TED Community » Juno Rescued Beagle

About Me

My name is Juno and I am a rescued beagle. My life started in a laboratory where I along with 119 other beagles were used as testing subjects for cosmetics and household items. In April of 2010 the lab closed their doors for good. Luckily for us some wonderful people from Best Friends Animal Society in Kanab, UT and Pets Alive Animal Sanctuary in Middletown, NY stepped in and rescued us. In the beginning I was seeing things that were completely new to me. Being outside, feeling grass, having good food and people to pet and care for me. I have a forever home with my very own family and have learned a lot about what it's like to just be a dog and life is good.

Location:
United States, New York, NY
Current role:
Ambassador for Laboratory Animals
Gender:
Female
My website links:
Juno Rescued Beagle
Member Picture


More About Me

I'm passionate about

Working towards the day when animal testing is nothing more than a distant memory.

People don't know that I'm good at

Zoomies n eatin peanut butter.

My TED Story

Stay tuned...

Comments

  • TEDCred score: +0.10 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.

  • A reply on Conversation: Given that chimpanzees are endangered, is it ethical to use them in biomedical research?

    May 15 2012: See my comment above. The very fact that you refuse to embrace the possibility of alternative methods reinforces my belief that vivisectionists are only trying to protect their jobs. Shame on you for inflicting pain and misery on innocent and unconsenting animals. And all for a less than 5% results. Junk science is what you practice.
    Again Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine and the New England Anti Vivisection Society for more correct information.
  • A reply on Conversation: Given that chimpanzees are endangered, is it ethical to use them in biomedical research?

    May 15 2012: Your response implies your ignorance much like most of the general population. I urge you to become familiar with the Physicians Committee for Reponsible Medicine before making incorrect statements. I Both PCRM and the New England Anti Vivisection Society offer a wealth of information on alternative methods. Both of whom employ doctors who unlike yourself I assume since you claim to be a science teacher and not a doctor have done their investigating into this subject and are more informed to make intelligent determinations in regards to animal testing. As for the 25 million animals sir your misinterpretation made me laugh or howl if you will. The 25 million represents all animals from the lowly mouse to the mighty horse who give their lives to bring products such as premarin to market. They are housed in research laboratories and universities all over the US.
    I fully realize that some people will never be persuaded to believe that animal testing is cruel and barbaric. When you meet your maker I'm quite certain they will echo that sentiment.
  • A reply on Conversation: Given that chimpanzees are endangered, is it ethical to use them in biomedical research?

    May 15 2012: Please also see my comment above.

    http://www.pcrm.org/research/animaltestalt/gapa/
  • +1

    A comment on Conversation: Given that chimpanzees are endangered, is it ethical to use them in biomedical research?

    May 15 2012: My name is Juno & in July of 2010 I was rescued from a testing laboratory in New Jersey. Since my rescued (with 119 other beagles & 55 primates) I have been adopted into a wonderful home I have become an ambassador for laboratory animals everywhere. Sadly many people believe that animals have allowed scientists to make beneficial progress in the medical sciences but that is far from the truth. Dogs & cats can eat arsenic without any side effects, humans will die. If dogs or cats eat grapes, chocolate & avocado in large quantities they could develop renal failure & die. Our biology is radically different than a humans negating results. But you should know that all of this testing can be avoided using a process called in vitro (in a test tube) testing with human (non-embryonic) stem cells. These tests are not only more humane but are less expensive to perform & yield much more positive results as these cell react exactly as a humans cells would. So why is it not more utilized? Because this technology is relatively new & scientists who have been trained in vivisection are not likely to give up their day jobs or their funding because that would mean they would have to be retrained. In the medical world greater than 95% of all animal testing is rendered inconclusive. Why? Because we are animals not humans. People donate millions of dollars annually to charities that directly fund animal experimentation to cure diseases such as Cancer, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's etc. Did you know mice were cured of cancer 10 years ago? It just doesn't translate to humans yet people continue to throw their money at these charities in the false hope that these diseases will be cured. In vitro testing has shown much greater promise than any animal testing ever did. The day that animal testing ends is coming just as soon as people & governments stop funding useless experimentation & demand that scientists stop killing the over 25 million animals each year in the US alone.

Favorite talks

This member doesn't have any favorite talks yet.