watch "Collapse" you'll want or need to watch "Future by design" it allows you to breath again , ad will "Zeitgeist" after watching these documentaries and many others these seem to me at least to hold a possible key for our future. It has changed my mind and given me a path and a way, but no one person can move a mountain.
correcting the mistakes that were made generations ago that we know are harming us, but are being to slow to even try to create a new way in underdeveloped countries like hydrogen power.
set in poor country a 100% self sustained alternative power, all the way up to governing and producing for their own needs and trade.
hydrogen generators, anything that repairs the environment, compertized viedo classes, green things.
listening and knowing where others are coming from in thoughts, well many actually know this
This member doesn't have any favorite talks yet.
TEDCred score: 0.00 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A comment on Conversation: How do Corporate Rebels challenge conventional business practices?
These are the radical ways of thinking and accepting the truth of what actually is, instead of what we hope it is, is the only way to correct, change and improve the manor in which we must move forward.
Finding that one plan that the majority of people will agree to move forward toward, that is the problem, that one voice that says, I know what is and what we can become.
A reply on Conversation: What wrong(s) would you right?
As far as religion I don't think they should be tax exempt to many while on there pulpits bring issues into their church like how to vote. If you ask me they should not "back" any person or any political idea, they are separate after all.
As far as morality giving the counties more power might cause people with the same morality to move within an area with like minded laws what ever they are, which would over time would allow whole communities to speak with one much stronger voice on many topics. Right now these few are scattered when they are within an area of others like them, perhaps they can see what they now turn a blind eye to.
Following what has been the way for many past generation when its clearly not working is beyond crazy but the "don't rock the boat" attitude is why I suggested a "test area" in my previous writing. I think to have change real change agreed upon we will end up having to first prove that it will work before it would replace whats failing now.
A reply on Conversation: What wrong(s) would you right?
But they are trying to stop that right to petition for change all together from what I understand. I've tried of course to get petition sights private but had problems there too (it was first) I'm no longer trying to do that.
I recently, with the "big government" failing, am looking for ways to give out smaller government (state, county and city, more power and the federal less.)
One idea was to have money collected not go "up" the ladder to the federal ladder (each "rung costs to run it" where once at the "top" it then makes its way back down once again costing money along the way. Instead a bank account for separate things where on the county level only for example 15% would go higher the rest remain there for that county and the state wiould pas 15% of what it collects from all the counties to the federal instead of the feds telling the states how to spend that money.
Also because of jobs set out of the country, we need to assemble products her in order to get we the people working again, but have the parts and pieces still made over sea's. And to create small assembly plants instead of one huge plant so that competition between plants at the consumer level would or at least could prompt a status to which assembly plant the product was from.
Import tax (which would go to support the federal government)would be less on parts but so high on the "whole assembled product" that is shipped in so that they are the same market price. Besides an assembled product might more likely be used to ship in contraband.
I would also roll back the salaries to 1990 for elected offices.
A reply on Conversation: What wrong(s) would you right?
Perhaps in South America or in poor areas of the east.