This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Is modern man just as much a slave as real slaves of the past?
In ancient Rome, slaves were generally part of the household. They were looked after, clothed, fed, housed and given medical succour or protection if needed. During the Saturnalia Festival, they even exchanged places with their masters for the day and the masters served them.
Now I know about all the horrors of the slave-trade and the treatment they received at the hands of the slave-owners, but I want to put forward the argument that people today living off low wages and having no land but having the obligation to pay huge mortgages, buy clothes for themselves and their families, feeding themselves, protecting themselves in time of distress are probably in much more of a vulnerable situation than many slaves of the past.














Gisela McKay 30+
David Barnett 20+
Gisela McKay 30+
If we are living in slavery at this point, it's a mental slavery and we're keeping ourselves in it.
Comment deleted
Gisela McKay 30+
Comment deleted
David Barnett 20+
Salim Solaiman 50+
Krisztián Pintér 200+
the notion that we would be slaves is not wrong. it is outrageous, ridiculous and delusional. or just simple propaganda.
David Barnett 20+
Krisztián Pintér 200+
actually, i have a proposition. everyone who thinks that being an employee and being a slave is similar could be enslaved, since it does not hurt them, does it?
David Barnett 20+
Krisztián Pintér 200+
observation: most of the time this kind of thinking comes from countries that are indebted and in which people are indebted. like greece, USA, spain, UK. sorry, but i'm not buying that for one second. peoples of the same countries used to say that democracy is hijacked by some shady forces, and people are not in position to change leadership. blatantly obvious defensive strategy. you screwed it up people, and now it is time to fix it.
David Barnett 20+
Didn't mean to get into a whole existential debate but thanks for participating.
Krisztián Pintér 200+
the thing is that i do mind uprooting myself. but it is MY DECISION. that is why i'm not a slave. i can move. i can give up my current life and choose another. i don't do that, because i believe that all things considered and all risks accounted, it is the best choice for me. and i can do something or not do something, as i anticipate is better for me. that makes me FREE. should i see an opportunity that is, all things counted, seems better, i will go for it. i CAN. freedom does not mean you have a better choice. it means that IF you have, you can go for it. if you are a slave, you can not make decision about your life even if a better opportunity presents itself.
you are not a slave. you just want to be one, so you can blame your problems on someone else.
David Barnett 20+
Barry Schwartz also had something interesting to say on the Paradox of Choice...and it wasn't liberating. Having choice does not necessarily make us free or freer, but actually burden us with more responsibility...sometimes it is a lot easier to be told what to do...especially in this modern age where specialization is everything and jacks of all trades no longer exist. Do I let the doctor decide my treatment or do I decide myself? Does deciding yourself make you freer? No...it just puts the responsibility of the decision into the hands of someone with no medical qualifications.
Peter Law 30+
I guess we are all slaves to something, whether it be money, power, fashion, drink, sex, or whatever. Many are trapped by peer pressure, & the things that the telly tells them they need.
I used to visit shooting lodges for my work. Normally the gamekeeper was in charge. He had a house, a 4x4, some guns, & a small wage. The owner of the estate was his boss. The keeper was vulnerable, he had to keep the boss happy, or he could be homeless & jobless, together with his family. Often his wife, & sometimes his children would muck-in as well. It was a shop-steward's nightmare.
Although it appeared like a slave-master situation, in reality it was more like mutual dependence. The keeper knew that he could rely on the boss to look after him. The boss knew that when he flew in with his paying guests that everything would be in place for a successful hunt. For most of the year the keeper was left to maintain the estate. No set hours, no set work pattern. These guys are among the most contented people I know. City folks pay thousands of pounds to go to work with them for a few days.
Did you hear about the keeper who was treated to a week in a London hotel by his boss? When the boss got the invoice he nearly choked. The only variable was the food. What on earth were you eating ? Oh, just the usual that we have at home; Salmon, Pheasant, Venison, nothing special.
:-)
David Barnett 20+