This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
The decriminalization of abortion
Are you in favor or against the decriminalization of abortion?
What are your thoughts and arguments?
Let's start the debate!
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Are you in favor or against the decriminalization of abortion?
What are your thoughts and arguments?
Let's start the debate!
Matthieu Miossec 100+
The amount of abortions that are carried out in countries that allow it remain inconsequential compared to the natural abortions the female body sometimes triggers. Indeed, not every egg fertilization leads to a successful pregnancy.
Now of course, an arbotion has to be performed under a time-limit, after which a foetus is properly a living thing.
Steve Bruno
Abortion puts into question the very definition of what it means to be a human.
I believe a lot of this debate goes back to your point of reference for human value. If you believe that abortion is acceptable, you also must believe that there is a point in which value is given to a developing life, and conversely that there is a point in which that life has no value and is disposable.
Comment deleted
Chris Aldon 20+
People will have them legal or not is an interesting point, I feel maybe more talk should be dedicated to that.
Brandon Cavalho
Nicholas Lukowiak 50+
Avoiding diapers is not a bad deal.
Martim Cutum 500+
Chris Aldon 20+
1st trimester, second, third?
Nicholas Lukowiak 50+
I'm in favor. Timothy covers a lot of my points.
Personal choices that affect/effect only self in general should never be illegal.
Steve Bruno
Nicholas Lukowiak 50+
But no, not everything illegal is a personal choice.
Steve Bruno
The problem lies with the thinking that abortion does not affect anyone. The people that are the product of rape, and are alive today show that abortion does affect others.
Nicholas Lukowiak 50+
All I am saying is abortion is a choice, and personal choices should be free, period.
Timothy Daniel
So yes, I'm in favor of the decriminalization of abortion. Or more accurately, I'm against its criminalization since it's already legal and well-accepted where I live.
Chris Aldon 20+
Brandon Cavalho
at the very least the child will live on freely with a family who really wants a baby and able to support it.
if you think of putting up for adoption as the best choice then there would be no reason to have a abortion
Lucas Avelleda 500+
Matthieu Miossec 100+
Nicholas Lukowiak 50+
A life full of depression and chaos is a miserable existence, especially if there are no to few chances of significant change.
Why I also believe in euthanasia; it is the ultimate choice every human always has, to end their own life.The most extreme choice next to taking anthers life in my opinion. Still when life is grim, your few choices become God.
Chris Aldon 20+
I also think that the chance to live is so rare and so precious that it is always worth the risk.
and like you I support euthanasia, but that is a whole other topic!
Helen Hupe 30+
@ Chris.......Thank you and yes, quite a shift occurs from despair to gratitude.
Helen Hupe 30+
Chris Aldon 20+
Nicholas Lukowiak 50+
With I all I say, is to respect, have you ever felt like you wanted to "die" a few times in life? Times those feelings by a million and some people deal with that daily and still find reason to live, but they have a goal, if you no goals you do not survive!.
WE must constantly trick ourselves into thinking there is value in life that there is purpose, goals do this! By "trick" I mean we follow what makes us happy in life, physically and mentally. We are controlled by what our body wants as well as our thoughts. By body I mean both brain functions (neurological) and organ/bodily functions (biology).
To have this ability takes a large consciousness. To have this ability and fight in life is beautiful, perceptively.
From this I gather; we need to encourage each other to be altruist and selfish at the same time! Oh that sounds silly! But that is how I feel.
If this was the practice I would agree abortions should be illegal, it just isn't reality to me...
Chris Aldon 20+
I'm against Abortion unless there is a particular health concern to the mother or the fetus.
When life begins is a chicken and the egg riddle with people, there is no sure answer that will convince everyone. Pregnancy whether wanted or unwanted is a responsibility both parents should share.
In the case of rape I am still against abortion, there are times in life when responsibility is forced into our hands, no matter the means the responsibility is still ours to bear.
Helen Hupe 30+
Chris Aldon 20+
I used to agree with abortion (hell I know a girl who's had one) then I slowly started to turn the other direction and realize how abortion (in my opinion) is little more than a modern convenience for a process of nature.
Lucas Avelleda 500+
But why can't we consider it a good convenience for a process of nature? I agree with you that it is a convenience, but in my opinion it is good convenience (if made properly)
Lucas Avelleda 500+
It's good to see your face around here, Helen, Welcome, haha!
Nicholas Lukowiak 50+
Helen Hupe 30+
Matthieu Miossec 100+
Notwithstanding the popularity of the Great Bethoven fallacy, the actual story behind it is an outright lie. Bethoven was the second oldest in his family and there is no evidence that either parents had syphillis. As for Helen Keller, she wasn't even born deaf and blind, she contracted an illness at the age of 1 that left her that way.
The Bethoven example relies on the illnesses of other siblings (in the tale, most siblings have non-genetic conditions so the whole fable is stupid anyway, even if it were true) to determine the deafness of Bethoven. You wouldn't diagnose an unborn child through its siblings, that's not common practice. Again, there isn't even a need for me to say thi because, perusing Nethoven's wikipedia page, I've just discovered that he too lost his hearing later in life due to some illness he contracted.
Lucas knows that the question of abortion would have affected him personally, yet in spite of that he chose to look at the issue rationally, rather than to succumb to the fallacious 'you've killed Bethoven' non-starter. Surely if anything in our history changed then we would not be born. Should we see the first world war as essentially a good thing because without it we wouldn't be born? I don't think so.
Martim Cutum 500+