- Michael Lee
- Fountain Valley, CA
- United States
manager, Jetson Woodcraft
This conversation is closed.
Is Shaffi Mather's idea for fighting corruption practical?
Here are some ideas to ponder about to answer this question.
1. Even though corruption occurs mostly as single incidents, people that participate in corruptions, can join together and fight against the for profit organization. E.g. mafia. It also could potentially increase the amount of violence in the area.
2. What if this for profit organization suggested by Mather, gets bribed? If it is for profit, doesn't whoever gives the most money wins? Without doubt, the margin of profit will greatly decrease for those who are corrupted, but it doesn't mean it will stop it. In fact, it could raise increase the value of the bribes, since the for profit organization would raise the cost to gain these bribes.
Closing Statement from Michael Lee
Sure, you can say that humans need to take a spiritual leap to solve corruption, but you can say that about a lot of things. It isn't a solution, merely a dream without means. It seems that everyone agrees that Shaffi Mather's suggestion is an insufficient one. It has good intentions but it isn't very thought out. I would argue that the main reason why corruption will always exist is because there's a demand and a market for it, and it's the same for drugs, weapons, humans, etc. My solution to these problems would be to legalize an international market for it, become the monopoly, and have the ability to regulate/monitor it.