TED Conversations

Phil Webb

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Are we bound by destiny? Or can we actually make a choice, other than that we are "destined" to make? ( if destiny exist)

I currently believe that, in a sense, we cannot make a choice, any choice, other than what we are destined to make.
Imagine having a clone of our universe, IE: plants, animals, weather, Humans, even the experiences, thoughts, memories, synapses of all brains, down to the atomic level etc, .but neither Universe is aware of the others existence.
Then if we could "pause" both universes and "play" at the same time where they would be in complete sync, same cloud, same raindrops, same falling leaf, same decisions being made, same thoughts etc from both Universes.
Would not both "Worlds" continue to run in sync ?
I propose that they would continue in sync since decisions are made solely on information taken in previously and or situations which we find ourselves.
Then if we paused "Universe A" and allowed "Universe B" to continue to run for 100 years before "playing Universe A" would not Universe A have to follow the exact path that took place in Universe B? If not, then why not?
I think, if the above is true, that EVERY decision we make is the ONLY ONE we can make as it is based on the things around us, and also previous thoughts and experiences, since this is all we have "to go on" when making a decision.
And since these 2 universes are not dependent on each other, would the fact that one does not really exist change this concept any?"
I think that being able to compare the "idea" of having 2 identical universes somehow makes it easier to understand, or at least for me to be able to try to explain my thoughts.
Not that there is something or someone controlling what we do, just that we have to make THAT choice based on ALL information being presented to us and making any other choice other than that one, is impossible, unless i'm wrong in my thinking.
I tried to bounce this idea off of my wife, but she shuts down when I get to the part about "cloned universe".
Also, if this is true, then how does knowing this information affect you now?
Phil

+1
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Oct 5 2011: This mental construction is very interesting. I do however not see how this assumption can prove anything because it is not really true.
    I believe we have perfect freewill because we are human and here for a purpose. That purpose is a heaven from the human race. We can want anything, love anything etc. Because what we love determines our eternity.
    Do you have the feeling that you are forced into any decision you make? Whether it is turning your head a certain way or seeing the Bible as nonsense, we are in complete control because that is what makes us human, and only what we decide in freedom becomes 'us', our character.
    Besides that there are certain influences. Our hereditary tendencies, our environment (spiritual and natural). But when we are healthy and not forced, we can use our will in total freedom.
    • Oct 5 2011: Adriaan,
      Interesting thoughts,
      What are your thoughts about the question regarding the :Universes "A & B" being in sync with one another with one even shadowing perfectly the other at a later date?
      I think that it is true, that it is not possible to run this theory in a lab, just for conjecture. But lets pretend that we could do that mentioned in the original post.
      If you think that the Universes "A & B" would be in sync, then would not this prove that the decision being made, have to be made that way, and if not, then, in my thought process, the cloning was not perfect since at the moment the decisions were not running in sync, something must have been different between the 2 Universes.
      I've read on another post regarding "Fate" a answer that mentioned "Cause and effect"
      I"m not saying that I think that there is a higher power that has already planned everything for us in advance and this power is just letting it play out.
      What I'm saying is that there is not other choice we can make, other than the one that we do make.
      How can it be otherwise?
      • thumb
        Oct 5 2011: Sorry I got to go for tonight, (no freedom) :) but it is just impossible to proof anything when done "just for conjecture" and with pretending..
      • thumb
        Oct 12 2011: Have some more time now :)

        So what if we change our minds? Why do you believe we can only make one choice when we do make a choice?
        Personally I believe we have free will and can make the choice we want to make because making those choices shape our character. Our, I'd say, obvious freedom is how we respond to events that happen to us. The last we have, usually, no control over but we certainly do over how we react, even automatically. We can 'teach' ourselves to not swear when the hammer meets our thumb :)
        There also may be no more love in a marriage so we decide to divorce, but with the right guidance things can be made right again. IOW we have the freedom to choose to make our responses more loving again (if that was lacking)..
        • Oct 13 2011: To me the "example" that I talked about makes sense to me.
          I know that you mentioned ",..... but it is just impossible to proof(sic)anything when done "just for conjecture" and with pretending."
          But there really is nothing wrong with using illustrations or examples of things that do not really exist to try to explain a theory.
          What I was originally thinking was that a person will always make the decision that causes the "least resistance" "in their mind" for example: ( and this would work with anyone, on any level) Mother Theresa, Ghandi, etc etc basically HAD to do the things that they did, acted the way they did, AS doing anything else, would have been a harder choice for them to make, mentally.
          For Mother Theresa to not care daily for those in India ,would have made her a miserable woman.
          Please understand that I am not in any way saying that they took the easy road, that is just the way that they had to be, to be satisfied with their life.
          Anyway, that is what started me to thinking about how we must follow a certain course. To me it makes sense.
      • thumb
        Oct 13 2011: I can see your point, that if there is a 'route' of least resistance that is what we take. What might help is to see us as spiritual beings with a basic or ruling love. As the saying goes We are what we love. This means that we do things because we love to do them, our attitude toward life..
        For Mother Theresa or Gandhi to act against that love of theirs would be very difficult.
        Some people love others to the point of deciding to jump in a lake, despite the real risk, to save someone from drowning. This indeed is, as you say, not taking the easy road. To not react and do what they felt they had to do, and see the person drown, would ruin the rest of their life.

        However, this "being determined" is so because that's what we have made ourselves into. Not any kind of outside force or determining power forcing us, was involved.

        As you ask, how does knowing this affect me now. I am trying to change what I love into what I know I should love. In other words I'm trying to become a better person.
        If you are interested, there is a book on my website called The Human Mind.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.