information is absorbed in the cosmic database in context to the observer.