TED Conversations

Linda Hesthag  Ellwein

Communication & Change Agent, Photographer, Rancher, Oikonomia, Inc.

TEDCRED 50+

This conversation has closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Have you believed something - or the idea of something - and discovered you were mistaken, or wrong? What's your story & what did you learn?

Our world view often conjures up ideas or beliefs that seem to 'fit' within it. We often cluster beliefs with ideas or behaviors that 'sound' right to us. Every now and then, the ideas we hold are simply wrong, or at least need to be questioned. I'd like to hear examples of paradigm shifts that changed your world view or point of view. When have you been mistaken?

These experiences, or paradigm shifts, often surface through cultural beliefs, politics, in beliefs relating to sustainability and environmental preservation, or human behavior/relationships - but are certainly not limited to these. What have you assumed to be true or right, and suddenly found yourself doubting your certainty?

+14
Share:
progress indicator
  • Sep 6 2011: i used to firmly believe that a person should keep their calm and never get angry, especially at children, who just need a chance to learn.

    i'm an ESL teacher, mostly at junior high school level. one of the things i try to do is have my students use english meaningfully, which sometimes means having them research a particular topic and present there findings using the language they've learned, and making a poster to support their speech with visual elements to aid the comprehension of the audience. on one occasion they'd spent a few eeks preparing and it was the due they were due to do their presentations, and the first group they got up and held up hastily drawn and unfinished posters, and accompanied them with short, half-assed, mostly forgotten speeches. i thanked them and moved on to the next group, but by the time the 4th or 5th group had presented the same level of work, i was angry, and told them so. it wasn't that the work was poor, it was that their effort was poor. they could do, and had done plenty of times previously, much better.

    at the end of the lesson i returned to my office and immediately felt terrible about it and felt that way for the entire time until the next lesson. on the way to class, one of the groups caught up to me and asked if they could redo their presentation. of course i agreed, and entering the classroom i found the others practicing their speeches and upon seeing me also asked it they could do their presentation over. it was an important lesson for me, that sometimes the best thing you can do for someone is to give them a (metaphorical) kick in the pants to help them realise their potential.

    being overly generous to kids does them no favours, since one day they'll come up second best against others who haven't been allowed to fall short. i'm not promoting shouting but it does have its uses - for me it's been about once every 2 years. praising mediocrity encourages mediocrity. call a spade a spade!
  • thumb
    Sep 5 2011: Yes, it had to do with quantum (particle) physics. The reality that particles have a behavior was life changing for me. I thought that particles were just traveling in a straight line based on whatever they just bounced off of.
  • thumb
    Sep 4 2011: Yes, Linda. That is what I mean to say.
  • thumb
    Sep 2 2011: That race was real and meant something when it, in fact, doesn't. I mean, there is the 'one drop rule' that actually prevents people from putting they are 'white' on their birth certificate if there is at least "one drop" of 'black' blood in them. And there are, of course, all those slaves we brought over here to build our railroads and pick our cotton because being a different race/ black meant they were less than.

    Yeah, learning how ridiculous the categorizaiton of race is; learning that it has no solid biological basis and even further learning that even though many of us know better laws like the 'One Drop Rule' still exist, affected how I understood the world.

    Now does that whipe away the inequities for those people who have been judged on their so called race? No, not at all. This foolish categorization has done so much damamge that we will be fixing things for decades to come. It is time that we all learn the truth about our own human variation. And if we are going to discriminate and judge one another, because unfortunately that probably is not going to stop anytime soon, don't do it in the name of an idiotic, antiquated, erroneous categorization system.

    Right or wrong, you can judge a person on his/her character, his/her behavior but to judge a human being on his/her skin color is an affront to decency and intelligence.

    Oh and for those who are confused about what you are because your mother is 'black', and your dad is 'white' and your grandmother, is 'Japanese' for example etc. I have an answer for you:

    You are Homo,sapiens, sapiens with a diverse gentic background with bits of genes from vairous parts of the world, and more recently,possibly even from different human 'types' such as Neanderthal ;-) Read up people! Read up. The truth shall set you free.
  • thumb
    Sep 2 2011: I was certain I was a Christian yet doubtful about religion until the fourth time members of my sect said in the presence of my wife that members of her Christian sect--she--would suffer helll. I researched the fourth issue and learned that the members of my sect misunderstood but could not persuade them. Confirmation is a sacrament. They did not defend faith in their ignorance.
    Inspired, I considerd her opinions more earnestly than before (then twenty-five years’ marriage). For the first time, I realized that she holds that God and Jesus are the same—absolutely. There’s no explanation; it’s a mystery. In earlier discussions I could have grasped her opinion but had not listened to her.
    That realization caused me, in discussions, to explore the word definitions we are using. Sometimes, I’d rephrase the question. In my writing, her review is my greatest asset.I would not change anything about my wife--especially her afterdeath.
    But the Christian experience demanded action on my part.After so many years attending worship with her, I would not accept her sect. I withdrew from my inherited sect.
    I focused on classical literature: Plato, Chekhov, Shakespeare, Nozick, and many more. Next, I focused on American literature through the seventeenth century.After about ten years, I realized I am digging out of the indoctrination my parents shared and am discovering my preferences.
    Now, my belief is that humans should not hold beliefs but should stay open-minded to reality, most of which is unknown—in other words, hold faith in the truth most of which is unknown. To place faith elswhere probably involves rejecting the truth. I do not wish anyone to follow my path, because I could be wrong.
    I am so fortunate to have discovered my bride and trusted myself to choose her, despite my sect's prejudices. Moreover, I am fortunate she waited so long for me to listen to her.
    I trust and am committed to the Preamble to the US Constitution.
    Phil
    • thumb
      Sep 6 2011: Thank you, Phil. Could you explain what you mean by sect? I'm moved by your story, and the awarenesses you've shared here. I have the sense there are many who may relate to your experience....even if they look or sound different.
      • thumb
        Sep 6 2011: Less than 5 minutes ago: Thank you for the question; perhaps I am reflecting the pain of de-indoctrination when I choose "sect." Regardless, I am referring to Christian denominations. If I had married within my denomination, I would never have discovered my preferences—myself.I am glad you value the story. There are many mixed marriages and many immature husbands, but few as fortunate as me. Regardless of my immaturity, my bride was as important to me as me, and after twenty-five years, defense of her religion after repeated attack by members of my denomination demanded a change by me. That's when the "me" became important. Within a couple years I had dropped out of church; about five more years, out of Christianity; perhaps another year out of religion. My policy is not to believe so as to wait for the truth.I often ask my wife if she prefers me or the indoctrinated me and she affirms me.I am reminded of Brian Wilson lyrics:I keep looking for a place to fitWhere I can speak my mind.I've been trying hard to find the peopleThat I won't leave behind.It’s the “behind” part that bothers me.When, in a denominational sense, someone asks me, “What are you?” I respond, “I am a human being and member of the community of humankind.” That is pleasing to me and sufficient. Being a small fish in a big pond is OK.However, I am also an American and past white Anglo-Saxon Christian male: a small fish now in the wrong pond. What I perceive is that the people in America have allowed regimes to drift away from the US Constitution. In searching for a fundamental explanation for what I perceive and may be true—US governance is unconstitutional—I have the idea that the people have failed to embrace the Preamble.Please see my current TED conversation on this topic.
  • thumb
    Sep 2 2011: The most beautiful part of having a mind is that it can be updated with new info. This occurs because a mind can look at itself as well as looking out upon the world, apply analysis to both the inner and outer worlds. This is what makes us unique among bioforms, we can step outside not only our present interpretive framework, but also our instincts, peer pressure (herd reflex), fear response and other external stimuli. This unique ability may stem from the ability to abstract, to model reality inside the head, to plan ahead in time and prepare for eventualities, to project a more ideal outcome onto a future scenario. People with minds are really all idealists, ideals are what drive us to invent a solution to a problem, and, more important, to conceive of problem solving as a game.
  • Sep 2 2011: I was a believer and a member of the inner circles of a Christian cult.

    The real world as I experienced it was very harsh than the world the cult had created for me. I learned the hard way that merely wishing/praying doesn't make it so. I stopped believing. Much much later I discovered an author which changed my life forever.
    • Sep 2 2011: I would be very interested in learning who the author was, if you would like to share? Thank you.
  • thumb
    Sep 2 2011: And I believe I was wrong about your intended meaning of the word "wrong".
    You are disassociating the concept of wrong with the concept of truth. Thus only when I discover that something is not what I believed, or assumed, it was am I wrong. So long as I am unaware of the disparity between my belief and truth I am not wrong? Using that definition I think the question should not include the words "wrong" or "mistaken": For example: "Have you ever changed your mind regarding what you believed or assumed about something?"
  • thumb
    Sep 1 2011: I was raised as a Jehovah's Witness. Around age 18 I left that group completely, still not entirely sure that I had done the right thing. Four years later, though, while meditating, I asked myself the question, "What evidence is there in the world that my belief in God was something other than self-delusion?" My sub-conscious had already done all the work and the answer was obvious. In the twinkling of an eye I switched from believer to atheist.

    Yet there was still much to unlearn. Saying "There are no gods" was no answer at all; it was merely a negation. Indeed, most of the atheists I encountered seemed (to paraphrase C.S. Lewis) annoyed at God for daring not to exist. Was there a spiritual answer? I looked. And looked. And in nearly every case I found self-delusion.

    Nonetheless, running underneath all that delusion, in science, in philosophy, in religion, was an attractive attitude. If this attitude had words, it would say, "Reality does not conform for your convenience."

    I eventually took a year off from my life and dedicated myself to finding reality. Oddly enough, it was there all along, but I hadn't been able to see or otherwise sense it because I kept imagining what it was supposed to be, according to what I'd been told or what I thought I needed.

    I learned, over the years, that there are countless people who will tell you that they have found the truth. In the vast majority of cases they have not found the truth. Rather, they crave for you to see things their way so they can further persuade themselves that they have successfully modelled reality.

    There are few things as refreshing as the realization that I've been wrong. In each case, that's one less belief to defend.
    • thumb
      Sep 1 2011: Hi Timothy,interesting you point out that we want believe in something so much that we almost think we contend reality and unturned bend others belief to ours. It's only when you realize you're alone in your thoughts and that there's more to what you think is right.
      If you don't mind me asking, what was it that you discovered from your quest?
      • thumb
        Sep 2 2011: What I discovered from my quest is that I am not separate. This is what love has been saying to me all along, but my brain was too busy regurgitating noise to hear it.
    • thumb
      Sep 2 2011: what a lovely response, Timothy. Your conclusion reminded me a little of three decades ago when people were going to EST. Do you remember that? One attended so they could get "it." It sounds like you got it...for you. :)

      That is my experience too. Being wrong generally makes me laugh...belly laugh, as a matter of fact. It's one of the most refreshing things I know - when I've held on to a 'belief.' I find it most fun when it comes to politics, or beliefs I've bought into because they 'sound right' or politically correct. They're the best of all... :) Thank you!
      • thumb
        Sep 2 2011: I never attended EST but I did read a book that depicted a session. It is said that you can't get it by reading about it, but I did take away quite a bit. In particular I recall a scene where a big tough guy was asked to walk around the stage like a woman. At first I didn't get why he'd be asked to do that. But eventually I got it, and perhaps so did he: "big tough guy" is a role, not an intrinsic feature of the organism.
    • thumb
      Sep 2 2011: Hi Timothy,

      "Reality does not conform for your convenience."

      I collect quotes and I copied this line to my quote file.
  • thumb
    Aug 31 2011: my biggest paradigm shift?

    Might probably my transition towards skepticism...

    before, I thought I could understand the world through intuition and a 'feeling'.
    It turned out to be terribly wrong... (went through a psychotic episode)

    Like Nash, I now understand intuition can be terribly misleading, and you should never have absolute trust in your gut feeling (though it does work great most of the times)...

    A skeptic questions his own beliefs all the time, and I think that is the only way one can take when one wants to reduce wrong ideas to the maximum. (It does not give always give you comfort though)

    - The book is the next one I'm going to read, though I predict it won't teach me a lot of new insights, I do hope to be wrong on that account -
    • thumb
      Sep 1 2011: Experiences like yours are the most profound examples of when not to trust our 'feelings,' while not knowing we shouldn't. Thank you so much for sharing that Christophe. I love your example.

      While it is probably true a skeptic questions his own beliefs all the time, I'd add the simply curious might also do that- without being skeptical in nature. But I could be wrong.... leads me to a thought for the next conversation. ;)
  • thumb
    Aug 31 2011: Oh yes, my life has been periodically punctuated by epiphanies of updated information that have changed my world view. One of the biggest was my introduction to the study of historic and archaeological catastrophism, formerly a taboo in the halls of academia but now part of mainstream as we have learned about the various catastrophic extinctions of the past. Richard Firestone has discovered compelling evidence that a near extinction event occurred as recently as ten thousand years ago, the Younger Dryas Event, a meteor impact that wiped out nearly all life in North America. The realization that we are in a cosmic shooting gallery was a game changer for me.

    This cosmic shooting gallery idea also led me to investigate other astronomy theories that need to be updated, among them the theory that planets form from accreted material left over from the primordial solar disk constituents. There are many problems with this model. A contending theory that needs more air time is that planets are ejected from the cores of their suns. What this means is that life in the Universe may be far rarer than Carl "Billions and billions of galaxies" Sagan and the rest of mainstream astronomy would want to entertain. Life may be exceedingly rare in the Universe, to the point, I'd speculate, that it may take an infinite Universe an infinite amount of time to create, not only life, but sentient life capable of contemplating it. What if we were in fact the only sentient, let alone living, beings in this Universe? What would that do to our sense of responsibility to ourselves and the planet?
    • thumb
      Sep 1 2011: Wonderful Walter! Reading this made me feel more alive! Your words challenged assumptions I hold in my mind without questioning, and don't necessarily believe. They're placeholders for the moment newer questions arise...which may be right now. Thank you.
  • thumb
    Aug 30 2011: I find it very interesting that you asked this question. I wrote a short blog piece about this exact topic. In short, I am thankful to have gone through varying difficult situations in order to get to where I am now. Without EACH ONE of those difficult times, I would not be where I am now, mentally, spiritually, and physically. I, just like so many others, was hoodwinked into believing certain religious, political, and social doctrines as truth. But had I not gone through these difficult and blind-sided happenings, I would still be LOCKED behind the dirty & tight-fitting, cultural spectacles that clouded the understanding of what I was observing with my physical eyes. Interestingly though, my mind was always free to think and contemplate and organize, but I never seemed free to express it. Until now. It feels good to know that I am free to think and seek for myself!
  • thumb
    Aug 29 2011: My Idea about reading
    For a long time I thought that reading happens by starting from the first word right the way to the last word. Consciously understanding everything. Critiquing and questioning every sentence. Now I understand our mind more capable than that. It is not what on the paper that matter but what is happening in our head. You don’t need to read every sentence to extract information from a written material. And learning happens on layers. You can’t be expert right the way. To make this sustainable I question my ideas beliefs every day. Discuss with people, find out what the experts say ,Critically question your thoughts e.t.c.
    • thumb
      Sep 1 2011: Interesting Bemnet. I like the example of reading - in the sense that, even that does not need to be done in a linear way. Reading is simply the catalyst, or behavior, to receive information - and our mind does what it needs to with it, in its time. I like that.
  • thumb
    Aug 29 2011: Yes!

    everything we currently know should be open to question, the ability to rewire ourselves with new information is what keeps us going. Holding onto the past information is what slows down evolution (maybe nature made us like that for our own protection). I think the paradigm shifts start with one person who understands how to rewire and rethink knowledge and realise it was probably wrong. Searching in this area then we find greatness and new ideas and goals. I am sure this is how progress happens, but the poor person has to persuade others to look, really look and that's harder as there are more of us.

    This is where peer review and establishment can actually do 2 great things
    1: weed out irrational and unfounded ideas
    2: Provide solid incremental improvements in state of art.

    This is where peer review harms us and increasingly so by
    1: No allowing changes to the current info base that are radical (so many people trained in the old wring way)
    2: Ensuring only incremental change happens (no heads above a parapet either).

    So in life we do not accept we are wrong much, but worse still it's become an institutionalised matter now and has the backing of large organisations, maybe natures brake on progress for our sakes, or perhaps we are just wrong in trying to compartmentalise information and maybe the people already invested in training the old ways, simply want to stay as they are and not change.

    Bottom line, until we embrace being mistaken and embrace change then we will evolve slower.

    Great question.
    • thumb
      Sep 2 2011: Yes, David. Seems to me embracing being wrong is a freeing and exciting venture! Imagine if it was how we approached our life and work, assuming we're wrong. In my experience, it allows us to monitor and pay attention instead of making the assumption we're right. We become more vigilant in our decision making, in my opinion; and more involved in the journey.
  • thumb
    Aug 29 2011: Last year, I came to know a man, and we like each other. He knew i was going to study abroad, but we tried our best to maintain the relationship between us. You know the relationship is kind of strange. Because we don't want to break the balance. We hope we can still be friends instead of a couple, as it is quite easy to lose each other during the time I was in another country. So, I almost persuade myself that there's true love in the world, and he is the right one, i can wait until see him again no matter how hard i am this year. But just two days ago, he upload a picture staying with another girl, and they are quite happy. I just don't know why I was deeply shocked and very sad, although I used to think it is normal and ok for him to love another one because he is quite good.

    The thing i cannot accept is that I used to believe in love and never suspect it, and think only if the two of us love each other, can we wait for each other no matter what happenned. But now, it seems i am wrong absoluty. What i have to believe is that something is changing totaly and true love can hardly be found......although i would not like to believe the fact.

    Thank you
    • thumb
      Sep 2 2011: oh, Cindy. I'm so sorry you're experiencing this. It's clear you're very disappointed, as anyone would be in your shoes. Nobody can take away the disappointment you're feeling, but I can share what I've come to understand about this kind of love. I've had a number of wonderful relationships throughout my life, each of which I believed was true love, and each one ended for one reason or another - leaving me questioning the same thing you are now. I've come to understand, for me, that each love was true love. It's my idea of how love should look that was wrong. It is such a perfect example of thinking we know something, and perhaps being completely wrong!

      Over the years I've found the love lives on. The form it takes does not. Real love is bigger than any picture we hold in our mind. I hope your pain subsides quickly, and joy replaces it again.
  • thumb
    Aug 28 2011: Does your use of the word "believed" mean to accept something as truth?
    Who has not realized that something they embraced as being true was, in fact, false?
    There are some epistemological definitions needed to weed-out the impossible things some people blindly embrace as truth. For example: What is Truth?
    Also, regarding the words "mistaken' and "wrong", is your intended meaning exemplified by the act of embracing as truth that which is false?
    • thumb
      Aug 28 2011: Why are you making this question so complex ? Everybody understood it easily & shared their experiences.
      • thumb
        Aug 28 2011: I apologize. It was not my intention to obfuscate the question.
        I do believe it is essential to define terms prior to answering a question.
        It is not clear to me precisely what the question means by, "discovered you were mistaken, or wrong?" For example, I once believed in Santa Claus. Was that a mistake, or wrong? If it was wrong of me to believe in St. Nick what made it wrong? Was it wrong because there is no proof that he exists? Or, was it wrong because there is proof that he does not exist?
        The question is complex, I did not make it so.
        • thumb
          Sep 2 2011: I think I was wrong in believing I made the question clear. ;)

          Edward, your responses make me smile. Your mind can obviously take this in many directions. I think you should simply answer it in a way that works for you, or contributes to your thought process. Fyi, the word wrong was not intended to mean a moral judgement, but simply to imply things were different than we thought, or how we assumed, they were.
  • Aug 27 2011: Taking a more personal route, I learned that my self-image was quite different from the way others viewed me. I suppose this would translate into a more universal lesson about the importance of others' opinions -- while they certainly shouldn't dictate one's life, I think acknowledging them has been productive in discovering/finding myself (I'm still a teenager, so I have a ways to go!).

    My story is a rather jumbled one, as the journey is ongoing. Though I am multiracial (Caucasian and Asian), I always saw myself as your average white kid, growing up in a sheltered and predominantly white suburb. I've grown up with my Chinese grandparents' war stories and other very "Asian experiences," but I always thought I was culturally white. However, from a young age I knew my classmates saw me differently. Generally they were never mean or exclusive, but as I got older I realized my race carried much more weight than I ever imagined. Whether it was an ex boyfriend who was attracted to my "exotic" features, or the casual suggestion I try a restaurant's Asian salad because "well, you know... [I] would probably like it," this label was fundamental to the way many people viewed me. I was really quite astonished, and even hurt, though most people didn't mean anything by their comments. I'm sure countless others have had similar experiences, regardless of race or ethnicity.

    With this disparity largely cleared up in high school (not without some identity crisis and struggle!), I went to college thinking I understood myself. Again I was wrong. To make a long story short, I've learned that some of my other traits give people certain opinions of me that I hadn't anticipated. Thankfully to my knowledge they're mostly positive, and even make me seem more interesting than I really am! Perhaps I'm a little disappointed that my identity isn't completely my own, but this has been a fascinating process. Regardless, I hope I'll have it sorted out soon.
    • thumb
      Aug 28 2011: Claire, Great story. And you write extremely well.

      Oh, and I'm not a teenager (far, far from it) and I'm still going through the same things you describe.
      • Aug 28 2011: Hi Thomas,

        Many thanks for the kind comment. I guess it'll be a while before I can figure myself out -- if only there was a way to speed up the process!
        • thumb
          Aug 28 2011: Do you know how Michelangelo carved the Pietà?

          He removed all that was not a part of the beauty.

          No more; no less.
        • Aug 29 2011: the sooner you find out who you are, the sooner you'll long for the days you were exploring possibilities, don't rush it
    • thumb
      Sep 2 2011: I'm fascinated by your comment, "Perhaps I'm a little disappointed that my identity isn't completely my own..."
      I beg to differ, yet I know what you mean. The projections others place on us is their picture or view, and the one we own is ours, imo. However, I imagine it gets rather jumbled up too - since we have projections we're throwing at others, and self images we want to portray. I loved this example too...I imagine all of us, no matter the age, have struggled with perceptions others have of us - some good, some bad. I've also had some real challenges with this in my life for various reasons, and it's been an ongoing process that continuously deepens and strengthens my own understanding of myself, and who I am in relation to others. Thank you so much for sharing this.
      • Sep 2 2011: Hi Linda,
        Your view is also fascinating! I can see what you mean. Certainly we create (or discover?) our own identities, but for me at least, the opinions of others have caused me to reflect and reevaluate myself. People's comments provoked thoughts such as "Oh, I guess I am pretty Asian!" or "I didn't realize my interest in art was so obvious, I guess people can see that," etc. and these ideas were incorporated into my self-image. Perhaps this incorporation was a conscious decision, meaning I ultimately have control over my own identity, like you said. Thanks very much for following up -- you've made me dig deeper when it comes to this issue!
        • thumb
          Sep 2 2011: Clair - sometimes the things people see in us are those things we are gifted with, such as your interest in art. I never thought I was creative, or had any talent whatsoever. I remained on the periphery of creative ventures by working around creatives. It turns out, even though people mentioned it to me often over the course of my life, I am creative and did not acknowledge it. One of my professions is as a fine art photographer now, but because I didn't fit the mold - not being gifted in drawing - I didn't think I had talent. Perhaps those things others see in us is a window to things we don't know about ourselves yet. I've learned it's valuable to pay attention to those things that light us up, or light others up... :)
  • Aug 27 2011: cynical world, is the real truth...
  • thumb
    Aug 27 2011: I used to believe that a fat man in a red velvet costume who had a prominent white beard went around the world in a slay carried by magical reindeer delivering presents to every house in the world.
  • Aug 27 2011: oh , that seem very little. In addition ,I have forgotten. I am so sorry!
  • thumb
    Aug 27 2011: There's an awful lot of things I used to believe in wholeheartedly: life after death, the trustworthiness of adults, God, and perfect love to name a few. In most cases, these beliefs were disconfirmed by various counter-examples. In other cases, it slowly became apparent that I had no real basis for believing except my own desire for that thing to be true.

    The big lesson for me has been that *belief* is fundamentally an emotional reaction, not a rational one. We tend to cling to ideas which comfort us, and this emotional investment is what differentiates a false belief from a mere misconception. Once you identify your underlying emotional drives, it's a lot easier to avoid the pitfalls of false beliefs.
  • Aug 26 2011: May i ask you some questions?
  • Aug 23 2011: How about the periodic table? I got thrown out of class in 7th grade science for asking where all of the half atoms were that we had split starting in the 1940s. My position was that the table did not account for those half atoms and as a result must be flawed, or, that there were a lot more elements out there than the table reflected as a result of those half atoms floating around and connecting themselves to other elements. Literally was sent to the principles office because I felt I had a valid point and by this time knew the teacher didn't have the answer.

    Time went by and I got lucky several years later when I had an old physisist for a client that had worked on our original atom bomb. I told him the story and after he got a good laugh out of it he explained it to me. Took him all of 20 seconds to clear up 8 years of confusion. :-)