TED Conversations

Valerie Netto

Horse Trainer Riding Instructor, American Riding Instructors Association

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

How would we treat each other if we were not controlled by a need to be right?

We all have areas of life that we are passionate about like religion, politics and horse training. We all think we are right, marriages end, families are torn apart and through history we have died trying to prove it. Why, and if the saying "would you rather be right or would you rather be happy" appeals to so many of us why do we cling so tenaciously to the need to be right? HINT:
E veryone
G oes
O verboard

Topics: polotics religion
+16
Share:
progress indicator
  • thumb
    Jan 8 2012: Good question. Got me thinking about how I interact with friends, work colleagues and family.

    Suggest males are more likely to push their view, fix a problem, fix perceived ignorance. Knowledge, knowing, being right seems to be related to social pecking order. Females seem to be less combative in general. Maybe some nurture drivers but probably a lot of nature.

    Ever notice a conversation between a bunch of men talking about, sports, politics or whatever. Contradicting each other, pointing out fallacies, expressing contrary opinions etc.

    I'll scan through the comments for an informed evolutionary/social perspective.

    Agree with themes that the search for truth and knowledge can be aided by debate, but we/I sometimes go too far.
  • thumb
    Jan 7 2012: This was my first "view" upon joining.
    How serendipitous and enlightening.
    Thank you, Valerie.
    • thumb
      Jan 8 2012: John Galt,

      Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged" also didn't reveal who John Galt was!
  • thumb
    Jan 6 2012: Good topic. I might be in the minority, but I feel what keeps people from seeing and understanding thier perfect-self is the centuries of believing and following moral and ethical values passed down and programmed into us by our families,peers,schools, and culture as a whole. I believe fear drives people not to question why they believe what they do. I believe ifin some magical moment, all of the current population were to somehow forget all their past and awake in the absolute present moment, humanity would progress and evolve and live in perfect balance with the earth as a whole, with no need for laws or ruling group of people. With no pre-wired morals or values or views of others, we would intrinsicly accept all others and our place in the web of life. No one would seek power of anyone else. no group would be suppressed because they looked or talked diffrent. Just like in nature when large groups of the same species work together, the focus is not selfish but seeing ones place in the whole.Peace.
    • thumb
      Jan 6 2012: Have you read The Celestine Prophecy, the 10th insight, The secret of Shambhala and the 12th insight? Because it sounds as if you have. If not you may really fly! It has totally helped me to understand the important message of the Bible!
  • thumb
    Jan 4 2012: Actively listen with non-judgment to provide the space for others to discover and follow their own truth.
  • thumb
    Jan 2 2012: The perception of being right increases in proportion to the strength of faith, of passion, of specialisation, of experience, and of qualification. The narrower that strand of specialism, the stronger the sense of having to be right at all costs, sometimes to the point of total exclusion of any other valuable argument which may come along to oppose it.

    What this means is that generalists, on the whole, find it very difficult or even impossible to argue with such specialists. For instance, they might be reluctant to argue about economics with someone who is an economist by interest or profession, for the reasons given above, even though good arguments are to be made from the more panoramic standpoint of the generalists among us.

    Narrow specialism is all very well and very admirable, but it also has to have strong links to openness and empathy towards others who wish to contribute to such debate - even though they may get stuff wrong.
  • Jan 2 2012: To be right or to be your self. To live comfortabilly or to live happy. To show up honest or to hyde a lying inside.
    Wich is the way to agree appearences and sincerity?.
    What have you happier?
    I´m sorry but I don't have the answer. Anybody has it?
    I would thanks your point of view.
  • thumb
    Dec 31 2011: Hello Valerie. A great topic for discussion here. A few commentators here apparently feel a need to be right. Many others seem like great models of tolerance!

    Learning involves listening. So IF we desire to learn we must listen to the "inner" of a person and that often means self restraint, which also could include hesitating before jumping onto the computer keys. A friend once waited three weeks before answering a question. That taught me a great lesson; to think before speaking.

    I agree with many of the superb responses to your great question and resulting conversations.

    I would add one more aspect that means a great deal to me: I like the narrative of Jesus' life found in Part IV of The Urantia Book (Urantia Foundation. www.urantia.org) The modeling he gave us for the question you bring is worthy of consideration for all relationship aspects of life including family, work, communities, nations, religious, political, education----everythiing. The one most prominent feature of his personality, for me, is graciousness.

    What I learned of graciousness is it comes from a love saturated soul within. We learn grace, but graciousness stems from love. With all the love capability I can offer from self at this moment, I recommend an honest study of his life from this resource. I do belief that this study would marvelously address your question.

    His graciousness was due to many realities, one of which is personal will. If we are indeed sovereign over our individual will (he knew), then we can see one reason why Jesus was gracious in allowing people to see the better way in relating to one another. Likely there are other many very good reasons for being gracious, some of which emerged from this conversation.

    He also knew of the guiding Spirit fragment of God within persons. Hence, will and listen became important for him and now us.

    You are so kind to give us all this opportunity to think about this question.

    Happy New Year!
    Humbly,
    • thumb
      Jan 6 2012: The love Jesus possed in him that guided him, is in all of us as well. some are just unable to see it. Not a knock on Jesus, just a simple truth he would agree with. Peace.
  • Dec 31 2011: Valerie, we would probably treat each other with kindness, and we would be tolerant of others opinions. There is a place for being "right", when wrong exists. For example, driving down a one way street and seeing a car come up....you will honk and put on your brights and try to get the person to realize he is endagering his life and others.

    Some of us are aware and know that we don't know everything.. we make an effort to be humble...but, still there are things within us that we know to be right. The trick is to be tactful, discreet, and cognicent of the following:

    "While our thinking colors all our experience, more often than not our thoughts tend to be less than completely accurate. Usually they are merely uninformed private opinions, reactions and prejudices based on limited knowledge and influenced primarily by our past conditioning. All the same, when not recognized as such and named, our thinking can prevent us from seeing clearly in the present moment. We get caught up in thinking we know what we are seeing and feeling. Just being familiar with this deeply entrenched pattern and watching it as it happens can lead to greater nonjudgmental receptivity and acceptance." J. Kabat-Zinn

    Great question. I thought you were right in asking it!!!
  • Dec 30 2011: I believe that the existence of a need to be right and its obtrusiveness is subjective. I do not feel I need to be right. Perhaps peoples ego's do create that need in some cases, but other motivating factors may have created some of the examples you mentioned, such as the need for material things or the need to feel a part of a group. You can't disagree with me here, right?
  • Dec 30 2011: I will just be happy doing what is right. But of course doing right is subjective, it depends upon what side you are standing. So i will do what i believe is right but leaving my mind open for the possibility that I am wrong, while living happy. That way I can treat everybody right while being happy
    -r.detre-
  • Dec 29 2011: I like the way you phrase the question. It is not uncommon that individuals that are quite dissimilar can get along with one another amazingly well. I think you have exposed at least part of the answer as to how individuals can remain good friends or happily married. These differences are overridden by what they share with one another. This attitude can make a relationship stronger because it allows for a constructive dynamic. The need to be right can be abusive, or for personal recognition and that is a whole different matter and motive.
  • thumb
    Dec 29 2011: Is it all about Justice!



    Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 02: "PUTTING A PRICE TAG ON LIFE"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0O2Rq4HJBxw&list=SP30C13C91CFFEFEA6&index=2&feature=plpp_video
  • thumb
    Dec 29 2011: Is it all about Justice!

    Is it all about philosophy!

    Watch Harvard students being educated to think about the meaning of justice; what is the right thing to do!

    Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBdfcR-8hEY&feature=list_related&playnext=1&list=SP30C13C91CFFEFEA6
  • Dec 28 2011: "Power over others is weakness disguised as strength"

    As Tolle points to in these few words what "needs to be right" is in fact that which is the weakest, most insecure aspects of the HUman personality. Yes it goes "overboard" in its attempt to

    1) desguise itself as being strong and
    2) again when it tries to invent ways of "fixing" itself ...to be "all right" again. But the "fixes" are short lived because the primary cause was weakness and insecurity to begin with. IOW the lack of knowing one simple Truth.

    http://www.eckharttolletv.com/uncourse/menu/

    This link is free and the "EGO" button points to Truth
    • thumb
      Dec 30 2011: Dear Ed,
      You have hit another nail on the head! Tolle, along with other sages, gurus, philosophers, psychologists, and teachers of many different practices, have given us this valuable information for centures.

      Your description of the process, which I agree with, reminds me of the cycle of violence and abuse - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_of_abuse.

      In an attempt to be "right" we often see people demeaning and belittling others to appear to be more "correct", more "evolved", more "insightful", "smarter", "stronger"....and the list goes on and on. Abuse is often a componant in an effort to be "right". Of course, those who want to appear "right" don't see it that way because in their insecurity, thay are too busy trying to convince others of their "rightness". It is exactly as you and Tolle bring to light...thank you for the information:>)
      • thumb
        Jan 6 2012: Great point. Ones fear of what they don't understand about someone else has led to violence all of humanity. Seeking positions of power thru, violence,segration,political gains, monitary gains, etc. are a result of a lack of knowledge and acceptance of another group. When we can see ourselves in every other person on earth, then there's no need to control or seek a position of power over anyone else. Takes a lot of courage to go against the conventional wisdom of your neighbors, churches, schools and family.
  • Dec 28 2011: I agree with you Philip, on the point that what drives human actions is empathy, compassion etc, However, if analyzed deeper, you will realize that be it kind souls or robbers, they believe that their actions are just tasks that will lead them to ultimate happiness level they have been pursuing for themselves. If may sound selfish, but we choose a certain action because in our own assessment it is the options that we derive most happiness (peace) for ourselves.
  • Dec 28 2011: Being right, or being happy, seems to me to be the wrong set of choices. I see it as being right, or being afraid.
    If I need to defend my opinion, it is probably because down deep, I'm afraid - afraid that being wrong will destroy me in some way. That big word EGO is very important: on the positive side, my ego has kept me intact, enables me to face the world, distinguishes me from others. On the negative side, to have it challenged threatens me with destruction, and I seek to remain intact and so will vigorously defend it.
    The answer is hard, yet easy, and found in major religions (I can't say ALL major religions, because I can't claim to know them all, but I suspect it will be there in all) - 'dying to yourself'. For example, Jesus used that very phrase, the Buddha taught let go desire, Islam means surrender to God.
    For me, this is a voluntary option, and a lifelong task, but the only way forward.
  • Dec 27 2011: We must treat each other like Comb pins, without a deference at all.
  • thumb
    Dec 27 2011: Being "right" is often an integral part of a belief system, which is taught to people when they are young by others who have the same or similar beliefs. These beliefs then become core values, which, when violated, threaten a persons understanding of the world. I'm wondering if the need to be "right" is the same as defending one's belief system. There are many behaviors that people engage in thoughtlessly. A lot of people are unconscious in their daily lives. I posit the inverse of your question by asking if we are truly capable of understanding or forgiveness? If we are truly capable of understanding another's beliefs but find it unnecessary to change those beliefs, or if we are truly capable of forgiveness, then the need to be right no longer controls our motivation.
    • thumb
      Jan 6 2012: Great key point in Jennifer's comment:
      We all have belief systems that serve us or ...don't. Whether they do or do not, they are part of our cellualr structure. Nurturing those fundamentals: forgiveness, empathy, love, understanding... this takes time, effort and work.
      being able to forgive-each other and ourselves
      • thumb
        Jan 8 2012: I find your comment sound, Sarah.

        Yes, we can still put forward what we believe to be "right" and with empathy.
        We would then be treating each other with honesty and love.
  • thumb
    Dec 27 2011: Education system...hmmm...very good Don.
    Your right, no they are not the product of an educational system, because if it were, I would be sorely disappointed and I would have views similar to yours, whatever they are.
    I can see an average man's reaction to my comments above. I understand the vagueness and quite frankly, frightening nature of the comment. Please Don, don't be surprised by the comment's language which I admit is very vague. What I was trying to convey was that even a murderer has a goal in life you know, and to reach that goal he will do anything. I was trying to eliminate this idea of right and wrong, of good and evil, of light and dark. This may seem overtly spiritual but in the end it has to be. I was trying to explain the example - a very bad example it seems considering your reply - I was using to say that there is no such concept of right and wrong, it is only the result of a society.
    As to what your beliefs are, I don't know and frankly don't want to know.
    But still, thank you for updating me on the vagueness of my comment.
  • thumb
    Dec 26 2011: The more I treat others with appreciation the better.

    For example, I asked my yoga class, with members having diverse ethnicities, to accept that I was expressing mutual joy and goodwill even though I would use phrases uncharacteristic to some cultures as I sang, “Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas.” Surprisingly, the only objection I received was from a Christian, who asked, “Just what in that song is uncharacteristic to my culture?”
    I responded, “The phrase, ‘let your heart be light,’ meant let your heart be an illumination.”
    My response mimics the yoga instructor’s statement ending each practice: My light bows to your light.

    Appreciation varies with the extent of sharing. When the other party expresses a preference I reject, I empathetically express opposition. For example, a very close friend said he must reprimand his adult, married son for not following his culture, I remarked that his son must mature in a time my friend and I cannot imagine. He must respect his son’s culture. I then asked him to read Kahlil Gibran, “On Children.” See online at http://www.katsandogz.com/onchildren.html .My friend said he treasured that poetry and thanked me for reminding him of his commitment to simply love his son and daughter-in-law. I was able to have this conversation because I appreciate my friend.

    When a friend points out how universally applicable his tradition is, I point to a new way to look at it and reiterate my faith in the truth much of which is unknown. For example, just today, a friend said that for Christians, history began some 2000 to 4000 years ago, but for his culture it began almost 10,000 years ago. I pointed out that tools from some 1.8 million years ago have been discovered, and the people who made those tools probably communicated from generation to generation. We happily agreed there is more to it than we know.

    It takes appreciation to converse on the other party's subject.
    • Dec 27 2011: Phillip, let me share with you my theory of what our roles are in this world. Maybe, it could afford a new perspective on the question of being right.

      If you watch National Geographic, you may have come across an episode where there are these birds who live on cliffs and build nests there. Everyday, these birds will go fishing in the sea beneath and carry the fish to their nest to feed their chicks. However, not all these birds will be successful in completing this task, because there is another species of bird living within the space which will rob the fish off some of these birds. So, if we were to moralized this scene the way religious believers do, we will say that the naughty birds which robbed the poor birds and deprived the latter's chicks from being fed are sinful birds ..so by normal religious rules, these sinful birds will need to destined to go to Hell. But some would argue that non-human beings are just resources for the human kind and that the human kind is superior etc etc because they can control the environment. But if you look at it rationally, we are just one of the species in this world, no different from birds, tigers, ants etc etc, just that we play a different role. What this role is in the jigsaw puzzle I don't know.

      My second point is, just like birds, the human kind have also "robbers" who are out there "terrorrising" the other human beings. For me , I would not label them as sinners, because they are part of the ecosystem and plays a role in ensuring the ecosystem is sustained.

      So back to the question of what is right? Is the act of robbing right or wrong? Wrong if you are the victim, right for the robbers, because they need to either feed themselves or feed their family,...

      Having said, this I will still try to ensure I am not a victim, just like I won't be the first gazelle to be at the edge of the pond that is infested with crocodiles.
      • thumb
        Dec 27 2011: kwang,
        I am reminded of my 37 year old daughter, when she left her job on one morning last week because her boss would not stop badgering her for being late to work that morning. She left with a migraine headache and called for advice about whether to go back for her personal items she left under the circumstance. I advised her to get rest and relief from the headache and let the items go until the next day.

        I went on to write an essay about conduct in that crocodile pond. I feel she is naturally kind, empathetic, and focused. Nevertheless, she must survive the crocodiles, so next day, recognize that she is entering a swarm of crocodiles but when she departs at the end of the day the crocks will marvel at her kindness, empathy, and focus.

        She's home on holiday until the New Year and lots of fun and has not mentioned the work incident.

        Each human is on a path with the potential to improve from the contradictions they were born into and rise to their natural goodness. We can appreciate each person for contending with their path and sharing with us a description of where they are at this moment in time. If it is a person who has been brainwashed to martyrdom but is questioning it, we can assure them that they are too precious for sacrifice and help them escape their school.

        Birds of prey do not have the ability to help each other in the same way humans can.

        I hope your environment offers you some relief from the sense that everything is about survival. For this reason, I also continually advise my daughter to seek a new job.
  • thumb
    Dec 26 2011: If you need to be right, you are wasting your time in learning what others can teach you.

    There is no universal right, but logic.
    • thumb
      Dec 26 2011: I agree Luis Javier López Arredondo,
      If we think we need to be "right" we are wasting our time, because we are all teachers and students in this earth school. The sooner we realize this, the better for all of us:>)
  • Dec 26 2011: Valerie, I believe your question will never have the RIGHT answer mainly because "Right" and "Happy" are abstract and relative; because it is impossible to clearly define what constitute "Right" and "Happy" there will always be disagreements. For example, you hinted that one has gone overboard to be right, may I ask how does one know when one has gone overboard? How do you measure? Isn't the conclusion of overboard that of one party? If you ask the other party it would have said that it has not gone overboard. Finally, definitions of Right and Happy are dynamic and changes with time, what makes one "happy" or "right" now may not be in the future, even to the SAME person !!
  • thumb
    Dec 26 2011: Well said Colleen,
    The key in any discussion is the purpose for which is made. If the other end is confrontational and is doing it just for the purpose of proving a point it does not lead to any healthy discussion. Good ideas only generate when there is healthy exchange of ideas.
  • thumb
    Dec 26 2011: I don`t think everybody is controlled always by a need to be right, although we all are tempted to be like this in a conversation, more or less. It depends on your power to empathize with the world and truly understanding the message they send to you. On the other hand the EGO doesn't let us go or we don`t let him go because of pride and unfortunately we cause a prejudice to that person. I think the solution is " let go of that ego" and start loving your "comrade". Wish you all the best !
  • Dec 26 2011: Does the asker assume the we are all indeed controlled by a need to be right? The assumption of the lack of free will confounds the question itself.
  • thumb
    Dec 25 2011: Feb 1995 NYT: "The earth is flat. Whoever claims it is round is an atheist deserving of punishment.

    That is a well-known religious edict, or fatwa, issued two years ago by Sheik Abdel-Aziz Ibn Baaz, the supreme religious authority of Saudi Arabia."

    So, if I insist that this guy is wrong and that I am right in believing the earth to be round, am I tenaciously clinging to the need to be right, or am I just a realist who wants to start a conversation from a point that agrees that certain facts of nature exist?

    The flat earth belief is an extreme example of the ridiculous religious edicts that can tie school boards into an impassible knot and stifle education systems.
    • thumb
      Dec 25 2011: Reminds me of the dilemia that was faced by the illuminati.
      • thumb
        Dec 25 2011: Did I miss something? What was that dilemma?
        • thumb
          Dec 25 2011: The illuminati were men of science and the arts. The church of that time found them in conflict with church dogma. The illuminati had to go underground as they became persona non grata. We currently recognize these men of science and the arts as some of the most influencial people in history. I am sure that you can find better references on the web than I can provide.
  • Dec 25 2011: It seems our wanting to be right is a mechanism that has proven us well in evolution, why else would it exist? Being right creates a sense of satisfaction, is rewarding, boosts our self-esteem. Being wrong yields opposite emotions, frustration, shame, even anger. It's possibly just a matter of dualism and creating structure in our lives. Humans have difficulties to function properly when living in incertainty, we need a system of beliefs to manifest ourselves and give ourselves a sense of (collective) identity. In our pluralst society this mechanism doesn't seem to serve us that well anymore. It's okday to have a view of how things are in the world, but we need to build in the premisse that there is real possibility that we're actualy wrong. This creates space for failure and strengthens our survavibility as a society. Of course, I could be wrong! haha. ;-)
    • Dec 25 2011: Well you have a good point point here. Beliefs are important and you do need beliefs for everyday functioning. Having said that you also need to be aware that belief is a psychological state in which individual holds a proposition or premise to be true.
      What if that psychological state (due to whatever reason) is distorted or is different from others. Do you stick to "being right". Do you end your marriage for it or do you kill or do you torn your family.
      As I write this, I am beginning to think that to be able to accept that you are wrong (only when you are actually wrong) is something that not everyone can do and should not do. You need a lot of knowledge and skill to change your beliefs. If you are not fully equipped, it will destroy you (in terms of your self confidence, self doubt etc.) and if you are well equipped, you will rise and shine.
  • thumb
    Dec 25 2011: People need something to believe in sometimes anything even if it sounds crazy. How would we treat each other?.. no one knows but we probably wouldn't be challenged in life. Good question makes you really think. :)
  • thumb
    Dec 25 2011: We all have hates and prejudices that are based on lack of knowledge and understanding. Through the invention of cars, planes, and passengerships the world has become smaller. Through travel and personal observation many of the myths have been debunked. We no longer live in the shadow of kings and royal blood, church rulers that demanded total obediance or death, or in fear of witch hunters. Today I acknowledge what works for me and will share that if you ask. I do have opinions, however I will revise them if given sufficient or compelling reason. So in the end I agree that the EGO, fear, and ignorance are the true enemies.

    One last thought .... Sites like TED have allowed us all to grow. I have not seen any conversation where a demand to a personal view has been made. I learn from each of you and thank you.
    • thumb
      Dec 25 2011: Thank you too Robert, for this illuminating comment, all of which I strongly agree with...except...the idea that we "all have hates and prejudices...". I believe that is a choice that some of us do not make:>)

      AND...I hope this is not really your "one last thought" because I appreciate your insight:>)
      • thumb
        Dec 25 2011: Some hates and prejudices are certainly not of our choice. If you are the child of a member of the KKK you would most likely be indoctrinated from birth. Some religions believe that if you are not among us you will not enter the kingdom of heaven. Some American tribes told their children that the white man would eat them if they were caught. A major religion in the world states that if you are not a believer you must die. Up until the age of accountability many choices are made for us ... or at least are guiding influences. After the age of accountability I agree that we either continue or we accept hates and prejudices. We also have the choice to discard that which we find objectionable. Phrases such as, "Born to it"; "the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world"; all indicate that influences exist in our (and others) lives. And thanks for your comments.
        • Dec 25 2011: We are as much of a product of our environment as much of what out being defines ourselves. Love, right, hate, and wrong all words that we choose to give meaning towards even though most of us are so blind to the extent of the true meanings. We are simple beings that may accept or discard the world around us , but in both scenarios where the just is met, it will effect us either way. This does not mean it is a direct hit for we always have control on the greatest defense of holy and wicked actions, our minds. No matter what age we are, our mind can use its defenses to block such influences; therefore if one lets the cradle rock, then, even though I am truly blind to such subtle things, I can still know that it is rocking.
        • thumb
          Dec 25 2011: Robert,
          I can only speak from my own experiences and the experiences of people I know. I was the child of a hateful, prejudice, racist father, and those are the messages I was given by him from birth. However, as a young adult, I made different choices because I understood his fear. I was also brought up in a catholic environment...12 years of catholic school and indoctrination, in which I was taught that we (catholics) would enter the kingdom of heaven, and everyone else was going to hell. I also saw the fear in that belief even as a young child. There is no doubt that there is hate and prejudice abundant in our world. However, I believe that as thinking, feeling adults, we have the ability to make choices, and on that we seem to agree.:>)