This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Is it possible to avert global warming by replacing "fossil coal" with biocoal?
To reverse global warming we need to eliminate approximately 7 billion tons of CO2 emissions annually. Worldwide coal consumption is 7 billion tons. This generates approximately 20 billions tons of CO2. Replacing about 2.5 billion tons of fossil coal with the carbon neutral biocoal will eliminate 7 billion tons of CO2 emissions thus solving the global warming problem. Is it possible to create biocoal that is cost competitive with "fossil coal"? What will it take to do so?
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.














Ruby Sahiwal
Krisztián Pintér 200+
i have some doubts, because there are methods to make pellets or brickets out of grass or sawdust. it sounds cheaper, but still not economic as of now. (i.e. more expensive than, say, natural gas.) this charcoal seems to be a more sophisticated, higher quality product, but also more expensive. so it seems even less marketable.
i would like to see some fact sheets about that technology, especially focusing on ROI, prices, etc.
Ruby Sahiwal
Biomass at $10-20/dry ton
Conversion Process $20-25/MT
Capex of $200/MT
I believe this is doable. High yielding grasses combined with mechanization can deliver biomass economics. Torrefaction and other processes borrowed from the mining and/or paper & pulp sector can deliver the right conversion processes. Not sure if the Capex piece is doable. I believe that is the key challenge.
Krisztián Pintér 200+
as i researched, hay for example sells for USD 50 there, or USD 25 equivalent here, still higher than the target.
converting at that price also needs R&D.
so go ahead, and good luck :)