- Chimezie Ihekuna
This conversation is closed.
Postulation of the sex arithmetic and the way forward
First and foremost, we consider the phrase 'postulation of the sex arithmetic'. This is a postulation which is intended to be a theory. Basically, it is a 'computable' equation which explains or depicts s generally the number of times individuals, irrespective of gender have engaged in sexual intercourse before marriage. Precisely, the 'computable' equation has 13 interpretations which represent the sex lives of different individuals.
At this juncture, the proof authenticating the potency of the intended theory will have to be shown. In this case, we take as case study Individual A. The validity of this equation is dependent on the following statements.
1) It can be numerically determined if individual A can keep a sincere up-to-date record of his or her sexual activities.
2) It is dependent on sex-influenced relationships engaged.
3) The first-time sex experience is constant, that is, it has a constant value of 1. Note: 'sex' refers to the direct physical relation between a man and woman
The 'computable' equation which is a representation of the total number of times individual A(N) had engaged is:,
N=No±N1±N2±N3±N4, where No represents the first_time sex experience had (with partner a, say), N1 represents the sex relations individual A had engaged in his or her subsequent relationships (with partners b, c,d, e, f... ), N3 represents the possible one-night stand/for-the-moment sex situations (with partners m, n, o, p...) and N4 represents the number of times individual A had engaged in sex with his or her would-be marital partner before marriage.
The interpretations are given as the following:
Secondly, 'the way forward' refers to the consequences_ the varying degree of insecurity and doubt as unveiled by infidelity and an unstable marital stance