TED Conversations

Gabe Ozoani

Engineer, Aerospace Engineering

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Are tablet devices a want or a need?

Tablets are extremely popular and some think they may replace Desktop PCs and Laptops. As they primarily "access content" and not "generate" content, some say they are a fad that will fade away. Some even go as far as saying, "Market a useless product right and the public will buy".
Do we really need tablet devices or are we just creating a need for it?

0
Share:
progress indicator
  • thumb
    Mar 18 2012: They are absolutely a want.

    However, all computers, gadgets, televisions, etc are a want!

    Even without that, they're still a want for me... I own 2... and 2 laptops... and a desktop... and a mini... and a internetTV... BUT, I don't NEED it to live... makes life easier, but thats about it...

    I don't NEED to watch videos on a biz trip.:P
  • thumb
    Mar 17 2012: I watched a couple of minutes of the ipads release and thought "Um...did they see an angel" i was looking at the ipads brother which was released a few weeks before,The asus prime that comes with everything the ipad has except it differs in the gpu cores.there was no big hooha with that unit.

    The only difference is the marketing and the spiritual fervor.I wonder if there is a new modern condition here developing,gadgetamine syndrome?,i've also noticed how some modern games get the gamers hyped up like bees and upon release there's a mad rush,unreal expectations take hold and once they played it and it has an ending to it rather than a possible lead in to another edition,it's like watching a crackhead go into withdrawals.The forums abound with disappointment,of being let down,having no effect upon the game because the outcome is always the same.I don't know about you but i see young men popping up with the word "emotional connection" or "I need to know i have an effect", "I wish she was real" "more real world dialogue" "I feel invisible in the game" to me it looks like some kind of nutty spiritualism.
  • thumb
    Mar 13 2012: want and need are arbitrary, artificial terms. they are in fact the same thing.
    • thumb
      Mar 15 2012: Want and need CAN be arbitrary/artificial terms (depending in what context they are used). They can be used in they same way (or interchangeably) but can never be the same thing.
      • thumb
        Mar 15 2012: very well. then define them.
        • thumb
          Mar 16 2012: You said they (wants and needs) were the same thing, I have clearly stated that both words are used interchangeably; I think the ball is in your court to define "them"?
      • thumb
        Mar 16 2012: it is an interesting request. i cannot define "them" since i'm aware of no difference.

        but okay, let's just ease your task a bit. you don't have to define them, just tell me what the exact difference, if you insist there is.
        • thumb
          Mar 16 2012: A dictionary I'm certain will define the words for you.
          An exact difference is simply in the way they are spelt (for starters), however, in the context of my question, it is a mere mere look at two extreems and the publics desire to have a frenzy over what is not a need. I cannot simplify the question any better....I hope I have been of assistance.
      • thumb
        Mar 17 2012: so you refuse to participate in the debate in any meaningful manner. never mind, i can do it for you.

        people take effort to enhance their situation. if they are hungry, they search for food. if they are tired, they might lie down for a while. people anticipate what will give them satisfaction, and will actively seek out such things. in that regard, food and a monteverdi opera serves the same purpose: it exchanges one state of existence with another state that is more wanted, more valued.

        for every individual, there is an order of wants. one want is more urgent than the other. if the person has the option to choose between the two, he will chooses the more important one. this order of wants changes from one person to another, but also from time to time. it is not fixed. as mankind getting wealthier, more and more wants can be satisfied. we move down on that list.

        this list tends to be similar at the top. a hungry man wants food, a thirsty man wants water. but as we go down the list, personal lists diverge. some prefers better accommodation and clothing, others prefer better food or more leisure time.

        one can classify these wants to "want" and "need", saying that "need" is something that is necessary for survival. but that categorization bears no relevance in our modern society. 99% of what we have is not necessary for survival. shelter is not necessary in warm climates. clothing is not necessary. only the most basic food items are necessary, bread or milk is not. what good a categorization is when in one group you have vegetables, grains, meat and firewood, and everything else is in the other group? and finally, if you define "need" that way, what kind of question is "are tablet devices a want or a need"? ten years ago, tablets didn't exist. yet we lived.

        so we are still looking for some meaningful definitions of need and want.
        • thumb
          Mar 18 2012: I think you are the only person having problems understanding the question, if you do not want to participate in the debate, there are tons of debates in the community you can participate in (or you can start a debate on the diference/similarities between wants and needs). In THIS debate, what I am trying to establish is simply the ridiculousness of the FRENZY surrounding a device that has come into our lives.
          Again, you are missing the point COMPLETELY.
          I cannot dumb down the meaning of the question any further.
      • thumb
        Mar 18 2012: i have answered your question multiple times. you chose the framework of need vs want, so i used that too. i hoped you will understand. seems not.

        trying to rephrase.

        rephrase attempt number 1: even if tablets are not necessary, it does not mean anything. neither are theater plays, vacations, television and icecream. do you want a life without such things? you would go to a similar topic about operas, and advocate "high culture". what is that double standard?

        rephrase attempt number 2: i know a company that gives tablets to its sales agents to have the customer and product database with themselves on the field. are sales agents a "frenzy"? or access to such databases a "frenzy"?
        • thumb
          Mar 18 2012: I cannot dumb down the meaning of the question any further, others seem to understand where the question is going except you.
          "Do we really need tablet devices or are we just creating a need for it?" - Is a simple question. Not quite sure what you are trying to prove by "merry-go-rounding" the question.
          Question is very simple.
          If it is confusing, you can start a debate and discuss need vs want, this debate is just looking at the question (I REPEAT AGAIN) - Do we really need tablet devices or are we just creating a need for it?
      • thumb
        Mar 18 2012: do we really need operas, or are we just creating a need for it?
        do we really need chocolate, or are we just creating a need for it?
        do we really need hats, or are we just creating a need for it?
        do we really need tv sets, or are we just creating a need for it?
        do we really need books, or are we just creating a need for it?
        do we really need boats, or are we just creating a need for it?

        okay, that is getting boring. everything should be said was said. if you still don't get it, you won't.
        • thumb
          Mar 18 2012: The answer to all the above questions is NO.
          See how simple that was?
          That is the whole essence of a debate. Ask a question, and debate within the CONTEXT of the question. If you feel the question is not good enough for your "high standards" (lol), move on or create a debate that is.
          This is clearly not rocket science.
  • thumb
    Mar 13 2012: Suggest you have a pretty loose definition of need to even suggest the possibility of a tablet being a need.

    They are great for browsing etc. But not a need. Especially if you have another device that does as much or more. A smartphone is nearly a small ipad with phone capability.
    Extra convenience or functionality is not a need.

    In fact if you don't use the Internet at home for work or study, you don't even need a computer.

    Email is not a need. Big screen tv is not a need.

    Food, water, shelter = needs
    • thumb
      Mar 15 2012: It is obvious that a tablet is not a need, and I am confident that "most" know the the difference between a want and a need. By saying "Food,water,shelter = needs" is stating the obvious. The use of the word "need", is used deliberately to show the ridiculousness of the consumers desire to feed off of strategic and clever marketing by purchasing expensive items that are advertised as needs.
      • thumb
        Mar 16 2012: Thanks Gabe. We are one the same page.

        It is amazing how strong the drive to consume or have the latest gadget is.
        We had people in Sydney lining up for days to get the latest ipad.
        Some interesting psychology going on here.
        With updates every year and so many different choices its consumer heaven (temptation)

        There was so much talk of convergence - phone, email, camera, internet, computing etc on one device. Small camera probably suffering now most phones take an okay snapshot but so many of us still have multiple devices:
        Smart phone, ipad, pc and or notebook doing much of the same stuff but with different emphasis.
  • Mar 12 2012: both really.
    we need them in our everyday lives for jobs, it helps make our lives easier, so perhaps we need them, - helps us for instructions to drive somewhere, provides us with entertainment etc..

    we want it for he exciting part, the games, the apps, the idea of this this innovative tablet amazes us as modern technology comes forward and infront of us!
  • thumb
    Mar 12 2012: Tablets are the cut down form of a laptop and i would say the base system to access the net for the coming future though for the foreseeable future the desktop will still be the locomotive for heavy app workloads as in rendering.

    Personally i think they're good for on the spot access other than that it looks more like a "want" rather than a need