This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Do you think we still need school?
We have many drop-outs that became successful. Well, to say it safer, there are who became successful in life that did not enjoy education in school.














Aries Eroles 10+
Alexander Miller
Christian Garland
Alexander Miller
Christian Garland
edward long 100+
peter lindsay 30+
Christian Garland
peter lindsay 30+
Josh S
Without education, we are unable to communicate through text and writing. True, we know these skills by the time we are in 2nd to 3rd grade, but we continue learning about language until we graduate high school.
I myself am still in school (high school), and i even see the importance of school. Without it, we would lose most everything. Yes there are the few exceptions, like Bill Gates, who dropped out of high school and became multi-billionaires. But i have yet to hear of a single story of a elementary drop out becoming successful. We must also look at what you mean by being successful, i take it that you mean a wealthy person that contributes to society. And i dont think i can imagine a single case where an elementary school drop out has become successful.
On the other hand, you reference high school drop outs. If we look at poverty rates and average incomes of those who dropped out of high school (i debated this a few months ago) then we can see those people tend to be much poorer. Not only that, but in today's day and age, it is even more difficult to make it in the world if you were to drop out of high school, as compared to 100 years ago.
Clearly it is beneficial and for the most part, required to finish grade schools to become successful. And while there are exceptions, we should not base our life decisions and government laws on the lives of a few exceptions when statistics show otherwise.
Xavier Belvemont 30+
You can apply this same logic to most things; Law for example.
If it becomes legal to take heroine, steal and drive down my street at 100mph, will I do it? No.
Most sensible people won't, so does that mean we don't need laws?
Answer: Some of us don't necessarily need these things, but it doesn't negate the reality that most people seriously do.
Carlos Carvalho
First, check the talks by Sir Ken Robinson http://www.ted.com/speakers/sir_ken_robinson.html
He actually addresses this in a brilliant way. In sum (as I understand it):: The schools (educational system) can be viewed as a moribund child of the industrial revolution, killing creativity and dumping tonnes of "useless" rules and goals for people that might never use them.
I agree with Sir Robinson's position, as in that we might need schools, but new schools, that respect individual goals and capabilities, that teaches not what might be important to engineers only, but what might be useful and interesting for each one of the students.
The general disregard for arts and creation is a major problem, as is the academical "hierarchy" of sciences, defining what's "important or not" for everyone.
The successful dropouts are usually successful in creating new things, in going against the norm, in shifting people's understanding of reality and what can be done in this world. That's the exact opposite of almost all the academic curriculum out there.