TED Conversations

Rohan Ravi

This conversation is closed.

The evolution of consciousness and culture

The evolution of consciousness and culture is a classic principle in spiritual societies throughout time where this knowledge of an evolving universe has been at the very least intuited. We have understood that in order for the world to change consciousness has to evolve, and since consciousness and culture are inter-related, so too does culture have to evolve through our own vehicles. I wonder how much consciousness there is of this movement in consciousness toward the new in this TED community. My guess is that there is quite a lot of consciousness around this topic. But i also feel that unless we begin to embody this new consciousness as ourselves in everything that we do, so that this consciousness can begin to transform the world around us, we will be falling short of the radical potential to create a new culture of higher values together.

Topics: consciousness

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Jul 17 2011: Rohan, Ed, Salim....excellent company in which to think about the co-fecundity, co-creation of culture and consciousness and the question of how we evolve a global culture from our defacto global pluralistic world where no one country can live in self determined isolation from all others.

    The work of Colavito, Wilber,deNicolas, emphasize "biolculturism". Colavitos work makes a lot of sense to me in its suggestion that the five different parts of the human brain, each with its specific function, in effect represent the history of culture in humanity reflecting both our biological evolution and our cultural evolution. While I don't believe consciousness resides in biology , many trying to make this biological connection to consciousness agree that the right brain, the source of our ability to imagine is the part of our biology that allows us to directly and knowingly engage consciousness .Each culture, each belief system, according to Colavito ( as further explicated in de Nicolas' work in the late 90's) "resides" in, is centered in a different part of the brain, many not including or developing any "right brain" activity. Wilber's Sex Ecology & Sprituality, of the same period , lays out cultural and spirtual evolutio nin or or less the same terms. I am not deeply immersed or well versed enough in any of this literature to speak from it or to it with any mastery but at my superficial level of exposure to it, it has provoked my own thought and my own questioning. My very supericial , very rudimentray grasp on how all this might fit together and what it means for forming a global cukture of stewradship for the planet and for one another is far from unified. It's a list of ideas, at the moment. A central idea though is that consciousness contains many different streams of energy not all working together or toward any higher good.
    • thumb
      Jul 17 2011: A very interesting discussion. of consciousness. In my talk, I avoided the left/right brain metaphor because the research has advanced so much further. Also, such binary assessments of the mind understate its quantum and analogue complexities, that I believe through millennia of plasticity has enabled the human spirit. Our mind is not a discrete package of left and right. This is not demonstrated by holding up a dead one that looks so.

      It is a living thing not a mechanism. As I said at INK and TED, and described from within in Rise and Shine, the human mind is the world's (likely the universe's) first fully functional, analogue, quantum computer.

      Look forward to reading more comments. Thank you, Simon
      • thumb
        Jul 18 2011: Simon,

        Thanks for your comment. I am an advocate for people with brain injury and cognitive disabillity so your remarkable story is one I will use and make reference to. Like Jill's story ( Stroke of Insight) it speaks to the power of your personal will and dedication in rebuilding yourself almost from the ground up.

        I am going to send your TED talk to my friend Seymour Papert, one of the great minds of this century, who suffered devastating brain injury 4 years ago that affected motor skill and language centers. I am sure he would enjoy hearing from you.

        .I have the sense that you are using the word "consciouseness" to refer to a brain centered function. It is my personal experience, and that of hundreds of thoursands of others, that our inner observer and the larger field "consciousness" oustide of us are non-corporeal. My own sense of how it all works is that the brain is more like a receiver than a creator of the energies and information of "consciousness" ( and that whether we do it knowingly or not, the way we live our lives becomes part of that consciousness)

        I would like to learn more about your personal program of cognitive circuit training

        As a contemplative, I too engage practices intended to excercise and align my inner faculties. I do "brain excercises"..I do excrcises to increase my ability to focus and concentrate, I do excercises to deepen my own centerdness . Would be interesting to hear more from you about your own practices to strengthen and build your cognitive abilities. Perhaps you'd consider hosting a TED conversation to go into that more deeply?

        In your talk you made two references to the awakening of conscioyness and cultural transformation which is the topic of this conversation. Could you share a bit more of your thoughts on that with us here?
        • thumb
          Jul 18 2011: Lindsay,
          Thank you for sharing my talk with Seymour Papet and your thoughts. My reference to consciousness as flowing from the world and universe's first fully functioning "quantum" analogue computer expresses a "quantum" element that is unbounded. As you know, it is an infinite field and I'm not sure it's possible to summarize it better than that. My book has a chapter on Innerspace and is an exploration of my consciousness during coma, while other parts share he many facets of cognitive training I experienced, and practice today. My goal is a nonprofit to focus on these, and grow awareness both of the gaps between potential mind and actual mind, and how many might bridge them. You might wish to "Like" my Facebook site as I'll announce developments there at:


          Thank you for contributing to awareness of this key question of our times.
    • thumb
      Jul 18 2011: Hi Lindsay, it is interesting that you mention Ken Wilber. Which books of his have you read. And have you been involved in the Integral community at all. I personally find Ken Wilber's AQAL model indispensable to understanding the world. But at the same time i see that the map is not the territory no matter how good that map may be. Which is why i mention in this post that we have to embody the understanding as ourselves. In other words we have to become it. Which is why i feel we need community.
      • thumb
        Jul 18 2011: Hello Rohan..Wilber is not one of my prinicpal "guideposts" but on the subject of "consciousness" one could hardly have a conversation that does not refer to him. After 3 months at TED conversations where I see currents and patterns that I don't see in my everyday life here on my remote Maine island I spent a day on retreat studying Sex Ecology and Spirituality and it is amodel that helps me understand what I see.

        I believe that what we need now to cure or ailing planet and care well for all who live here now, to be good stewards for those who will follow us we need to move and act in what modern wise man Tom Atlee calls "Co-Intelligence" I don't agree with Wilber that it is through the "enlightened" that the cultural and political changes we need to effect will come into being. Tom has written beautifully about that in a recent post at his blog:


        I believe that every time an individual steps forward in service to others, offering whatever gifts or abilities that person has to serve and build community, to comfort and heal broken people and a broken planet, the collective consciousness somehow "takes over" and magnifies, and makes possible the dissemniation of that gift into the world. That act alone, that act of giving of oneself in service to others, somehow engages an unimagianble enabling power that doesn't require any inner work or preparation on the part of the person. The act of commiting to the service of others transcends all belief systems, all IQ, all brain development, all knowledge. Every time we intentionally plug our unique gifts and abilities into serving others, into healing our broken world, the full power of consciousness engages to allow that gift to do its best work.
        • thumb
          Jul 18 2011: Lindsay, i don't think that's what KW actually believes. That only the enlightened can participate in cultural transformation. His AQAL model provides a theoretical framework that can be used by anybody at any level of development.
      • thumb
        Jul 18 2011: Rohan,

        I am sure you are far more steeped in Wilber's teachings than I and am glad if his teaching inlcudes the possibility of anyone, whether on a spirtual path or not, particpating in and controbuting to cultural transformation in a postive way...

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.