- Alexander Wilke
- London
- United Kingdom
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Can playground equipment be rigged up to generators/ dynamos to harvest energy that a school could then use?
Imagine a roundabout in a school playground that gets played on for about two hours a day. Underneath the centre could there be a dynamo gathering the electricity and storing it? It could be used to power night lights, or other temporary lighting (such as toilets, hallways etc). Dynamos could be attached to swings too. We could even design playground equipment for this purpose where children have to lift, pull, turn, spin, rotate objects or handles during play.
I'm calling it "Active Electricity". Cheesy tag line; "Harnessing the Energy of Youth"!
Is this a feasible idea? Does anyone want to help make it a reality? What challenges would there be to this being successful?













Aidan Parchelo
My concern of course would be understanding the gross environmental impact of each process. Little to no electrical devices are designed in wholesome accordance to environmental protection. They may work like magic, but are far from it. All it takes is to consider the mining and refining process, not to mention the exhaustive use of water and energy to create modern electronics:
http://stuff.mit.edu/afs/athena/course/2/2.813/OldFiles/www/readings/WilliamsMicrochip.pdf
Further, the whole PlayPump idea sounds great in theory, but perhaps is only that:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/24/africa-charity-water-pumps-roundabouts
Now, this by no means is meant to be a downer post - just looking to re-shift the focus of an excellent initiative. My counter-question would read something like,
Considering the huge amount of human labour available on the planet, how might we be able to use simple mechanical processes to convert humans' potential kinetic energy into useful functions (i.e. twenty stationary bicycles connected to the well-meaning PlayPump's axle)?
Steven Slaughter
Claudette Cohen
Jamie Barnes
At any point, you would have to assess the Net Gain.If the net gain is at all positive, then I belive it would be worth doing. When I say this I mean in a Life Cycle sense.
It's interesting to note that in some cheaper production plants, the energy that goes into producing a solar panel is in excess of the power that panel can produce and supply in its life time (Many factors cause this).That is an example of a Net Loss. The answer is to improve both the production technology and the efficiency of the unit..so the net gain from both ends is incresed.
Alexander Wilke
This is an angle I hadn't considered. I instantly thought about children being the on site constructors. They could learn electrical skills, engineering skills and construction skills. This would be especially useful for teenagers looking to do more practical qualifications. I wonder if Marcin Jakubowski's construction kit could do all the construction work necessary? They in turn could be made first!
I'm glad you gave me a perspective I hadn't considered. Production is as important as utilisation.
Jay Robinson
Alexander Wilke
Jay Robinson
Claudette Cohen
Alexander Wilke
Let me know when it's open, I'll come down for a run!
Xavier Belvemont 30+
Another invention I came across was a t-shirt panel that generated electricity by sound pressure hitting it.
These would produce more electricity if they were to be implemented (seeing as school playgrounds are filled both with loud noises and 100's of people walking around).
Practically everything can be manipulated to harness energy, its just a case of being inventive enough to create something which will utilize it.
Alexander Wilke
I love the idea of electric shoes! Imagine putting the floor Xavier Belvemont mentions into a shopping mall to make it self sufficient? Or outside a sports stadium to power the flood lights? Or in the pedestrian tunnels on the underground (subway) to power the station lights? Or...