- Mathieu Guerin
This conversation is closed.
Languages evolve. What is the significance of language death facing the human race?
If you think of a plant as having leaves interspersed at equivalent intervals, you may see an algorithm forming spontaneously in nature. This step, then this step, then this step, and repeat. Another example is the geometric shape of cauliflower or broccoli which are algorithms occurring in nature, manifesting through the observable phenomenon of fractals. If you take those rules and let a human interact with the variables, you get something like the Mandelbrot Set.
If you think of black box trading or algo trading as they have occurred by nature in the human invention of the stock market, you have algorithms again which are causing humans to use/alter real, physical space to incorporate these algorithms within their own machine to maximize it's efficiency (see Kevin Slavin's talk on algorithms).
What does this have to do with language or culture?
I speculate that this shows us a mathematical proof that human behavior is bound to biological rules (epigenetic rules), thus bound to hitherto ungovernable nature. Given this "bypass" of freewill in the human race and based on the fact that more languages die every year than are being created, we can observe that nature's course is to achieve unification of the human race, maybe to amplify cooperation and improve the fluidity of network building. This pattern points directly to the death of diversity in a cultural, linguistic and even genetic way. Monoculture seems inevitable.
In the spirit of memetic, a subject that ironically has spread like wildfire in the past few years, I might paraphrase Susan Blackmore when she exclaims "We are the meme-machines!" Geneticists' work illustrates that humans are bound to those epigenetic rules that guide/conduct behavior, and memetic illustrate that our ideas are basically governing themselves through our living fleshy brains.
Will globalization continue to bottleneck diversity in culture forever? Have we become the tools of innovation? How imminent is the Third Replicator?