TED Conversations

Adam Burk

Founder/ Director, Treehouse Institute

TEDCRED 500+

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

In your opinion, what should the purpose of education be?

Education is a prominent cultural institution used to perpetuate the prevailing values of a society.

Our modern education system has a sordid past largely rooted in industrialism. It's aim is to produce economically viable products--employable citizens. Nearly all our tweaks to the system in the last 100+ years are simply attempts to ensure that the products (graduates) are prepared for the work force.

I want to hear from YOU as I believe this conversation is crucial to lay a foundation to create significant and meaningful change.

Here is my answer:

I believe that education should be an empowering process that allows and guides children to develop their passions, critical thinking, compassion, and orientation towards wisdom for timely action.

In other words, self-cultivation should be the purpose of education. Understanding self-cultivation in terms of being a part of a unified field of relationships is key to the growth of a mature culture of peace. When the natural web of our relationships is used to strengthen our depth of knowledge, the feedback from the environment supports timely adjustments and refinements in our emotional and technical developments.

For this conversation, please focus on the question "in your opinion, what should the purpose of education be?"

We'll talk about the "how" in another conversation.

+28
Share:

Closing Statement from Adam Burk

Thank you all for joining this conversation. There are beautiful aspirations here of bringing for the best of humanity through the development of individuals, married with tensions to ensure that society is served and supported and that the basics are not overlooked.

There are currently 365 comments and 365 distinct articulations of "what the purpose of education should be." The process to develop a consensus on this is beyond the scope and purpose of this conversation. However, I do hope that it is understood that this question and its answer are the shapers of education systems and in turn cultures.

And so I invite you to ponder the question Thomas Brucia raised earlier, "Who should decide what the purpose of education is? http://www.ted.com/conversations/8190/who_should_decide_what_the_pur.html

Once we decide who should be making that decision then we can return to my original question and ultimately re-inventing education.

Thank you all again for sharing of your selves.

In peace,
Adam

progress indicator
  • thumb
    Dec 29 2011: Thanks Adam. I returned to this conversation frequently to view all of the inputs. Answers came in many varieties from professional, emotional, and personnal. Each has contributed to my view of the purpose of education. I find it curious that not one mention of role modeling was addressed. You would think that easy instructors would get a vote but in my case a tough, but fair, grader opened my eyes to litertature. We now respect the teachers that developed our work ethic. She was not my favorite when she made me work and think. Perhaps I now see the need for more discipline, which breeds respect, in the classroom. I still think of her and thank her when I conduct research, read a great novel, go to the theater, or just enjoy the arts.
  • Dec 29 2011: This is a beautiful thread with so many wonderful responses. Thank you for the question.

    There is nothing more important than education. Lifelong learning is a process we all participate in, knowingly or unknowingly, in each and every moment. We are all interconnected with each other and with nature's systems. This is why I feel that your question, "In your opinion, what should the purpose of education be?" is quintessential. The answer must come from a deep causal root of understanding from which all things stem and intertwine. That said, here is an attempt at an answer.

    The purpose of education, on all levels, is for each and every person—both within the collective whole of humanity and individually as a vitally necessary, and fully whole and contributing part—to ultimately reach the full realization of what it means to be human.

    By explaining and pointing to this foundational root of understanding, in each and every activity, subject, and direction, that the most basic, common law thread that runs through all of nature is the greatest Human Universal known as The Ethic of Reciprocity, also known as The Golden Rule, each person, and all people together have the best opportunity to fully realize their humanity, as empathic, compassionate humans that care for the needs of others in all areas of society.

    Human Universals bind us together as one great global human family. The Human Universal called "The Ethic of Reciprocity," also known as "The Golden Rule," expresses itself throughout the world in varying degrees, through phrases such as, "Do not do to others what you yourself hate," "Do to others what you would want done to you," "Regard your neighbor’s gain as your gain, and your neighbor’s loss as your own loss," and "Love your neighbor as yourself," to name a few.

    If one generation of children were to be educated with this natural law of love and unity as the basis for all decisions, approaches, and mentalities, just imagine the impact.
  • Dec 29 2011: Education is just a tool and not a final aim, achievement or destination. education helps you along in the journey of life where the ultimate goal i think should be KNOWLEDGE and WISDOM in understanding the meaning and purpose of this journey of life, in which all of us are students carrying our own backpacks towards the true destination! May peace be to you all my friends!!
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: To impart wisdom as well as knowledge.
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: To learn the schema that is necessary to conduct life successfully. It is important to learn that one is loved
    and how to love others. AND to be a critical thinker not an accepting follower. To be authentic and compassionate is the short answer.
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: Thank you all for joining this conversation. There are beautiful aspirations here of bringing for the best of humanity through the development of individuals, married with tensions to ensure that society is served and supported and that the basics are not overlooked.

    There are currently 365 comments and 365 distinct articulations of "what the purpose of education should be." The process to develop a consensus on this is beyond the scope and purpose of this conversation. However, I do hope that it is understood that this question and its answer are the shapers of education systems and in turn cultures.

    And so I invite you to ponder the question Thomas Brucia raised earlier, "Who should decide what the purpose of education is? http://www.ted.com/conversations/8190/who_should_decide_what_the_pur.html

    Once we decide who should be making that decision then we can return to my original question and ultimately re-inventing education.

    Thank you all again for sharing of your selves.

    In peace,
    Adam
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: A plea from some of the elderly

    The Science of the "Silent Generation" is the "lever" which moved us to where we are today.
    http://innjustice.blogspot.com/2011/12/science-of-silent-generation-is-lever.html

    Until soon,
    Aware of and caring about you
    Don [From The Silent Generation - 1930's]
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: Having received my PhD at 19 (no it is not a typo) and beginning my career as a University Teacher who later steered his way into Public School education I probably am very jaded with my opinion. I believe strongly that "Man is a son of his environment". I have two grown offspring raised under this philosophy and two parents who strongly believed that it was OUR job to educate our children and the Public Schools responsibility to expose them to different experiences. My wife and I believed that we would NOT teach our children to fail by allowing them to "try" boy/gjrl scouts, "try" soccer, or "try" other popular activities. We decided that our son would play the cello and that our daughter would study ballet. We enforced our decision, as parents running the family and not allowing our children any control of OUR chosen disciplines. We relied on our Public School system to expose them to other disciplines, ie. soccer, art, science, theatre, etc. and remained constant in our responsibility to TEACH our children the old Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic.
    My point is simple. WE were responsible for the education of our children. The Schools, peers, and synagogue, were responsible for their "well rounded" personalities and education.
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: Hello to everyone on this TED conversation [Originally - Nov 23, 2011]

    I believe that old men, who have lived out their lives according the laws of the creator, hold the distilled truths about children. Children are simply amazing little bundles of wonder.

    I talked to three old men who fit this criteria during the past few days [hours of asking and listening] and heard beautiful stories of what they learned from their parents at ages of 3, 4 and more.

    All these men were brought up on the farm, where survival depended on knowledge and wisdom. Without that knowledge and wisdom their stories were filled with suffering.

    Instant happiness flows from me in the presence of a child. They are so precious, so beautiful. Learn from the child within us!

    Good old people are masterpieces of distilled wisdom. Go and talk to your parents and grand parents while they are still alive and listen to their answers to “What are the Top things that their parents taught them before 6?” You will be amazed and you will do them honour!

    Realize that you get more things wrong than right!

    At this moment Dec 28, 2011, there are 323 comments of wisdom from beautiful people of all ages, in this conversation. I thank our creator for TED.
    I don’t want to offend anyone, so I went deep into my courage to add this comment today!
    Love to all of you
    Don [From The Silent Generation - 1930's]
    • Dec 28 2011: Mr. Wesley let me just say that I admire your courage. Will you please let us know what are the top things that your parents taught you before 6? Also, I invite you to contribute to the question I posted on the following talk:


      http://www.ted.com/talks/ramona_pierson_an_unexpected_place_of_healing.html

      It is always a pleasure to read your comment.
      • thumb
        Dec 29 2011: Thank you Mary,

        My parents were away for much of my childhood. Both worked for the richest people in Canada at the time. Both my parents were from Britain and times were tough.

        My Mom, was a Nanny for the Bronfman Family[Seagram's] and my Dad was a body-guard and chauffer for the Sir Herbert Holt. They were often in the Bahamas.

        We lived in a cold water flat, with a small central stove which was frequently out of coal. I walked to school from grade one.

        I could say my education seemed alone and as a quiet observer. By the time I was seven we had a radio.

        I was often left in the care of local families; both French and Jewish. Some were elderly women who kept me. I spent time on two farms during a few weeks of the summer. I never felt abused.


        For more info visit my Blog: http://innjustice.blogspot.com/p/inn-justice.html

        They did teach me to pray to God, which I did often when I felt alone and fearful.

        Other Nannies, friends to my Mother, taught me to read and write.
        They gave me toys and books; which included a Bible. Nancy Drew mystery books were my favourites. I had a chemistry set and a “mechano” set and an electric train.
        I also had a crystal radio. My Mom told me about her life in Scotland; many stories of difficult times. My parents then separated before I was six; that made it 1939!

        M brother went to WWII. And my days always seemed alone. At 8 years of age, while on a farm I was bitten by a dog and under went the treatment of the times for rabies.

        At 9 we moved into the downtown area of Montreal where I had access to the YMCA and McGill libraries and fascinating apartment people. I now lived in a heated apartment. I was clearly entrepreneurial. I baby-sat children; I loved children.

        I survived and by 19, I was a Commissioned Officer in the Canadian Military. I was a passionate fighter for those who were victims of evil.

        Mary, you just opened a door into my mind. I feel the Grace of God.
        • Dec 29 2011: Once again, thank you for your wonderful contribution and helping me get a glimpse of your life experience. You have helped me make a connection with those of your generation.

          Mr. Wesley, let me just add something for your reflection: If you, being an imperfect man, with limited knowledge of life and human affairs felt at the age of 19 a desire to fight passionately for those who were victims of evil, then how much more so must our Creator be anxious to rid evil from the earth. His patience is beyond my comprehension.....especially when I reflect on passages such as Second Peter chapter three and verses three through thirteen.

          May you continue to enrich the lives of those you come in contact with.

          Mary

          **To bring my comment back to the discussion: The purpose of education....I think education should make you a better person. And, in my opinion, we can be educated by anyone, anywhere, at anytime. We therefore need to always have an open mind for learning. Mr. Wesley has just educated me...and I am so very thankful.
      • thumb
        Dec 29 2011: Mary,

        Everyone young and old call me Don; I feel welcomed by them.
        I don't know Mr. Wesley.
        When I spent much of my time at Sikh Temple, they called me Mr.Don

        http://www.ted.com/profiles/985830

        Don
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: The purpose of education should be to create a well rounded individual. Someone who adds to the diversity of society. As well as allowing this persons individualism to find a passion and express it whether it be science, the arts, or even religion. By definition education is receiving and giving information through a system. Which is exactly what it should do, but what we are teaching and learning is what matters. The purpose should be to learn basic information and then decide what they want to do with it.
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: The main purpose for education is increasing the degrees of freedom on various levels.

    Freedom of thought - Supplying cognitive instruments / tools, powerful metaphors, learning to master grammar and algorithmic thought

    Freedom of affect - Allowing to feel oneself, to develop an empathic theory of mind, to be able to "deeply" connect to the world: rather then just "think about it" - "feel a part of it". Feel freely about love, death, loneliness and meaninglesness (the 4 existential categories proposed by Yalom)

    Freedom of expression - Ability to learn languages: foreign languages, programming languages, mathematical descriptions of reality, Ability to use one's voice in speach and tone-shaping, Graphic and literary forms of expression

    Freedom of communion - Team skills, Problem solving and negociating skills, basic political and social concepts applied.


    - I think the whole concept of education should be about enabling children to do whatever they want to do - to make them understand that learning is not something they "have to" but something they want to in order to do whatever makes them happy. I don't think a reform in education will do it. Old forms of education have their merits and sometimes when dilluted with a bit of freedom concepts have shovn worse results than the original - which only goes to show that sometimes a full-hearted choice or the other is better than any compromise.
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: Thank You Mr. Adam Burk for igniting the debate and i am amazed by the ideas put forward by many. I shall say i learn plenty here than in a classroom and i am very glad. I think that we have plenty of ideas that is enough to change the world, in this context improve education. i also think education must enable children not only to think but to 'do', since they will inherit a world which is at stake;judging by the present scenario. For all of us ( including myself) i would like to end with a quote by Gandhi " Be the change you want to see". Happy New Year to All.
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: Education should aim at the following three things in that order: -

    1. Develop an ability to simplify things.
    2. Develop a good sense of values.
    3. Develop civic sense.
  • Dec 28 2011: Well I believe education should be focused on bettering ourselves and our own interests. We should have more classes that focus on asking "What would you like to learn today?" rather than saying "Here is what we are learning today." As Ken Robinson said in his speech, our education system teaches us subjects like Mathematics, Science, etc because it assumes these are general necessities for everyday life but this is not necessarily the case. If an artist wants to learn about art, he/she should be able to learn art and if a dancer wants to learn more about dance, he/she should be able to learn dance. People don't really get the opportunity to learn what they REALLY want until maybe college -- in both middle school and high school you have requisite classes you MUST complete and high school has become more of a pass by in our lives that serves as, rather than an educational experience, our transcript for getting into a college we want -- and even college has its limitations with class sizes being too full, pre-requisite classes to take a certain class, etc.

    The main problem with this form of learning is that it is heavily dependent on the student. In our current education system, we simply feed people knowledge that society has deemed "important" or "necessary." In this idealistic world, the student will have to know what he/she wants to learn and in a lot of cases, people don't know what they want to learn or what they want to do. It requires a lot of self-motivation and self-discovery because people can and should be able to always change what they want to learn, what they want to be, etc. Of course, this skepticism should be saved for the "how" conversation you mentioned.
    • Dec 28 2011: From experience with many children, the kids are not as open minded as you'd think. They do need big pushes to do new things especially if they have problems with trust. once they see something in action a few times they will start to ask questions and interact. I think a better question would be "What would you like to learn more of?" I do like the idea you have. I agree about asking them. I, myself, wasn't interested ,and didn't strive until college when I got the option of what I was learning.
  • Dec 28 2011: The core "purpose of education" has remained unchanged and by definition it has rightfully focused on developing the individual with the right set of values, throwing in the right dose of knowledge, develop and hone skills with various tools and techniques needed to make a successful living and good human being. The definition can absorb any decent amount of interpretations on the various intricacies involved. It would be more intriguing to understand what needs to change in the process of education with time.Even sub four year olds are comfortable enough navigating through ipads finding their way to their favorite games..Very soon they will be in facebook, and would be making meaningful searches in youtube etc, being exposed to information through true multi media (touch ,sound and visuals)..There is a new way/thought process these little minds invent to find their way through..unguided by any schooling system..where the grandma wisdom has no more takers..
    The education system has more or less remained lethargic ,out of sync and unprepared with these fascinating and accessible changes happening around for these kids, which also bring a disturbing sense of apprehensions when it comes to the content they have access to as they swim through them freely, unguided and unchallenged.. The conventional education is sluggish owing to its "logistics". However a non transformation is reason to for worry.
    The transformation has to happen not only in the content but also in delivery and reach. There is large population of kids who does not have access these changes and rely on the conventional sources for their daily dose of information and connect. This is a huge divide and can make them just gape at the acts of their "advanced" counterparts with just wonder in their eyes as they grow up..not worthy of competition in a non level playground..
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: the purpose of education should be developing the naturals skills and talents every human has in order to use them to build up a better world and society not only to teaching persons how to generate wealth.
  • Dec 28 2011: The education should also be of basic living and self reliance. How to interact by putting names to actions instead of throwing them in to learn it on a spelling test. It would be great if the kids could grow vegetables or learn from nature. There are more resources than a pencil and paper. Kids learn by being active and involved. Having them up and seeing, this is how there school work effects there life, could be a much bigger impact. It seems they only give small examples they can't really relate to.Most important, they should learn they are good at something if they find what they love doing and why they love doing it. Sometimes if you don't figure out why you love something you'll find out later it was just an activity. It's not easy to figure out what it is you NEED to do with your life. Those people who got half way threw college before they realized they didn't like what they were doing could probably give you more tips. This is a good example of how to learn from nature. http://www.ted.com/talks/janine_benyus_shares_nature_s_designs.html
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: Hey Adam Burk
    What is the purpose of education? Does it have a purpose? If so, how do we know when we have it right?

    In the context of the industrial revolution, there were many valuable lessons that we could have learned about the value of educating people in a systemized way. The problem, I think, is that we didn't learn these lessons because we deferred to experts and politicians.

    What is the purpose of a baby? Same question really, just a different context. Maybe we should ask what is the purpose, the why, in life itself? As in: What is the purpose of promoting well-being for everyone and strong thriving communities on the whole planet. What would that even look like?

    What if we developed the bonds of humanity so well that everyone was perpetually contagiously happy. This seems to be a choice between survive and thrive or between ceasefire and loving relations.

    What if we had a gift economy? What if we saw real and economic value in natural capital? What if we gave people opportunities to practice what they have a natural talent to do well? Wow. We might need lots of practice appreciating clumsy fumbling beginner efforts.

    What if it's too hard or we're not really up for it?

    From my experience in seeing the plots of our end-of-the-world movies, it seems we need to learn that we've already invaded our own planet. We are at war with our own long-term existence. Maybe we could kick off a really enlightening education revolution by producing a movie that shows we are already dooming our future survival. The trick is to be clearly understood without causing depression or panic.

    I think we should be asking ourselves lots and lots of "what if" questions to really open up the context and create new possibilities.

    What if...
  • thumb
    Dec 28 2011: Off the top and short!

    1. - Self actualize - Maslow
    2. – Survive – problem solve - creativity
    3. – Empathise – love – aware and caring – curiosity
    4. - Justice - Right and logic – no fence sitting
    5. - Family values
    6. – Arts
    7. – Don’t fear to be wrong

    http://innjustice.blogspot.com/2011/11/hello-to-everyone-on-this-ted.html

    Aware of and caring about you
    Don [From The Silent Generation - 1930's]
    • thumb
      Dec 28 2011: Hi Don
      Spooky that you posted your blog on my birthday, but that's besides the point: You make a very good point about age and wisdom. To follow my own rule, I HAVE to ask the rhetorical question. What if we imparted wisdom? I mean what if the very purpose of education was to impart wisdom? Dare we wish for this? I dare say we are not overly supplied with wisdom as it is, and the practice of getting the eldest and youngest members of our species together seems to be a very good one. Could the purpose of education be to build bridges? Bridges such as these?
      • thumb
        Dec 28 2011: Hi Mark,

        Good metaphors we must use to “reveal wisdom” - bridges to virtues is a good idea.
        You are demonstrating your wisdom by acknowledging the question and the replies.
        Happy birthday Mark.
        Until soon,
        Aware of and caring about you
        Don [From The Silent Generation - 1930's]
      • thumb
        Dec 28 2011: Hi Mark,

        The idea of imparting wisdom is at the core of my current (and likely lifelong) pursuits. How do we do that in a world where we are "not overly supplied" with it as you say? What are the environments (physical, social, and interpersonal) that are most conducive to doing so? Those are the questions that I am thinking about and experimenting with.

        Thanks for joining the conversation.
  • thumb
    Dec 27 2011: One thing that worries me is how the education system in my country crushes most kids' creativity and causes them to become "numb"; and how that, I think, is the main reason why Portugal is out of the map in most areas of innovation. The way arround the economic crisis we face nowadays certainaly comes across a better education that arouses innovative thinking instead of spoon-feeding these kids with concepts.
  • thumb
    Dec 27 2011: This is a great theme, I think. To keep it simple, I believe that education should be about giving children the tools they need to make a positive change in the world. We should start being so much more creative when it comes to teaching and we should focus on showing kids around the world that everyone deserves to be happy and have the same human rights and opportunities. Education should focus on making better human beings. That's the only way we can have a better world. Let's help kids grow up to be knowledgeable people but also great inspiring courageous people that want to make a positive change in our world.
  • thumb
    Dec 27 2011: Great conversation and I am very happy for the opportunity to read though all the ideas here.

    I certainly agree that our modern education system derived from perpetuating the values of industrialism; the problem is that while basic literacy prepares workers for a position within the industry it does not concern itself with the special abilities that exist in each child allowing them to develop and contribute to society as is best for them.

    Although education and literacy are distinct, the emphasis must always be on education. The elements of literacy should be integrated throughout the day in a social manner through music, theatre, games and in the form of group discussions where the educators’ job is to assist students in transitioning from topic to topic and students learn how the various disciplines are tied into the whole picture of reality.

    The purpose of education should be to prepare children for life, nourishing the potential in every child so that each may connect and contribute his/her unique ideas and abilities to society.
    • E Pines

      • +21
      Dec 27 2011: Excellent points! We spend years teaching the math skills that could be taught as a model of approach in a few days as these will essentially done by computer and calculator anyway. In the meantime, the thinking/cooperative skills -- total integration -- necessary for true success in the new global world that has come upon us, are left to float.

      The industrial age has been passing to the information age, and now to the global/integral age.

      In the 13th century Leonardo of Pisa, "Fibonacci," widely introduced Italy and Europe to the Hindu-Arabic numeral system and its wonderful arithmetic. It freed them of the hopeless entanglement and debilitation of commerce and engineering under Roman numerals and abacus.

      Who shall come forth for 21st century children so that they may have the tools to untangle the global systemic mess. That they may work as a single vast strategist and tactician with billions of eyes, where all individuals use their unique talents, creativity, and problem solving skills in mutual concern and guarantee that links into a whole truly greater than the sum of the parts. Who will teach them to map and implement the interactive/interdependent strategies of Nature, on the human level, to achieve a world never before known. Who will bring our children to adapt, evolve, survive and thrive -- to start that great new chapter of human history, to fly forth as the butterfly from the overspent, rapidly decaying cocoon?
      • thumb
        Dec 28 2011: Who is a good question—we must first of all recognize who or what constitutes education. About the age of seven, a child becomes acutely susceptible to suggestion of the values and ideas implicit in society; therefore, we must rethink our programs and systems of education (including the media) in order to provide an appropriate quality education that will enable all children to fulfill their potential and contribute to building a sustainable and just global society.

        “Education must simultaneously provide maps of a complex world in constant turmoil and the compass that will enable people to find their way in it.” (Delors Report, Learning: the Treasure Within)
    • thumb
      Dec 28 2011: Nourishing the potential, C. Medansky, is a most excellent purpose.

      I wonder whether you would accept that potential as the potential to love, potential to empathize, potential to play, create, to be happy, to spread happiness, to be sensitive to the needs of our planet. I'm speaking about things that occur to me as usually not associated with head thinking or knowledge learning per se, but rather strength of spirit and heart. Even when we include health and safety (and physical agility, strength and endurance) still--emotional power and well-being often seem at the end of the list so to speak.
      • thumb
        Dec 28 2011: Thanks Mark! In answer to your question: YES, I positively accept that potential as the potential to love, potential to empathize, potential to play, create, to be happy, to spread happiness, to be sensitive to the needs of our planet, and agree with Jeremy Rifkin (The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis) that distributed and collaborative learning experiences that foster critical thinking skills and greater empathic engagement go hand-in-hand with curricula emphasizing the interconnectedness of life and geochemical processes, preparing our children to think and act as part of a global family in a shared biosphere.
  • thumb
    Dec 27 2011: I could not have expressed my feelings any better than in your answer. I agree. Although the basic skills of reading and arithmetic must be taught, it most certainly can be intergraded with the rest. Much time is wasted in a "system" that could be made more efficient, interesting and positive. My children were failing in public school with the threat of being held back. I home schooled them for 2 years, the 6th & 7th grades. I integrated all the required subjects with every activity we did during the day to make a connection to the purpose, which inspired them to want to learn more. I put them back into public school. My daughter graduated on the honor roll from 8th grade my son's grades were above average. I myself never graduated high school but I am an avid reader. I have worked successfully as a bookkeeper and a secretary, I can repair almost anything from kids toys to computers ( I have repaired my own trucks and cars). I am a decent gardener and cook, I play the guitar and sing (not too badly) I am an eternal student. I am also an eternal teacher. All because I can read and write, add and subtract AND I am INSPIRED!
  • thumb
    Dec 27 2011: To educate is to cultivate for oneself at the same time for others the skills of living in a multi-cutural and globalize world and values of life (social, political, economic, moral etc) in relation to the environment or surrounding. In order to educate we must have the enabling conditions; for personal reasons we must have the right attitude and right mindset,( to paraphrase the Bible Proverb,'Wisdom begins on the day or moment you decide to get/have/acquire Wisdom') For everyone ( in relation to School) we must have the basic infrastructure, Quality rather than Quantity, Learning rather than on Teaching and most of all it must be fun, relevant, interesting and child-centred. I prefer an outdoor school, a field trips.. so that we can use all our senses to learn; learning through interaction or action. Learning must be rewarding children response to reward, so experiment in gardening, basic mechanics etc is a must.
  • Dec 27 2011: I don't know rules here much.While I got a +3 ,this seems a good response for my express。Thanks
  • Dec 27 2011: Since the question is as confusing as asking, 'what is life?' , i will be as vague as my education taught me :-)

    To me the purpose of education is about providing a viable and open platform where 'growth' of an individual is nurtured to its highest potential in confluence with their environment.