- Drake Volkov
- Bozeman, MT
- United States
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
The dying art of conversation.
There is a lack of people willing to expand there way of thinking. And I'm not talking about a simple small talk conversation, but a conversation that allows people to debate a topic even if the problem is against the way they think. And what would be the benefit of having a said conversation.
Topics:
conversation intelligent conversation













Jom Bunsiri
edward long 100+
Jom Bunsiri
edward long 100+
Jom Bunsiri
Come to the point, the dying art of conversation. If there is the best explanation of the topic's assumption and perspective, would you mind sharing it to allow people to understand? The writer has his own assumptions and perspectives to create the topic. Is it good enough to deal with a problem with one limited assumption and perspective? Is the art of conversation dying? Thank you for your suggestion.
edward long 100+
On the topic of Mr. Volkov's debate I have nothing to add to what I offered in my comment dated Nov.20, 2011 (see below).
Sarah Moran
I personally have been forced to place a lot of, "now i don't know if i really support this", or "no offense", or any amount of lengthy explanations in order to try to convince the other person that I'm simply inviting them to look into a certain topic with me. The sad thing is, the explanations only work half of the time.
Instead of welcoming hypotheticals, people put up a wall they didn't even know they had been building.
I think the art of this type of conversation is tough to have with some individuals no matter what time period we live in. In the digital age, it seems most people are overwhelmed with viewpoints that such speculation naturally turns into a debate for the fact its hard for viewpoints to mature when you are constantly bombarded with new ones on a bunch of irrelevant topics.
The convenience of conversation in a quiet environment is a necessary break from influence besides the imagination and creativity of the people engaged in such conversation. It needs to happen more, but people need to accept that stubbornness is something that they might have to overcome in order to be able to carry out any conversation that holds meaning.
Goldmark Anthony Indico
Phillip McKay
Rhona Pavis 50+
edward long 100+
If yes, I argue that conversation is not dying. It is an art enjoyed by those who can practice it freely and respectfully with those who hold opinions different from theirs. For those who insist that their opinion alone deserves consideration and acceptance conversation is most assuredly a dying art, if not already dead. Conversation is where two or more people take turns listening patiently and respectfully while another person speaks of theirown opinions, understandings and curiosities. Shakespeare said conversation should be, "pleasant without scurrility, witty without affectation, free without indecency, learned without conceitedness, novel without falsehood."
Ed Schulte 50+
for bringing forward the necessary qualifier here.
I wasn't willng to ask if this is a conversation about debate, or, a debate around the art conversation.
Alos re: " For those who insist that their opinion alone deserves consideration and acceptance "
it is always FUN to remind "those" of the Dr D. R. Hawkins pointer, " ALL opinions are Vanity"
Robert Galway 20+
However, writing, like these blogs, does permit conversations of the type you looking for to occur and flourish.
Jeronique Bartley
Drake Volkov