TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Why do we chase happiness?

If each emotion we experience is for a reason then why do we try to not to experience some of them as they are? Why there is a race for happiness out of the entire range of emotions? Is it a new phenomena or has the happiness always been sought the most? Is it a human need ?

Share:
  • thumb
    Jan 14 2012: Happiness is not something that is out there, something that you have to find or earn. Feeling happiness is up to you only, is not directly connected to the material things that you have, your health or if you have accomplish all your goals.

    For me happiness is not being “Hi” or tripping with drugs, or being with beautiful women or being rich. I find happiness inside me, even when I failure, is up to me think like this: “I’m a looser, I really work hard and a fail, I give up”

    Or I can think: “Well, I try and a didn’t get what I was expecting, but I can do better and tomorrow is a new day, and if I keep trying I know I will be successful”

    Being wounded in life is inevitable, but suffering is optional.

    Oneself is the lord of his steps, the absolute master of his way, the architect of his dreams.

    If you are happy just when the world is nice with you, so you not are in control of your life. This is my opinion of what is happiness.

    Happiness is necessary to enjoy living life.
    • thumb

      . . 100+

      • 0
      Jan 15 2012: "Being wounded in life is inevitable, but ...suffering is optional." Thanx David :)
    • Jan 17 2012: Cheers David!
  • thumb
    Jan 22 2012: Why do we chase happiness? Seratonin and Dopamine. We pursue what is internally biochemically rewarded and avoid the alternative. The poets and playrights have long listed the items, situations and stimuli that result in the reward but the reward itself is a consequence of internal cellular secretion.
    • Jan 23 2012: Very true Michael,

      Can we then say that happines is the ''high' humans get from these and other neurotransmitters and that we are always looking for opportunities and experiences that give us this high / take you higher ??

      Is this why it seems that we chase happiness ??
      • thumb
        Jan 23 2012: Sorry Mwenjew...I cannot give you thumbs up...I've maxed out for you again!
        This will have to do for now............:>)
        • thumb
          Jan 25 2012: But it was Michael's contribution ... shouldn't he get the thumb up? (In the singular, that doesn't sound very nice.)

          Ah, I'll give him one.
      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: Hi Thomas,
        I gave Michael a thumb up. I also like Mwenjew's insightful questions, and wanted to let him know that...makes me happy/content:>)
    • thumb
      Jan 23 2012: agree even if sometimesthe long term result outweighs the pleasure of today. we are pleasure seeking biological entities.
      • thumb
        Jan 23 2012: The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence? We think that by continually seeking something outside ourselves things will be better?
    • thumb
      Jan 23 2012: I agree Michael and Mwenjew, that natural chemicals in the body contribute to the feeling of happiness/contentment:>)

      I am reminded of an experiment that was done with actors:
      By changing the expressions on the face (smiling or frowning for example) scientists have researched the theory that changing the expressions actually facilitates change to the chemicals in the body, therefor changing our mental/physical health OR our perception of health. We all know that laughter is good medicine, and there are actually "laughing meditations" now, where people are encouraged to laugh together to improve their health:>) I LOVE IT!

      What do you think/feel comes first? The change in the chemicals in the body? Or external experiences? My feeling is that we can change the chemicals in the body with our perceptions, facial expressions, etc. AND external influences/circumstances can contribute to the internal cellular secretion? What do you think?
      • Jan 24 2012: Colleen,
        Think so too.I believe in MIND over BODY. i.e mind has objective and subjective controll of body through the conscious and subconscoius mind. I believe this is how these actors can shed a tear just at the right moment. cant do that yet.

        G M
        I like the phrase, pleasure seeking biological entities.
        the very fact that we are SEEKING these pleasures thrills of chemicals in our bodies i think makes us human. and just as joy would feel so good if it werent for pain, the constant quest for this pleasure is why it seems that people are chasing it.
        does this explain why people do drugs like alcohol for social purposes?
        • thumb
          Jan 24 2012: Hi again Mwenjew:>)
          I agree that mind/body is very connected, and working together through the objective and subjective conscious and subconscious.

          Having been a professional actor for many years, I would like to tell you how I connected with various feelings in myself. A good actor cannot simply "shed a tear" at will, in my experience. Every emotion I played as a character, I needed to connect with in myself to create the actions/reactions that were needed for the character. So, to cry for example, I needed to connect with the character with compassion/empathy, and step into that characters shoes. I had to feel what that character was feeling.

          I had a great lesson for this idea, one time in particular. I was playing the role of a mother who lost her son, and the character had a very deep, long monologue. The director, who wrote the play about her own life, kept telling me that I didn't quite have the depth of feeling she would like to see. In my perception, I was going as deep as possible to imagine how it would feel if my son died. We often used videos in rehearsal as a learning tool, and sure enough, when I looked at the video, I agreed with her assessment. What I realized, is that I could not go deep enough in myself to actually feel how it would be to lose my son. I played the role successfully, and usually had the audience in tears during the monalogue, but I never was able to take myself totally to the feeling of losing my son.

          I learned with the acting, that I can change my experience by changing my thoughts, feelings and perceptions of the "scene", and I took this lesson into my every day life.
          Sometimes, when my personal life seemed in shambles, I went into the theater and played the role of a very happy content person, and I noticed that my life experiences changed. Sometimes my personal life would be happy and content, and I played the role of a person who was discontent...guess what happened? We CAN make choices.
      • Jan 25 2012: Hi Colleen,
        You say, Sometimes, when my personal life seemed in shambles, I went into the theater and played the role of a very happy content person, and I noticed that my life experiences changed.

        Shouldnt we be doing this every moment? and does this everyday acting lead to the "effortfulness" that we were talking about earlier ?
        • thumb
          Jan 25 2012: Mwenjew,
          That's exactly my point...we CAN be doing this in every moment, and that is the lesson I brought into my everyday life.

          As I said in my previous comment, we don't simply "act" the part, we feel it..."be" it on many different levels. It is not about "pretending", it is about "being". You've maybe heard of psycho-drama? It is sometimes used by psychologists to teach people how to get in touch with deeper feelings in themselves. Well, I did 10 years of phycho-drama...AND got paid and applause for it!! How cool is that? By that time in my life, I realized life was about learning, so I was diligent about learning all that I could while pursuing the acting career...it was a great experience in learning, growing, evolving in my "self". How else can someone experience how it "feels" to be a hooker (Sweet Charity) and a nun (Sound of Music) in the same summer!!! LOL:>)

          I loved the exploration of all the underlying feelings in my "self", and of course, when we know our "self" better, we get to know and interact with others on many of the same levels:>)
      • Jan 25 2012: Soooo happy right now !!!

        :->
  • Jan 13 2012: Chasing happiness, searching for happiness , the pursuit of happiness ... are poignant metaphors of the human state,
    for what the searchers seek in the outside world is often that which is missing in themselves.
    The most successful 'runer' in this race looks sometimes like a lost child, looking for home.
  • thumb
    Jan 13 2012: Good questions Manuj, and very relevant in our world today.

    I agree that some people try to avoid certain emotions, probably because they can be painful at times. Facing some emotions causes us to be vulnerable within ourselves, and that is not always a good feeling. However, facing all emotions, also helps us gain strength and confidence in ourselves. So, while facing all emotions can feel frightening/vulnerable at first, it is also empowering.

    This TED talk might fit in nicely with this discussion:>)
    http://www.ted.com/talks/brene_brown_on_vulnerability.html

    Sometimes people "chase the happiness", as you insightfully say, because they don't know that happiness/contentment is something we create for ourselves in ourselves? Too many people are searching for happiness from external forces or influences, and not realizing that happiness/contentment is a way to travel, not a destination.
    • Comment deleted

      • Jan 13 2012: "Happiness is like a butterfly. Chase it and it will always elude you, but divert your attention to other things, and it will come and rest quietly on your shoulder."
        • thumb
          Jan 15 2012: I don't know, chasing butterflies is pretty fun, lol
    • thumb
      Jan 13 2012: I love the idea of happiness as an internal force: something to be created, not found.
      • Jan 14 2012: I don't like my answer now, I like this one! Happiness isn't searched for, it's already inside of us, waiting to come out. Deep in the recesses of our mind we know what will make us happy, but maybe we chose to avoid happiness because we value other emotions more greatly.

        Every person has the capability to be happy, but it must come from within.
        • thumb
          Jan 14 2012: I like BOTH of your answers...seems like you're exploring and growing with your discoveries...I LOVE it! Seems like you very quickly took the exploration from the outside (baggage/expectations making us happy) to the inside..."it must come from within". Good perception...in my humble opinion:>)
        • thumb
          Jan 15 2012: I agree with Colleen, both of your insights are profound and wonderful!

          It is definitely within our power to create anything we want, including happiness. What I was trying to explain above, through the "human needs psych", is that once you realize that you have the power to achieve fulfillment, you realize you don't "need" happiness, but that you can have it anytime you wish. It's freeing not to have to chase those butterflies around if you don't want to, isn't it? lol
        • thumb
          Jan 15 2012: Yes Amanda, it IS indeed "freeing" not to have to chase anything:>) When we realize we have the power to "create" our life with certainty, variety, significance, love & connection, growth, contribution, acceptance, satisfaction, humor, joy, bliss fulfillment, challenge, etc. etc., we reach a state of happiness/contentment, which becomes the foundation of our every day lives:>)
      • Jan 20 2012: Super !
    • Jan 14 2012: Thanks Colleen, for understanding the question in its entirety that too without my being able to phrase it correctly. And thanks for your answer, it reassures my belief that all emotions, including happiness, sadness, vulnerability etc, are essential to be experienced, identified and embraced as they come and go. None can be skipped and i should not choose to reach out or strive for few selected ones like happiness. Its like a wheel of time, the wheel of emotions(centered at me) also keeps rotating, i should not sleep over the painful ones by diverting my attention and shouldn't hold on to pleasurable ones.
      In fact, when i try to identify & observe a feeling, i see a reason behind and it begins to become normal. At times it becomes normal just by observing it as it is. Sometimes i am unable to clearly identify or define an emotion, then i feel the need to talk about it or read about it, mostly just to confuse myself further :-) ...like this one...the emotion which leads us to chase happiness...is it because of conditioning by society or because of ever growing sense of comparison....i am unable to define this very emotion which drives people to chase a particular emotion...
      • thumb
        Jan 14 2012: Manuj,
        I think/feel you phrased it PERFECTLY:>)

        I agree with your belief that it is beneficial to explore and experience all emotions. I believe that is how we find contentment...by "knowing" our "self" on many different levels. "It's an inside job", as Dru says!

        It is very insightful that you percieve the exploration as "like a wheel of time, the wheel of emotions...rotating". I believe that everything in life, including emotions, are meant to flow. We can explore and experience all emotions, and be aware of them flowing through us, adding to what we "know" about our "self". In my perception, this is how we learn, grow and evolve.

        LOL....I agree...sometimes learning more simply confuses us further...well put! That is where acceptance comes in. We can accept the confusion as part of the process. I don't have to have all the answers right now. I enjoy the exploration, and that is one piece that provides contentment for me...patience and acceptance of the process:>)
        • Jan 14 2012: Colleen, you are so well aligned here. Thanks.

          "accept the confusion as part of the process"..this is what i do and your opinion on this further reassures me.

          Right now, i am enjoying the confusion happening over here by everybody's perception of my imperfect question. The confusion is pulling me to make an imperfect conclusion, but, i would rather accept and enjoy the confusion to let it defog on its own.
        • thumb
          Jan 15 2012: Confusion - Another great experience we humans are lucky to enjoy! lol
      • thumb
        Jan 14 2012: Manuj,
        Thank you:>) I've had some very good teachers, interesting and challenging experiences, and many years to learn....or not:>)

        I've also learned to be comfortable with discomfort....maybe that's similar to accept and enjoy the confusion?

        "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused":>)
        • Jan 14 2012: Indeed, you seem to have been alive. Keep guiding people and making sense in conversations when you can.
        • thumb
          Jan 15 2012: I agree with Mauj, You rock Colleen!
      • thumb
        Jan 15 2012: You rock too Amanda:>)

        I cannot get this response near your comment I'm responding to Amanda...
        Your comment..."Confusion - Another great experience we humans are lucky to enjoy! lol "

        I agree that confusion CAN be a great or interesting experience. I appreciate confusion, because it tells me that I have so much information that it is difficult to make a choice. I need to simply give it a rest, and let the information sink into my mind/logical "self", and heart/intuitive "self". When we really listen to all "parts" of our "self", there is no longer confusion:>)

        Often, when we (humans) feel confused, we get angry, frustrated, impatient, etc, which simply adds to the confusion.
      • thumb
        Jan 19 2012: Manuj & Colleen,

        It is wonderful watching you unravelling the mystery of happiness. I feel like I am reading a story, "Will Manuj find the answer to his question". I can't wait to read on.
        • Jan 20 2012: :-) thanks Jonnie... Its an experiment which i am putting myself and everyone here though.... i am enjoying the dissection of thoughts. Its an open ended question, may or may not have an answer, or perhaps the answer lies with in the question. I am certainly enjoying the process, thanks to everybody.
  • thumb
    Jan 14 2012: A Chinese proverb:" Happiness is like a sunbeam, which the least shadow intercepts, while adversity is often as the rain of spring." In the material world, people look like they are chasing happiness but they are actually fleeing from unhappiness. Material Man lives between happiness and unhappiness. Happiness is like a carrot dangling on a string on a stick. No matter how fast one flees from unhappiness, a good, solid bite is very elusive.
  • thumb
    Jan 23 2012: Chase equals Pursuit.

    The belief has always been that we pursue happiness.

    But I think the pursuit itself is what fulfills us, though we scant recognize this during the chase.

    Pursuit equals Happiness.
    • thumb
      Jan 23 2012: YES!!!

      "Remember that happiness is a way of travel, not a destination"
      (Roy M. Goodman)

      When we "recognize" that we can experience happiness within the life journey, we no longer need to chase/pursue it? Perhaps we need to recognize and acknowledge that it is the journey in which we experience happiness/contentment?
      • thumb
        Jan 23 2012: Mam U have always a great answer... thanks for share.... We r just here bcoz share the exprncs... Now I m seeking here Meaning of life Ted is only Platform ....

        Thankx..
        • thumb
          Jan 23 2012: Hello again Harsh,
          I think it is wonderful that in Hindi language your name..."Harsh" means Happy!!!!
          Wherever you are, you are "Happy" all the time...I LOVE it.

          I agree with you that we are here to share experiences, and I'm grateful for your presence here on TED Harsh. Thank you for your kind words:>)
      • Jan 24 2012: I got a fortune cookie a few months ago that said "Don't pursue happiness. Create it." It made me smile and I carry it around in my work badge. Just thought I would share. You are wise enough to write fortunes. :-)
        • thumb
          Jan 24 2012: I agree Rosemary,
          We can "create" our life experiences:>)
    • Jan 23 2012: "Pursuit equals Happiness" Thanks Dean.
    • thumb
      Jan 23 2012: Perfect answer...
    • thumb
      Jan 23 2012: No, pursuit does not equal happiness.

      Happiness equals happiness.

      "Pursuit" often triggers expectation and hope. You may have observed this in yourself: A twinge of "discomfort," in the moment, followed by the anticipation that "something" will make it better. The something could be more money, more recognition, watching TV, eating food, believing in heaven, etc.

      Then we do (or pursue) the "something" and the discomfort is replaced with expectation and hope ... but only for as long as we keep on moving. When we stop, we feel the discomfort (which never really went a way.)

      We like hope and positive expectation more than we like discomfort so we keep on chasing happiness .... because the pursuit is better than the alternative ... but, as long as we are chasing anything, it means, by definition, we haven't "caught" what we are chasing yet.

      If we "caught" happiness we would not have to do or chase anything.
  • Jan 17 2012: I chase happiness because i don't know what happiness is
    • Jan 18 2012: Thanks for your in-genuine comments. Nevermind Zona, most of us here don't know what it exactly is, but your ingenuity makes me feel that you might just find it soon..

      Have you ever seen a pup/dog chasing its tail ?
      • thumb
        Jan 24 2012: QUOTE: "Have you ever seen a pup/dog chasing its tail ?"

        And should that pup catch what it is chasing, what is it that it has caught?
    • thumb
      Jan 19 2012: no , you chase happiness because you know it ,so you do something for it
      • thumb
        Jan 24 2012: Hi Han,

        You are mistaken. We do not chase things we know will make us happy. We chase things we think will make us happy.

        If we knew what would make us happy, we would already have it. It would no longer be necessary to chase it.
    • Jan 19 2012: Come to think of it, if we we sampled amongst ourselves what happiness is, (excluding how it makes us feel).....
      would we arrive at a similar conclusion?
      • thumb
        Jan 19 2012: Hi Mwenjew,
        Good question! My guess is that all of us may never come to the same conclusion, UNLESS we are all willing and able to accept the very same information? We are all different, have different experiences on which to base our perceptions, different programming, etc. I believe that each and every one of us as individuals sifts through information...or not....to come to our own conclusions, ideas, opinions and beliefs...what do you think?

        You asked another interesting question below, and I cannot respond anywhere near the question, so I will do it here.

        Your question..."is it then true that you cannot experience something outside your mentality ??"
        I think/feel that if we do not have the information in our "mentality", then we probably have no way to "experience" it? Our experiences give us information, correct? If we do not have the experience or information in our mind, how could we experiece it?
        • Jan 20 2012: Colleen, thats very true.

          Our individual experiences shape us to who we are and I tend to think that they give us different perspectives to what happiness is.

          Me thinks that people are on a VERTICAL CONTINUM - X axis and due to our individual experiences we are plotted on various points on this vertical scale and we are looking at the SAME THING - happiness, but because of our different perspectives of it, we tend to have different opinions of what we are perceiving. birds eye, normal eye and worm eye ? what do you make of this ??
      • Jan 19 2012: Fantastic thought Mwenjew. If we try this experiment, to just feel a feeling without having the urgency/need to label it. Perhaps, we'll not need to label it. Because, theoretically, when we focus on a feeling it gets dissolved. The corollary is that when we give it a name, it remains attached with us in the form of a name, stored in one or more memory cells, not allowing it to dissolve. So if happiness is dissolved, the calmness / nothingness will set in.
        • thumb
          Jan 19 2012: I agree Manuj,
          When we give it a name, it remains "attached" with us, stored in the memory cells, we think we "know", and we become limited by what we "think" we know. Many people prefer this way of functioning...label, think they "know", and limit him/her "self" to ONLY that information.

          In my perception, calm/nothingness leaves me open to new information, possibilities and discoveries. It's always a choice:>)
      • thumb
        Jan 23 2012: Mwenjew,

        You write..."Our individual experiences shape us to who we are and I tend to think that they give us different perspectives to what happiness is".

        Do you think/feel that the experiences shape us? Do we shape the experiences? Is "perspective" a choice we make to maybe "shape" things differently? Can we change our life experience by percieving or "shaping" our experiences? I believe we can:>)

        Yes, I think/feel that many times, as humans, we can see the same things and percieve what we see very differently. You ask..."what do you make of this ??"

        I believe we are all on different paths in this life journey. Because of our programming (family, cultural, societal, religious, etc.) we have different programming/perceptions in this life experience, which causes us to percieve things differently. We also have our own "character/personality", which adds to the mix of us being different from each other. Life would be kind of dull if we were all the same...would it not?

        My perception, is that our differences are opportunities to learn from each other, so I am happy/content and really joyful with the differences. If one percieves the differences to be problematic, that is how s/he will live the life experience. What do you think/feel about this?
        • Jan 24 2012: Colleen,

          You never cease to amaze

          Do experiences shape us or do we shape experiences ?

          Thats brilliant.
          You say, our differences are opportunities to learn from each other, so I am happy content and really joyful with the differences. If one percieves the differences to be problematic, that is how she will live the life experience. What do you think feel about this?

          I also have to say that I a few years ago came to a point in my life where I became comfortable with other people being different from me, or is it me being different from other people. Anyway I completly embraced other peoples uniqueness, I encourage others to express their idiosyncracies and as you said, turn it to an opportunity to learn from other people.

          I believe that this is the key to truly freeing society by allowing people to live from their hearts.
          ps. cant imagine a world where everyone is the same.
      • thumb
        Jan 24 2012: Dear Mwenjew,
        I believe that we are shaping our experiences AND our experiences are shaping us...IF....we choose to percieve our world in that way:>)

        I agree that this way of percieving and embracing each other and our "self" is very joyful, pleasurable, happy, content and freeing:>) Why would anyone NOT make that choice?

        I maxed out on thumbs for you again:>(
        • Jan 26 2012: Shaping my experiences from now henceforth !
  • Jan 14 2012: I think the word happiness here carries a lot of baggage. I think that having a brain and being conscious naturally causes one to seek reason and purpose of life. I also think that our happiness, much like our vision of god, is the arrival at a point of understanding in our lives where everything makes sense.

    We chase our dreams because we think they will make us happy, but I think we chase our dreams because we think it will complete our lives, making a partial human finally whole.

    Its amazing to see so many opinions on a thinking question like this!
    • thumb
      Jan 14 2012: Dear Hunter Bliss,
      Good point..."the word happiness...carries a lot of baggage". I call the baggage "expectations". We often expect that certain things, or people will make us happy, so we carry around this baggage/expectation. As you insightfully say..."we chase our dreams because we think they will make us happy". I have more fun being happy/content WHILE chasing the dreams. For me, it is the process of exploration, learning and growing that is important in every moment. Reaching the dreams is a bonus:>)

      I agree that our "brain and being conscious naturally causes one to seek reason and purpose of life". It may be as you say..."a point of understanding in our lives where everything makes sense". I believe that part of that process is also our heart/intuition. What do you think about that?
      • Jan 14 2012: "Reaching the dreams is a bonus".. lovely thought.
    • Jan 14 2012: Thanks Hunter. Thats exactly the idea that there is a sense behind all feelings we come across, so why ignore some and chase some, and continue swinging on either side of the line which makes sense.
  • Jan 14 2012: In a state of happiness, there is absence of sadness. It is probably why we chase the feeling of happiness, Absence of either state is, in my view, Nirvana where you are neither happy nor sad. So what happens in such state? Listening to a number of highly esteemed speakers on this subject could probably provide us a clue or a glimpse of what it is. We are perfectly content when we sleep. So do we attain a state where we are neither happy nor sad. Can such a state be obtained during our waking hours? I believe it is possible.
    • thumb
      Jan 14 2012: Sekhar,
      Very good point..."happiness...is absence of sadness"....very interesting perspective:>)

      You ask... in the absence of happiness and sadness...what happens in such a state? I think you have answered your question..."We are perfectly content". I like using the word contentment rather than happiness, because to me, contentment is a state of mind and heart that I can maintain. The word happiness seems to have different meaning for me, and seems to be more fleeting, while "contentment", for me, is everlasting. Yes, I believe it is possible because it is part of the foundation of my life:>)
      • Jan 15 2012: Interesting differentiation between contentment and happiness, Is a person when he is contented? This is something akin to the state where you are neither asleep nor awake or when something is neither cold nor hot and so on.... I come from deep down south of India and some of us tend to turn philosophical at the drop of a hat. I have a very positive attitude towards life and take things as they come on. Does that represent a state of contentment? Probably, yes. I may argue but do not find faults; I disagree but do not force my view points; and I definitely do not advise. If all such qualities make a person immune to "sadness" then by my definition, I am a happy person and a contented person too:)
        • thumb
          Jan 15 2012: Hi Sekhar,
          I am in north east USA, and it is -15 degrees here this morning, so apparently it is not the beautiful warmth of southern India which causes us to be philosophical!!!

          I think/feel that we all decide for ourselves if we are happy or content and what that means to us as individuals?
      • thumb
        Jan 16 2012: Colleen / Sekhar,
        Very interesting conversation here. I was at TED in 2011 and wanted people to talk to me about "Happiness and Contentment". My name badge for the next conference says the same thing. It's specially interesting for me to find this conversation here.

        I agree with you Colleen, that it is contentment that stays, while happiness is momentary. It may last, for example, when one starts to think, "I'm having a really great time, I wish this would last!!". Funny, but that is the moment when it ends!

        The real big thing is to define "Contentment". I believe it is very difficult state to define. In it's true form, it will be a place where there is no possibility of happiness or sadness. There will be a sustained sense of completeness, satisfaction, lack of desire for something in the future with it's associated pain! However, if this so called pure state lasts for some time, say an hour of quite stroll on a tropical beach, is it not as momentary as happiness?

        Does that make contentment any better than happiness?
        • thumb
          Jan 16 2012: Hi Gaurav,
          Lucky you for being at TED in 2011...must have been a great experience!

          If we look at the definitions, happiness is:
          "good fortune. prosperity, a state of wellbeing and contentment, pleasurable satisfaction".......all good:>)

          If we look at "happy", we see some of the same things AND ALSO:
          "characterized by a dazed irresponsible state, impulsivily or obsessively quick to use something, enthusiastic to the point of obsession" etc. These are the kinds of definitions that cause me to percieve happy, or happiness as fleeting, unstable or unpredictable.

          Content: "satisfied, to appease the desires, to limit in requirements, desires, or actions, freedom from care or discomfort". I don't think it is difficult to define...much easier than happy/happiness...don't you think? Like you say...it is a sustained sense of completeness, satisfaction, lack of desire for something. That is very well said. I don't necessarily think contentment is "better than" happiness, but different. I'd prefer to have sustained contentment, rather than fleeting "strolls" through happiness.

          I prefer the word "contentment" because it more effectively describes the underlying feeling I have in myself most of the time and in my experience, it IS sustainable.
    • Jan 14 2012: So do i Sekhar. Thanks.
    • thumb
      Jan 15 2012: The next would be question - Do we want to be that content all the time?
      • thumb
        Jan 15 2012: Good question Amanda...
        "Do we want to be that content all the time?"
        It is a choice we all make as individuals in each and every moment.

        Yes, I prefer to be "content" all the time:>) I accept the challenges as part of the human adventure, and know that I can experience balance by choosing to stay in a mindset which allows me to accept every part of being human:>)

        I've told this story before on TED, and I believe it's worth repeating here:
        After a near fatal head/brain injury and craniotomy, unconscious and hooked up to life support systems in ICU, I'm told I was smiling and giving visitors thumbs up. By that time in my life, I recognized all experiences as an opportunity to learn, grow and evolve, so my intention, even in an unconscious state, was to get on with the lessons with as much acceptance and love as I was capable of at that moment:>)
      • Jan 17 2012: "Do we want to be that content all the time?" Amanda, i guess, the answer lies with in your advance question. The gap between our needs and wants keeps us walking, experiencing and living. During the walk the cause and effect is to be kept in mind, I think that it assures at least a smile, rest is a bonus...like Colleen says.
      • Jan 18 2012: I like to consider the state of contentment as a state of balance or stability in the scheme of things. Metaphorically speaking, in happiness we are in a state of excitement wherein we are absorbing energy and then begin to expend more and more energy in order to return to a state of balance. As one could determine, this is an unstable system because the excitement is dependent upon a finite source of energy. Even if we use ourselves as the source of energy we will eventually deplete our energy and will return to a state of unexcitement. Sadness on the other hand, is what I like to consider as the creation of a deficit of energy. The energy is drawn from the person and there is no source to return it. In order to beat sadness the person may find a source of energy to draw upon it in order to maintain the balance or find a way to stop their own energy from being drawn out of them.

        In terms of: Do you want to be content all the time?
        I think the answer is, "yes but..."

        As fundamentally selfish creatures we view other people through a kind of cost vs. benefit set of spectacles. That is to say that, It does not matter what any individual person does, but rather how what you do makes other people perceive you.

        As things go then, because as people we crave novelty or excitement, we will constantly be looking for a source of energy to fuel that excitement and what better way to do it than to get it from someone else. So as this translates then, people will see you as an unexcited, content person who would not be a good candidate as an energy source and will not be attracted to you. What's worse is that if they perceive you as being sad then they will actually repel away from you naturally.

        The point is that if you want other people to be attracted to you then you must put forth the image of excitement to draw them in. Otherwise you will maintain contentment but at the cost of attracting only those people who have a deficit (sadness) of energy
  • thumb
    Jan 25 2012: Short answer:
    positive emotions feel good
    negative emotions feel bad.

    We are programmed to seek good experience (and pleasure/benefice) and avoid bad experience (and pain/harm).
    So I think the answer lies in evolution.

    Our current culture is a bit exaggerating though
    • thumb
      Jan 25 2012: I agree Christophe, that part of the answer lies in evolution. Do you think that our current culture feels a bit "exaggerating" because our minds may be evolving too? When we think of evolution, perhaps most people think about the physical evolution? Sometimes, we forget that the brain/mind is evolving as well? The brain has actually doubled/trippled in size over many years of evolution. Do you suppose that the exaggerated feeling is caused from the fact that we retain more information and are exploring that information more than we have in the past?
      • Comment deleted

      • Comment deleted

      • Comment deleted

      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: Colleen,

        I think that when I point out exaggerating, I mean (1) that we are currently struggling with a discrepancy between how we evolved to experience good stimuli and how we are creating these super stimuli that have some negative consequences that we are not 'programmed' to face. and that (2) we might be over-stressing the idea that we "need" to be happy.
        I don't think we need to. Feeling neutral or a bit negative or pessimistic is not wrong.

        As for cultural evolution, and the adaptation of our brains to it: We start to figure out how to elevate happiness, and apply that to ourselves and society in general if we wish to... I think that's not bad. As long as it does not become like "soma" or that it does not divert us from seeking truth and accepting reality.
        • thumb
          Jan 25 2012: Christophe,
          I think we are agreeing? I agree that some people are "struggling" with discrepancies...that is pretty apparent here in TED conversations! I believe that feeling whatever we are feeling at any given time is good:>) I also do not feel that we need to label things/feelings as some of these conversations are trying to do.

          You say..."as for cultural evolution, and the adaptation of our brains to it: We start to figure out how to elevate happiness and apply that to ourselves and society in general if we wish to". I agree...that is good:>) Is this similar and/or related to my statement/question..."Do you suppose that the exaggerated feeling is caused from the fact that we retain more information and are exploring that information more than we have in the past?"

          It seems like we are saying the same thing? With cultural evolution, we adapt, start to figure out how to elevate happiness, apply to ourselves and society, this intensified use of our brain/thinking/more information sometimes causes a "struggle"? And/or discrepancy in how we were, and what we are evolving to?

          Christophe,
          I will tell you honestly, that with our interactions, I often feel that we are saying the same things, and your comments seem formed in a way that feels like they are in opposition.
      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: Hahaha
        Yes, Colleen, I think our opinions are very close to each other...
        Maybe our approach is just from another angle, so that the formulation seems more opposing than the actual content.

        "Do you suppose that the exaggerated feeling is caused from the fact that we retain more information and are exploring that information more than we have in the past?"
        Hmm
        I don't know, but I think it is at least a partial cause.
  • thumb
    Jan 25 2012: I think happiness is within. It's not a long term checkpoint or a great feat of effort. Rather, it is the result of our own self-perspective. When we see ourselves in third person, thinking about all that we do for those around us, all that we influence for the better...we can decide to be happy or unhappy with ourselves.

    "Happiness is like a butterfly.
    The more you chase it, the more it eludes you.
    But if you turn your attention to other things,
    It comes and sits softly on your shoulder."
    Henry David Thoreau
  • thumb
    Jan 25 2012: In my most recent research on the topic of happiness, I found out that as we step into this earth as babies, we all come whole, complete and happy. But as we gain consciousness, we enter into a dire pull to conformity which leads to further conformity which disconnects us from our real selves.....our real essence. And the quest to reconnect to our real essence which we most times do not understand leads us to the pursuit of happiness. Happiness has always been the greatest need of man, although sometimes we barely understand what it is we are longing for.
    • thumb
      Jan 25 2012: Fountain,

      You must be speaking metaphorically because, as I am sure you must know, we do not come into the world complete and whole.

      Happy?

      I'd be interested in hearing how you came to this conclusion.

      Our first expressions in the world are (usually) tears of pain and, perhaps, grief.
    • Jan 25 2012: Fauntain & Thomas,

      I tried and could not revive the experiences of the time i came into this world.

      Could you both please share how you figured that we came complete & happy (-Fountain) and how our first expressions in the world are tears of "pain" & "grief" (-Thomas)?

      Thanks
      • Comment deleted

      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: I have been present at the birth of two children. They both cried. I imagine it is painful being squeezed through a narrow canal that requires one's skull to be literally compressed.

        The grief is a guess. Grief from being "expelled" from an environment that was maintained perfectly for one's comfort and development.

        I know of one child whose mother went into labour and gave birth 20 minutes later. The child did not seem to experience much trauma ... she was the mother's third.

        I do have memories of my own from about 18 months but my introduction to the world was somewhat unique. I do not think my experience is common.

        Do you think being born is a pleasant experience?
        • Jan 25 2012: "Do you think being born is a pleasant experience?" ...i don't know. Why a baby cries and laughs is purely our interpretation. That fellow doesn't know the why, he hardly has any memory cells, as a reference, to laugh or cry about. Those expressions cant be termed as emotional expressions. That fellow never chases any emotion. It just is...absolutely in the moment. Crying only out of physical pain or need. I dont know why they laugh.
          Here's a link to both expressions together... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuYhQS4aVdQ

          The chase i am questioning is different. This is running away from some memory cells or chasing some memory cells. Ok...if our emotions are stored in memory cells as references and if each memory cell has a limited life span. Then, by remembering good feelings we multiply pleasant memories and by remembering unpleasant memories we multiply unpleasant memory cells? Does that justify the chase for happiness ?
          I think i am beginning to find the answer.
        • thumb
          Jan 25 2012: Manuj....GREAT clip...makes me smile:>)

          Perhaps this child is demonstrating what you describe in another comment?
          You write..." is a child born with all this ? Or is a child born blank?....and then these emotions get labelled in its mind as per his exposure?"

          Could the child in the video be simply "feeling" and reacting to those feelings without labeling? I believe crying and laughing are very connected:>)
        • thumb
          Jan 29 2012: Manuj Sharma
          About that video: I think we have more in common with the infant than we care to admit as adults. Not that they use memory cells or that they pursue happy memories as we might, but all humans have a capacity to synthesize happiness. I believe memory actually gets in the way of our reaching happiness and well-being. The video shows a learning experience for the capacity to synthesize happiness. It is not just an odd behavior. The infant laughs because he is gaining that capacity to create well-being. (synthesized happiness TED talk http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_gilbert_asks_why_are_we_happy.html )

          Find happiness switches, not memory cells.
          Happy thoughts,
          Mark
      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: Hi Manuj,

        I am not sure I am following you but, when they are born, babies do have LOTS of "memory cells." They are not a "blank slate" as we used to say. Far from it.

        I am told being born hurts. I don't remember my own birth but having witnessed two, I have no difficulty believing that it hurts ... a lot.

        You may have heard the expression "neurons that fire together, wire together." So, yes, "remembering good feelings" will strengthen those connections.

        I think you would enjoy studying neuropsychology. Amongst other things, it has a lot to say about happiness and "memory cells."
        • Jan 25 2012: Thanks. If they have lots of memory cells, is there anything stored in there or they are like blank cells ready for impressions ??
      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: QUOTE: "If they have lots of memory cells, is there anything stored in there or they are like blank cells ready for impressions ?"

        Both.

        But "blank" isn't really the right metaphor.
    • thumb
      Jan 25 2012: Fountain,
      I agree that when we are born into the human experience we are whole, complete, trusting, honest, happy, content, unconditionally loving. I believe that life experiences often cause us to disconnect from our true selves by building masks and defences which are supposed to protect us from feeling vulnerable and hurt. The challenge is that the protective defenses also keep us from experiencing life to the fullest, so we feel we need to search for those "parts" of our "self" that we are not experiencing...."our real essence", as you say. That may be why so many people are searching outside themselves for happiness. It can be frightening to let go of the defenses and feel vulnerable, and that is exactly what is needed to "know thyself" and experience true happiness/contentment.
      • Comment deleted

        • thumb
          Jan 25 2012: Pierre,
          It makes a lot of sense that we all listen to others, read some books, watch so many TED videos because in us is a great bank of knowing which is inate but silent and untapped but is staired at the entrance of knowledge. This knowledge we can gain from our experiences or by learning from that of others.
          Just as Colleen and myslf said before, when we set out in pursuit of happiness, we often think it is in pursuing so many things but one others point us to ourselves through their teachings we are reawakened to awareness and consciouness.
        • Jan 25 2012: I think Pierre is fine the way he is. He may appear to be bit irresponsible here but he makes the environment light with his casual comments.
      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: We're not complete and whole when we are born. Parts of us are quite literally missing. Our brains, not to mention our bodies, are not yet fully developed. We may have the potential to be complete but we are not yet "fully baked."
      • Jan 25 2012: Colleen,
        "I agree that when we are born into the human experience we are whole, complete, trusting, honest, happy, content, unconditionally loving." .... is a child born with all this ? Or is a child born blank?....and then these emotions get labelled in its mind as per his exposure?

        As far as labeling of emotions is concerned....can we say that there may be many more emotions yet to be explored and labeled ?
        • thumb
          Jan 25 2012: A child is content when s/he gets basic needs met, correct? The baby will let us know if s/he is hungry, uncomfortable, hurting etc. They have very basic communication skills and use them appropriately. I think that demonstrates trust, honesty, and contentment. Babies are unconditionally loving and will bond with parents even if that parent is cruel to the child. We hear stories all the time about abuse and cruelty to children, and yet, the children continue to love the parent. That is unconditional love.
      • Jan 25 2012: Pierre, Thanks for your brilliant & in-genuine inputs. True, at times, i feel i am wasting my time here. Perhaps, i am "chasing" answers which exist within or which i will find as i move ahead, without having the need to define/label them.
    • Jan 25 2012: Fountain,

      Me thinks that we are born as a clean slate - nothingness so to speak, and just as a software developer writes codes for a program, the environment were born into coupled with the experiences we encounter, kind of moulds us along the way.

      How do you take this ?
      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: Hi Mwenjew,

        We're not born as clean slates. We're born already knowing a lot. (There is a TED talk on this ... does anyone remember what it is called?)
      • thumb
        Feb 6 2012: Good link Koen.......thanks!

        Much of this information was available to us 40+ years ago when I was having children. I guess that's when I learned more about babies/children:>) It was well known, scientifically researched and proven way back then, that babies start to be programmed even BEFORE they are born. All of the child's systems are directly connected to the mother, as they are developing. How can we ever think that they would NOT be influenced? When are we, as humans with intelligence, going to start paying attention to so much information that is available to us???
  • Jan 24 2012: Happiness is ever changing, it is not a constant. It is also not something that is (or should) be experienced all the time. Happiness is a perception, if your life was perfect then you would feel no happiness because it would be normal, you'd have nothing to compare that feeling too. In my opinion, the greater depths of despair we reach in our lives the greater compacity we have to love and experience happiness. Another point is that what makes one person happy, does not make another happy, before we can chase happiness, we must first find what makes us happy, and only then can we begin to chase it.
    • Jan 26 2012: Erin,
      You say, Happiness is ever changing ! - sooo true
      Things that made me happy last year dont right now, and the things making me happy right now may not next year. Its been said here, happiness is a way of travel, not a destination and differs from one person to the next !

      Why would you say that happiness should not be experienced all the time ??
      • Feb 9 2012: If we experienced it all the time, we would not apreicate it as much. As the saying goes about having too much of a good thing is bad. Im not saying we can not be content and have to be depressed or sad when we are not happy, but we should not strive to be happy all the time, for that is impossible and will lead to dispair.
    • thumb
      Feb 9 2012: Erin,

      You are mistaking relief for happiness.

      Relief from, say, grief may "feel like" happiness by comparison. In other words, if we remove the grief (or sadness) we will feel happy by comparison.

      That is like saying if we remove the darkness, there will be light.

      You cannot create light by removing darkness.

      You remove darkness by shining a light.

      Light is something. Darkness is its absence.

      Happiness is also something. It is not the absence of another thing.

      Happiness is not ever changing. What is ever changing is that which temporarily distracts us from a lack of happiness. Entertainment, enjoyment, pleasure, distractions like TV, movies, and such, often provide pleasant experiences and we interpret this as happiness. We soon get tired of our distractions and notice our "base state" (whatever it is) and it creates the illusion that "happiness is ever changing."

      QUOTE: "...we must first find what makes us happy, and only then can we begin to chase it."

      This is a contradiction in terms. If we find what "makes us happy" we will have already "caught it" and so there will be no need to chase it.

      Of course, the syntax alone will trap us in an endless and futile search: nothing can "make us happy."

      Happiness is a choice.

      Happiness exists (like light exists) and we choose to experience it or we choose not to.* (We may need to learn how.)

      ---

      * There are exceptions: for example, people with severe mental illness cannot "choose to be happy" and there are certain extreme circumstances where choosing might be as close to impossible as to make it so.
  • Jan 23 2012: The question contains the answer; whatever we chase, we define as happiness, no matter how irrational or dysfunctional the pursuit. We avoid stasis and call the avoidance the pursuit of happiness. Giving in to stasis can be defined as depression.
    • thumb
      Jan 23 2012: I agree David, that our questions often contain our answers:>)

      You say that we continue to chase happiness, no matter how irrational or dysfunctional the pursuit to avoid facing other emotions? I agree that this concept may be part of the scenario.

      I've found that facing all the emotions in myself is the way I recognize happiness/contentment in my "self". Knowing myself because of the exploration in my "self" gives me information which helps me understand myself and others. The exploration and knowledge contributes to my self knowledge, self worth, self respect, which all contributes to my happiness/contentment. When I have that in myself, I can share it with others, which again, contributes to happiness/contentment in myself and others. It feels like a wonderful cycle:>)

      So, with the constant pursuit of happiness outside our "self" we may be actually preventing ourselves from experienciing real happiness/contentment? Sounds like a different cycle that prevents happiness/contentment?
      • thumb
        Jan 23 2012: agree less striving for some ideal state and more appreciating now. and perhaps some acceptance of aging adversity and the final end without dwelling on it too much.
        • thumb
          Jan 23 2012: I agree G M...
          Less striving, more appreciating, gratitude and being in the moment NOW contributes to more peace, happiness and contentment:>) Sometimes, we (humans) spend a lot of time and energy chasing something that is in us right here and now:>)
      • Jan 23 2012: Colleen, a fresh week allowed me a fresh quota of thumbs up for you...in this moment i am happy for this :-)
        Cheers!
    • Jan 23 2012: Thanks David. Short & superb !
  • thumb
    Jan 22 2012: Hi Manuj Sharma
    As an American, I've spent the better part of my life fully believing that it is my inherent right to both pursue happiness (see Thomas' nasty 1776 letter to George III) and derive happiness from my choices in life. Even my brand of soda becomes my propaganda enhancer. All humans want to be good, just, and honest. The cultural message I got was that if I was honest about what I wanted in life, then I had to admit I wanted to be happy. Yet I remember that even as a young child watching Superman shows on TV, it bothered me that this super hero from another planet felt obligated to "fight a never-ending battle for truth, justice, and the AMERICAN way." Somehow my "pursuit-of-happiness" cultural tradition had an internal contradiction! Your other questions may be legitimate starters for some interesting research projects. The last question, whether it is a human need, I think is false. I think we often confuse the comfort of insured survival and safety with our projected image of future happiness.
    Aren't you glad you asked this question? [:-)
    Mark
    • Jan 23 2012: Yes Mark, I am glad to know that i am OK. Or at least, i know now, that i am not the only idiot to have such a question, i have found some like minded people here ;-)
      Thanks buddy. Will see the letter.

      hey Mark, could you please forward me the link to that letter? Thanks
      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: Sure Manuj Sharma
        I was a bit sly with my reference. I was trying to be funny. Thomas is Thomas Jefferson, the major author of America's declaration of independence, and George is King George III, then being the oppressive monarch we were breaking away from. Actually there was a pleading "we promise to be good" letter of 1775 (see http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/olive-branch-petition.html ), and then there was the nasty nagging complaint letter of 1776, the declaration of independence (see http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/ ).

        Enjoy the wonderful US History lesson. Here's my mental excerpt from the document from memory: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.

        Ta ta
        Mark
  • Jan 21 2012: Why do you assume that we experience each emotion for a reason?

    Maybe we seek happiness the most because it is hard to achieve. I do think people now seek after happiness more than generations before. This is not because people before didn't want to be happy or thought it was good for them to try the whole range of emotions. It was because many people perceived their place in society (their lot in life) as being one where they would suffer more than others and that there was little they could do to change that. As people's thinking changed so that more and more people were seen as being equal to each other, this changed. I think more people now see the possibility of being happy and feel like they have as much right an anyone else to be happy and to try and achieve happiness in their lives.
    • thumb
      Jan 21 2012: Excellent point Deborah!
      I agree that people may be seeking happiness more now than in previous generations. There used to be a number of philosophical and/or religious teachings that tried to convince people that they were not "supposed" to be happy....suffering was thought to be more honorable for some reason.

      I think/feel, that as we evolve, more people are questioning those beliefs which were meant to keep the masses of people "controlled" in my perception. I believe we are evolving to the point where we KNOW as thinking, feeling humans, that we DO have choices, and thankfully, many people are questioning the old teachings.
    • W T 100+

      • +1
      Jan 21 2012: Hi Deborah...your comment reminded me of a previous convesation on here about why we acquiesce to suffering. The Ted member from Nigeria was dumbfounded as to why his fellow countrymen did not see suffering as optional. He wanted them to see they had choices in life....seems that in some parts of the world happiness still eludes people, and sadly they don't even know they can chase it......

      Just my observation....I really enjoyed reading your entry, it enlightened me.

      Happiness is always really there, no over there.....people chase it because they don't know where it is at. Happily, they might be helped by this wonderful conversation started by Manuj. Thanks Manuj!
  • thumb
    Jan 19 2012: I do think that happiness has something to do with a physical state of well being. Knowing that chemicals trigger interesting and desired states, of mind or body, one can say that it's all down to the chemicals your body/brain produces for harmony and perfect function.
  • Jan 17 2012: Choose happiness, dont chase it.
  • Comment deleted

    • Jan 17 2012: Thanks Adriaan.

      True... sometimes hidden within the help is selfishness...like said by Sir Guy Ritchie in his latest film...hidden within conscious is evil.
      • Comment deleted

        • Jan 17 2012: haha true
        • Jan 18 2012: Continuation...

          Lastly we must consider that the ego(sub-conscious) is a structure concerned with coping with reality in that it is essentially a survival mechanism. In essence, it is a structure that compels us to act on our own interests in order to survive. This makes sense because (Darwinian theory) those characteristics, pending outside interactions, that enable us to survive by virtue of being more conducive to survival (survival of the fittest) will become more prevalent in a species population through time until something more suitable to the survival of the species takes its place. So again this means that the ego is a structure that compels the individual to act selfishly in order to survive. Therefore this ego(sub-conscious) structure is completely selfish and because it has been paired up with the sub-conscious experience the following perspective can be established.

          Realizing that the sub-conscious experience contains those behavior that are below our awareness and that the purpose of the ego is to act selfishly in order to survive, it follows that humans are fundamentally selfish creatures whose true motives for any automatic behavior are to help the cope with reality. Therefore I conclude that being selfish is not act of evil in its own right but rather a function that allows us to continue living and is outside of morality.

          Yet we have concluded from our morality that selfish behaviors are bad. Well if you re-read the conscious experience I did say that it has the capacity to act selflessly and through that use of directable, focused attention and will power to choose to act in the interests of the individual. This means that we can actually choose to act selfishly.

          It is those situations when we consciously choose to act selfishly that we must individually examine for morality against our own personal code.

          (one more continuation)
      • Jan 18 2012: ...like said by Sir Guy Ritchie in his latest film...hidden within conscious is evil.

        I find this statement and some of the ones preceding it to be somewhat loaded. Loaded with the belief or opinion that selfishness is evil or wrong. While I neither disagree or agree with this belief, I would like to provide a different perspective that we may find to be of use here.

        In setting a foundation from which to extrapolate this different perspective we must first consider the mind as a set of three experiences which have been established by Sigmund Freud. These experiences are named the Superego, the Ego, and the ID of which for this purpose we will only need the first two.

        Next we need to equate the Superego with the conscious experience and the sub-conscious experience with the ego. The conscious experience containing those behaviors that we are aware of and therefore can manipulate through directed focused attention and will power and the sub-conscious experience being those behaviors that are below awareness and therefore are of a highly automatic nature.

        From here we note that the superego(conscious experience) has a purpose of keeping the ego in check(Freudian theory) as (from an evolutionary perspective) the newest structure of the mind. This then is essentially where we hold our sense of morality. What we know of morality is that it is something acquired through the environment of the subject. i.e. We learn it from the people around us. Therefore it is safe to say that the conscious experience has the capacity to act selflessly or for the interests of others but at the same time because the conscious experience contains this directable, focused attention, it is possible to choose to act selfishly or for your own interests.

        (to be continued)
      • Jan 18 2012: (the last continuation) this is part 3

        To me, or in my opinion, I do not like consciously directed selfishness that causes harm to another person under the condition that the victim (victim being the person who receives the effect of the selfish behavior) must perceive the selfish act as harmful upon recognition and must not receive a delayed benefit. In other words if someone is harmed as a result of a selfish behavior and does receive an actual gain or benefit (gain and benefit being determined by the individual being harmed) that outweighs the harm caused in any type of delayed manner, then the consciously directed selfish-behavior is Evil.
  • thumb
    Jan 16 2012: I think that many people have been conditioned to believe that 'happiness' is a natural healthy state. If you are not happy 100% of the time, then something is wrong. Its even in the American constitution - life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

    Studies of drug users show that long term drug use can short-out a recovering addict's ability to feel happiness. This is because the pleasure receptors of the brain have been abused so much that they are unable to register the brain chemistry of pleasure and happiness. Depending on the drug use this may be permanent damage or temporary.

    Being happy all the time is impossible - our brains are not wired for such emotion. While we can't feel happy all the time, we can choose to feel satisfied and/or content.

    Research shows that at the root of satisfaction and happiness is gratitude and connecting with other people. Unfortunately as society advances, gratitude and connection with others are practiced less and less.

    We have smart phones that put the internet at our finger tips. Go to any public place and there is someone cursing the slow speed of their internet access. We can cross the world in less than 24 hours - a journey that would have taken years and considerable risk to life just 100 years ago - and go to any airport and you'll see someone having a hissy fit over a late flight.

    Add in the fact that people can't distinguish between a Facebook friend and a real friend and the people who think that text messaging is an acceptable way to end a friendship. You have a society where ingratitude rains and people have difficulty genuinely connecting with others.

    And we wonder why people are so unhappy.
    • thumb
      Jan 16 2012: Hi Robin,
      No, it's no wonder people are unhappy and searching for happiness. Add to your good list of reasons, the fact that there are a lot of wounded people in our world, who are searching for a way to feel less wounded.

      I agree...we can choose to feel satisfied and/or content, and part of experiencing those feelings is gratitude and connections with people. For me, gratitude is a big step when moving from one life experience to the next. If I don't recognize the challenges I have faced with gratitude for the lessons learned, it is more difficult to move on in the life journey. I think it's important to feel all the emotions, embrace all emotions, and that is how we get to "know" our "self".
  • Jan 16 2012: I also found an easy explanation by Osho, where he makes us see our life as an ocean. He says that till we live a mindless shallow life, we live like on the surface of an ocean. Some waves of emotions take us high some throw us back to lows, we keep getting disturbed by the waves of emotions, we keep struggling with them. But, with a bit of effort, when we go deep inside the ocean, there is an absolute calm; there are no highs or lows. However, most of us cannot dive directly deep into an ocean, one has to face those waves of emotions on the beach of real life, as they come and go and keep striving to go deeper. I personally feel that there is no fun in holding the hand of a god or a guru or a psychologist to dive directly deep into an ocean. “Absolute truth” to self, without any layering, in itself is a god, a guru, a psychologist or a master. Like, we Hindus say when somebody dies “Raam naam satya hai”, “Truth is the God”. It is recited like a mantra while carrying the dead body for cremation, I don’t know if we say it to ourselves or to the dead body :-). The body, which has had its chance, it will be bit late to realize the fact.
    To experience this knowledge which I got from the article & Osho, when I meditated I found that initially I experience a lot of mixed emotions. After sometime, for some moments, the mind disappears, there is no thought, no emotions. This led me to understand that all emotions are originated by some memories from the past or some thoughts of future. While I’m present in the moment, there is no emotion, just an absolute calm. Perhaps most of us are looking for that in our daily life and calling it different names, some call it bliss, some peace, some happiness. And some or perhaps most of us find it too monotonous to live with.
    I’m no god to fully understand such things to conclude them. The forum remains open for your further reflections, experiences and deeper understanding of this phenomenon, for everybody’s good.
    • thumb
      Jan 16 2012: Hello Manuj,
      It looks like you have been exploring:>)

      I love the metaphor of life...like living on the surface of the ocean...waves of emotions...high and low...sometimes disturbing...we sometimes struggle, and with a bit of effort, we can go deep inside the ocean where there is absolute calm.

      This reminds me of a true experience I had years ago while living aboard a dive boat for a week. Unfortunately, we had serious storms most of the time, and everyone was sea sick, including the crew. We discovered that the ONLY way we could releave the sea sickness was to dive. It was difficult to put the equipment on when feeling sick, but it was necessary. Once in the depths of the ocean, it was indeed peacefull and calm, and we did not feel motion sickness. Sometimes, to discover and connect with the peace and calm in life, it is necessary to dive into a place that on the surface may not look hospitable, but that is indeed where we find peace and calm.

      It also reminds me of a quote I discovered years ago:
      "I tell you how to stave off drowning. Dive down, Embrace it. The sea will spit you back, astonished."
      (David Brendan Hopes - A Sense of the Morning - Nature Through New Eyes)
      • Jan 17 2012: ohh yes Colleen ! I am trying to explore, so far so good, but Its bloody effortful.

        Loved it..."I tell you how to stave off drowning. Dive down, Embrace it. The sea will spit you back, astonished."

        Thanks.
        • thumb
          Jan 17 2012: Effortful? Really?
          Did anyone ever tell you the life journey would be easy??? LOL:>)
          Isn't it WONDERFUL, JOYFUL AND PLEASING though when you make a new discovery?
          That really excites me and motivates me to pursue more....more.....more...........
          I like working/playing/exploring the life experience with the curiosity and unconditional love of a child....have fun with it. This perception causes me to feel happy/content:>)
  • thumb
    Jan 15 2012: We are expressing emotions as a result of the thoughts we entertain. When emotions are not being expressed, perhaps they are being repressed from ourselves, our conscious minds or suppressed from others?

    Happiness is a spiritual quality, along with joy and peace and understanding etc., So called chasing of happiness does not produce happiness, in fact it keeps one unhappy, strange isn't it?

    The principle "human need" as you describe it is I think the need to live in reality, Spiritual Reality, which requires a transcendence of the human condition. When this occurs, Happiness can become the context in which we start living and forming happier perspectives on daily life.

    Don't waste time chasing Happiness, it is within, if we desire to wake up.
    • thumb
      Jan 15 2012: Hi Patrick,
      You say..."we are expressing emotions as a result of the thoughts we entertain".
      Change our thoughts, we change our feelings, and change our lives? I agree with that:>)

      Chasing happiness does seem a little "strange" at times, as you say. Perhaps it's not so "strange" to understand when we consider that we are often looking for happiness in all the wrong places? We (humans) are often searching for happiness outside our "self", when, in fact, it is something we have "in" our "self", which you insightfully mention:>)

      I don't agree that experiencing happiness "requires a transcendence of the human condition". Living the human adventure, being totally present in the moment with the human experience is how I enjoy happiness/contentment. If one is striving to transcend the human condition, is that not looking "outside" our human "self" for something? How can we "form "happier perspectives on daily life", if we are trying to transcend the human condition?
  • Jan 14 2012: It iz easier to deny emotions (which iz truth) than to accept and deal with them. As in the truth hurts.One can ignore ANY emotion for a period of time. I feel eventually it will come to the surface almost forcing you to deal with it. Some people never know happiness-ever.can you imagine that ? I feel once you experience true happiness and then you lose it, one yearns for it to come back.Happiness iz a state of mind. People have always been chasing happiness. From the beginning of time. It's the one thing a Mother asks her child once they're grown. "Are you happy honey?"We want it for ourselves, We want it for our loved ones. I feel it iz a human need.We were designed to be happy. It's an inside job.
    • Jan 14 2012: Thanks
    • thumb
      Jan 14 2012: Dear Dru,
      I love your comment..."it's an inside job"...wonderful and true:>)
  • Jan 13 2012: It feels good. It feels natural. It feels as though that is supposed to be the normal condition of life for everyone.
    I think it is achievable. Using truth in communication - full-time - is one way to achieve it, I think. Using positive words and committing positive acts is another way. We have the power to cause happiness in others and in ourselves. We can use those powers and freedoms we currently possess to generate happiness for ourselves and others.
    • Jan 14 2012: Thanks.
      "Using truth in communication - full-time - is one way to achieve it"....well Rhona, this thought is debatable. The full time truth to self is different from full time truth to other?
      • Jan 16 2012: Manuj, People who treasure truth, know it when they are expressing themselves. If we attune ourselves to others, we may often discern truth in the expressions of others. Listening, for example is a useful thing to do, when one wants to hear, to know truth about something. Manuj, you can do some personal experiments with truth, e.g., speak truth only for 24 hours and observe what is going on. Thank you for expressing your true thoughts here. Best wishes.
        • Jan 17 2012: Rhona, the last time i experimented with truth i created a storm. Nevertheless, i felt light and aligned with life.
          Thanks.
      • thumb
        Jan 17 2012: Hi Manuj,
        You ask... "the full time truth to self is different from full time truth to other?"

        Can we honestly be truthful with others if we are not truthful with ourselves? Can we honestly be happy or content with ourselves if we do not share that with others? Can we give something to others that we cannot, or will not give to our "self"? Do you think/feel that perhaps those who are happy/content/truthful in themselves are the ones who can honestly give that to others? Perhaps everything has to start within our "self"? Is giving or "being" something with our "self" so much different than giving something or "being" a certain way with others?
        • Jan 17 2012: What i meant with it is that one must be absolutely true to himself, however, one should rather choose silence over expressing a hurtful truth to others.
        • Jan 19 2012: Colleen, i love this bit of '"everything has to start within our "self"
          I also think that you have to be before you are.
          And you can only be to the extent that you are.
          you therefore cannot give sth you dont have,

          is it then true that you cannot experience something outside your mentality ??
        • thumb
          Jan 20 2012: There is no such thing as being truthful to oneself. First, the aforementioned statement implies that there is an essential/constant self. The self, generally speaking, is merely a social construction we impose upon our perception of the world. In short, the self is a convenient fiction we frequently refer to in social situations (i.e. the workplace, social gatherings, etc.), and at times, this narrative undergoes various paradigm shifts: childhood, adolescence, and so on. At this juncture, it would be helpful to paraphrase something Foucalt poignantly touched upon: I am not who I was four years ago. In sum, one can never be "true to oneself, because there is no self to begin with. And Happiness is a lie, etc.
        • Jan 21 2012: Eduardo: Of course there is a self. If the self is a construct (I would argue not so much a social construct as a mental and emotional one), then that is what 'the self' means and is. if the narrative that informs it changes, and thereby alters the construct, that just means the 'self' is not static. It doesn't mean the self doesn't exist. Just because you are not who you were four years ago doesn't mean there wasn't a self then and isn't a self now.
        • thumb
          Jan 21 2012: Deborah: If the self is fabricated, then does that not presuppose that when we are referring to the self, we are referring to some misconceived understanding of what we call our conscious experience. In a word, does an amnesiac have a sense of self? Human beings have to trick themselves into thinking that there is in fact a constant, unchanging core--who they are, so to speak--that perceives/observes the external world, whilst simultaneously synthesizing disparate bits of sense datum (i.e. watching a movie requires auditory/visual synthesis, etc.). I'm merely arguing that the impetus for seeking a core "self" actually lies in our instinctual fear of death. Humans have a primordial urge to anchor their existence to some stationary, and reliable sense of "self". The self, in a metaphorical sense, is merely an onion composed of various layers of social conditioning. Sometimes, it's a hard pill to swallow, but it this is also something we can't ignore: the "self" you construct for yourself is merely a combination of mannerisms, and abstractions you have retained in your long term memory. Who you are is wholly contingent upon what you have experienced. However, what you have experienced is "retained" in a curious fashion. In the field of neuroscience, the experts generally agree that we are only able to process 15% of the information from sense stimuli, all other sense data is lost in static. Roughly speaking, if we do have a self, it is a self that is based of off a fractured and opened ended narrative--a narrative that is loosely correlated to the actually of reality. "Most of our lives are lived out in our imaginations". The internalized life is something worth looking into, it is a world rife with dead ends and absurdity.
        • Jan 21 2012: Eduardo: You completely miss my point. Whatever the self is, that's what it is. That's how it exists. Of course who we are is contingent upon what we have experienced. So what?Why do you assume it is some kind of misconceived notion just because it is a construct? why is it a dead end?Why absurd? If people are mistaken as to its constancy, they are mistaken, but something called the self is perceived. And, to go back to the original statement you were arguing against, it is possible for us to be truthful, or not truthful, to that self. Maybe even because our self is the sum of our sense and experience and memory and all of those things can be manipulated by our own brains, it is possible for us to deceive ourselves, too. When we don't, we are being truthful. It doesn't matter what the self actually is. It just matters, at least while we are alive, that it exists, because it's the only way we have to perceive what we are at any one time.

          I don't have to trick myself into believing I have a constant, unchanging core. I'm not even the same person I was a week ago. I'm not scared of death (dying, yes, but not of not existing). Not since I left religion and became an atheist, anyway. :)
        • thumb
          Jan 22 2012: Deborah: Certain religious belief systems are automatically exclusionary (some faiths have a built in "us versus them" mentality). I've noticed numerous instances--throughout history--in which religious ideologies served as main causes for the conflict; the crusades come to mind, the war on terror, etc. Perceived difference has always been a fundamental facet of a "dualistic" form of existence. A daulistic approach of existence argues that the internal self/external world dichotomy is a necessary truth. Upanishadic philosophies (that, in some sense, find commonality with modern quantum physics) posit that existence itself is "non-dualistic"; in other words, there is no "me" within the context of "the universe", there is just "being" in itself--it's just something to think about.
      • thumb
        Jan 17 2012: AWWWWW .....Got it!

        I thought you were suggesting that truth with our "self" is different than truth with others.

        What you meant is that we can choose to be silent with our truth rather than sharing information that might hurt others. So, the truth, as we percieve it, may not really be "different", but we can choose not to express it?.....I agree:>)
        • Jan 17 2012: Yes :-)... and others can read the silence (sooner or later) without having their ego hurt by the truth.
        • Jan 20 2012: When you are coming from a place of peace and non-judgement you are able to be honest with others without harming their egos but rather as a source of empowerment and change. If your true goal is increased peace and harmony than honesty is the most powerful transformative tool in the human conscious experience.
        • thumb
          Jan 20 2012: 'Honesty' is an inflated, and misused concept that tacitly suggests something utterly ridiculous: to be 'honest' is to openly convey the 'facts' without dissemblance. How can someone possibly hope to live up to such an arbitrary standard. Honesty presupposes that we understand some 'deeper' truth of the external/internal world. I sad truth is that we have no such understanding. We can only give our best guesses. Instead of saying that we should be 'honest' with others, one should really be saying 'lets be reasonably deceptive with one another'. Conrad had much to say on this issue in his novella Heart of Darkness. Monolithic civilizations that have utilized monetary systems have always had a curious way of operating; ultimately, society expects its citizens to willfully deceive themselves into thinking fiat currency (emphasis on the fiat) has value. This self deception--concomitant with the mutual deception betwixt buyer and seller--is quintessential to the steady operation of the machinery of the modern (and steadily declining) technocratic empire.
        • Jan 21 2012: 'When you are coming from a place of peace and non-judgement you are able to be honest with others without harming their egos but rather as a source of empowerment and change.'

          It is not possible to try to change someone without first judging them, or why would you see the need? It is also rarely possible to accept a need for change in yourself and effect that change without a hit to the ego. But so what? Do our egos need that level of protection? I'm not disagreeing that we should be kind, but in my experience people who attempt to change others without hurting anyone's feelings usually come across as incredibly patronising in the process.
        • Jan 21 2012: Eduardo: you make a lot of assumptions in your assertions. :/

          'to be 'honest' is to openly convey the 'facts' without dissemblance.' How does conveying the facts (as we perceive them) with tact or consideration or even analysis make that communication dishonest?

          'How can someone possibly hope to live up to such an arbitrary standard.' It is context that renders such a standard arbitrary or not. A request for facts alone from a witness in a law court, for example, is not at all setting a standard of honesty arbitrarily. Also, this seems to argue that we should not expect anyone to be honest, because it is not possible for them to be honest. But that is only true based on your given definition of honesty, which is not at all the way most people define it.

          'Honesty presupposes that we understand some 'deeper' truth of the external/internal world.' No, it doesn't. Honesty is not at all defined by how clearly we understand the truth fo the matter. Honesty is reporting the matter as we understand it. Complete honesty means that there is no difference between what we perceive to be the truth of a matter and what we communicate about that matter. We add nothing. We leave nothing out. If we are mistaken, then we are, but if we delivered what we perceived to the truth, then we were not dishonest.
        • thumb
          Jan 21 2012: " Honesty is reporting the matter as we understand it. Complete honesty means that there is no difference between what we perceive to be the truth of a matter and what we communicate about that matter."
          Deborah: I find the aforementioned statement quite problematic; it presupposes that there is flawless translation in terms of externalizing internal thought processes. This, unfortunately, is not the case--I am referring to linguistic barriers. The constraints of language force us to be "reasonably deceptive". You can never hope to be "honest" with anyone, because language forces us to push our thoughts through the liminal threshold of vocal/written expression. Once an internal abstraction is molded into the metaphorical box of a word, something magical happens: the meaning of your original sentiment takes on a whole new life. In essence, the word's prefigured meaning covertly influences the meaning of your original 'intention'. Therefore, systems of language have their own particular influence on expression--they end up readjusting and re-configuring the original "message".
        • Jan 21 2012: Eduardo: It doesn't presuppose anything. And communicating poorly is not deception. Failure to entirely translate thought into words is not deception. Deception must involve intent to deceive, or there is no deceit. If you had said that we cannot hope to perfectly convey our thoughts, well fair enough. But to say we can't hope to be honest is just ridiculous. Honestly does not depend on perfect expression or perfect understanding - only an absence of deliberate deception or omission.

          Does it ever occur to you that fiercely pulling apart words this way is counter-productive to real discussion? Serously, in a discussion on the statement, 'we can only be true to others if we are true to ourselves', a deconstruction of the concept of self is about the least useful distraction I can think of. In order to have the discussion at all, one has to assume (even if only hypothetically) the existence of a self. And that seems a reasonable place to discuss from, seeing as every functioning human being in the world (including you who believes it is delusion) has a sense of self.
        • thumb
          Jan 21 2012: We are still always engaged in various degrees of self deception. The mind has an instinctual drive to associate sense stimuli with elaborate false narratives; human beings associate emotional/anthropomorphic characteristics to the objects-or events-we perceive (i.e. the color red and its correlation with 'passion'). The problem arises when perceived difference facilitates conflict. When humans begin to realize that constructs like 'identity' and self are merely tools used by the power dynamic in order to keep population centers fragmented, we can start looking forward to positive social change.
      • thumb
        Jan 17 2012: Manuj,
        I believe we came full circle with part of this topic. I percieve the practice of "reading the silence", as an underlying perception or intuition. When/if we are in tune with all emotions, we have opened the heart and mind to accept more information, which is carried by the energy that flows through our body/mind. So, rather than chasing happiness, we can recognize the energy of happiness/contentment flowing through us?
        • Jan 17 2012: Yes, i thought that everybody here is slowly zeroing in from extreme emotions to fine emotions like contentment/bliss/peace till i saw Amanda taking it to another level by asking 'Do we want to be that content all the time?"....haha, now, that makes me feel like we came full circle with part of this topic.

          Practice of reading silence would be very interesting. I feel that more communication happens by the silence between words and letters than by the words themselves. However, one needs to be very very sensitive to read silence even without words. You, ladies, are good at that.

          "When/if we are in tune with all emotions, we have opened the heart and mind to accept more information, which is carried by the energy that flows through our body/mind." ..wow, Thanks.
      • thumb
        Jan 17 2012: I agree Manuj, that communication often happens in silence...between words. We need to be able to feel, or intuit on that level, for that to happen...as you say...very sensitive:>)

        So, back to happiness/contentment. Most people on this thread agree that it is something within ourselves, rather than external....correct?

        What do you think and feel about this statement?
        We can obtain, sustain and experience happiness/contentment to the extent that we are willing and able to explore within our "self"?
        • Jan 18 2012: Well put Coleen !

          And may I add,.... whatever other emotion and or feeling we would like to experience in our lives both positive or otherwise !

          Remember, its the intention & attention that governs the intensity !

          This explains why say, two people may go through the same experience whether good or otherwise but experience it on differing levels of intensity.
        • Jan 18 2012: Colleen: "Most people on this thread agree that it is something within ourselves, rather than external....correct? " yes, thats why we dont need to chase it, just stop and see.

          "We can obtain, sustain and experience happiness/contentment to the extent that we are willing and able to explore within our "self""...well, like i said, there is nothing to be obtained and sustained, we just need to stop and see that what is, is. It can only be experienced with in. The challenge in sustaining it is not in making an effort but in stopping ourselves from making efforts to obtain it....even from with in.
      • Jan 17 2012: Manuj, "......you created a storm...." We have a choice about what to focus on. Sometimes we focus on positive truths and sometimes we focus on negative truths. It's a free country. Take your choice. You do have the option of focusing on positive truths and expressing them. You might want to try that experiment. Truth is the main thing. As you said, you got some substantial benefit from your truth expressions. Feeling "light and aligned with life" seems pretty valuable to me. Happy today.
        • Jan 18 2012: Thanks Rhona,

          Ultimately, the choice is yours.Focus on the good and experience it with the intensity of the focus.You may however experience things that you never focused on (read no so good),but these will not afflict you intensly cause your focus was elsewhere.

          Choose.
        • Jan 18 2012: Rhona:
          From my experience...a truth is a truth...there are no layers of good/bad or positive/negative. If we begin to layer it, then our power of inner vocabulary takes over and begins to justify every layer of it to ourselves. However, the expression of it to others can be termed as harmful or beneficial in that time and space... thats the only choice we have...to express it or to choose silence.
        • thumb
          Jan 18 2012: Rhona, Mwenjew and Manuj,
          I like this idea that is developing:>) I agree Mwenjew...what we focus on expands:>)

          What happens when/if we do not need to label experiences/situations as good/bad/positive/negative? What happens when/if we view a situation from a neutral place in our "self" without labeling it? What if we suspend our "truth", as we may label it, and percieve something from a different level of understanding?

          I think of my near fatal head/brain injury and cancer for example. I wouldn't exactly say these were "good" experiences, nor would I say they were "bad" or "negative" experiences. They were simply experiences...life challenges that needed to be met in some way.

          As Mwenjew insightfully says..."Ultimately, the choice is yours".:>)
        • Jan 19 2012: Colleen, me thinks that by default, human beings simply expresses how a certain experience makes them feel and thus the labelling, which in my view falls as good or not good but we give them all sorts of names in a bid to specify the particular feeling.

          Am impressed by how you handled the injury and cancer experience, product of elevated thought, where you are the captain of your ship and determine how a certain experience is going to affect you instead of the reverso, being at the mercy of whatever happens to you
        • thumb
          Jan 19 2012: Mwenjew,
          Me thinks that humans often want to "KNOW" and be able to define the answer NOW, and that is why we sometimes get attached to labeling...as a way to "prove" that we KNOW the answer? And who are we "proving" that to...our "self"? I believe that when we are content/happy in our "self" there is nothing to prove, nothing to label, and we can detach from any attachment to believing we "know" anything:>)

          Thanks for your kind words regarding the injury and cancer exploration. The head/brain injury was an excellent lesson in detachment from labeling, detachment from expectations, detachment from "knowing" anything at all!!! Interesting, because at the same time, I was divorcing after 24 years of marriage and my mother and father died around the same time...talk about lessons in detachment!!! LOL:>)

          After the head injury and craniotomy though...after living...when they said I would not live ...after being unconscious and hooked up to life support systems for a couple weeks... they told me I would never function "normally" again. One question to myself at the time was..."WHAT THE HECK DOES THAT MEAN"???

          At first I could not even walk or talk, so I detached from what I was PRIOR to the injury. I detached from any espectations of what I might be, or how I might function in the future. I detached from anything I had previously known about my "self", and dedicated myself to a new life exploration. I was content/happy in believeing that I would function to the best of my ability at any given time regardless of the circumstances.

          This, I believe to be the underlying sense of happiness/contentment that is within all of us. We do not have to chase it. We have that energy flowing through all of us:>)
        • Jan 20 2012: Colleen, WOW !

          I stand here .had to give u a standing ovation, least i could do. speechless, with no right words to express what I feel for you right now as they would seem sooo feeble next to your deeds.

          You say, I believe that when we are content happy in our self there is nothing to prove, nothing to label, and we can detach from any attachment to believing we know anything.

          This is absolutely amazing. I like this new concept of detachment, as it provides you with the CHOICE of what you would like to reattach to for your benefit. And even after all you went through you still believed that you would function to the BEST of your ability REGARDLESS OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES !

          Colleen, I feel humbled and honoured to draw from your fountain of knowledge.

          Keep sharing.
        • thumb
          Jan 21 2012: Dear Mwenjew,
          Thank you for your kind words AND standing ovation:>)

          There are, of course, many people in our world who face unbelievable challenges in their lives, and mine seems insignificant. One thing I often do, when facing my own challenges, is read about people who have moved through incredible situations, and it seems to minimizes my challenge. Another thing I often do when challenged, is volunteer to work with people who are much more challenged in his/her life. Change our thoughts, we can change our feelings, and change our lives. My purpose in sharing my life adventures, is to help inspire others in moving through their challenges....it's pretty simple:>)

          Yes, I believe that when we are content, there is nothing to prove and we can detach from any attachment. You know this is not a new idea...right? This information has been passed down by teachers, psychologists, philosophers, sages, guides and gurus throughout history. I'd like to claim that it is my original idea, but I cannot:>)

          Yes, we can make choices regarding how we accept and deal with the challenge. With my head/brain injury, for example, I did not consciously "choose" the circumstances. And I cannot deny the incredible lessons I learned from being fully present with the situation.

          For example, I had the opportunity to move from a child like state to adulthood TWICE in this same body...how cool is that!!! First when I was born and secondly after the head/brain injury.

          When I regained consciousness after the injury and craniotomy, I was AGAIN in a child like state emotionally and physically. Somewhere in the back of my mind (such as it was) I remembered that I learned to walk and talk before, and I believed I could do it again. I wasn't sure to what level, but I was going to do the best I could. Interestingly enough, a few months later, cognitive tests indicated that I was high average/superior!!! How the heck did THAT happen??? LOL:>)
      • thumb
        Jan 18 2012: Manuj,
        You write..."The challenge in sustaining it is not in making an effort but in stopping ourselves from making efforts to obtain it". I certainly don't think/feel we need to chase happiness/contentment, and we can stop "chasing" if we choose to.

        I agree with Mwenjew's statement however..."Remember, its the intention & attention that governs the intensity !" In that respect, I believe that sustaining happiness/contentment is supported with our intention, attention, mindfulness, awareness, etc., and that takes a certain amount of effort, don't you think?

        Edit...
        This is what you wrote yesterday:>)
        "ohh yes Colleen ! I am trying to explore, so far so good, but Its bloody effortful".

        I agree...exploring, attention, intention, awareness, mindfulness, etc. takes effort:>)
        • Jan 18 2012: yes ....there's constant effortfulness in sustaining a state of effortlessness.
          There is a very thin line. There is a thought involved even in stopping the mind from thinking. The more we do this mental walk the thinner the rope becomes...and sooner we reach a state of a ropeless walk, the mind gets astonished... gets awakened just to make the bloody rope appear again...and so on and so forth. I dont know what happens after that, haven't gone ahead of this yet.
        • Jan 19 2012: Brilliant !
          >>..."The challenge in sustaining it is not in making an effort but in stopping ourselves from making efforts to obtain it".

          I think this is excellent, its a good indication of our true state of being.

          Manuj, ROPELESS WALK - love it !
        • thumb
          Jan 20 2012: We can never stop chasing any facet of our perception, we are literally living in the past--and always trying to catch up to the 'present'. In other words, I'm referring to the millisecond lapse between events that have already occurred, and when your brain processes this information. We are chasing our perception of reality itself.
      • thumb
        Jan 18 2012: Manuj,
        Yes...it may take effort if it is a new concept we are embracing:>)

        The more we practice, the less effort it takes and it becomes a natural, normal state after awhile....in my humble perception and experience:>)
        • Jan 20 2012: Thanks Colleen. Come to think of a new concept...How about if the humans race becomes emotionless by dissolving all extreme or subtle emotions? Will we become robots ? Animals ?Trees ? Rocks ? Rivers ?

          That also makes me think, that i am yet to see an alien with extreme emotions in any sci-fi film, except Mars Attack. In ET, the emotions of the alien are very subtle. I think film makers are some of the most important people in shaping societies. What do you think? Do we need a film "In pursuit of nothingness"?

          Why TED allows only three layers of dissection of a thought? Cant put fourth thread without breaking continuity of thoughts.
    • thumb
      Jan 21 2012: Dear Manuj,
      I'm honestly not very fond of your "new concept"..."is the humans race becomes emotionless by dissolving all extreme or subtle emotions?" Why would we want to do that to ourselves? I LOVE experiencing all the emotions, because it reminds me that I am alive and living life with gusto!

      I agree with you that films contribute to shaping societies. Many times, in sci-fi films, we see things that much later are proven with scientific research:>) Did you see Avatar? Emotions CAN be subtle. Just because we don't express emotions with extreme outward actions/reactions does not mean we don't feel emotions on a very deep level. In fact, maybe it is a deeper level, when we're not "spending" the energy with all the common outward manifestations? That's one reason I keep using the word contentment rather than happiness. The feeling of "contentment" seems to be more subtle and quiet, while the feeling of happiness seems to be more acting/reacting...what do you think?

      Yes, TED allows only three layers of comments, and I realize that Rhona will get the notice for this response...oh well....you may get it eventually Manuj:>)
      • Jan 24 2012: Colleen, Just reached my maximum in thumbs up for you so you will have to receive my thumbs up using extrasensory perception. That may be a more efficient way to communicate anyway. I think today we may as well create fun-filled fabulous days for ourselves and everyone we encounter. Happy Right Now.
        • thumb
          Jan 24 2012: Rhona,
          I got it by ESP...LOL:>)
          The thumbs up are fun, because it reminds me that I'm having discussions with like minded people. That however (discussions with like minded people) creates the pleasure and joy of this TED experience...thank you for that:>)
      • Jan 25 2012: Again I could not give you a thumbs up. So............:>)
  • thumb
    Jan 13 2012: If one really believes in happiness one doesn't have to chase it! The chase/pursuit expresses something which is hard attain or impossible at all. As if we are trying to catch up with a running cheetah to get the best possible shot/glimpse of it. It's hardly manageable without the additives like a jeep or a camera with great zoom.
    My point here is that all the tools we need are within us we shouldn't look for happiness outside of us! Just believe and search for it deep inside yourself ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5TqIdff_DQ
  • Jan 13 2012: "I went looking for paradise and found hell. Only to discover that we carry them inside us wherever we go".
    - Christopher Columbus.
  • Jan 13 2012: To reach true happiness, we need to know what is the purpose of our life.
    People need to eat every day to supply their bodies with energy and to keep themselves healthy. If they stop eating for a period of time, diseases will sneak up upon them and overtake them, and perhaps even kill them. Similarly, people also need food of another kind, food for the spirit and heart. It is unfortunate that while people are careful never to forget to feed their bodies, they do not show the same concern for the health of their souls and hearts. The heart needs food as the body does. The diseases of the body and the debilitating effects they have are not more dangerous than the diseases of the heart and soul.
    • Jan 14 2012: Thanks Kareem. To know the purpose of existence is a must, i think being one the natural self (including our natural feelings/emotions) at all times helps in finding and meeting it.
  • Jan 12 2012: I assume the main reason is because society convinces people that being 'happy' is either
    1) Something that must be attained at all costs
    or
    2)The default position
    A perspective that I assume can infact be harmful to humans, potentially directing people towards materialistic greed (as a substitute for actual happiness?) or suicide when failing to meet the 'requirement' (among many examples).

    I don't believe there are many (if any) examples of the strive for happiness among other animals.. Nor do I see examples of Suicide of Greed among those animals either. Whether correlation = causation in this case, I don't know..
    • thumb
      Jan 12 2012: I think the opposite, the search for happiness is the normal drive for life with animals as well as humans.

      If you look at a singing bird. It takes a seed and is happy to find it, it looks around and find another seed and again it is happy. In spring it's the same as it finds a strow for the nest and again and again.
      If a human being can follow his or her bliss s/he will be happy all the time.

      If there's nothing ahead, no perspective, people can become unhappy, suicidal even.
      • Jan 12 2012: 'If you look at a singing bird. It takes a seed and is happy to find it, it looks around and find another seed and again it is happy'

        I question whether this is actually 'happiness' or just a sustaining of its existence by doing what it needs to do (being content).
        Lets try a polar bear. Is it actually demonstrating happiness that it caught a fish, or is it merely indifferent or fine with its catch and WE project our feelings of accomplishment onto its accomplishment?


        'If a human being can follow his or her bliss s/he will be happy all the time.'

        Well let us take celebrities for example. They began wishing to fulfill their dream by earning large amounts of money and admiration for presenting their talent and are now doing so..Are famous celebrities historically known for being consistently happy?
        Don't get me wrong, I don't doubt that people can be happy by following their ideals, but having a sustained permanent happiness doesn't appear to be realistic to me, based on what I can observe from people.
        • thumb
          Jan 13 2012: A few remarks:
          Being content and being happy, I can't see much difference there.
          And most celebrities aren't content or happy they search for a kick.
          The ego always need a kick to get happy because it has nothing of its own. And of course the pressure they have to bear by impresario’s and to always live up to the expectations people have. If you just love to make your product you can easily get mad.
        • thumb

          . . 100+

          • +2
          Jan 13 2012: The truth about bliss................... is that it is not something you "follow".
        • thumb
          Jan 15 2012: There are two types of people "Those that believe they are the only sentient beings with free will, emotions and consciousness." and "Those that believe all things are beings of consciousness, emotion and free will."

          Personally, I believe that people don't maintain happiness, because they don't fully understand it. Contentment and fulfillment are what cultivate happiness, not things or actions or careers all by themselves. Celebrities aren't happy, not because they got what they wanted, but because one of our basic needs that we have to meet in order to be "happy", is Variety/Uncertainty. We aren't happy if things are the same all the time. Most people don't understand this, though I know you do, and that's what stops most people from being "happy".

          If everyone understood that we have a true need for Variety and Uncertainty, they wouldn't wallow in unhappiness so much. They would realize that they can bring back that happiness, simply by finding fulfilling ways to sate their need for Variety. as well as their other needs.

          In essence, what happens with all people who are successful is that they achieve success and do it again and again and again, then get bored with it, and start to create failures just for the change of scenery, emotion and experience. This all usually happens on a subconscious level though, making it appear out of the persons control. Though once you come into conscious control and awareness of your needs, you have the ultimate control over how to fulfill them anytime you need, and to be happy when ever you wish.
        • thumb

          . . 100+

          • +1
          Jan 15 2012: "all things are beings of consciousness", and we humans are the ones with free will and choice to rise within our good spirit from animal and transform ourselves through love :)
      • thumb
        Jan 13 2012: "If there's nothing ahead, no perspective, people can become unhappy, suicidal even."

        Yes, I agree. But I don't think that happiness lay in future, I guess the most happy people are those who live in this proper moment, not in past or future. In that meaning we could say that happy people don't care about future. They are happy, positive so they probably know that whatever happens it will be fine, but they are in NOW, not in TOMORROW :) I guess the most happy people I met, where just like this :) And I don't mean short-term happiness, but the long one :)
        • thumb
          Jan 13 2012: It's exactly like you say it is for those that has arrived, that are matured, are in balance and at peace. Like a cat after dinner, it stretches and lays down to enjoy its being.
          But life runs a program and young people need to find their way, meet their desires and can only develop further if they satisfy them. If they're stuck because any outlook on work, house, a loved one etc. is barren they can't mature and get unhappy.
          So happiness is the drive to get at the right place, to develop and to enjoy life forever.
        • Jan 14 2012: Thanks Marcin
      • Jan 14 2012: Thanks Frans.
    • thumb
      Jan 13 2012: Happiness - "Is it a human need ?" I guess so :) I did an excercise like this, during some training:
      1. You take whatever action into consideration
      2. You ask Yourself a question "why do I do this" until U go to an end, to statement which don't change anymore
      3. In my and others experience, always on the end was happiness :) whatever we took on the beginning

      For example:
      - I do water plants in the garden
      - why?
      - so they live and grow healthy
      - why?
      - cause I like to have healty plants in the garden
      - why?
      - cause they are nice looking/tasty and I feel nice being in green nice garden
      - why?
      - cause it gives me a good feeling, comfort, it makes me happy
      - why You want good feeling of comfort?
      - it makes me happier :) to by happy :)

      You can try it for Yourself and write me what happend :)

      If it would be so, that in every action we look for parts of happiness, small "income" of happiness, then wouldn't it be a need for humans to be happy? And even more.. wouldn't it be THE MAIN NEED, the HIGHEST one to humans? :)
    • thumb
      Jan 13 2012: "I don't believe there are many (if any) examples of the strive for happiness among other animals.. Nor do I see examples of Suicide of Greed among those animals either. Whether correlation = causation in this case, I don't know.."

      I guess we don't know the emotions of animals. I guess a statement that we know them is a part of ignorance actually, as we have no way to check it with full certainty, or I haven't heard of such. No, I did, sorry. I heard of an experiment where to rat's mind was put an electrode, which did activate pleasure area of the mind, each time he did push the button. There was another button, which give food after pushing. Every time doing the experiment the rat did push only the first button, not pushing the second one and dying from hunger.

      I know that pleasure is not the same as happiness. Pleasure is rather short-term and happiness long-term. Rat may feel something like orgasm, I don't know how strong it was, but all of them did die from hunger, so we can say that animals do have at least hedonistic nature.

      And according to my higher post on the "why?" excercise, I guess animals as well do everything to be happy. There are many differences, bigger or smaller, like that they do act instinctively more often, but I guess all their actions are to lead them to happiness.

      And about greed, my cat eat so much that he do vomit. I don't know if it's sick, but seems to be greedy for food, as it happened many many times, maybe a 100 ones or more. I would expect him to learn not to eat to much after some number of times, just like Pawlow's dog.

      About suicides I heard about lemmings which are supposed to die in big numbers sometimes, but it's just like hearing, haven't checked it. And maybe, probably I think, it's not cause of suicidal motivation but rather risk taking motivation when there's not enough food for the population or something.
      • thumb
        Jan 13 2012: Maybe your cat is sick. I know there are humans that can't feel that they've eaten enough for a defect in a sensor in the stomach. Maybe the same can happen with cats.
        What you tell about lemmings I know of and indeed if they're overpopulated and can't find enough food. They run en masse into the sea and drown. Maybe they lack sufficient predators and found a way to keep the population down by getting depressive. Nothing new in the animal kingdom. What we have with humans you find everywhere. I kept fishes for a long time and you can observe all this kind of behavior with fishes as well. If they haven't the space they need, if water is bad depression follows, resistance goes down and they get sick and die.
  • thumb
    Jan 24 2012: I personally seek happiness because the effects of fear and anxiety seem damaging to my mental health.
    • Comment deleted

      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: Manuj,
        I think I may understand what Tyne is expressing, and hopefully she will pop in to clarify. You say Manuj..."lets forget happiness for a moment. Seek Fear & Anxiety".

        Here is another "experiment" I suggest, and it is a way that I live my life. Try embracing the feelings of happiness, fear and anxiety all at the same time. We are multidementional, multi sensory beings, capable of experiencing several emotions/feelings at the same time. I call this being comfortable with discomfort:>) For me, happiness/contentment is a way of life that is part of the foundation of who I am and how I live my life. We can be frightened and anxious, and also realize that it is part of the life experience, so we can, at the same time, be patient, compassionate and unconditionally loving with our "self". This is how the underlying feeling of happiness/contentment can be part of every moment of our lives.

        Perhaps Tyne is saying that she focuses on the happiness rather than fear and anxiety? When we focus on fear and anxiety, that becomes the reality in our lives. When we focus on an underlying happiness/contentment that we can tap into, then that becomes the dominating reality:>)

        After my head/brain injury/craniotomy, while unconscious, hooked up to life support systems in ICU, they say that I was smiling and giving everyone thumbs up, even when the body was near death. Happiness/contentment is one of the dominant "parts" of the underlying foundation of my life, no matter what is happining in my life...or death:>)
        • thumb
          Jan 25 2012: Colleen, that is how I feel. I seek happiness and do my best not to cultivate negative and nervous feelings. Anxiety is unhealthy to experience.
      • thumb
        Jan 25 2012: Manuj, I have severe reactions to anxiety (blacking out) and I investigate anxious feelings as they occur. When I do this exercise of holding anxiety inside I feel stress on my heart and my body feels light and weak. Mentally I feel separate from my body's experience and maintain a calm demeanor through an anxiety 'attack'.
        • thumb
          Jan 25 2012: It sounds like you know yourself pretty well Tyne. Investigate....I like that! We can investigate ALL feelings and emotions in every moment. I think holding onto anxiety causes everyone stress and illness at many different levels, don't you? That seems to be one of the reasons for "stress" in our world...people holding onto feelings of frustration, anxiety, anger, etc?

          I believe emotions/feeling are meant to flow, rather than be held onto, and that's why I like the use of the word investigation Tyne. When you say "cultivate negativity and nervous feelings", you mean focus on them? Hold onto them? I agree that to cultivate and focus on negative, nervous feelings is unhealthy for the body/mind.

          Thanks for asking Manuj, what do I suggest? I suggest that it is not helpful to tell another person what s/he "needs" to do.
        • Jan 25 2012: True Colleen. Thanks
        • thumb
          Jan 25 2012: Manuj,
          Like I said, it appears that Tyne knows herself pretty well, and can probably teach us if we are open to that possibility:>)
        • Jan 25 2012: Colleen, you are right. There is a learning in how she copes up with her negative emotions. My intention in suggesting a different approach was to figure the root of her extreme emotions (anxiety & fear). I felt responsible and made a suggestion.
  • thumb
    Jan 24 2012: we don't. it chases us but we keep on missing it.
    • thumb
      Jan 24 2012: Hi Jean-Pierre,
      You touched on a very important piece of the puzzle:>) "It chases us but we keep on missing it".
      I agree!!!

      Opportunities for happiness are all around us...the people we love and who love us...the fact that most of us have food in our belly, a safe shelter, clean drinking water, and freedom. To me, these are things I am grateful for, and happy/content with every day of my life. How many people in our world do not have even the very basic needs met? I agree Jean-Pierre, that many times we are missing happiness........ because we are too busy chasing happiness?
      • Jan 26 2012: "Opportunities for happiness are all around us"

        Colleen, Colleen, Colleen !
    • thumb
      Jan 24 2012: Maybe if we stopped moving, it would catch us.
    • Jan 25 2012: Jean, Colleen, Thomas,

      I agree with all of you here. However, i would like to put it bit differently.

      I feel that no emotion is chasing us. We are a set of different emotions in different proportions. And mostly, all are caused by us and exist with us all the time. However, we want to have & feel only the pleasurable ones. Its ok (if not good) till this point. I think the problem begins when we think that this art of self deception is the way of life. We keep ourselves/mind busy with the chase of happiness/pleasure so that we dont have to experience self in totality.