Sooshrut Thakur

Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India

About Sooshrut

An idea worth spreading

Strive to be better

Comments & conversations

Noface
Sooshrut Thakur
Posted over 1 year ago
Evolution: "just a theory". Scientific caution is sometimes confusing.
my dear friend you have the freedom of belief :-) just listen to what i know about evolution nd decide for yourself, what you find more closer to truth. First of all you are incorrect in stating that man has evolved from chimp. We share same ancestors with chimpanzees, rhesus monkey, gorillas, orangutans and the chimpanzees. Actually we share same ancestory with all other living beings, however we are closer in relation to chimp. yes they are still evolving, just like every other organism in this world, however there life span is of about 60 years , so it would take thousands of generations to observe evolution in them by a human being (with life span of around 80 years). However living beings like moths have an age span of week or two nd are easier to observe for evolution. And so happened in london. Pre industrial london had whiter barks, so mostly one could observe only light colored peppered moth. Dark colored peppered moth were born, but they were an easy catch for the birds. However industrial population caused bark to darken by pollution , nd the same most hunted dark moth, could not be seen at all nd the light colored moth became very rare. Wiki link - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth_evolution Evolution is much more complex,however there are some basic things- 1. There is limited food and space 2. The living beings divide at an exponential rate 3. In each generation there is some genetical change from previous generations , which can be transmitted to the next one 4. genetical changes or mutations can be good or bad,depending upon the environment 5. if it is excellent of the survival ,it becomes the majority, nd viola, you have your evolution. 6. environment is ever changing nd mutations always occur, so evolution never stops 7. however its so slow,that to an individual of the species its non existant Hope it helps you. Do read in detail, you will love it :) http://anthro.palomar.edu/evolve/evolve_3.htm
Noface
Sooshrut Thakur
Posted about 2 years ago
Michael Anti: Behind the Great Firewall of China
Its not the job of Government to tell the news ....Its the job of news channels ....if the government takes on the job of telling news to the people its not responsibility... its called total control ... And positive side of the world ?? Are there only kids left in the china, that they need to hear only positive news ? If the chinese people want to hear and see only what they like, they are going to fail in real world You said your government is responsible ... responsibilty is defined by merriam webster as : the quality or state of being responsible: as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : reliability, trustworthiness The media controlled by the government as in your country , is morally and legally unaccountable .. and also unreliable and just forget about the trust ... Hence your government is irresponsible. About the train ....filling the morass to save more people on the high bridge sounds more like an excuse rather than a plausible explanation .... did they only had the train filled with bodies to bury ? Burying the crashed train sounds more like a cover up than anything Every country tends to protect its own weak industry when facing the treat from other countries ?? 1. Google is multinational 2. What kind of weak industry did you had , which was threatened by the google?You made a copy of google after you banned it ... we really want to be friend with you, but you are blind and brainwashed and dont know it , sorry, we live in different planets
Noface
Sooshrut Thakur
Posted over 2 years ago
Sean Carroll: Distant time and the hint of a multiverse
@Maya Zack "When there is 1 There is also -1 as they are just directions of Movement from the 0 = Centre (= Nothing)" the base starting of your argument assumes that there is "1" and "-1" and "0" ..... and you are assuming that THEY ARE DIFFERENT entities , definitions or existences or whatsoever... and from them you prove -1 = 0 = 1 In other words you are disproving your sole assumptions, meaning thereby something is wrong somewhere and the thing is you have not defined the words you put in arguments And that does not work in maths Its like firing Harry potter spell in a Twilight universe Not a good analogy , but i hope you get the feeling
Noface
Sooshrut Thakur
Posted over 2 years ago
Dan Ariely: Our buggy moral code
But considering the fact that he is a Behavioral economist .... i guess he has spent a lot of time on it and really loves the subject [may be] ... if he turns his research towards these other disciplines most probably he will end up depressed, sad, lonely and hating the world .... and we will lose a good TED speaker and a productive human being....going by your ideology we should sell lady gaga in the black market , to amass enough money for cancer cure ....