TED Conversations

Lydia Loizides

VP Corporate Planning, Canoe Ventures, LLC

TEDCRED 100+

This conversation has closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Have women reached equality in the workplace if, as in the US, they earn77 cents on the male dollar?

I was helping my 9 year old with a school project and came across this article form 2010. My personal reaction is somewhat irrelevant. The question should be addressed objectively vs. subjectively, distilled to the core of the question which, in my mind, is simply a matter of social policy. How to do we raise the next generation of leaders where this disparity will become obsolete?

0
Share:
progress indicator
  • thumb
    Feb 28 2012: Suggest there are several dimensions to this.

    Do they earn the same for the same job, with the same experience and qualifications.
    This equality should be the minimum.

    Do they earn less because more low paid jobs, part time jobs, interrupted careers from child rearing? This is more complicated. I suggest things can be done to improve this, to help women have more options. However, I believe it is unreasonable to expect people working less hours, in lower skilled jobs, or with less experience to earn the same as men or women how work full time and take no time off for children.
  • steve a

    • +2
    Feb 20 2012: women earning 77cents compared to males is a complete myth base on research done by the census bureau. The department of labor came out against this.
  • R Jones

    • +1
    Feb 20 2012: If women were only paid 77 cents compared to a male's dollar - why would any company hire men if they are getting the same work from women?

    Or, just maybe, could it be that this 77cents/dollar thing is the result of incredibly poor research and a heavily biased representation of the results?

    Who work more hours? Who is more likely to move for work? Who takes less time off from work? Who doesn't take time off to have children? Guess.

    Women make choices and these choices affect both their careers and salaries.

    Look at doctors/surgeons - so many more women training as medical students - great, so many of these women becoming outstanding doctors/surgeons - great, so many of these women, after only a few years, dropping to part time or even quitting - not so great.

    There's nothing stopping women working in the same way that men do ... apart from things like making choices, and having children.

    The only problem is that if you raise these points in your son's school project he'll probably get a low mark since it's against the standard myth that all men are oppressing all women.

    (Just as a note - I think the man/woman thing is irrelevant in terms of merit - this is based on working with incompetent males and females, as well as extremely skilled males and females. However, I have also worked with women who have used their jobs to get maximum maternity money, and then leave soon after they have the children they want. Viewed purely in terms of investment and return ... these women represent a loss rather than a gain for the company)
  • Feb 20 2012: I'm not sure that equality in wage is as big of a deal as many people make it out to be. The reason why men earn higher wages on average is because men have more experience. Men on average in the workplace are older than women, who have just recently started to gain some experience as the female workforce ages. Inequality does come in, though, at higher income levels, because that is mostly of that person's own volition. Once you get to the CEO-type management level women do not demand as much of a salary as men do. I do not in my experience see much disparity to the number of women in management, though at the very top (CEO) there are not many women.

    On a societal level many of the inequalities of women are overplayed, as many women do not even want equality in these areas. Take things like the assumption that your husband would jump to you and assume you an fix the car, which most women by nature either do not or cannot do. There ARE inherent differences in men and women, otherwise why is there a distinction?

    Do not get me wrong, women are oppressed in many instances (most notably in other countries), however these instances are not part of the mainstream culture in the U.S. anymore.
  • Feb 18 2012: David, I do not agree with you. I think you are biased and that you do not realize it. For example, you write " Men need to make things... so women can consume them... Or women need to make things, so that women can consume them." All the men I know want stuff, e.g., cars, tickets to ball games, sneakers, electronic toys. I guess you are "above" materialism, but, if so, you are rare. I just do not agree with you. I am satisfied to leave it at that. I assume when people disagree with me, that I am right and they are wrong. I hope the women in your life are equal to you in spirtmindbody and all that jazz. Happy today.
  • thumb
    Feb 12 2012: This argument is pointless. Any attempt to bring the pay of men and women to the same level, with no regard to productivity, will destroy the incentive to create wealth. It is productivity that determines one's pay.
  • Feb 12 2012: Are these numbers for the same profession, work experience, company, education, responsibility, work-description all taken together and compared women to men or is it one of the fairly common "let's just take all women vs. all men and ignore arguments!"?

    I believe you've run across an article meant to make you feel angry and buy the newspaper.
    • Feb 12 2012: Great questions. The article is from TIme Magazine found here http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1983185,00.html and does takes into account race, education, profession and other factors through out. It also points to interesting data that show that even in countries where gender representation is mandated by law, women still under represented http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1982304,00.html
      • Feb 13 2012: No, it dit not account for such factors, It was mentioned in the second paragraph as one of the potential reasons for the huge difference.

        I found a couple mentions of a study that shows a number close to 5% taking more things into account, but leaving out a couple of other important factors, like what their job description actually said they was supposed to do and where these differneces arise. Is it because women just get offered less money for the same work at the same time of employment or do they arise after a couple of years when salary-negotiation may make a noticable difference?
  • Feb 12 2012: We all know that women have not reached salary-earning or management equality in the market place or equality of power and influence in any other societal institution. One fast way to accomplish this might be to have the USA switch from a one-male-President to a one-male/one-female CO-PRESIDENCY that will be an efficient and effective role model for the USA and the whole wide world. We can change the approach from a painful winners/losers competitive process to a winner/winner model of cooperation that will yield greater productivity, justice, prosperity and happiness for all men and women.
    • thumb
      Feb 15 2012: In The United States right now...

      Women are less likely to be unemployed than men. Women drop out of high school, less than men. Women graduate from college, more often than men do... Women suffer from drug addiction, less than men. Women suffer from mental illness, like stress disorders, less than men... Women live longer than men. Men kill themselves more than women do. Women work manual labor, coal mining, and farming jobs... less than men.

      Women make 77 cents on the dollar... Women are less likely to try to dominate others, as managers in the workforce. What inequality?

      Sometimes, I worry that people really think, money is the only thing that matters. Don't bother with the whole male and female president thing, you'll run the whole show soon enough. Hillary is leaving office to run in 2016 for sure, and the republican party is imploding, trying to court religious zealots. You don't need men to run the country... but, the one built by women isn't going to be much different... We just do what you tell us anyway : p
      • Feb 16 2012: David Hamilton, I disagree with just about everything you have said. Oh, well. I believe that female domination would be just as inefficient and cause just as disappointing results as male domination. I do not understand why you and so many others resist the idea of men and women having EQUAL power within all realms of society. Must people look up or down at each other?! How can one be honest and enjoy a good, fulfilling relationship with someone you consider inferior or superior? I do agree with you that money is not the only thing that matters. Truth and love are far more important. I think it is totally okay that we think, believe differently and that we reach different conclusions about things. I respect you for expressing your true thoughts and feelings. Happy Today.
        • thumb
          Feb 16 2012: I wanted to talk to you about this... because you and I actually agree on so much, but on womens issues, I think you simply fail to acknowledge reality. You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Everything I said in the first paragraph, is an absolute, statistically verifiable fact.

          "Must people look up or down at each other?", no... of course not. But, men will always look at pretty women and say "what can i do to put a smile on your face?". That's just biology. Men will always look up to women socially, and sexually. We will always care more about female emotions, than masculine ones. We're trying to build a more balanced society, but we (meaning men), aren't good at it, we like women too much.

          The problem exists because the people in charge are men, but they are still trying to make women happy... They are still second class citizens to thier wives, in their own mind. Women have power over men, that does not exist economically, so it is unfair to talk about equality, only as it relates to economics.

          In many ways, men are very economically self sacrificing to women, without complaint. Women live almost a decade longer than men, on average. Men are all paying into a social security system, that will almost never pay them out, as much as they paid in. Medicare, and private insurance, now call charging men and women different health insurance premiums sexist, despite the fact, that women cost a lot more, through pregnancy, and longer life expectancies. So, men are now paying a percentage of womens health insurance costs as well.

          For a married man, this might seem to make a type of sense, and almost be fair. His health insurance costs go up, so he can help cover his wife/partner. He pays extra for retirement benefits, so that as his wife outlives him, she can benefit... For single, or gay men... This is just pure sexist wealth distribution... Yet, men don't complain.
        • thumb
          Feb 16 2012: We also, ignore consumption patterns, when comparing men and women... Men don't buy a lot of stuff. Men rarely say "lets go shopping", with a big smile on their face. "Men don't buy nice cars, because men like to drive nice cars... Men buy nice cars, because women like men who drive nice cars", Dave Chappelle. There is little statistical evidence to support my position that men spend less money than women, and that more money is spent on women, so I will state that as opinion.

          I think in our own lives however, we have all seen this pattern. It's what almost all sitcoms are about, because it happens a lot. Shoes, Make up, clothes, all manufactured in third world countries, and all tested on, our made out of, animals... but women are often pro labor, and animal rights... It's an interesting consumption culture we have here in the US, and it's very interesting which gender takes the blame for it. Again, that's just opinion though.
      • Feb 17 2012: David, When you speak of the differences in consumption patterns, remember that these behavior patterns were established when women did not have access to jobs. Shopping was an activity for women. If they were employed, they probably, like men, would have shopped less and worked more. Inequality exists in the market place. I wonder why you do not acknowledge that. True, money is not everything, but you know very well it is quite important in our society and world. The thing about men and cars.....you are making a whole bunch of statements as though they are facts. You are alleging that statistical evidence supports your conclusions. I agree with a lot you say too. Women and men can produce goods and services. Let's value their productivity fairly. At present, that is not the case. Perhaps unemployed mothers and housewives who do a whole lot of work ought to be financially compensated in accordance with the value of their work. The market system is not solving all of our problems and dealing with all of the injustices. Make women corporate presidents (and other good jobs) and they will be so busy producing that their daughters will emulate them and not be shopaholics like the women who were dependent upon men for money and could not get jobs with fair pay.
        • thumb
          Feb 18 2012: I understand where you're coming from... but, women have out graduated men, since the 1980's... Is it sexist to suggest that consumption, and production patterns may not be related to descrimination, but might instead be related to entitled women, assuming that men will pick up their slack?

          Do you see a new generation of women fighting to work in productive fields? Are women in my generation begging for mining jobs? Or, are men, who used to do physical labor, wondering, "where are the jobs for people like me?". Meanwhile women perfectly capable, and encouraged to do physical labor say "I want to work in the customer service economy, not the productive one... it's easier".

          I'm not trying to suggest that all men feel one way, or that all women feel the other... but, from what i've seen in my personal experience... Neither men nor women in my generation, want to work in a farm, or factory, or mine... but they all want to have products made, in a factory, or farm, or mine... and that's not a valid way to view the world... Men need to make things... so women can consume them... Or women need to make things, so that women can consume them... We can't live in a world where no one makes things... but everyone consumes them.

          Men and women must produce equal amounts of goods, before they claim to have earned equal consumption. I would love to see that... but, your argument tends to suggest that it is mans descrimination that is stopping women from producing as much as they consume... I would suggest that it is human laziness... and men are no more prone to it, than women.

          I would also suggest... and, this is pure opinion... that men... don't want anything... They don't want to buy products... They don't want to consume. Men, tend to get their ego's from production... So, if women become equal producers... Won't they just produce for their own demand, and won't men work just hard enough to feed themselves?

          Men like women... Women like stuff... Men buy stuff, for women.