- annie mzn
This conversation is closed.
The standardization or the use of specific leading manners in Art concours is the same reflection as commiting the censorship by the media.
Talking about strictly identified definitions on arts and efforts to achieve so-called, "an ideal" art performance or art project is leading us to the same source of the censorship in the media. By thinking profoundly about the compassion of Theodor Adorno on this issue we could be able to observe the role of capitalism by means of its overall leadership on each sort of liberal expressionism. Our historical memory testifies that conservative art leaders which also had been known as "Elits" tried to identify the ideal art (or interpretations) by organizing international art concours or establishing academical systems in base of their own aesthetics. Secondly, if we concentrate on the term ''Ideal', we are faced with an abvious human`s life long ambition, simoltaneously, we are obiligated to point out the reality about this ambition. Freud defines the idealism as we`ve been seperated from our definitive unity(Mother), therefore, the man kind is never satisfied by the world around and is always looking for her complementary (ideal), so, necessarily the way each person tries to define her ideal is different and by lifting up a limited amount of ''elits'' to the power (who describe and identify Arts) which are under the power the overall leadership`s ideology of society ( Capitalism, Imperialism, Liberals,..) day by day we diminish(sort of Censorship)other new viewpoints on Arts by means of the periodic imaginative superiority.