TED Conversations

griffin tucker

TEDCRED 10+

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

jails should be more widely known as schools

some correctional facilities are becoming a business or already are a business, the future of these businesses depends on more people to commit crimes.

the idea here is to give incentives for correctional facility businesses to fully rehabilitate people into society by means of ensuring they don't re-offend.

one incentive in western society is money.

while giving money to one of these businesses from the tax-payer for each individual that doesn't re-offend may seem like a good idea, there are many problems with this idea. one of the problems with giving individualised incentives is that the future of the business would still depend on repeat or new offenders.

however, if the tax-payer were to give incentives to a correctional facility business based on how successful it was based on statistics, eventually the rehabilitation facility would effectively be a school.

this idea was inspired by a conversation i had with Colleen Steen.


EDIT: the main premise of the thread was intended to be an effective realistic way to utilise the commercialisation of prisons, and in the process improve society, but perhaps i didn't word the topic's title very well.

instead, i have changed the topic title to better suit the conversation, just as Salim Solaiman suggested.

+8
Share:
progress indicator
  • thumb
    Oct 23 2011: Schools try to turn out successful students so they can advertise their success, in order to attract new students. Could a few "special" jails be run in this way, so as to attract "students" who truly want to be rehabilitated? It's one model. But then you are removing those more positive inmates from the general population. Is this good or bad? I don't know.
  • thumb
    Oct 23 2011: I think that your idea might have some good timing as far as teaches in the US being laid off and unappreciated that maybe, just maybe, the department of corrections ought to hire them to teach at the state prisons. How about create a program where teachers could volunteer some of their valuable time while they adjust or rethink their careeras altogether. Maybe the state could at least offer these teacher volunteers some kind of incentives to donate their time to help out with some of our needy inmates and state prisoners. But then again that would be very idealistic as the state prison system is not so much into the rehabilitating business these days. Or how about rating prisons as far as how well they are rehabilitaing prisoners and then closing the ones that are not accomplishing their purpose. Prisons seem to run like our pentagon, wihtout any oversight and getting bigger and more complex; but always ripping off the taxpayer since we really do not benefit from any of their complex expansions and/or spending. It is a shame that we spend less and less on students than we do on prisoners, something is terribly wrong with this picture and should be a national dialog to find a solution to a worsening problem. I think prisons provide an environtmet for prisoners to sharpen their skills as criminals or to the very least to connect and network with other criminals to the detriment of society.
    So for the sake of a safer society we do need prisons to resemble more like schools in more ways than one as these prisoners end up integrating back into our neighborhoods. But at the same time we need ot figure out how to spend more on our current shool children and reform our crrent school systems otherwise we'll be preparing our kids to fill the spots in prisons rathern than colleges and universities. I am ecouraged by the well informed and creative comments here on this subject and hope this dialog ends up a priority for the sake of a safer and more educated society.
  • thumb
    Oct 19 2011: Hello to all..........Last week I watched a documentary on TV which gave a description of a rehabilitive "prison" in of all places, Texas, The CP state. Anyway this is a separate facility where the population has chosen to go. The person leading this program demonstrated how this works. Prisoners are told about how the program is run and only those who want to suceed are allowed. It was amazing how these people responded to respect and caring from their teachers. There are hugs and tears at graduation time. The prisoners' entry back into the world is made much easier by what they learn there (Things they should have learned as a child) I was really gratified and hope this spreads.
  • thumb
    Oct 19 2011: Great topic. I don't know much about prisons but I know a thing or two about incentives vs. achievements. If prisons are commercialized they have an essential incentive of keeping crime alive so they can stay in business. I'm not suggesting that they will be devious and try to keep crime incidents well and kicking, however, by having an incentive to their business model that goes against the principle of reforming society it will be hard for the prisons management and unfair from Government to expect full cooperation because while the mission might look similar the vision is slightly different. A Vision is where an organization wants to be in the future. A mission is the things they'll do to get there. So, while societies, governments and commercialized prisons agree on the activities they need to do to reform prisoners (i.e. the mission) the visions are different. For society it's to have less crimes and a safer place; for commercialized prisons it's to have a lower ratio of returning criminals, while they sound both positive they're not the same thing.

    We need to take this a step back and look at a preventive approach. What's causing the crimes to take place? And how can we minimize these circumstances from existing? Governments need to focus on the preventive part by offering better opportunities for developing healthy minds from a young age. Prisons need to prepare prisoners on how to get back to society so they can contribute positively to their lives and to the communities. That means their KPIs should be purely on how well they prepared these prisoners for life after prison and the return to prison ratio. Society is also responsible for welcoming the newly rehabilitated fellow citizens so they can feel they have a chance of starting over. We can't punish people twice. If they did the crime and the time then they're back to a clean sheet. Otherwise, it is society that needs reform.
    • thumb
      Oct 19 2011: i agree that the KPI score should be measured by how well the prison has prepared the prisoner for life after prison.

      perhaps if there were more contributing factors to the KPI, such as incentives for released prisoners to prevent crime itself and encourage good behaviour once they are released? i'm not sure how this could work in a proven measurable method, any ideas?
      • thumb
        Oct 20 2011: Drivers for people are different. What might motivate one released prisoner might not work for another. So, measurability in this case will be quite complex because of the social and psychological factors involved in both the released prisoners and society around them.

        In order to set the KPIs we need to breakdown the types of crimes according to behavior. Character is influenced by two factors: nature (innate qualities that we are born with) and nurture (the environment we grow up in). Promoting and facilitating change will be relatively more successful among those who committed crimes mainly due to external elements like peer pressure, poor upbringing, and lack of education and vocational skills compared to those who committed crimes because they got a rush from breaking rules, causing pain to others, or simply out pure greed. Therefore, the rehabilitation process and KPIs for those two types of criminals need to be different. Such a deep structure is difficult to design in short conversations, but I guess that's why sharing ideas from everyone works wonders.
  • thumb
    Oct 15 2011: Colleen, you're right. There is a technical difficulty with the Reply. It is being checked out right now. Thank you for working around it. :)
  • thumb
    Oct 15 2011: Hi Colleen
    You are welcome !!!
    Good things need to be spreaded as much as possible, you did the right thing by posting it.

    A bit uncomfortable with the credit you gave which I don't deserve as I just did the copy paste job ..... but as always I am fond of your loving and kind gesture.............. :)

    Note : TED Conversation needs intervention from IT experts as "REPLY" button is not working for quite sometime today
  • thumb
    Oct 15 2011: There must be a challenge with the system...it will not accept a comment directly under the comment I wish to reply to.

    Salim,
    Thanks for providing those two links. She is an amazing person, and I hope you don't mind that I posted the first link on the TED page with credit to you:>)

    Gisela,
    You are absolutely right...we need to give them something different to learn, if we hope to see different results.
  • thumb
    Oct 15 2011: Jails already seem to be places where people learn to commit different kinds of crimes - or better ways to commit the same crimes.
  • thumb
    Oct 14 2011: Hi Griffin I have the similar view as some of the posts below. One question was immediate in mind as came across the main premise of this thread. That is "are not schools already jails"?

    So both needs to be reformed.

    Here comes an actual experiment already done with jail...please check the link
    http://www.goodnewsindia.com/Pages/content/transitions/tihar.html

    Below is the TED talk of that person who did that http://www.ted.com/talks/kiran_bedi_a_police_chief_with_a_difference.html
  • thumb
    Oct 14 2011: The most important thing is that we get kids interested in school, I know I already said this in a previous comment, but it's what needs to be done.
    • thumb
      Oct 14 2011: It's a very important piece Dude, and a good place to start changing our systems and practices:>)
  • Oct 14 2011: Nathan and Colleen, That is what schools should be. In other countries, children are tracked at a very early age based on abilities. If we attempted to allow them to discover as mujch as possible through at least grade 3 or 4 and then present them with career possibilities, they could track themselves. Schools could become magnet programs where the English taught in a particular program would be specific to that field as would the math and the science, etc. A student who wanted to be a mechanic could learn good communication skills, filing, keyboarding, some basic literature, accounting, lots of associated math and science, and then begin an internship for his remaining 3 years of school. If we had a person at the school that could check to see that the student was learning things, he would be in the best environment for doing so - real life. I don't think that anyone would ever want to shake the beehive up this much though. It is far to comfortable the way things are.
  • thumb
    Oct 14 2011: Drugs are a HUGE issue. Now I live in Maine, so there aren't as many people in our schools. But I can only think 10 people that don't do drugs.Even though my school only has 183 kids in it, that means only 1 out of 19 kids DON'T do drugs. Apply that statistic to a school with 3000 kids in it and only 170 don't use drugs. Now there may be more than 10 kids in my school, I mean a child of my intelligence could be disliked by many, so I don't know everyone. But even if its 20 out 183, thats still REALLY bad. that 1/9 kids if i now apply THAT to a school with 3000 kids, that's 2640 who do drugs, that's A LOT of kids.
    • thumb
      Oct 14 2011: I agree Nathan, that drugs are a HUGE issue in our schools, and the problem goes with those folks all the way to jail, because 95% of those incarcerated are drug and/or alchohol addicted. Many of the crimes committed, are by offenders under the influence of drugs, or trying to get money for drugs.
  • thumb
    Oct 14 2011: When I was a kid I would visit my father in prison, not here in the US but in my country, and I remember that his last few years were spent in this huge prison complex that seemed more like vacation retreat than a prison. I say this because the prison had a school, tennis courts a large soccer field and even a few acres of open land for some prisoners to cultivate all kinds of things. My father was a farmer and he had a small plot where he would plant tomatoes, green peppers, tomatillos, sweet potatoes, potatoes, peanuts, and many other veggies that I can't think of. He somehow also owned about 30 chickens and would make all sorts of things for us to bring home and sell; things like fishing nets, car seat covers, huge light bulbs with nicely decorated ships inside and a along with the many vegetable and eggs what we would take home to sell to help us surve.

    I say all this to make the point that what we should create is a prison system where prisoners would make their own products and take care of their own needs. In other words put them in a place that would give them the opportunity to learn skills that would teach them to be self sufficient.

    Maybe this could be an alternative prison model that prisoners could choose to go into instead of a traditional prison. Having learned from my father to love and appreciate mother earth has tought me how to be a better human being and I think that this would be a great way to teach our prisoners respect and collaboration for a better future for them and their children.

    I work for the LA County sheriff as a custody officer and see first hand just how this alternative way of treating and dealing with out prison and inmate populations could not only save us tax money but teache them life skills usefull once they are released into our communities.

    Great question Mr. Tucker, now lets just keep brainstorming and we'll figure out the answer to one of the biggest monetary issues plaguing US and many other countries.
    • thumb
      Oct 14 2011: Such a moving post, Ruben. Thank you. Your experience as the child of a prisoner, and now working within the prison system itself demonstrates your ability to see this issue from many sides. Your humanity and compassion clearly weaves itself through your life, and into your work. There are some prisons in Norway that practice principles similar to the ideas you suggest. It does address some of the less sustainable problems we face in the prison system. Are the prisons in your country still like that? Can prisoners grow their own food, and distribute it to family members to sell? Growing food also gave your father a way, albeit difficult, to contribute something to his family's well being...which could only be beneficial to his sense of self worth. I hope you keep going in this conversation...you have so much to offer.
      • thumb
        Oct 16 2011: Hi Linda, thanks for your response to my post. My country of origin is Mexico, and to tell you the truth, I don't know of any other prison within Mexico that is similar to the one my father was in, but would like to believe that there are many more like it throughout Mexico. This was about thirth plus years ago and i was about seven years old when my mother would take us to visit my father. It did seem very dignified for my father to be able to provide for his family's well being. And this is something that is completely missing from the way we imprison inmates and prisoners here in the USA.
        But you bring a very important point that for the life of me I can not seem to understand how come rich nations refuse to implement viable solutions to the problems at hand that already exist in other countries. Why is this? If Norway does in fact implement priciples similar to the ones I mention and that are hopefully working to rehabilitate prisoners, then why not borrow those systems and then apply them wherever needed. And I see this unwillingness to borrow and implement great ideas from other countries that would work miracles in many other places. Things like what the Cubans started doing after the collapse of the cold war; the Cuban government started implementing an organic way of growing their food since they did not have access to fertilizers anymore. There is truth and proof to the saying "necessitiy is the mother of invention" is alive and well.
        We have a program here in the LA County Sheriff that to a very small degree works a bit similar to what my father lived at that prison in my home state, Colima Mexico. About a 45-60 minute drive north of LA there is a jail complex called Pitchess Detention Center and is has lots of open land that is used for a green house and other work shops that are tended by inmates who work and train in them while in our temporay custody. I only wish that our Sheriff would expand on this idea.
        Best regards Linda.
  • thumb
    Oct 14 2011: Although many are suggesting ways to correct adult offenders, I think the best way to solve the problem is to spend more money on educating people when they are young. It's harder to reeducate people when they are older.

    This question reminds me of a satire piece I've read: http://politicalirony.com/2011/06/05/a-modest-proposal/ . The most important line being at the end, suggesting that we give "our schools the resources necessary to keep our students OUT of prison".
  • Oct 13 2011: We should turn schools into schools first. In K-12 schools, we spend about $10,000 per student/per year (on average). In prisons we spend about $30,000 per inmate/per year. If we reversed these amounts, schools would be able to address many of the current issues and shortfalls, such as inadequate facilities, class size, teacher training, supporting special needs kids, etc. before these kids would become illiterate drop-outs destined for the rotating doors of the penal system. I'm not an advocate that throwing money at schools is going to solve all the education problems in our country, but a better distribution of funding in the education/prison symbiosis is certainly worthy of exploration.
  • Oct 13 2011: I do not think that the same is true for some sex crimes. Many pedophiles and rapists cannot be rehabilitated. Even after chemical castration or other types of treatments, they will reoffend. Others who opt to commit different types of crimes may have more of a choice, but these people seem not to be able to help themselves. I can see your point regarding most crime being centered around the almighty dollar. Just about everything done in this country is centered around money. I don’t believe that sex crimes are, however. Those are a special breed of crime which should have special types of rules. I am not talking about the statutory rape of a 16.9 year old girl by her 18 year old boyfriend whose parents are out to get him. I am specifically addressing pedophiles who molest young children because they believe that is the way they express their love. That child cannot give consent and it leaves lasting scars. Worse yet is the offender who is jailed, released, and reoffends because rehabilitation is not possible for such people. Some of them will tell you this. I would not mind putting them on an island somewhere where they could not hurt anyone and let them care for themselves. I disagree with your idea that we need to keep crime alive in our society. Our present system is obviously not working (for schools and prisons) and does need to be revamped. The problem is that no one with any sense will be allowed to work on the solution.
  • thumb
    Oct 13 2011: Think about it in a different way.. in school, people socialize, get to know each other. there are rules, but overall people make friends. now lets put criminals in that atmosphere. They would be in a place where there are more criminals just like them. putting two and two together, you're helping them find friends/accomplices who share similar backgrounds and are not afraid to do break the law, and at the same time raising their intelligence level.. it doesnt sound like it would have a good outcome for me.. however, i also understand that there coudl be positive outcomes from such an arrangement.
    • thumb
      Oct 13 2011: Estrella,
      Do you think offenders are not making friends and connections while in jail now?
    • Oct 13 2011: If a person is hell bent not to change nothing can be done. But if teachings can bring about changes to some jail birds it might have impact on others too. Question is, what will be taught in such schools?
      • thumb
        Oct 13 2011: I agree Sunil,
        People will not change unless s/he wants to change. I believe they need to learn skills they can use to be productive members of society when released from jail. Some offenders have some skills, and many do not. We could set up programs to teach and learn some skills from each other?

        Estrella mentions the possibility of connecting with each other, sharing similar backgrounds, and probably sharing information regarding how to be successful in crime. Offenders are doing that all the time now. We somehow need to redirect them to a more productive learning experience.
  • Oct 13 2011: Excellent idea. In India many corrupt politicians and bureaucrats are going behind the bars. Most of these lunatics are anyway "under educated" so forcing them to study some life lesson can bring some humility in them.
    • thumb
      Oct 13 2011: Sunil,
      I also think that generally politicians and bureaucrats are not a direct threat to the safety of society. Their crime is usually corruption, as you say. So, rather than putting them behind bars, perhaps serving the community in some way would be more appropriate? What do you think?
      • Oct 13 2011: Sorry, I don't agree with the point that they are not direct threat to the safety of the society. Consider a corrupt engineer using lower grade cement to build a bridge. It can lead to a really bad outcome. So I don't think a softer punishment to corrupt officials is a solution. However, I do agree that community services should be the part of the punishment.

        We all know education plays a major role in building ones character but I guess there are other basic life lessons that are missing in our educational system or they are not instilled properly. Highly qualified educated Wall Street Bankers should be at least taught to not to be so greedy.

        I guess my point is criminals should be punished according to their crime however if they are not going to spend all their life behind bars they should be at least given some good lessons in moral values along with some professional training to survive outside the jail compound.
        • thumb
          Oct 13 2011: You're right...building a bridge with lower grade cement is a threat to members of society. I was thinking more of crimes like rape, murder and assault as "direct threats" to members of society. And I was thinking of "corruption" more in terms of financial corruption.

          Unfortunately, many who are incarcerated for crime, come from backgrounds that have not taught them some very basic beneficial life lessons. This fact is no excuse for their behavior, but if they don't learn a different behavior, they are going to continue to offend.

          I agree that criminals should be punished, and/or given some good life lessons according to their crime. If they are going to be released back into society, which most of them are, it would be beneficial to all of us to have them be more productive members of our societies.
  • thumb
    Oct 13 2011: Nice Idea ..... But need Moral Bases ...... !
  • thumb
    Oct 13 2011: I agree with changing the Jail system, but I wouldn't change the system to mimic schools. If I had to make an on the spot answer, I'd say the Norwegians have it right. They really focus on rehabilitating the inmates. In a way, I guess you can say they're teaching the inmates how to live a proper life.
    Here's a couple links on the prison system they have:
    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1986002,00.html
    http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1989083,00.html
    • thumb
      Oct 13 2011: thank-you very much for the very relevant links!

      perhaps other countries could adopt this system if it's proven to be successful, perhaps via the means of a system of evidence-based policy.
  • Oct 13 2011: Wow, interesting Mr. Tucker!
    In my humble opinion, All correctional facilities are a business. How much does it cost to feed an inmate?
    Per day? (of course it is a business) School is over rated. Parents, must step up, and take care of their own children!
    I like your idea!! (pipe dream but good idea!) My apologies, my glass is half empty. Good luck!
  • thumb
    Oct 13 2011: By the looks of it (at least in the States) it seems as if the opposite is happening :) schools are turning into jails.

    But still, how do you teach someone, in a school setting, that stealing is wrong, while they love stealing?

    Nowadays jail no longer seems to be a deterrent. To a homeless person it is better than home.

    What may very well help in case of stealing/robbery is to have a lessening of the sentence if there is an agreement to be educated or trained in a profession, so the person can be useful to society, and so make a living.
    • thumb
      Oct 13 2011: Adriaan,
      You've touched on an important piece that is being used with the "Real Justice", "Reparative" and "Diversion" programs...reduce jail time in favor of educational programs, training, and community service. I think it would be beneficial to use all of these programs more often and more effectively.
  • thumb
    Oct 13 2011: I think this is a great idea but the fundamental problem with the prison system (and really the justice system in general) is that we actually have a very confused idea about what we want out of it. We want to punish as a disincentive but prisons are not frightening enough to really do that... in fact the threat of having your hand cut of or being hung wasn't enough to stop crime. We want revenge, though we don't like to admit it we want people to 'pay for what they've done.' And prisons are not close enough to 'an eye for an eye' to satisfy our need for a symbolic balancing of the scales. Plus a key part of 'paying a price' is that once it's done it's done. You steal something, you get a spear in the leg, then it's forgotten about. Our most modern idea is that of rehabilitation. Clearly that's the best way to stop people re-offending and improve the character of society and just as clearly our prisons do not do that... in fact they generally make people 'more criminal'. We can never really do that though because our nature will not allow us to see people get counselling and a good education in return for committing a crime. Until we can love and feel compassion for those who wrong us we cannot rehabilitate them.
  • thumb
    Oct 13 2011: That is a great idea!
  • thumb
    Oct 11 2011: Dude, they're the same thing HAHAHAHA
    • thumb
      Oct 11 2011: Hey Dude:>)
      Your profile says that you have a lot of interesting ideas and spend time pondering interesting concepts.

      How do you feel about the present system of punishment or corrections? Do you think/feel that it is working well? Do you think/feel there are some changes needed? Why do you think/feel jails and schools are the same, and how could they be very different? Thanks for your forthcoming ideas...I appreciate your ability to ponder:>)
      • thumb
        Oct 13 2011: In all honesty, I've actually come to like school. I have friends and interesting things to learn. So I'm overall happy going to school
        • thumb
          Oct 13 2011: Glad to hear you like school Nathan...it's a GREAT tool and wonderful opportunity:>)

          In another comment, you write..."Well when schools and prisons are compared schedule wise, there are many similarities, set things at set times, I realize it needs to be like this in order to keep the students from getting confused with scheduling, but I feel as though something could change about the whole process...i just don't know what"

          I agree that schedules and organization are important to maintain order. I feel that students could participate more in the process, and have more choices regarding what s/he would study. It may help a student feel more creative and part of the process? What do you think?
    • thumb
      Oct 11 2011: they are already very similar - atleast boarding schools might be considered jails.

      school is supposed to be enjoyed in my opinion. if you're not enjoying school, then maybe you could come up with some ideas on how to make school better or something. maybe even a class where you play educational video games that are actually fun? (educational and fun don't always seem to mix - this should be changed)
      • Oct 11 2011: I am not sure why young people always beel that school must be fun. I like to think of school as being the "job" my students are fulfilling at this time. This is why they are not paid to go to school. We offer them a free education. Now I agree it should be as painless as possible and I do attempt as much technology as possible (one of the 21st century skills) for my students. In this time of immediate gratification and such a sense of entitlement, I believe that we need to teach students to work for what they get and not just let them play more. In terms of prisons, convicts used to work while they were incarcerated. Now we are too concerned with violating people's rights. And what about those who commit acts for which they cannot be rehabilited? By the way, are boarding schools really that bad?
        • thumb
          Oct 11 2011: i believe jobs should be enjoyed too! - but perhaps i'm being too idealistic.

          i also believe that there is simply no such thing as those who commit acts for which they can't be rehabilitated for - maybe the knowledge of how to rehabilitate them isn't around yet, but it's simply my belief that anyone can be taught.

          boarding schools really aren't that bad, no, i was just going along with the joke that Nathan Austin made. jokes aside though, sometimes school can seem like a prison to those attending.
        • thumb
          Oct 12 2011: I believe that education and employment can be enjoyable, and we need to put in the time and energy to reach our goals. Many times our perception of an experience can change the dynamic of the experience:>) What do you think about this idea Nathan?

          Penny,
          You ask..."what about those who commit acts for which they cannot be rehabilitated"? If we had prisons/correctional facilities that were educational, self sustaining communities, the offender could still contribute to society in some way while incarcerated?

          I agree Griffin, that anyone can be taught, and maybe the method by which some people can change their life, is not yet apparent to us.
        • thumb
          Oct 14 2011: I like it Colleen, but I think when a child takes a class he or she should be able to chose a field that that classes specializes in. For example if someone, like myself, wanted to major in computer programing when they go to college, and is taking and English class, they would want to learn certain vocab such as loop, binary, etc. I personally think it would make students eager to go to class. Who wouldn't want to learn about something they plan to have a career in?
          Plus it would be inexpensive to schools, it would be easy to teach the teachers what each word meant and what action that word states.
          If we were able to get just one school to do this, and then see the success rates of the students getting into the career they honed in their classes. We might just be able to get government funding for maybe not all...but most high schools to do this.
        • thumb
          Oct 14 2011: EXCELLENT ideas Nathan.
          I totally agree that people learn better when a topic is interesting for them. So, we agree that a certain amount of organization and scheduling is important, and within those guidelines, people could have more freedom of choice regarding what they study? Sounds like BALANCE! I also agree that people would be more eager to learn, which may distract them from some behavioral problems, which means the teachers would have more time to teach, rather than deal with discipline. This sounds like a win-win situation for everyone involved!!! :>)
        • thumb
          Oct 14 2011: It's like a positive domino effect
    • thumb
      Oct 12 2011: Hi Nathan,.

      In a way, I would agree with your opinion the school and the prison system are similar concept. When we look back at the history of public education after the industrial revolution has been to generate median workers to know enough about the work manual for which they had to perform; a factory model. As a result, the quality of the system has been always poor as well as it has been enfluenced by other factors, such as economies, and political trend.

      I do not know very much about the system, but if we find a way to effectively educate the people who are in jail, that would be a triumphantant way to reduce many problems in our society.
      • thumb
        Oct 13 2011: Well when schools and prisons are compared schedule wise, there are many similarities, set things at set times, I realize it needs to be like this in order to keep the students from getting confused with scheduling, but I feel as though something could change about the whole process...i just don't know what
    • Oct 12 2011: Nathan;
      I tend to disagree with the common concieved notion that schools and jail are alike. In truth jails are structured to resemble a school in that they are supposed to encourage rehabilitaion and structure. However it has been my experience that often times jail creates stigmas which follow a person and make it very difficult to be accepted into society. As well there is much unrecognized injustice in a regular penatentary that contributes to harder criminals rather then functioning members of society. I take a more "treatment" oriented approach; not to say that peeople who are jailed are ill but it relates better to me in a treatment vs punishment point of view. As a studying addictions counsellor I am also aware that a good portion of inmates suffer from addictions which helps neither the addict or the tax payers. The addict can easily access many drugs in jail while the government spends tons of incarceration fees for an individual to doesnt only not get better but possibly gets worse. And that more of less goes for most cases, addictions or not. Idealistically if the idea of jails being modeled after schools hasn't worked yet , will it ever? Personally i feel that if you put a ton of people with no empathy for eachother into a room and tell them to 'fend for themselves' then no its never going to work.Maybe if some actual real life learning was implimented or offered an inmate would possibly feel useful and be motivated to change. But realalistically speaking who's really going to want to help the "BAD" part of society? I would be but the point is people dont tend to want to fix whats already broken, and it would certainly cause uproar in a society so use to punishment as motivation. So I guess I pose a question to anyone willing to answer: Where does our obligation to a population of "criminals" lie and how can we fix what is broken (meaning the institution)?
      • thumb
        Oct 12 2011: Christitne,
        I agree...95% of those incarcerated are drug and/or alchohol addicted. I also agree that they can access drugs while incarcerated. In fact, one thing I discovered while volunteering in a facility, is that one of the correctional officers brought the drug supply into the facility. When I went to the administration with this information, it turns out they all knew about it, and the excuse they gave for keeping this person as an employee was that he showed up...did his job...and it was difficult to get people willing to do this job! One of the offenders in the "cognitive self change" sessions I facilitated recieved the drugs and sold them to other offenders. He said he makes more money when he's in jail than he does on the outside! The very sad thing is that EVERYBOBY within the system knew about this!

        "Where does our obligation to a population of criminals lie and how can we fix what is broken (meaning the institution)?"
        That is a HUGE question!!!
        First of all, my belief, is that as individuals, we are all connected. Obviously, behaviors that cause incarceration for some, are impacting our society a great deal. So, is our obligation simply to those incarcerated? Do we also have an obligation to ourselves? I believe that we do.

        Changing how the institutions function is a big challenge. As with anything, I believe we need to continually take small steps to the best of our ability. We can be more aware of who we elect, appoint and employ in state and federal gov. positions, we can speak up when prison/correction issues are debated, we can volunteer within the system and/or speak about the issues to our legislative representatives (both of which I have done in the past).

        FYI...When I discovered the drug issue within the facility, along with many other inappropriate, and illegal behaviors, I spoke with authorities. It wasn't long after, that there was an investigation and the 4 top administrators were removed from the facility.

        I believe there is hope:>)
  • Oct 11 2011: While I think this is a marvelous idea, I couldn't help but think of a piece I consider missing and I hope you won't mind. It's just wishful thinking on my part.The idea of prisons as private business, traded on the U.S. stock exchange, really turns me off and makes me feel it doesn't bode well for the future. In fact, I do believe the first prison ever built failed and they all have since then. That is, as real correctional facilities. Yes, as business it would need steady traffic of oh, what, clients? customers? foot traffic? but this has already been mentioned. But what made me think a bit further were the comments about the need for the business to survive. What if those incarcerated, depending upon the degree of commitment they had, the degree of real interest they really had in helping to bring about change and the degree of honest and sincere commitment to helping the society they failed in, that the very idea for them to work for was, or is, as teachers themselves, to be so successful (a high goal) that they saw a steady decline in their customer base. So the goal really is and isn't this it? is to not survive as a business, so-to-speak. It is to be so successful that they truly become assets to their communities, that they eventually have no traffic at all. I can only imagine not only what their "outside society" might be like but also what real, honest, heartfelt and perhaps profound psychic and emotional change they might experience within themselves and how much love and compassion might flow between these two societies. It's a brilliant idea and I believe very possible. Felons have a tendency to really value their prison peers, people like them and I have seen this happen on the outside for those who were able to find their way once released. This could very well help many become citizens who could be released once more, having really changed themselves. As the saying goes, "In teaching, we are taught."
    • thumb
      Oct 11 2011: Hello Random Chance:>)
      I don't like the idea of prisons/correctional facilities operated as businesss either....but they are. I also agree that as they are now, and have been for many years, they are not working. We're continually building larger facilities, to accommodate more offenders!

      Another thing I've observed, while volunteering in woman/childrens shelter, family center, child protective services and correctional facilities, is that we're seeing the same families going through these agencies and institutions generation after generation. Something is obviously missing in all of these programs that are supposed to "help" people move out of dysfunctional behaviors. I even had the opportunity to mediate with 3 convicted felons...mother, father and son!

      Many offenders have certain skills which could be taught while incarcerated and used productively when they are released into society. I agree that there is an opportunity to teach and learn something different while they are imprisoned. I agree..."In teaching, we are taught". We often teach what we need to learn:>)

      This is why I would LOVE to see correctional facilities turned into self sustaining villages, where offenders could teach/learn with each other, and with planned programs. They need to have skills they can use, and they need to learn different practices and life styles that will support them while trying to become productive members of society. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever, to continue to put them behinid bars for a period of time, and expect that they will go out into society and behave differently. We are doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results?
      • Oct 11 2011: You know Colleen, there are those who say the definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over and expecting different results. Your last sentence. You didn't say that but it evoked something in me. Doing the same thing over and over is not a definition of insanity but for those with serious problems it is a "description" of insane behavior. Otherwise, it is called practice in all other endeavors.
        So something is very wrong with seeing the same people over and over but I will say that should really sound an alarm that it isn't solely them! For that to occur points to a system that is deeply flawed and we keep using it over and over! We keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results! So, who's insane here? Someone in another forum here said that there are people who need to be isolated from society to learn how to adapt to that society. I had to ask, just how is someone to learn that in isolation from the society in which they have failed and will be put back into? They will learn only about the society in which they are put, so your thoughts about self-sustaining villages makes sense and how that would come about I don't know but I can certainly imagine it. And I agree about the skills which are empowering and can be passed on in order to learn how to be a master safe-cracker of life. So ultimately, it is those on the outside of prison who have to truly embrace accepting the person though we don't accept the behavior. We cannot continue to condemn, ostracize and demonize those we say live in the "dark". They will neverever want to come out then. We have to invite them into the light and accept them as they are in many ways if we are to truly help them to help themselves change.
        • thumb
          Oct 11 2011: Yes...I know...I left that little piece out:>)
          I agree, many of our systems that were put in place to assist people in their time of need, or punish them for crimes, are not working...so...who is repeating the insane behaviors?

          I ask the same thing...how is someone to adapt to a society from which they are isolated?

          I don't think it would be that difficult to create self sustaining villages...one small step at a time. Of course, we mention this to the powers that be, and it will take several years of legislation and billions of dollars!

          The facility I was involved with has a garden, which started out years ago as a very small project to keep some of the offenders busy. It has grown incredibly since it began, and they now suppy all the vegetables for the facility, as well as many non-profit organizations. The guys who work in the gardens are in a very different mind set than those who hang out inside doing video games! We could get them to build little garden sheds (woodworking and building skills)...maybe get some chickens and other animals (farming)...get them to paint the facility some interesting and stimulating colors, rather than the drab, dirty walls they look at...many of the guys are good mechanics (they know how to hot wire cars anyway!!! LOL)...they could repair and maintain farm equipment...teach and learn at the same time...it could evolve, IF the administration supported the idea!

          I like that...they could learn to be "master safe-crackers of life"!!! Good one Random Chance. BTW, I don't believe anything is by "chance":>)

          Yes...accepting the person and not the behavior is the piece we need as part of completing the puzzle. There is an old Native American practice to deal with offenders in the tribe. The villagers would gather, and the offender would be put on "trial". The members of the village would talk about the offenders skills and talents, tell them they are appreciated for these qualities, and their offensive behaviors are not acceptable.
      • Oct 11 2011: I think we need to intervene while the kids are young and stop the progression of this. I like your village idea, especially with violent sex offenders who probably cannot be rehabilitated.
        • thumb
          Oct 12 2011: I agree Penny...intervention while kids at risk are young would be the ideal! That's why mentoring programs are usually so helpful. Kids at risk need good role models in their lives, which many of them do not have.

          I mentioned this in another comment, but I feel it's worth repeating:
          While volunteering with dept. of corrections, women/childrens shelter, family center, and working with children in state custody, I observed that we are running into the same families generation after generation, who continue to fall through the cracks. We need to break the cycle somewhere along the way!
        • Oct 13 2011: Hi Penny.
          Just wanted to add that anyone can be rehabilitated except for some extreme forms of insanity. While there are some great ideas espoused here, none address the cause of crime and to eliminate the cause of something is to eliminate the thing itself. Most don't want to go there because therein lies the truth and the truth means action in ways we don't like or want to do. At that point we all become a bit more like a criminal ourselves, that is, if we identify them to some degree as those who might take or look for the easier softer way to do or get something. Stealing isn't really stealing. It is just another way of getting something. To one who doesn't think or believe that way, it must seem preposterous, outrageous and not true. But it is. But what is the cause? The cause is money. Studies done for almost 100 years show nearly all crime, worldwide is directly or indirectly connected to money. Since this is true, why don't people see that getting rid of almost 100% of crime is a good thing? Well, they cannot or will not think with imagination, creativity, critically and courageously because they don't see a future that isn't like it is now with all the things we are so comfortable with even if they are bad. This points to a populace that might not be willing nor able to save themselves. After all, how in hell can we live without crime? Surely we need to keep crime alive so that we have something to fight against, even if it is each other. It is really sad and foolish.
  • thumb
    Oct 10 2011: TEDxPrison events!
    • thumb
      Oct 10 2011: a seriously great idea!
    • thumb
      Oct 10 2011: YES! The facilities I've been in (working with offenders...not incarcerated myself...LOL) have computers, and the offenders are allowed to play games, surf the web, and participate in blog forums, etc. The TED event could start by encouraging them (mandating?) to only watch TED videos! This could expand to actual TED events in the correctional facilities...geared toward issues affecting offenders?

      There was a program started here years ago by two offenders who were in jail for life. They called it "Get a Life". They talked about their own life, what led them to get in trouble with the law when they were very young, their families and what programming led them to crime. As the program evolved, they gave a tour of the prison, and told the participants exactly how it felt every day to be incarcerated. Showed them the shower room with cameras...what it felt like to hear the metal doors close behind them each time they moved from one place to another in the facility...many little details that one who has not had that experience may not think about. They did their presentation to classes of high school students, kids at risk, social services workers, etc. etc. In my perception, and the belief of many others, the program was a GREAT success, and many other offenders started participating...telling their stories, etc.

      THE PROGRAM WAS CANCELED...AND NOBODY KNEW WHY!!!

      "Houses of Healing", the book/program I talked about Griffin, encourages those incarcerated to tell their stories. This, of course, gets them to think and feel the underlying reasons for their behavior. In the "cognitive self change" sessions we did, one of the very first questions I asked is..."what were you feeling or thinking when you committed the crime"? The answer was often..."nothing...wasn't thinking or feeling anything...just did it". They are not thinking about or feeling the consequences for themselves or others, and that is a very basic beginning that needs to be addressed.
      • thumb
        Oct 11 2011: while i think it's a good idea to encourage watching ted videos, i'm not so sure it would be wise to mandate for them to only watch ted videos. i agree that if these events go ahead that they should include issues affecting offenders.

        another issue that they could talk about are how society reflects upon offenders, and suggest ways for society itself to improve the general attitude toward offenders and the rehabilitated, and even how to prevent future crime from occurring that would normally happen indirectly due to society or any individual's actions.

        also another issue could be the way the correctional facility is run with internal evidence-based policies that would affect the way they live.

        the issues they could talk about aren't limited here, though. they could talk about anything that they can think of that would be productive in a positive sense. (perhaps productive isn't the right word?)
        • thumb
          Oct 11 2011: You're right Griffin...I got a little carried away...LOL:>) It would not be appropriate to mandate TED videos. Most of the time offenders used computers while incarcerated, it was for the purpose of playing very violent video games, and I have a desire to get them away from the behaviors/practices that got them in jail! The violent video games reinforce the kind of life style that got them incarcerated, and I would like to see those games banned from society! I think the violent videos, are encouraging bullying and violent crimes in schools...I think young kids are "normalizing" the violence. That may be another topic, but I think very related.

          Bringing society into the challenge happens with the Reparative Justice programs, and can be very successful at times. This process engages the offender and victim (if s/he is willing) in a discussion with the facilitators, about educational programs that might help, community service, all of which may work toward preventing future crime, Our criminal justice system, as it operates now, usually leaves the offender AND the victim out of the proceedings. The attorneys and judge negociate, plee bargin, etc., and sometimes the victim and offender don't even know what's going on.

          I think productive is a good word. Offenders need to feel productive because one underlying issue is that they are usually lacking self esteem and confidence.
        • thumb
          Oct 13 2011: @Colleen:

          "The violent video games reinforce the kind of life style that got them incarcerated, and I would like to see those games banned from society! I think the violent videos, are encouraging bullying and violent crimes in schools...I think young kids are "normalizing" the violence. That may be another topic, but I think very related."

          I respectfully disagree. Violent video games are... well... games. Actually I believe they serve a higher purpose. Just like soccer, or tennis, or the Olympics. These are all methods that replace the violence that's already coded in our genes. Humans are violent, competitive creatures. A history of constant wars and violence and bloodshed would be the evidence. Of course we're not just violent. We've evolved to become more. But violence persists. And team sports like soccer or hockey or even polo are replacement for battles (between tribes - and the modern day tribes being the 'fans' of the teams) and sports like tennis and golf etc. replace duels. Violent video games are similar. They allow you to compete with other human beings in a non-lethal, non-violent and skill-based manner and serve as an outlet for the violence.

          The media on the other hand... well, when it comes to violence I think the evening news is much much more dangerous than computer games.
        • thumb
          Oct 13 2011: Hi Muratcan,
          I've heard your rationalization before. I agree...games are games...however...soccer, tennis or the Olympics are games that test the individual and his/her challenge to push the limits of physical strength and endurance, with competitions that are, for most of them a life long achievment. The end goal produces healthier, more focused, dedicated people. So, to say that video games are comparable to the olympic games seems like a stretch. I agree that humans are competitive, but I do not agree that we are by nature violent.

          You're right that video games provide competition and require skill. Again, I do not percieve video games providing anything like the competition and skill required for sport events. I do not agree that they are non-violent or serve as an outlet for the violence. I believe, as many others do, that they reinforce violence and "normalize" it to the point that some people do not realize what is real, and what is not real.
        • thumb
          Oct 13 2011: Hello again Colleen, and thank you for you reply.

          Well I guess the wars that have been continuing since the beginning of time is a pretty good indicator that we are violent. Also there's this experiment where they take 20(?) volunteers, which are completely normal people from all walks of life, and make half of them prisoners and half of them guards. Well, it doesn't end nicely. Here is the link if you haven't watched it. It's a real eye opener.

          http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/philip_zimbardo_on_the_psychology_of_evil.html

          As for comparing video games and Olympics... I guess you don't know much about video games (I mean no disrespect) but game conventions have become global events where highly (VERY HIGHLY) skilled gamers compete against each other. Yes it is not physical, but it sure takes a lot of time to master and dedication and concentration and endurance and very good reflexes and quick-thinking. Video games and sports are not that different actually. Just the mediums of competition (and thus the methods) differ.

          Anyways, I'd better return to the real topic :)

          Yes I can't deny that the violence in the video games "normalize" it to the point that some people do not realize what is real, and what is not real But you can't generalize. If someone can't see the difference between "playing a computer game and killing people that don't really exist" and "killing actual, real, breathing, alive human beings" than this is not the fault of the video game. It is the fault of the family/society/school/community.

          You can't stop someone from killing by destroying all the guns/destroying all the knives/destroying all the baseball bats/destroying all the violent computer games. You do it by raising conscious, aware, awake individuals that can empathize, sympathize, think and separate 'right' from 'wrong'. Pressing a mouse button to cause the image of a human(oid) that appears on the computer screen 'die' is not wrong. Killing an actual person IS.
        • thumb
          Oct 13 2011: Hello again Muratcan,
          You're right...I may not know much about video games. The only thing I know about them is based on my observations while volunteering in a jail for years. I observed the inmates totally engaged with video gaming as if it was real. I observed fights often breaking out during and/or right after playing the video games. I observed grown men spending a lot of time playing games, that in my perception, were not going to benefit them when they went back into society. Now, I suppose if they got "VERY HIGHLY SKILLED" with the video games, they could make a living...earn money.... playing them when they were released?

          They've been "competing" against each other all their lives, in ways that are not particularly productive to themselves and/or society. What we are talking about in this discussion is education, and the teaching/learning of skills that may assist the offenders in finding a new life path.

          Yes, I can "generalize", because I observed the offenders/gamers and the impact the playing of the games had on their emotional and physical well being.

          You are right...we change behaviors by raising conscious, aware, awake individuals who can empathize, sympathize, think and seperate right from wrong. Pressing a mouse button to create similar violent situations they have experienced their entire lives CAN make a difference in reinforcing previous programming. In order to raise conscious aware, awake individuals, we need to provide them the tools which can facilitate that process, rather than reinforcing the old behaviors.
        • thumb
          Oct 13 2011: Hi Colleen,

          No they wouldn't be able to make a living. They wouldn't be able to keep up with the teenagers. And I agree with you about the inmates. Rather than allowing them to play violent games that reinforce what they have been through all their lives other alternatives should be chosen (maybe martial arts?), which is the actual topic of this debate right? :) Sorry, I jumped in at the middle and maybe drifted off the real topic but it seemed important. Kids and offenders are very separate categories, and the kids' relationship with video games is very different from the offenders'. So yes maybe you can "generalize" for the offenders, as you have so much experience with them, but I think you shouldn't do so for the global population, since I have a lot of experience with kids playing video games, and if there's something wrong with their approach to violence (like "normalizing") video games has little effect. As I said, evening news and in addition to that, newspapers, nationalism, patriotism and religion have a much bigger impact. And furthermore these are 'real' stuff from the 'real' world. Not 'virtual realities created in a box'.

          As for the offenders, and turning prisons into schools... I don't think it can be done. The system is wrong from the beginning. These offenders are the by-products of the world we live in. They are a natural outcome of the mess we have created in the world. And what do we do? We imprison them.

          What do they do? They meet like-minded friends in the prison and get 'educated' in their field of crime. And when they get out they are much better at doing what put them in prison.

          So prisons are already schools in a way...

          I remember reading about an African(?) tribe in which when someone does something 'wrong' they put this person in the middle and all tribe members tell a good story or say a few good words about the guy, that acknowledges his existence and thanks him. They pour out LOVE to the offender. Yeah, utopia, I know :)
        • thumb
          Oct 13 2011: Hi Muratcan,
          With anything in life, there is a balance:>) Martial Arts would be FABULOUS!!! So many lessons there, and it is also a wonderful physical activity:>)

          Some kids may be different with video games and some kids may be the same as the offenders. A lot depends on their background and how they are using the "game".

          I agree...there is as much violence on the evening news! You're right...the offenders are the by-products of the world we live in. So, is it possible to change the world we live in? I believe so:>) You're right again...prisons are already schools. We need to change the direction of the "schools" and change the direction of the offenders. They have energy and are often very intelligent people who have been "programmed" with certain information that is not beneficial to themselves or society. We need to change the "game".

          I love your story about the tribal process. I heard it was a Native American practice...maybe both??? It just makes so much sense. Offenders are insecure with low self esteem. They need to know that they have potential...that there is hope for them. SOMETHING has to influence them enough to cause them to change their behavioral preference.
        • thumb
          Oct 13 2011: Hi Colleen,

          I, too, believe that it is possible to change the world we live in. Actually it is already changing everyday. Edmund Burke said all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Well I'm generally hopeful about the future of mankind (not always). I also believe that in general, mankind is inherently good, but unfortunately very prone to manipulation and misdirection, very naive and still very primitive.

          Changing the "game" is certainly not easy. Everything is linked to everything else. The monetary system, nations, corporations, banks, religious institutions, governments, armies... It's like a spider web. And we're talking about just one strand of the web here. I don't think it can be changed without changing everything else. And the web in full is both very delicate and very strong.

          I can think of only two outcomes: Either this web of civilization will completely collapse and a new one will be built. Or it will evolve and become something else. The first option scares me, though second option has its pitfalls, too.

          But at the individual level I believe what everyone should do is help each other. Without asking for anything in return. This would be an action occurring 'beyond' the web, unaffected by its 'rules', because the web is built on a give-take basis: you don't do anything that doesn't bring gains. If enough people started to give without expecting anything in return it could turn into a global revolution.

          Unfortunately those in power obviously don't want his. That's why they keep the world fearful, poor, angry, and ignorant. Whoever/whatever is in control wants to stay in control, and a mass awakening would be the last thing they'd support.

          But I'm drifting from the topic again and 2000 characters is much too little for me to explain everything I would like to. :)

          Thank you for this conversation Colleen, I'll be looking forward to 'connect' with you in the future on different subjects.

          Btw: Native American yes!
        • thumb
          Oct 14 2011: I agree Muratcan...
          Our world is changing as we speak...I am hopeful about the future...everything is interconnected...when we change one thing, we change the whole...we are here to help support each other in our life journeys...if enough people started to give without expecting anything in return it could turn into a global revolution...it is going to be more and more difficult to keep the world fearful, poor, angry and ignorant because of our technology...people are no longer as isolated...
          Thank you for the conversation, and I'm looking forward to more:>)
      • thumb
        Oct 19 2011: Confession is good for the soul............
  • thumb
    Oct 10 2011: Education and rehabilitation( if they are different) are surely lacking in Prisons. Most of our prisons in Australia if not all are not privatised but this doesnt mean money cant be an incentive. The taxpayer would save 200,000 a year for each inmate who didnt reoffend on release and return to prison for a year. I work in a program for young offenders which has restorative principles at its core. We probably manage to redirect about 14 young people away from long term persistent offending every year. Thats a potential saving of 2.8 million per year into the future. This does not include other costs of crime these offences would incurr. So its worth it. The cost of the program is about 750,000 per year. A bold outlay to start but money so well spent.
    • thumb
      Oct 10 2011: while the tax-payer would save 200,000 a year for each inmate who didn't reoffend, how much would serco save?

      my point is, the business would need to survive - or in the case of serco, still make more money.