TED Conversations

faiz mukthar

Doctor, kvg medical college

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

why is islam grossly misunderstood??

why is islam grossly misunderstood??
why is people who doesnt know much about islam so keen in attacking islam?
why an event in islamic countries more focused than others by our media??
why is not prophet muhammed considered great??

+4
Share:
progress indicator
  • thumb
    Sep 28 2011: From Yahoo! News:

    "A Saudi woman was sentenced Tuesday to be lashed 10 times with a whip for defying the kingdom's prohibition on female drivers, the first time a legal punishment has been handed down for a violation of the longtime ban in the ultraconservative Muslim nation."

    -------

    Faiz,

    Are you still with us?
  • thumb
    Sep 23 2011: Thanks Thomas, that was helpful and I agree with you - that makes sense.

    Krizstian - I did care, because I was interested in your comment, so I respect Thomas for responding to my curiosity.
    I also have respect for your opinions, but I would respect you more if you didn't say things like "you are not worthy." There's nothing to be gained by belittling other human beings. If there was anything worth learning from the TED community, it would be that we should be trying to help each learn new things and understand the world more, instead of cutting conversations short with ego trumpeting.
    Thanks.
  • Sep 21 2011: C'mon gentlemen, TED is not the usual fanboy forum where people bash at each other "OMG I PAWNZZORZD YOU, TOTAL OWNAGE!!"

    Nobody is all dark, nobody is perfect, we all have to learn to live with each other, and that's also true on the Internet.

    Peace.
  • thumb
    Sep 21 2011: Why is islam grossly misunderstood??

    This is from a article printed today, Sept 21, 2011, on Yahoo!

    "Suspected [Muslim] Sunni extremists opened fire on Shiite Muslim pilgrims travelling by bus through southwest Pakistan on their way to in Iran [sic], killing 26 people, officials and survivors said."

    Muslims shooting Muslims.

    This is the first comment written by a reader under the article:

    "want to see what islam will do for the places its going to? just look where its been and is dominating. afganistan, pakistan, nigeria, iran, iraq and so on. what does islam offer to the world? really?? what?" - Scott

    It is not surprising that Islam is grossly misunderstood.
  • thumb
    Sep 20 2011: 2 things:
    1) Political agendas from the West
    2) Media profit goals
    • Comment deleted

      • thumb
        Sep 20 2011: You have stated this is wrong with no input or counter evidence. From what I've learned, the misrepresented image of Islam pretty much boils down to a combination of sellable stories for the media (they can hype up stories of Islamic extremism, which results in organisations such as the English Defence League forming - a manifestation of people being deluded by images from the media, and if the media find any media from terrorist groups, they will slap it everywhere, because it is a story that will sell a lot) and a little bit of governments wanting oil. The leaders say Terrorism must be stopped at all costs, its the biggest threat to humanity. Then they send people off to war and we somehow get the added bonus of millions of barrels of oil. Terrorism is not a global threat - it is hugely exaggerated by Western governments. More people die from accidents in hospitals each day than an an entire year of terorrist related deaths. Terrorism has been made synonymous with Islam. So therefore there is a tainted image of Islam, which has been created by media profit goals and government agendas. If you can disprove these points, I would appreciate it. Thanks.
        http://cafr1.com/Terror.html
        • thumb
          Sep 22 2011: [Reposted with quote from Krisztián removed.]

          Charlie, I do believe your assertions address only a small, though important, part of the problem.

          Islam seems to be grossly misunderstood within Islam itself; and in communities that have little or no access to media; and in countries that have no political agenda insofar as Islam is concerned. For example, in the villages in rural Kenya, where my friend Maurice Kokayo lives, Islam is misunderstood.

          My view, which I think is also "partial" is that Islam is grossly misunderstood because of the actions of fanatical Muslims. The "source" of our misunderstanding is their actions. The source of their actions, is their belief. So the ultimate source of the gross misunderstanding is "Muslims."

          The rest of us just amplify the misunderstanding and perhaps, as you say, use it for political gain or to provide "content" for our "news" media, and so on.
        • thumb
          Sep 23 2011: Charlie,

          Your points are well-argued.

          Andrea
      • Comment deleted

      • Comment deleted

        • thumb
          Sep 22 2011: Blimey. I'm curious to know what the general gist of Krisztian's reply is?
          I would also be interested in any constructive counter points.
          Thanks.
      • thumb
        Sep 22 2011: You can read the whole conversation here:

        http://www.ted.com/conversations/5165/a_disproportionate_few_wealthy.html?c=309514

        The "gist" of Krisztián's argument was that socialism is inherently violent.

        The request I referred to has been deleted from the conversation but it still exists in "the cloud."

        You can probably find it if you do a search for it.
      • thumb
        Sep 23 2011: Krisztian and Thomas --

        How dissonant that in a dialogue about polarized beliefs you perpetuate polarizing behaviors by demonstrating it.

        Andrea
        • thumb
          Sep 23 2011: And you are doing what, Andrea?

          Interesting, isn't it?

          When others do it, it is obvious; when we do it ourselves, not so much.

          Essentially you are saying you do not appreciate the dialogue. And I respect that.

          That is what I am doing too. I do not appreciate Krisztián's propensity to drop little bon mots like: "wow, you've managed to be wrong and meaningless at the same time."

          If it was "once in a while" fine ... but it's not; he does it quite often.

          I agree the dialogue between Krisztián and I, might be socially awkward but I choose to engage in it anyway. My exchanges with Krisztián do not bother me in the least.

          If they bother you, I suggest you ignore them.

          The "juicy bits" get deleted by the administrators soon enough anyway. But interestingly not, "wow, you've managed to be wrong and meaningless at the same time."

          What did that contribute to the discussion?
  • Sep 18 2011: I think there's a minority of people both among muslims and non-muslims that are staining the reputation of Islam.

    I'm living in Europe, and from here, the image of Islam shown in the media is totally biased. Of course, the media in general only talk about things that are going wrong. So whenever we hear about Islam here, it's all about intolerance, sex discrimination, scary fundamentalists, etc... And I perfectly know it's biased because I have Muslim friends and their lives are exemplary. They are the most respectable, rational and compassionate people in my entourage.

    On the other side, these things we see on TV are not all made up. Problably they are inflated to look even uglier, but they are here and they exist. And it's as Debra said, I think the other normal Muslims don't condemn these fundamentalists strongly enough. Of course as I said, it's also our media's fault not to try to make your voice heard.

    I think there are efforts to be made on both side. And also, don't be too afraid. It's not because they are saying trash on TV that everybody in the west believes that trash.

    I like to say that the smaller dogs are often those who like to bark the more.
    • thumb
      Sep 18 2011: QUOTE: "I think the other normal Muslims don't condemn these fundamentalists strongly enough."

      The fact that fundamentalists might kill them if they spoke out probably dampens their enthusiasm.

      [I am not being facetious; knowing that some religious fanatic halfway around the world can command "the faithful" to kill you if you say or do "the wrong thing" has a less that salutary effect on people, I am sure. What's worse, is knowing that some "nut jobs" will actually take the command seriously and act on it if they can. This, I think, leads to a degree of misunderstanding.]
      • Sep 18 2011: True. Thank you reminding me this. I had the incredible chance to grow up in a country where freedom of speech is more or less respected. I tend to take it like it was granted.

        And it is not.
  • thumb
    Sep 17 2011: Khilafah might lead to misunderstanding.

    "It is the duty of every Muslim to reject nation states and only recognize one united Islamic Ummah ["community" or "nation"]"

    These excerpts are from a mainstream Muslim website (presumably that has the intention of eliminating gross misunderstanding.)

    "The Khilafah is the name given to the Islamic system of government. When we say that Muslims must establish Khilafah, we mean that Muslims must establish an Islamic state, with an Islamic system of government ruled by the Islamic Shariah. ...

    "Muslims must perform the bay'ah [oath of allegiance] on the Khaleefa ["Leader"], which means to select him as a leader and to trust him to rule by the word of Allah (SWT). This means that the Khaleefah must implement Islamic laws, the Shariah, in all the lands under the Khilafah. The Khilafah must include all nations in the world where the population is predominantly Muslim, and all Islamic Shariah laws must take effect in these lands with respect to all issues in the society. ...

    "Islam came as a uniting religion, meant to unite all of mankind under one rule, the rule of Allah (SWT*)...

    "In order to be true Muslims, we must follow the commands of Allah (SWT) and his messenger (pbuh), and we must unite ourselves into a single nation and a single Ummah under one leader...

    "Not only is it a religious duty on every single Muslim [to establish Khilafah], but it will also lead to economic prosperity, justice, peace and security for all Muslim communities living throughout the world...."

    -------------

    Essentially if, say, Kenya, or America become "predominantly" Muslim, the existing government should be replaced by Khilafah with a single Leader ["Khaleefa"] who may live in another part of the world (as there are no "nation states," there is only a single "Ummah" (Muslim community.)

    This scenario, I think, might, unwittingly, contribute to gross misunderstanding.

    ---------
    *SWT = Subhaanahu Wa Ta'Ala = most glorified, the most high
  • Sep 16 2011: Faiz, (or any Muslim)

    Please describe the concept of Abrogation in The Koran and how "The Verse of the Sword" is viewed in this respect. Please give both Muslim views on this example for the most complete understanding.
  • thumb
    Sep 16 2011: Very utile as a coment. i congratulate you for your ideas. Thnaks for sharing
  • Sep 16 2011: Its because you have events like 911 mixed with the racist-im-better-than-you types out there, who dont underdstand that its only the few terrorists who tarnish islam. i know quite a few islam people, and known of them ever run around with bombs and guns, so why dont we take a good opinion and over estimate islam? because people are ignorant and always look for faults in others before themselves. thats a big part ofthe reason. wedont want to blame ourselvesfor americas entire economic crash, so we need a scapegoat. Hope that helps
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2011: But where are Imams in http://www.journeyinfaithfilms.com/gallery.cfm ?
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2011: Thanks to all of you !

    erm, i see your point Mr. Thomas. Non-religious people are really making a stambilg-block toward breakingh the religious ice. i can answer that, for i have no pre-knowledge on that. i may assume which is relly bad.
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2011: yeah indeed, they are a very utile e.g. i do encourage more activities like these. Yet, we don't find these in the Arab World why?
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2011: All in all, a pure dialogue, a respectful vision, and a peaceful manner all contribute to the building of underpinnings of world religions’ dialogue. All sorts of linkages, mutual believes and shared faiths would make a possible and positive dialogue between Judaism, Christianity and Islam


    I hope you can get my point now
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2011: The dialogue between religions requires a very well open mind and attention. By omitting all stereotypes and considering the historical, eschatological and moral linkages, the three religions might start dialoguing. Another good manner which could contribute to a possible and positive dialogue is reaching the level of understanding that all wars and conflicts of this very day are mainly due to political, economic, and nationalist reasons, and not of religious ones. It is believed that once a religion reaches this level, then directly a sense of collaboration, tolerance, anti-violence, peace, and respect would appear to make dialogue easily to be done.
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2011: One of the dangerous things when being confronted to another religion is when we have no idea about the other’s faith. It happened to me once; I was participating in a forum on facebook.com called; ALL ABOUT GOD. As the discussion board was full of Christian and Jewish participants; I posted a topic about the prophet Mohammed (pbuh). One of Jews there started insulting the prophet (pbuh). By then I realized that there was a lack of knowledge about the other religion (Islam).often, the notion of knowledge goes side by side with the notion of respect. In Islam, people are obliged to believe and respect all seers and prophets (pbut) (sura; al baquara: 283). As one of my American friends says; ‘knowledge is respect’. Existentially, as long as the three religions believe in the doomsday, then why shall be a conflict? From an ethical viewpoint, the more the three religions are aware of the shared Ten Commandments or teachings, the more they are likely to dialogue.
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2011: It is now the time to stop all sorts of stereotypes and propaganda. Islam is likely to be set for propaganda. Islamphobia is a result of those who tend to misuse and tarnish the image of Islam. However, by detecting mutual believes and common points, a possible dialogue between the three religions could happen. One good example of this would be monotheism; all three religions believe and worship the same God. Historically, we are all children of Abraham, like the ‘Fatiha’ in Islam; there is the ‘Lord’s Prayer’ in Christianity. In addition to this, even the name of God in Islam ‘Allah’ is almost sound hearing to the Jewish name of God ‘Eloh’. As a result, the more we feel these common points, the more we feel close to each other and the more dialogue could exist.
    • thumb
      Sep 15 2011: I visited a church that held service with a priest, an Imam and a rabbi for all 3 religions. They do this once a year on the theme of peace. Maybe they're an example?
      • thumb
        Sep 15 2011: Franz --

        Yes!

        My priest Fr. Michael O'Connell, has been a leader in this sort of multi-faith leadership. He led a visit to the Holy Land, where all three religions began, with a group of leaders for all three faiths, and others from different religions, too..

        This website provides a snippet of video from a documentary that was produced on their "Journey of Faith"

        http://www.journeyinfaithfilms.com/cast.cfm

        I very much see efforts like these and the service you mention as critical methods to promote peace. There are no more "qualified" professionals than they to bring religions together -- and most important of all, each faith's respective flocks.

        Perhaps the biggest lesson they learned from the journey was the importance of relationship. For all their religious differences, and their were tensions that cropped up around these differences during their shared journey, was the power of relationship that holds the reality of "other" through even the most difficult divisions.

        Many thanks, Franz, for illuminating this example.

        Andrea
      • thumb
        Sep 15 2011: Here is a TED talk that supports what you have all been saying in this thread and the bridges that you are building. It is by William Ury:

        http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/william_ury.html

        (Out of thumbs up for you Franz but please keep sharing!)
    • thumb
      Sep 15 2011: Hamza,

      As-Salamu Alaykum.

      And thank you for reorienting us with your wise thoughts.

      Andrea
    • thumb
      Sep 15 2011: This is a practical suggestion on how to diminish some misunderstanding between three religions. Excellent idea.

      Now, what can we do about the misunderstandings between the religious and the non-religious members of our one, large family?
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2011: Hi Debra, i do show my gratitudes for your further point. erm to be more precise i want to suggeste manners that can contribute to a possible/positive dialogue between Judaism, Christianity and Islam.The dialogue between religions is nowadays more than a need, but rather a necessity. Dialogue should be among religions, cultures, and civilizations. Not only should dialogue be between Judaism, Christianity and Islam, but it should also be among each religion-per se. One of the best manners which can be taken for a positive and possible dialogue between the three religions is simply emphasizing the common points or mutual believes, plus learning the other’s religion and respecting it as well. It would be true to say that Christianity is the first religion to point out the idea of the inter-religious dialogue, however, nowadays it has become expanded to a global necessity, thus, Judaism, Christianity and Islam must dialogue positively.
    • thumb
      Sep 16 2011: Hi Hamza, Thank you for your kind clear hearted engagement here. I too, believe that positive dialogue is vital for all of us to live on a small planet. The dialogue has to be unbiased and tolerant on all sides. The world view that one holds cannot be the only one that cannot be examined, reasoned about and asked sincere questions. In addition, there is a big difference in every religion between the way it is practised by followers in their humanity and the ideal versions. I think that is worthy of challenge. Every person in every belief system is human and fallible. To quote a Christian expression: they "Fall short of the glory of God (Allah)."
  • Sep 15 2011: Faiz Mukthar,
    "why is islam grossly misunderstood??"
    -- actions speak louder. suicide bombings i suppose.

    "why is people who doesnt know much about islam so keen in attacking islam?'
    -- because of its claim without evidence that Allah is the only one god. on the contrary Islamist has no clu about other highly developed religion.

    "why an event in islamic countries more focused than others by our media??"
    -- media loves to fill-up its pagers with craps.

    "why is not prophet muhammed considered great??"
    -- child lover.
    • Sep 15 2011: suicide bombing:
      Koran does not teach suicide bombing.why is it tagged to islam??
      indian young prime minister rajiv gandhi was killed by LTTE through suicide bomber!!
      Between 1980 and 2000 the largest number of suicide attacks was carried out by separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam of Sri Lanka. The number of attacks conducted by LTTE was almoust double that of nine other major extremist organizations.
      The tactics of the Kamikaze, a ritual act of self-sacrifice by state military forces, occurred during combat in a large scale at the end of World War II. These suicide attacks, carried out by Japanese kamikaze bombers, were used as a military tactic aimed at causing material damage in the war. In the Pacific Allied ships were attacked by kamikaze pilots who caused significant damage by flying their explosive-laden aircraft into military targets.
      Suicide bombings have become a tactic in Chechnya, first being used in the conflict in 2000 when a man and a woman drove a bomb-laden truck into a Russian army base in Alkhan Kala.[15] A number of suicide attacks have occurred in Russia as a result of the Chechen conflict, ranging from the Moscow theater hostage crisis in 2002 to the Beslan school hostage crisis in 2004.[16] The 2010 Moscow Metro bombings are also believed to result from the Chechen conflict.
      Rudolf Christoph Freiherr von Gersdorff intended to assassinate Adolf Hitler by suicide bomb in 1943, but was unable to complete the attack.
      Modern suicide bombing as a political tool can be traced back to the assassination of Tsar Alexander II of Russia in 1881. While driving on one of the central streets of Saint Petersburg, near the Winter Palace, he was mortally wounded by the explosion of hand-made grenades and died a few hours afterwards. The Tsar was killed by a member of Narodnaya Volya, Ignacy Hryniewiecki, who died while intentionally exploding the bomb during the attack.
      are these muslims??whomever does it is enemy of mankind!!
      • thumb
        Sep 15 2011: Faiz,

        Let's stay focussed: The fact that others do something - like practice suicide bombing - does not excuse the practice by Muslim or Christian fanatics (even if the Muslims or Christians do "less" of it than the "others" do) nor does pointing out others do the same thing address the question of why Islam is so grossly misunderstood.

        If someone killed your mother, would it make any difference to you to find out many other people had also killed other people's mothers?

        No, it wouldn't.

        -----------

        You have asked us why we think Islam is grossly misunderstood. We are telling you. Accept what we say whether you agree with us or not ... we are telling you: Why WE THINK Islam is grossly misunderstood.

        Isn't that what you want to know?

        -----------

        Faiz, why do you think Islam is grossly misunderstood??

        -----------
        PS If you are going to cut and paste from Wiki, it's considered polite to say so.
        • Sep 15 2011: thomas sir
          sorry that i dint mention it..i had done that only i accept...
          i accept the fact that whomever does suicide bombing is a crime for which they should never be forgiven i just wanted to ask that if all these groups does it why is it tagged only on with islam??
          thanks sir
      • thumb
        Sep 15 2011: Hi Faiz,

        The reason we are mentioning that Muslims carry out suicide bombings (and other such things) is because you asked us why we think Islam is grossly misunderstood.

        You have defined the extent of our focus by the question you asked.

        If we were discussing suicide bombing, in general, I am sure we would tag it onto other groups as well.

        So, to get back on topic: Why do YOU think Islam is so grossly misunderstood?

        There are some interesting answer in the conversation so far:

        - Islam is not misunderstood.
        It is misunderstood because of:
        - the violence perpetrated by a few fanatics.
        - expressions of fear from all sides (Muslims and non-Muslims, etc.)
        - the way women are treated.
        - Etcetera.

        What do you think, Faiz?

        How do you think we could resolve the misunderstanding?

        I suggest you think of something other than having the whole world converting to Islam; the whole world reading the Quran; the whole world watching a video, reading a website, etc. It's not going to happen.

        It's a nice idea, I suppose, to think about the whole world reading your book but be realistic ... it's just not going to happen.

        So aside from the grand ideas, what do you think might help dissipate the gross misunderstanding people have about Islam?

        You are a member of a minority (Islam) and you think the rest of the world misunderstands you. Your solution seems to be that the rest of the world should change ... that is, the rest of the world should make the effort to understand you.

        Personally, if I was a member of a minority, I would not expect the majority to adapt to accommodate me, I would be asking myself, "What can I do do make myself better understood?"

        "What can I do to eliminate or minimize this gross misunderstanding?"

        So, my question to you is: What can YOU do to eliminate or minimize this gross misunderstanding?

        (Now, be careful: Generally, "we" do not misunderstand you because of something we have NOT done; we misunderstand you because of something you HAVE done.)
        • thumb
          Oct 5 2011: Thomas, thank you for clarity and patience.

          I want to share a concern that might help Faiz respond to your question, "What can [Faiz] do to eliminate or minimize this gross misunderstanding?" He could share—give and take—speak and listen.

          I am a person of faith in reality, much of which is unknown. Additionally, I am a human being and member of the community of living species, immediately, humankind.

          I was born Southern Baptist and indoctrinated myself in their Bible interpretation until age 54. I am slow; it took me that long to discover that neither my mind nor heart is Southern Baptist. Before, I was trying to fulfill my mom and dad's vision. I continue to discover my preferences.
          My experience did not happen only because of precious doubt I discovered in the sixth grade: A being, possessed with the self-doubt and weakness expressed by the threats in Revelations 22:18, cannot be God. Added to my long-standing precious doubt was castigation of my wife’s religion (Catholic) by my Baptist peers in a married-couples Sunday-school class.

          Slowly, I became a human being—a minnow in an ocean. Each day, the joy of my status increases.

          About twelve years ago, I was trying to share my discovery with two co-workers, each in private conversations-- one a PhD chemical engineer and the other a PhD chemist.
          In both cases, their only response was, “Phil, sooner or later you will submit to Allah.” As a result, I have no desire for heartfelt conversation with Muslims. I want them to flourish in peace and happiness as equals. By equals, I mean governed by the authority of the governed including me. However, I have no desire to try to share my experience with them: I do not want to hear that “sooner or later” message, let alone debate it.

          Faiz, please comment on this idea:
          Islam is misunderstood because it seems Muslim people can’t share—can’t give and take—can’t speak and listen.
          Phil

          Edited to "Faiz." Also made “could” and “can’t” consistent and more.
          Phil
      • Sep 15 2011: Fazir, none of those suicide bombers you mentioned holds koran and loudly pronounce "Allahu Akbar".
      • thumb
        Oct 6 2011: Hi Phil,

        Thanks for your kind words.

        I think this conversation has run its course, for one thing, Faiz Mukthar, the person who started it, seems to have abandoned us. He has not posted since September 15th (and he did not reply to a personal message I sent him to see if he was still interested in the conversation.)

        Perhaps he received a satisfactory reply to his question.

        Thomas
        • thumb
          Oct 6 2011: Thomas,
          Thank you for the information and for somehow prompting me to share my story.
          One of the two gentlemen I referred to I feel is a dear friend, yet we have the “sooner or later” barrier. To make it worse, each time we depart, he says, "God bless you," not realizing that my brain bounces to, "You will submit to Allah," and I depart a little alienated or perhaps wounded--again.
          I think my question is one that would eventually help the Muslim dialogue with non-Muslims and will be looking for another opportunity to present it.
          In the meantime, perhaps another Muslim will respond. I do want to help.
          I would be interested in your comments on my story. Is it too blunt? Would there be interpretation problems with the edited language? Does it prompt the Muslim to merely stop making the “submit” statement, or does it come through that perhaps they cannot imagine a non-Muslim has a desirable destiny? In other words, is my story too subtle?
          Phil
      • thumb
        Oct 6 2011: Hi Phil,

        I do not think your story is too blunt or too subtle. It is your story, and you can tell it however you like. Of course, the purpose of a story is for another to hear it (it also informs us of the image we hold of our self.)

        So, if you would like your story to be heard, consider the audience (perhaps your dear friend) and find a way to tell it so that he can hear it.

        Remember, all stories are fiction - even if they are based on fact. The only true Story must be no longer than a single breath. Any story that takes longer than that to tell will abandon us as we breathe our last breath. (Such a Story, of course, cannot be "told," it can only be lived.)

        However, if we wish to tell our longer stories (while we have the time) considering the audience is a good place to start.

        As Stephen R. Covey puts it:

        "If I were to summarize in one sentence the single most important principle I have learned in the field of interpersonal relations, it would be this: SEEK FIRST TO UNDERSTAND, THEN TO BE UNDERSTOOD. This principle is key to effective interpersonal communication." [Emphasis his.]
        • thumb
          Oct 7 2011: Thomas, thank you.

          My story about why I misunderstand Muslims:
          To submit to Allah, I would need to deny my faith, which I cannot do.
          But I am good to my neighbors, without wanting to know their religions.
          Can the Muslim accommodate my citizenship?
          Can the Muslim be my good neighbor?

          Phil
  • Sep 15 2011: he taught almost eveything.christianity teach very less about the political world.jesus(pbuh) taught things which needed for peace and love same did muhammed(pbuh).islam forbids many things which the modern world cry for.and unfortunately they call it developement or civilised..homosexuality islam forbids but modern world talks for it (wats the sense in it think if all of us are homosexuals the world ends).homosexuality was something moses (pbuh) fought against when it was prevalent in pharoas but now jews doesnt attack homosexuality but muammed(pbuh) and quran clearly forbids it and hence islam still attacks it.jews and christians to some extend compromised it but muslims didnt and wouldnt compromise for it because it is crystal clear that its dangerous for humanity.this is just an example and here im not criticising christianity and judaism im sayin that christianity and judaism got more human interference (apart from messengers) than islam and hence except islam other religion was made flexible and hence people accepts it because they get more room in it.
    islam is so detailed that it teach you how to do sex with your wife.its a perfect guide you can refer to live.
    now you may ask why rule for everything or why a control over everything.answer is simple but not easy to accept.you can question yourself and try to get answer "will you pay tax if you are not feared legal action"
    So for a peaceful and adjusted life always needs some rules has to be kept.islam never says that you should wage war for spreading islam.islam teach that if you dont love the country where you live even if its not an islamic nation you are not a complete muslim..why people are deaf and dumb to such noble teachings???
  • Sep 15 2011: The answer for this questions can only be given through relative thinking as far as understand from the talks here..
    lets think wats there in islam which is not there in other religions which makes islam a villain in this modern world.
    christianity if embraced as such as jesus(pbuh) i will be confused whether to call him a christian or muslim!!that deep is the relation between christianity and islam.
    But what happened to christianity was it got influenced by people.the bible itself was edited and was made it comfortable for us.this is the reason why you will never find reason to hate christianity because its more humane and match the way we think and gives as a better room.
    abraham(pbuh) was a messenger whom islam respects a lot.quran sites the abraham's (pbuh) examples a lot in islam and every muslim's pray 5 times a day wont be complete without praying for him.muhammed (pbuh) itself is his descent.. http://www.atlantajamaat.org/md_saw_family_tree.php..
    abraham (pbuh) is in islam to the extend that every muslim celebrates the day when god asked abraham (pbuh) to sacrifice a goat instead of his own son.but rarely people know this.in islam this day is given more importance than prophet's birthday.
    abraham(pbuh) destroyed all the ideals and preached monotheism and discarded idol worship but what happened after his death we all know his own idol was made..how STRANGE!!
    I told above things to make you understand that islam is not an alien to other religion.we are all preaching a religion whose messengers had same aim.

    Now let's take islam.what makes islam different from these religions is that islam interfere in everything in your life.right from you are born till the judgement day is being discussed and explained.quran was never edited and hence its not humane at all in our eyes but its divine hence can never be against humanity and love.muhammed(pbuh) taught how to live.he was a ruler and taught how to rule.continued....
    • thumb
      Sep 15 2011: Faiz,

      Thank you for your thoughtful reply.

      However, you miss an important point: You believe in Allah, the Quran, and so on.

      For you, they are true, because they are true.

      Not everyone believes as you believe.

      For many, what you believe is simply superstition that we humans have a tendency to propagate.

      For some, the Quran and Bible are fiction; for others they're an inspiration but not literally true; and for others they are the Word of God.

      Perhaps one of the reasons that Islam is so grossly misunderstood is because (some) Muslims fail to accept that contradictory views are as equally valid to those who hold them as Islam is to them.

      True believers of all religions tend to believe they are right and everyone else is wrong.

      A few true believers are willing to kill to make the point.

      Do you think that might lead to a gross misunderstanding?

      ----------------

      By the way, if, in response to my comments, you assert that the Quran is true, and that if I only read this or that website, I will understand and accept your interpretation of the "Truth" as correct, you will have missed the point completely.

      This seems to be a common error we make. We assume that if the other person knew what we know, they would believe what we believe ... which is true, by the way. The part we miss is that it goes both ways ... for example, if you knew what I know, you would believe what I believe.

      The difference between a religious believer and, me, for example, is I don't mind if you agree with me or not.

      True believers such as fundamentalist Christians and Muslims, do care whether others believe in what they believe in or not - for them, it is a "matter of (eternal) life and death." If I do not believe what they say .. well, you know what the outcome of that will be .. I'll go to hell.

      Now, if you are a true believer, you will likely say I do not have to believe in what "YOU" say (because you are fallible) but I should read the Quran .. because it is infallible .. and so on.
      • Sep 15 2011: I do understand that.I do accept the fact that other religion need not respect quran nor they will accept it.im trying to state that islam is grossly misunderstood just because that people do not try to explore the or learn about quran its content why when and how was it introduced but they are very well interested to criticise it!!
        if you want to criticise something you have to learn it properly

        Anyways thanks bro for your feedback..god bless you
        • thumb
          Sep 15 2011: Hi Faiz,

          So you are suggesting that anyone who criticizes Islam should first read the Quran, is that correct?

          It's a fair assertion to make.

          What if they have read the Quran and still choose to criticize Islam?

          Then what?

          -----------------

          Why do you think Islam is so grossly misunderstood?

          -------------------

          By the way, you sound an awful lot like another person I was conversing with about the Quran here on TED.
        • thumb
          Sep 15 2011: Hi FaizI for my part have read the Quran just to find anything that I could admire. I know most sacred books of the world and find true meaning in them but for the Quran it isn't that easy. Some say it's a matter of interpretation, if I would translate the spirit of it to todays values it would fit. Maybe this is true and maybe not every muslim is doing so.
  • thumb
    Sep 15 2011: Islam is misunderstood because of fear.
    People often attack that which they do not understand, because they are afraid of it/them.
    The media focuses on it because fear seems to attract people as observers.
    Prophet muhammed is not considered great by some people, because he did some things that do not seem acceptable.
  • thumb
    Sep 14 2011: Regarding media . don't want comment because the role of media is really a big question mark ............
    Whom with Islamic community ,people who are not muslim can learn what Islam means from your view point?
    Why there are so many fight fraction with in followers of islam ?
    What lesson world can learn from the so called muslim countries of middle east ?
    What are the bigger events now around the world going on which is out focus other than what happening in so called islamic world of Middle East ?
    What lesson no islamic world can learn from Islamic country of sub continent Pakistan , where every now and then muslim are killed in the hand of muslim ?