curiosity for curiosity's sake, international health equality, poetry and prose, mountains, bringing people together, silence.
When it is genuine, when it is borne of the need to speak, no one can stop the human voice. When denied a mouth, it speaks with the hands or the eyes, or the pores, or anything at all. Because every single one of us has something to say that deserves to be celebrated or forgiven by others. ---- Eduardo Galeano
Global health policy and practice, religion (or non-), community organizing, comics, running, radical tax reform, higher education, sailing, spoken word poetry, new places and interesting ideas.
23:41 Posted: Mar 2012
Views: 1,151,768 | Comments: 375
09:43 Posted: May 2012
Views: 1,467,638 | Comments: 214
19:28 Posted: Jan 2012
Views: 744,202 | Comments: 402
18:28 Posted: Mar 2011
Views: 2,687,818 | Comments: 492
14:58 Posted: Dec 2010
Views: 2,488,661 | Comments: 567
TEDCred score: +2257.00 TEDCred reflects your contribution to the TED community.
A reply on Conversation: We can learn by exchanging and discussing our own lists of "10 Things I Know to be True."
On your interpretation: I think you're absolutely right.
A reply on Conversation: We can learn by exchanging and discussing our own lists of "10 Things I Know to be True."
A reply on Conversation: We can learn by exchanging and discussing our own lists of "10 Things I Know to be True."
I love this idea. To quote Sarah Kay, "I see the impossible every day. Impossible is trying to connect in this world, trying to hold onto others... knowing that while you're speaking, they aren't just waiting for their turn to talk-- they hear you." I know I still need to work on that: truly hearing everyone I listen to. "Listening them into existence" (what an incredible phrase. Thank you.) But I'll never stop trying, because every time I manage to really do it, I learn something amazing.
I grew up going to a Quaker school. We had a weekly mandatory Meeting for Worship which every student, teacher, and administrator sat together in complete silence and periodically listened to short messages people were spontaneously inspired to share. I often learned more about myself and the world around me in that hour and a half than in any class; I wasn't talking, I was sitting in silence. I miss the structure for listening that the meetings offered, but I hope to apply the lessons learned there to the rest of my life.
Thanks for listening,
Cleo
A reply on Conversation: We can learn by exchanging and discussing our own lists of "10 Things I Know to be True."
A comment on Conversation: We can learn by exchanging and discussing our own lists of "10 Things I Know to be True."
Right before this conversation closes, I will compile a list of the ten most frequently cited "truths."
Also, if their opposites appear in the conversation or someone strongly disagrees, I'll note that too.
Can't wait to see what the list will look like!
A reply on Conversation: We can learn by exchanging and discussing our own lists of "10 Things I Know to be True."
A comment on Conversation: An atheist is still in a theist paradigm.
Atheism as a 'religion' itself. It seems to me that agnosticism (although I am not agnostic) is the only viewpoint that can be considered "factually correct" and devoid of any "belief," because while we are alive we cannot possibly know for sure whether or not God exists. So, in the same way that religions take leaps of faith into the unknown to assert that God exists, atheists also take "leaps of faith" in order to say that God affirmatively does not. I think that atheists and the religious both rely upon faith, to opposite extremes. Because of this, I don't think I agree with your statement that atheists should remove themselves from a theistic paradigm.
A reply on Conversation: What place does creativity have in education?
Take the college application process as an example. The purpose of the process is inherently to determine which students merit entrance to a given institution. This is of course not a bad thing in and of itself, but I feel that our definition of "merit" is wrong. Journalist for the New Yorker Louis Menand says in his essay "The Thin Envelope" that we define "merit" as "quantifiable aptitude and achievement." I think this concept is the crux of the problem; By upholding this limited definition, we ignore the need for creativity and passion. And, honestly, those are the more important aspects of "merit."
In short, I think that by focusing on the quantifiable, we form an education system that ignores the qualities that make for success. We choose the best test-takers, but not the best students.
The question that I have though is: How can we change this system?
I don't know. I'd love to hear another's thoughts.
A reply on Conversation: We can learn by exchanging and discussing our own lists of "10 Things I Know to be True."
Education is the most empowering tool
The goal of being happy is good enough
The questions you ask can be more telling of your character than the answers you give
A reply on Conversation: We can learn by exchanging and discussing our own lists of "10 Things I Know to be True."