Debra Smith


This conversation is closed.

Learning to forgive is 'the PhD" of being human. True or False? It represents the highest level of human development or does it?


We are at beyond the half time mark so I would like to add another question:
What are the elements of a good apology?
What are the elements of a lousy apology?

Forgiveness is a very difficult thing to give.

It is necessary to forgive?

Is it right to forgive?

Who deserves forgiveness?

Who doesn't deserve forgiveness?

Does a person have to ask for forgiveness to deserve it?

Can you accept being forgiven when you have hurt someone?

What does forgiving do for the person who forgives?

  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: Forgiveness comes from a concept that someone else has done or said something that is "wrong", that has in some way gone against you, or has hurt you or has denied you "a right". It implies that because of this thing that has been done to you, you have in one way or another suffered or been disenfranchised, or denied something that you deserve. It also implies that something then has been taken away from you, and in most cases this causes you unhappiness.I tend to believe that everything that happens has a purpose, and that I too have contributed something, even if minor, to any event that happens to me, and therefore share some responsibility for the outcome, or the reality that I find myself in. So, I ask myself, what is there than needs my forgiveness? Nothing, unless, of course, I am caught up in the ego that tells me I have been denied my right to something, or I had allowed others to be responsible for my happiness, or, I have forgotten that every situation I am in is one that I have, at some level, co-created for my best possible learning about who I AM, and what I came here to do.If any of the above is true, then, yes indeed, forgiveness is a mighty gift to have and to share.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Well said Ronald, and I absolutely agree with your comment. To forgive someone, we would have had to blame him/her for something. I also agree that everything happens for a purpose, and is an opportunity for all individuals to learn and grow in ourselves. Helen insightfully states: "When you understand it all, there may be nothing to forgive". Many times, we have expectations of others they are unwilling or unable to meet. We feel hurt because he/she is not acting or reacting the way we expect. When we hold onto that hurt, we give up our choice, and try to give responsibility for what we feel to the other person. We co-create ANY situation we are involved in. Perhaps the important thing is to forgive ourselves for blaming others. When we take responsibility for our own feelings, the heart has a chance to heal.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Ronald, I am so happy to have a different world view represented here.

      Often, when cultures or world views intersect the very fundamental assumptions result in misunderstanding.
      It must be a major skill set to navigate such waters respectfully and productively.

      Who among us understands all? Certainly not me and I don't think I can honestly say that I have met many who would claim to.

      If we live in a world where one group believes differently and thinks and feels deeply about forgiveness, is it enough to simply say "I don't believe in it. Your world view is bunk. You are simply not nearly as enlightened as I am and if you were - you would not be hurt or offended by any of my actions?'

      Yes, we may co-create but does that negate our responsibility to co-fix, co-communicate, or co-build bridges of understanding.

      All I seem to hear from those who consider themselves enlightened is that if I were only as advanced as they were none of the problems would exist. My sincere and heart felt question is: Where is the humilty and love in that?
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: Debra,

        @the enlightened etc.

        through many of of our conversations in recent months on fear, ego, radical empathy ( any others???)you have said this..and also most others,if not in so many words in a general resistance or inability to access the ideas offered out of which you have created this construct..ths paradigm about the enlightened vs the non enlightened.

        This is all about basic human stuff..All humans have the capacity to manage their stuff perfectly well all by themselves through their intentions, their will, their determination. I believe that is possible without faith and without a spiritual practrice..just by the sheer alinement of heart, will, and mind..probably exactly what you called on beyond medicine to become, as I am, a cancer "survivor", what you did to raise your children, to do well in your earn your degrees.alll things in which heart, mind and will were alined..working together.

        It doesn't require faith, it doesn't require spiritual prcatice and it doesn't require years and years in psychotherapy. it just requires a commitmnet to your own your own fulfillment, to your own actualization.It does require a practice does require dailiy habits. It's something anyone can do for themselves but it is work and it does require vigilance.

        I must say, few support me in this view. You are quite right in observing that those of faith and those in spirirtual practice seem to think they have some kind of high ground and that it isn't possible to tackle these fundamental conditions of all humanity without faith and without spiritual practice. There are many many many roads to the same one owns the one and only path..evryone can find their own path and we'll all get to the exact same place.

        Each path ,each practice,almost unavoidably has its own language..its own approach..its just amatter of finding or building a practice that works for you.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Lindsay,

          I encourage you to open a conversation about the meaning of "enlightenment"
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Ronald I welcome your voice and your wisdom.. important awareness.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Incredible insight Ronald. Feel like you just triggered an epiphany.

      How'd you get to be so wise anyway?
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Interesting, happiness seems to be an underlining value of many conversations started on TED.

      All questions seem to end in humanism when the wisest of TEDsters put their connecting abilities to perfect harmony.

      Brilliant Ronald.


      I consider you to be wise, the question can easily be asked of you in my opinion.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Debra, Ronald & Tim Ronald receive our aknowledgement. Your point is very deep and mercyfull. We all are delighted with your clear heart and wisdom.

      This is what happens at the end of "The Merchant of Venice" . Shylock is forgived.

      Auguri da tutti noi,specially from Father Delacourt.
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: Yes, Conte, Shylock is forgiven when he gives up what is his.
  • thumb
    Jun 10 2011: @ Collen, you put it very well- When all is understood, judgment ends- and I guess if we can cease to judge, well, then, what will there be to forgive?

    @ Debra, thanks for the warm welcome. I hope to continue sharing my thoughts as plainly as I possibly can, but please remember, they're just mine. My opinions may not be very representative of my peers.. that said, may I also say that my experience of the 'enlightened ones', and mind you, I have met children who to me fit that expression, is this: Its not that problems wont exist if we all got 'enlightened', is just that problems wont bother us as much as they presently do. Perhaps a bit simplistic...but then adults do tend to make things very, very complicated.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Ronald,

      That is beautifully put Ronald.

      "if we can cease to judge, what will there be to forgive"

      So wonderful to have your voice here at Ted Conversations.

    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Thanks Ronald:>)
      Forgiveness comes from the concept that someone has done something "wrong", and our perception of the situation is that we are "right". That is a judgement, which comes from the ego. You mentioned in your previous comment, that we "get caught up in the ego" and allow "others to be responsible for my happiness".
      When we "cease to judge", we free ourselves to create our own happiness without depending on, or expecting someone else to create it for us.

      To be aware, and understand some of the underlying feelings is sometimes not easy, and will not solve all challenges in our lives, but as you insightfullly point out, "problems won't bother us as much as they presently do".
    • Jun 10 2011: "When all is understood, judgment ends" - Did you say this Colleen? A most profound statement when taken to its greatest extent. Kudos :-)
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Sorry to be the persistent reality check but, respectfully, are we not all living with partial knowledge?

      Who is honestly claiming to 'understand it all"?

      And let's move to a practical and compassionate place: for those of you who do claim to understand it all- why do you still show up at a question like this (let's call it remedial class for the unenlightened)?

      Is it honestly to declare your superiority or do you have some compassionate agenda?
      • Jun 10 2011: HI Debra, My bad. It was Helen who said
        " My life coach tells me this...."When you understand it all there may be nothing to forgive".
        I think it might be true if we can ever get to that point, hence my comment about its meaning if taken to the fullest extent. But as you say and I have stated in my posts, it is not simple to get there. Sorry that I did not explain that properly.

        Sincere apologies Colleen.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Hi Julie Ann,

          My quibble is not with the quote. Helen's therapist is one of those people in the trenches holding out light to redeem lives and I admire her work and most especially the evidence that it helped Helen to have a better life.

          My quibble is that too many are ignoring what the hopeful quote says;

          "WHEN you understand it ALL there MAY be nothing to forgive"

          Given all the spirtual traditions represented here- and given Helen's stated age- it may mean in heaven we will understand it all because that is an explicit teaching of the faith.

          I just want people to have 'more life in their lives' here an now and forgiving to the extent that one is able frees up a lot of cognitive space and room in the heart for love.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: No problem Julie Ann:>)
          Did you see my comment regarding this? (It is below at this point in the thread)
          It was an evolution of an idea which started with Helen's life coach!

          I don't honestly think we understand everything as long as we're on this earth school, and as Debra insightfully states: "...forgiving to the extent one is able frees up a lot of cognitive space and room in the heart for love".
      • Jun 11 2011: Hi Debra, I must commend you on the way you manage to moderate the topic, with so many varied opinions and even working through the maze of posts to find the ones that require a response!
        I think one of the reasons your topic is so engaging is that it applies to a broad range of situations from harmless sibling rivalry to brutal crimes, and also a range of scales - from interpersonal discord to conflicts between ethnic groups or countries. I think the responses have covered the ranges quite well. I noted before that some things are easier to forgive than others and you have summed it up quite well - "forgiving to the extent that one is able to". Realistically, that's all we can ask. Cheers :-)
      • Jun 11 2011: Hi Colleen, I have to admit that I get lost trying to navigate through the maze of responses, as I mentioned to Debra just now. I did manage to find your post and Helen's as well. You are quite right - we have very limited understanding and are bound within those limits. I suppose we can only hold on to our beliefs of what is right and wrong and try to live within those as best we can. I do like Debra's expression of forgiving as best we can because each conflict scenario has a different effect and elicits a different response. The complexity of human existence! Cheers :-)
        • thumb
          Jun 12 2011: Hi Julie Ann,.
          The comment threads do seem like a maze at times! LOL :>)

          I think that sometimes, our understanding is impacted by our willingness or unwillingness to open the heart and mind to information. We "can only hold on to our beliefs of what is right and wrong and try to live within those as best we can", OR we can explore different thoughts, feelings, beliefs and ideas to create less limitations. What do you think?

          I agree that there are different scenarios and different responses, and I feel that the more information I have, the better able I am to be fully engaged in any scenario to the best of my ability.
        • thumb
          Jun 12 2011: Good Morning Colleen!

          As long as we are alive I agree that we should be open to new learning. My approach is to try to maintain width as well as gain depth because as soon as knowledge and understanding are fully engaged in only one direction it becomes more like a tunnel than an inverted pyramid open to every expanding depths of light.
          So finding the good in different spiritual practices or traditions without humouring the bad, following the studies of humaity and sciences and integrating them all with my own experience is what I try to do.

          More understanding, more compassion, more tenderness is my goal and I think it is your goal too.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Ronald, Thanks for returning to share more of your views.

      I would like to understand what you are preaching.
      Let me ask you my heart felt questons.
      I am talking about real situations in real lives and I am hoping you can give me help in understanding your ways. Because our styles are so different I find one of the most frustrating things is that 'the enlightened' never respond to direct questions. Will you follow that pattern too?

      Is it only ego that damages the child who experiences a rape at the age of 5?

      For torture victims- is it your world view that they brought the experience upon themselves?

      For the father who just buried his son who just graduated from highschool because of a drive by shooting where do you tell him to put his grief?

      How far have you tested your world view in actual painful situations?
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: I am looking forward to Ronald's reply as well..and I am intrigued..actually moved by your focus on the different languages spoken by those in faith and spiritual practice and those not

        when people of different views and backgrounds and cultures engage and especially when people from faith and spiritual practice engage here they engage from the language of their culture and the esoteric language of faith and practice is not really very acessible.

        I came to Ted thinking that an attempt to avoid practice and faith based language was the way to go. I Can't help speaking from that place..that is my life that is what supports and feeds and empowers all the very difficult advocacy work I do in the world so even when I don't use the language of my practice..the ideas of my practice are obvious in everything I say.

        I think what you are speaking to is that the language comes from a very different mindset and world view which is what I think might be coming across as not answering.

        I am not here to teach or enlighten or convert. I am here to speak for things that I believe are very important..the plight of people with cognitive disbailities, plutonomy etc. etc.

        Speaking only or myself our voices are as valid here as any and your growing frustration and intolerance of our voices is mystifying.

        .As for your assumption that those of us who have a spiritual practrice are all rich from inherited wealth and have lead charmed lives, unchallenged by harsh realities..that is a red speedo.

        On the wisdom path for atheists the first thing to let go of is judging others., characterizing them, classifying them, forming lenses that eirther "place them in china" or bombard them with confused torpedoes.

        I ask for tolerance and respect and would appreciate all Tedsters refraining from htis characterization Debra is marketing here at Ted. of people who speak from faith and spiritual practice.
      • Jun 10 2011: Dear Debra,

        You pose interesting questions, and I would like to share some of my views on them (not any faith based)

        First of all, I believe we are all connected and make up this plant called earth, so our actions or inactions affect each other whether we like it or not.

        the child who experiences rape at the age of 5 needs love, compassion, understanding, and learning to forgive, not for the sake of who wronged him/her, but for the sake of his/her own sanity. So that the 'rape' does not become a part of his/her identity. so that the anger does not build up and so that he/she does not grow up to be a person who shoots someone's son in a drive by shooting.

        I beleive learning to forgive is learning to accept. when something happens to us that we can not control or change, if we can accept it, forgiveness emerges out of the acceptance. however, it becomes difficult when ego comes in between and makes it all obout the other person who wronged. and the vicious cycle continues.....
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Davinder, Welcome and thanks for sharing your views.

          I am in full agreement with this. Learning to accept the events and what they mean and more often -what they do not mean about the self- is crucial.

          To pretend or suggest as I percieve that some here do that if the child was only 'egoless' enough it would be 'no big deal' is the opposite of establishing the environment for healing and exactly what facilitates the future acting out of those unresolved feelings and mentations.
      • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Hi Julie Ann,
      I did say that, and we are building on a concept that was presented by member Helen Hupe in a previous comment. A quote by Helen's life coach, which I find to be very profound: "When you understand it all there may be nothing to forgive". Ronald insightfully mentioned the ego, and how it may impact forgiveness...I expanded on that with the idea that our ego is often judgmental...trying to make one person or idea "right" and another person/idea "wrong"...and so the evolution of thoughts, feelings, ideas and perceptions grew:>)

      I don't honestly think we ever understand everything, but to take the journey which may help us understand some of the scenario is important to me when I am moving through challenges. I've also found that suspending judgement, allows me to understand more.
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: Colleen, I do live in a world and with a world view that believes that certain things are wrong.

        It is wrong to rape a child.
        It is wrong to increase suffering in other lives.
        It is wrong to torture.
        It is wrong to burn women in tires.

        I cannot bridge our world view when you keep telling me -as though I were deaf- if I only did it your superior way all of these things would not matter.

        They matter to me - and to the people who experience them. I think they deserve help in freeing themselves from the events.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Dear Debra,
          I am not telling you to do anything my way, nor do I believe the information I offer is "superior" in any way. Actually, I was simply reinforcing ideas that others had already offered.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: @Ronald


      "When all is understood, judgment ends- and I guess if we can cease to judge, well, then, what will there be to forgive?"

      How would you answer your own question Ronald? When considering judgments could be ended, do you mean universally everyone's judgments could be ended in all situations or do you only mean the individual practice of understanding?

      Can the whole world achieve these "enlightened" moments? An epiphany of great consideration? To eventually become "enlightened" or to simply become wise.

      I agree if all events had full understanding to all the individuals in the dispute, the factors/details to judge on said event would be easier to be determined. However, I do not feel judgments would end there. Judgments are forever given to the one's we know and love, let alone those who creates disputes with us.

      Example: For now on, my judgment of you will be you are a brilliant person, therefore I find deep meaning in your simplicity. How will this end? You cannot unconsciously make me change my judgment or opinion of you. Opinions and judgments change depending on evidence, claims, and facts.

      The judgment to see a man with bloody clothes with a scared face, no evidence, and a poor story (claims). To now be considered a suspect in a murder. If no evidence is illuminated and if his story does not match other stories, this man will surely see the inside of a prison cell, innocent or not. Until new evidence comes forward, his judgment is set on guilty. However this example is from society, where the general consensus of opinions should arise from.

      That is why I considered your quote to Lindsay universally applicable. But, not about the end of judging, but the mark of "enlightened" judgments, what do you think?

      Sorry, if it's tough to read my writing, and these are my opinions also Ronald.
  • thumb
    Jun 8 2011: I preface:
    Forgiveness is not the end goal indicating high development, rather it is a single symptom of highly developed people. One who forgives MAY be at that level. One who is at that level DOES forgive.

    It is necessary for yourself that you forgive others, holding onto that which hurt you is a knee jerk reaction that is counter-intuitive.

    It is right to actually forgive, it is not right to just say it without meaning it.

    Everyone, we're all just trying to be the best we can.

    See above.

    No, imagine home much pressure that would put on the forgiver.

    I can only accept it when I've forgiven myself.

    It starts to heal the wound. If you haven't forgiven someone you're holding the knife in your own side. Only be forgiveness can you take the knife out and heal the wounds. Without forgiveness the wounds can heal around the knife but it doesn't take much for the blade to start cutting you again.

    Sorry if it seems a bit scatterbrained and new age-y (I haven't had my coffee yet)
    • thumb
      Jun 8 2011: I admit to trying to make the title catchy in phrasing it as a PhD. (You caught me!)

      Someone said " Refusing to forgive someone is like drinking poison and expecting the other person to die' (no idea who said that). I think its true.

      Another great point you made above is that to forgive without sincerity is no good at all because you do not get the benefit. Saying it without meaning it makes the burden worse because then you are boxed into 'acting' as though you do.

      Christopher, is there ever a circumstance in which it is wrong to forgive?
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: To truly forgive? No there I can think of no circumstance in which it is wrong to forgive.

        Forgiveness is healing for the victim not the perpetrator.
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: Christopher.....I disagree. It heals both.
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: Hi Helen,

          Does there need to be some interaction between the victim and perpetrator for the forgiveness to heal both parties? In other words, can I forgive someone who is dead, or someone I will never see again or a stranger who harmed me?
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: Debra.......So Sorry I did not make that clear. Of Course There has to be contact between victim and perp. I did forgive my family for all their abuse (they are all deceased now) but this did not happen until a therapist convinced me that I was indeed loveable and it took a lot of patience and faith on her part to convince me ,but she did. You cannot know what freedom is until you let go.
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: The work that some therapists do in helping people overcome traumatic events is really laudable. I want to thank yours for convincing you of the truth- you are lovable, Helen and I can sense that from here!
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: helen..not if the perpetrator is not a particpant in the forgiveness. The victim's decisiion not to be distorted by rage, anger.etc.etc. is a complete forgiveness that allows the victim to be heal and move on..that is a complete forgiveness even if no words are ever spoken to the perpetrator an dthe perpetrtaor has never apologized or asked for forgiveness.

          Forgiveness can be healing for both are involved and can even save and transform a relationship but a forgiveness that doesn't achieve that level is also complete and whole and allows the victim to be complete and whole.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Lindsey...............I agree that there must be contact between the two. I did not explain myself very well or maybe not at all...If I ask for pardon and my victim refuses to pardon then all is not lost. I have redeemed myself by admitting my shortcoming and now the "ball" is in their lap. I cannot make someone forgive and as long as they hold on to it tthey have to carry the burden. I think the most arrogant thing one can do is to tell someone that you forgive them. That goes nowhere Cheers
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Helen..yes we are on the same page..and thanks for sharing some of your own experience in forgiveness. A great gift to others always when people speak from experience ( and never very helpful when people speak boyt experience)

          Like your picture

          Between this talk, fear, ego,radical empathy,freedom ( who would think freedom is controversial) we have the makings of a very interesting book, I think. Glad to have you here. Always interesting to visit these issues, which are more complicated that they seem at first glance, with mnay of the same voicest we have gone over other terrain with.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Helen, How great is this input!

          You are helping us by switching roles from the person who was injured to the person to needs to ask forgiveness. It is a side we have not explored much to this point. -The art of the apology.

          I bet you have seen many people in your day cough out "I forgive you!" at an inappropriate time or at a stage of a conversation which did not seem to warrant it.

          When I have seen it - I considered it a call to attend to the person's hurt - meaning that they probably were not forgiving the person at all but saying 'You hurt me and I want you to know it- and i"ll pretend to be the bigger person.

          Is that how you see it, Helen?
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: @Debra...................Again I did not make myself clear. Yes, what you are saying i is true probably for most cases.............I was astonished when Pope John Paul went to the prison where his assailant (I think his name was Agca) was being held for the purpose of telling him that He (the Pope) had forgiven.him. Now I don't know what the rest of the conversation might have been but as far as I can see Pope John Paul was an humble man. Of course the media grabs on to anything and sensationalizes it even if it partially knows the facts. But then I wondered if Agca thought he needed forgiveness. If he was convinced that he was right as are suicide bombers, then maybe th gesture was useless and arrogant. Maybe the effect was positive, who knows. I don't know the end of the story.If someone with radical empathy went to Osama it would be useless to say to Osama "I forgive you". There are reasons albeit not reasonable that people like him do these terrible things that in their minds justify such actions. There is a whole world to be explored in this area but not all people think that far. Your friend Helen
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: @ Lindsay...............Freedom is controversial ........You have freedom from and freedom to. There is a boundary that applies to both that people don't seem to take into consideration. THE GOLDEN RULE hh
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Helen, You express your points very clearly.

          I just want to learn more when I ask a follow up question- I'm greedy to know more of what you have learned in your lifetime.
          Sometimes there are pie in the sky explanations but I love to learn from the people with the battle scars who are still standing and still caring. At 80 - that's you!
          Thank you for being my friend. I take that as a real kindness.
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: more quotable tan jonatan's version wi th laxative:>)))
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Christopher!!! A thousand white roses and a thumbs up..nice to see you..completely on the same page and saying the same thing
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Debra............You are really nice !!
  • thumb
    Jun 15 2011: Before this conversation ends,I would just like to say thank you to my friend,Debra.I've learned a lot from the comments regarding this topic.What a debate Debra! and its all because of you!!!! thanks!!!!You make me proud Debra by just being your friend!!!! Hug!!!!!!!
  • thumb
    Jun 15 2011: Great topic!

    I don't think there are elements that every apology should have but I remember having read a research somewhere (I don't remember the source, sorry) which concluded that an apology has more effect when you don't say it immediately. I realise and feel that too. When somebody apologies the day (or more) after the unfortunate event I'm more likely to say "it's okay" and mean it because I had time to think it through and place it. When I've done wrong and realise it I always say sorry right away but the next time I see that person I'll say it again "I'm sorry about last time, I didn't mean to". That approach to apologising is very powerful in my opinion.

    It is necessary to forgive? Yes! To forgive is to let go which alows you to move forward. By letting go I don't mean to forget about it, some things can't be erased from your mind. By forgiving you give those events a place in your mind and when you're somehow remembered of that event you won't feel anxious anymore and put all your energy in "why did that happen to me" and so on. You might think about it for a moment but since you've made peace with it by forgiving (yourself and or the other(s)) you won't suffer (that much) from it.

    Is it right to forgive? I can't see why it would be wrong. Forgiving is a powerful act and can only be respected. People who don't want to forgive will carry a grudge for their whole life, that's a lot of wasted energy you could have used to laugh.

    Who deserves forgiveness? That's a hard one. The bible says everyone deserves it but in my view some really shouldn't be forgiven. On the other hand you forgive in the first place for yourself. It's up to you to decide whether or not you want to put your energy in hating somebody for the rest of your life. I think it's not worth it.

    By forgiving somebody you make clear to that person that he or her has done you wrong, even though they don't realise it. You can accept being forgiven but you need to forgive yourself too.
  • thumb
    Jun 12 2011: I would like to clarify a little when I say to forgive is not necessary. Forgiving someone I do not see as necessary as long as you don't focus on the occasion or person with negative thoughts in mind. I suppose though that moving past those negative emotions is what some would call forgiveness?
  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 12 2011: Hang in with me ED! I am responding at the same time you are to a previous post so it appears that I am not answering or assimulating your thoughts. I am just one or two posts behind. I think this is very valuable. I am gong to pause for 15 minute so that I see your most current posting without overlapping.


      Ok, I think I have seen all your excellent postings. I hope that the way that they are out of step in responses does not hinder communication.

      The mind cannot forgive only "you' can. This suggests to me that the hope comes from bringing our whole self to bear on the issue to make the choices. I agree- but I think there are a lot of people bringing every bit of clarity, mind body and soul that they have to their issues and they are still stumbling in the darkness of the first night after their houses have collapsed. They need some help and some 'things' to get there. Things like water, like light like hope, like directions. They might very well find it on their own but.............they are not pretending to be where they are and pretending will not get them further.

      "It seems that most people need to experience a great deal of suffering before they will relinquish resistance and accept - before they will forgive. As soon as they do, one of the greatest miracles happens: the awakening of Being-consciousness through what appears as evil, the transmutation of suffering into inner peace. The ultimate effect of all the evil and suffering in the world is that it will force humans into realizing who they are beyond name and form."

      Maybe your sentences here are true but what harm is there in handing them tools to cope and tools iwth which to build as they suffer in hopes of reducing the culmuative suffering and speeding up their process?

      Forgiveness is one such tool. Diminishing it, saying it is old fashioned or not the most modern tool adds nothing to the mix. Then, when the person is stronger s/he will find even better ways as soon as s/he can or are able
  • thumb
    Jun 11 2011: I believe there are two levels of forgiveness - Letting go and Reconciliation.

    Letting go involves allowing ourselves to experience painful emotions without resistance and without dwelling on judgments about fault or blame. Resisting painful emotion creates tension which draws our mind to the transgression and stimulates more painful emotion. Letting go involves choosing not to take mental paths that involve blame, judgment or revenge. Most times we have to let go more than once and often many times over a period of weeks or months. Ultimately letting go frees us from mental and emotional aftereffects of our hurt and allows us to get on with our lives.

    Reconciliation is the deeper level of forgiveness. It requires not only that we let go but also developing compassion and understanding. There are many situations where reconciliation is not appropriate or worth the effort. However, reconciliation is necessary for healthy long-term relationships. Once broken, trust needs to be rebuilt over the long term with verifiable evidence that it is deserved. Reconciliation requires openness of all people involved. I cannot reconcile with someone who thinks they did nothing wrong or is plotting how they might cheat me again.

    The importance of letting go, reconciliation, and therefore forgiveness is easily discerned by looking at what happens when we don’t do it. Not letting go leads to anger, frustration, tension, stress, and often anxiety and/or depression. In addition to these, choosing not to reconcile with someone in a long-term relationship feeds miscommunication and mistrust, undermines cooperation and interferes with problem solving and peaceful co-existence.
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: Bob, Thank You.

      I am always grateful that you care the way you do and that you share such practical tips and approaches with such a gentle style.

      You do much good here at TED.
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: well said Bob and nice to see you here!!!
  • Comment deleted

    • Comment deleted

      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Hi Wongmo..glad you resonate with Abbott Keating..he is the founder/center of my contemplative community

        .My all time favorite Keating is "Invitation to Love" Of all his works, "Invitation to Love" is written in the most "universal language" least the first few chapters. In it he has a wonderful description of how we collect all this brokneness over the course of our we end up with an egoic " operating we begin to disentangle that by recognizing how it is operating in every moment

        Here is a wonderful quote that we could cut and paste as well into our conversation on freedom:

        "When locked into our private worlds of narcissistic desires, we are not present to the needs of others when they seek help. The clarity wit which we see other people's needs and respond to them is in direct proportion to our interior freedom."

        .Abbott Keating is dying now ,confined to the monastary . His heir apparent is the head of my community, Cynthia Bourgeault, whose writings are even more in a universal language than Abbot Keatings. Of her works, "The Wisdom Way of Knowing" is most accessible and universal.

        It's a joy to me see these universally accessible works brought here to Ted and offered as a resource in conversations like this. (Thank you Ed.) They were written for people committed to and willing to take up a spiritual practice ,from a faith based Christian center, especially Abbott Keatings work, but they contain wisdoms that require neither faith nor spiritual practice. ( Just skip over the part s that don't click for you)

        I hope you enjoy it would like Bougeault especially she is a genius who speaks simply. and with great wisdom.
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Womgmo it's Bourgeault..available through Amazon.
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Hope this falls in the right place wongmo..its BOURGEAULT here is the link to the Contemplative Society where here latest writing and essays appears..aslo a schedule of her lectures and wisdom scools

        She is dazzlingly brilliant and utterly simple. She writes with amazing clarity and at a very human level. You'll enjoy her, I'm sure.
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: This is really great Ed. Really great. We are bridging a 'language' barrier and i appreciate the effort it costs.

      That is my own expression for what I see ' clenched self of fear and wounded-ness ' not a quote of some kind. It is what I see. So many people in a sort of charlie horse of pain and my heart wants them to stop hurting.

      I promise you that as much as I sense that I am frustrating people with my questions sometimes- I know what I am after is important- for many people.
      • Comment deleted

        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: Well Ed, I'm glad you decided to pick cherries in this orchard.

          I know that we grew up in the same country but I sometimes find it hard to understand your writing style and I want to access what you are saying more deeply. If you knew me, you would know that there are few things that I dislike more than debating tactics. I don't know why I phrased this as a debate when I could have put it as a question but I guess I wanted people to be free to bring entirely different views to the table for our feast.

          I think it has been a feast. Context is a very important element. I am deeply grateful for the generousity people have shown in opening up and comparing notes. I am also glad to be able to say - welcome to your world view, or I'm glad you're here, or that is a great new point or I do not understand. I am even more grateful to have the honour of reading the words of the many sincere people who have contributed here.
  • Jun 11 2011: My opinion is that in order to be able to forgive, one must learn to accept forgiveness, and one should start by forgiving itself. Learn to forgive yourself first, and then you will understand what could feel someone who receives forgiveness.If your forgiveness helps or not that person it is not up to you, it is up to that person if he or she can accept this forgiveness. And it will not be able to accept it if it hasn’t forgave itself first. So it all start again, the main idea is to learn to accept forgiveness that you should give to yourself first and then to others. And how do we accomplish the stage of forgiveness? I say only through love… To love yourself it means that you have accepted yourself, through love you can forgive yourself, through love you will forgive others…. To answer your question, in my opinion learning to love is the PhD of being human.
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: Cornelia, I am so pleased you joined us!

      Your answer focuses on how forgiveness fits in with our relationship to self and I think it is a very important consideration in this issue. As others have pointed out it is the self that is somehow injured and in the process of self repair.

      I like your point that love is the PhD of human existance!
      • Jun 14 2011: Dear Debra, so happy to be here with you in this great ted community. I feel everyone has so many interesting to say, and I am so thirsty to learn and find some answers myself. Thank you for challenging our mind with your wise questions. Regarding the process of self repair I would like to quote Ghandi that “Nobody can hurt me without my permission.” I would add that perhaps nobody could hurt us more than ourselves. The negative side of our ego (“the little demon” like I call it) stands against forgiveness, If we could only understand ourselves better, if could only understand why we feel hurt, then forgiveness would come naturally. Love I see as being the ultimate ingredient to a happy balanced life, is the kindness, the acceptance, the knowledge, the understanding, the forgiveness and the courage to be yourself…and maybe much more. One could spend a life time trying to love itself, and I am too young to have answers to all questions…. But I know I am trying to understand, to learn and to love.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: a wonderful offering Cornelia and i especially like this which I and many others have been singing as the refrain thoughout this conversation

          “Nobody can hurt me without my permission.”I would add that perhaps nobody could hurt us more that ourselves. The negative side of our ego (“the little demon” like I call it) stands against forgiveness:" Cornelia Coricovac

          a lovely medittaion on forgiveness with gifts and wisdom for all
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: I wish I could bridge the gap between our ways of thinking Lindsay. I ask again, in another way, are you truly looking the hurting people in the eye and saying- 'you gave permission for this to happen to you.' ?If you are- please tell me how that helps them in this moment and in their pain? Doctors normally help people even people who did hurtful things to themselves, ensuring that their lives are stable again before lecturing them on what they 'should have done' and or why letting what happened to them was 'stupid'. When you keep saying things like the above I cannot understand what feels to me like cruelty. "Hey, I'm so enlightened nobody can hurt me' in the face of hurting people. You may have a nice, healthy happy way of dealing with this but I ask again if you are so perfectly convinced- why do you visit this question on something you do not believe in- over and over again saying the same thing over and over again?And with all due respect to Ghandi- I think there have been a lot of people murdered, raped and emotionally destroyed in thisworld who shouted "NO" every step of the way.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Debra, While Ghandi has been short sighted in some of his sayings these one is one of the more accurate ones I've heard. This kind of ties in with my thinking that you do not need to forgive someone their transgressions but don't let it define you. Everybody experience things in life that could be scarring. If you don't let these things define who you are then they can't hurt you. While a rape victim is a tragic experience defining yourself as such is where the pain really comes. When people define themselves by the atrocities that they have lived through they have let those events hurt them and control them unnecessarily. I can see here a relation between self love and the amount of pain allowed by a situation.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: As to the Ghandi quote it works only once a person is well equipped in every other way. Once a person is trampled by their circumstances the horse is already out of that barn.

          I agree with what you are saying here Thomas in the first person in terms of self definition but what is plain is that many people are already in a place where they have already defined themselves in terms of trauma.

          What I have trouble with is seeing the person in pain and offering platitudes. All of the sayings are great to forearm ourselves and we should make ourselves strong to every extent that we are able. True Enlightenment (which is a valuable thing) does give people that strength in many circumstance but you already know how I feel about people claiming it based on never having their metle tested in the fire.

          However when faced with another's pain I think we model strength and courage and get busy in the trenches and help by holding a flashlight in the dark and offering love, triage and encouragement.

          I think you have been with people who have no ablity to sense their present moment in this moment. They are trapped in a frightening experience to a greater or lessor extent. In some moments words are not worth as much as hug. Compassion is sometimes worth more than our own wisdom in many circumstances because wisdom is discovered for oneself and compassion can be received.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Debra, you say... "I wish I could bridge the gap between our ways of thinking Lindsay".
          The phrase "nobody can hurt me without my permission" may be somewhat confusing, so please let me offer a bridge.

          Usually, we don't consciously give someone permission to hurt us. Once we realize that we are hurt however, we have the ability to carry that hurt, and in that way, we give the other permission to continue to impact us...make sense?

          As Thomas insightfully says..."don't let it define you". Suffering is caused by holding onto the hurt and allowing it to define who we are. For example, I could define myself as a child of abusive dysfunctional family, or cancer survivor, or Traumatic brain injury survivor, etc.
          I do not choose to hold onto any of those labels. Those were experiences I had in life that provided opportunities to learn and grow beyond the experience itself.

          Debra, to use your metaphore..."once the person is trampled by their circumstances, the horse is already out of the barn". That's when knowing ourselves and exploring the underlying emotions helps us move through the challenge. We can get out of the horses way...we can tie the horse up...we can lock the barn door...and when we reach a certain level of understanding, with our own exploration and the help of our friends, we can learn to ride and control the horse:>)

          Funny you should use this metaphore because it was a horseback riding accident that caused my near fatal head injury:>) One of the first things I did when I was able, is ride that horse again:>)
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: P.S. It wasn't easy
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: There are many levels of crisis and hurt, and many levels of healing and forgiveness. When I volunteered at a shelter, I held a woman in my arms who had been tied to a bed and tortured for 3 days, and there were many such stories. At that point, a person needs comfort, compassion, empathy and unconditional love. At some point in her healing process (different for each individual) she may realize that by staying with the abuser, she was giving permission for him to continue to abuse. She may realize that by helping and supporting others, she is better able to understand herself and move through the pain so she is not identifying herself with the experience...or not. Each individual will make his/her choice regarding what information they will accept and use at any given time. With empathy, sometimes we can feel what a person is ready to hear...or not.

          You are absolutely right Debra..."in some moments, words are not worth as much as a hug". Compassion AND wisdom can both be given and recieved.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Colleen, That was a really helpful answer. I believe it was not easy.
          What helps me to understand the mindset better is that you are not denying being actually being and feeling hurt but saying that the way out of hurt is a decision. That makes sense to me. It is consistent with what I have seen happen for people over and over again. A process that starts in pain ends in victory when the person embraces a different way of looking at things - call it perspective, forgiveness or a forward focus.

          The day I was diagnosed with cancer i was told I had a few months to live at best and that would have been after I was eviserated like a turkey. I was as angry as I had ever been- steam came out of my ears and i isolated myself for fear of the inkiness of those feellings spilling out onto anyone else- for about 3 hours. I asked, as I remember you saying, 'Why me?' and then not long into my snit fit my subconscious spoke up and stopped me cold' some part of me asked myself 'Why not me? It was like a stream of cold clear water through my brain. 'Who would you rather carried this thing, your husband, your kids?' Suddenly I felt a surge of relief that they were safe and' why not me ' made a sense. In all the random events of the universe it did not seem the most impossible of turns so I came very quickly to terms with it and the doctors and medical people were convinced I was in some sort of denial until I marched through every hurdle and out the other side I just got on with it and help whomever I could in the process.

          My problem Colleen is that I saw many broken people who could not 'get on with it.' They were crushed and many of them died. I think that there must be a way to to transfuse that love and life into them. I believe that sometimes the cumulative horrors of a life time drag people into quick sand that they cannot get out of. I can't stand watching anyone sink and it horrifies me to have them called cowards, or victims or people who brought it on themselves.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: 3 Thumbs up for Colleen!
        • Jun 14 2011: Colleen
          Thanks for your words. The thoughts about compassion adn wisdom are very true.

          I want to say though that pain and suffering are real. It isn't I don't believe "if I allow it too" just hurts. People hurt for all sorts of circumstances. As you mention, you helping in a woman's shelter is a great way to see that. After having worked some terrifically horrible situations, some natural, some at least "man-induced", I know what that pain can be.

          In the midst of that pain, it is the thought of forgiveness, not my thoughts of it defining me that make the change possible. When I through love, as Cornelia says, reach into myself, not for myself, but for the other, and give forgiveness, I may find healing. It is my desire for the other to be healed that heals me. Sometimes however, that reaching out only results in the butt end of a rifle.

          This has been a great discussion.
          I think I do vote for holding the flashlight and getting down into the trenches as Debra says.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Nobody told me when I came to this earth school that it was going to be easy. From the time I was a child, however, I knew it was about learning. I believe I am a spirit being having a human experience, and I'm going to give it my best shot!

          Right...we don't deny or ignore the feelings...we move through them...sometimes with words of encouragement, sometimes with lots of tears, and sometimes simply with a hug, mostly, by accepting what is happening in the moment and unconditionally loving ourselves through the process. Our decision, if/when we are capable of making decisions, is to stay in the "poor me" state, or move through the challenge with the information we have. I say, if/when we are capable, because there may be circumstances that prevent us from gathering information. Right after my brain injury, for example, the only thing I could think about or put my energy into was healing. The disconnects in the brain caused me to be incapable of making choices. As I began to heal, I was ready for more information and could start making simple many steps can I take today without falling down...I'm serious about that. We're all at different places in our journey at different times, which is why it is important to unconditionally love ourselves as well as unconditionally loving others. The way "out of hurt" is a decision (when we are capable of making that decision on many different levels) and acceptance of ourselves and the situation. Not acceptance that says "I'd like to repeat this and it's ok"! Acceptance as in "this is what happened to me, and I'm going to move through it and learn.

          What we focus on expands, so as long as we focus on the hurt, it becomes our identity. When we focus on moving out of the pain, we have the opportunity to let go of that identity and embrace another identity as an empowered person.

          The world is full of wounded people. All we can do is support those who come into our radar...starting with ourselves:>)
    • Jun 11 2011: You said to love yourself first, how do you really do it in an effective way to see the result that you've really forgiven that person and not just on a superficial level i.e to root up so that whenever you think of the bad incident that occurred, you have no more ill-will or anger towards the perpetrator and felt victimized again each time your memory takes you there again or your thoughts of the past incident popped up in your mind? Is just by consoling yourself, self-pity, reciting or saying that we need to love ourselves first workable to totally root it out? How do you effectively do it? Would meditation help? Appreciate your suggestion. Thank you.
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Carole, I think the questions you are asking are really important- very real and honest.

        I really think they deserve good answers so I am asking people from different perspectives to attend to your question and give you their feedback.
      • Jun 13 2011: Carole
        I believe that those feeling often pop into our heads, and they will continue to do so. I think though that by consciously saying I have forgiven you can make it not go away, just by saying that we are making that forgiveness part of ourselves again. We can literally understand and stand under our own forgiveness. And yes reflecting on a deep love that we hold in our hearts can help healing take place.
      • Jun 14 2011: Dear Carole, thank you for your sincere comments and questions. I would start by pointing out that consoling and self pity it might not the best way to help yourself when coming out of bad experiences. Accepting some bad incident through self pity puts a lot of pressure on your self esteem. And your self esteem is the key to your balance, as it is the key to loving and accepting yourself. Sometimes having to go trough a bad incident, request us to take the time and look closely to ourselves and sometimes we come out stronger from these experiences. Why? Because we spend more time, quality time with ourselves, trying to learn, understand our thoughts and feelings. One of my personal motto is that in every negative there is a positive, and this doesn’t mean that I am going around looking for trouble, not at all, it means that whenever I experience something “negative” I try to see what I can learn from it.
        Loving ourselves starts with accepting and appreciating ourselves, accepting our feelings, our strengths and weaknesses, having the desire to develop ours strengths and control our weaknesses, feeling worthy of life and love. To love yourself means to be kind to yourself, to take care of yourself, to listen to your feelings and needs, to feed your soul with knowledge, to be honest with yourself, to love yourself means ultimately to let yourself be the best of yourself. Everything I say here are pure personal opinions, you might disagree with it all or you might find it helpful…. Be well.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: thnaks you again Cornelia..excellent guidance.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: I agree that self pity may not be the best way to help ourselves, because it keeps us in a "poor me" mindset and prevents us from exploring deeper feelings to find understanding in ourselves. I also agree Cornelia, that in every situation, there is an opportunity to learn and grow in ourselves. There is always something to be grateful and thankfull for, when we are open to the possibilities. Knowing ourselves strengthens our self esteem, which allows us to accept, appreciate and unconditionally love ourselves and others. It is a cycle, in which unconditional love strengthens self esteem, which strengthens unconditional love...etc. I don't believe we can give something away, that we don't honestly have in ourselves first, so as you insightfully say, acceptance, appreciation, forgiveness, kindness, honesty and unconditional love are important to realize in ourselves.

          This is often a difficult concept for women to embrace because we were taught to always help others...take care of others...give of ourselves...don't cause the emotional support...etc. etc. We were often taught that loving ourselves is selfish. I have done what I was "supposed" to do in the past and found my energy and self esteem depleted in an effort to help someone else be more comfortable. When I realized I needed to care about myself, and give myself the same attention I was giving others, I became a more healthy person.
  • Jim Ivy

    • +1
    Jun 11 2011: What an interesting conversation!

    I’m a bit out of my depth here. Clearly most of you have given this a lot of thought. I have to confess that I had to double check to make sure that I can even spell “forgiveness” correctly.

    Lot’s of good ideas here. My favorite was “the most arrogant thing one can do is to tell someone that you forgive them”. I like that. Arrogance is a highly under-rated art form. Tomorrow I believe I will engage in a few arguments just so I can throw in “I forgive you” and see what happens.

    Most of you seem to agree that forgiveness is a good practical thing. That makes sense. Forgive and get on with your life. That is a difficult point to argue against. The disagreement seems to be about who deserves forgiveness.

    Now, I have never been raped. But I do have two daughters and the question of would I be able to forgive someone who raped one of my daughters stopped me. After giving due consideration to that question, I must say, yes, I would forgive the transgressor. However, I would withhold my forgiveness until I had finished removing the offending body parts with a very dull knife and cauterized the area, and any convenient body openings, with a very hot soldering iron.

    Did he deserve my forgiveness? I could care less. Any future threat to my family has been effectively neutered and I can at that point afford to forgive and move on.

    With that dilemma solved (at least to my satisfaction), the next question that struck me was, if forgiveness is such a good thing, why don’t we see more of it? Obviously there must be some payoffs to not forgiving, otherwise why doesn’t everyone forgive everything? So what are the good things that can come of holding on to a grudge?

    One of my favorite grudges is against William Tecumseh Sherman. I have never forgiven him for his march through Georgia. Never mind that the event occurred years before I was born. In fact, even long before my great grandfather was born. I don’t even like A
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: Jim, I really enjoyed your response!

      Thanks for bringing in that rubber meets the road viewpoint.

      I do think it is FAR more difficult- at least for me- to forgive something done to someone I love than if it were done to me. In the case you cite above any forgiveness would challenge your role as a father - and the assumption that you 'could have or should have' been there to prevent it. (I love the fatherly protectiveness)

      My question for you is this: Do you think that in such events- that you might have a subconscious need to keep that grudge partially because 'doing something' and being hypervigilant after the offense would help to calm any sense of 'failure' to protect? I might be off the wall in my question- if so - I ask forgiveness in advance (and please don't bring your dull knives when you respond!)
      In what way would holdng the grudge help the victim?
      • Jun 14 2011: Well, I simply choose to reject "victimness". This may sound strange, but whether one is a victim or not really depends upon point of view. While I admit that in the "real" world, there may be things that "happen to" an individual, I personally pretend that everything that does happen, happens only for my higher lesson or best interest.

        Let me try to be more clear using the example of someone harming a family member. Since I am human, my immediate reaction would be concern, anger, fear, etc..., but eventually I would decide to stop reacting to the situation and would say to myself, "Ivy, nothing happens if it is not for your , higher good. Therefore you wanted this to happen. Why did you want this to happen?"

        The principle is this: The answer is contained, or preconditioned by the question. If you ask a non-fruitful question, you will receive non-fruitful answers. A victim will ask, "Why did this happen to poor little me?". A creator will look at the event from a different point of view, "Wow, faorout! I have really created a mess here but I know it is for the best because I only create what is for the best. Now what are the good things that I created this event to bring about?"

        This does not mean that victims do not exist. It is only another way of looking at the event after the fact. Obviously if I create something, the actual perpetrator is not to blame and there is absolutely nothing to forgive. They are blameless because I created the event. Nor do I need to forgive myself. I was doing absolutely the best I could do with what I had to work with. So forgiveness is not an issue because blame is not present.

        The point is that everyone can choose a point of view. They can choose to look at any event as a victim (Why did this happen to me?) or from accountability (Why did I WANT this to happen to me). There are payoffs for either way, but which question generates the more fruitful answers?
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: I am confused. In your first post you certainly appeared to react to an event that hypothetically entered your daughters' lives. If your daughter clearly had signs of PTSD from the trauma would you get her help or just expect her not to be a 'victim'? How about if your son came back from war with PTSD? Woudl you just tell him to 'buck up'? Can everyone really choose a point of view- at least intitially?

          In this world view how does holding a grudge against a perpetrator work if he actually did you a favour by bringing this circumstance into your life?
      • Jun 14 2011: Good points! Yes, I would react. Nature has given us a fairly comprehensive set of emotional and physiological responses that have served us well and will continue to do so. I have (thus I suppose everyone has) immediate reactions to any threatening situation. Fathering responses and mothering responses seem to be innate, or at least widespread. This may be partly cultural but you can observe the same sorts of behavior in species other than the human species so there is also reason to suspect that the responses are not entirely due to culture.

        I suspect that the first thing I would do is comfort my child and that the second thing I would do is remove to the extent of my ability any future threat to my family. Eventually though, there is a time to move on. I would do my best to lead my child toward a viewpoint that would allow her or him to move on with their life. I certainly would do everything within my power to assist my child in moving on. That means I would do my best to find and reinforce positive aspects instead of reinforcing the negative aspects of my child's experience.

        "Choice" is an interesting concept. It seems that choice only exists when I recognize that it exists. If I don't know that I have a choice, then I do not have a choice. When I am on autopilot, I have no choice and will respond as nature and culture have programed me to respond.

        As soon as I recognize that other responses are possible, that I have a choice, then I can break out of autopilot mode and choose a different point of view. A different point of view generates different questions, thus different answers. One of those different answers may be more fruitful than the autopilot response.

        Well, I am out of space and have still not answered your question about holding a grudge. As far as I can see, a grudge is an autopilot response. It has useful functions to a certain point but once the threat is removed or distanced, the utility of a grudge diminishes.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Thanks again for engaging the discussion Jim and for sharing this response that takes roles and internal programming into account.
      • Jun 14 2011: Debra, Your question was, "In this world view how does holding a grudge against a perpetrator work if he actually did you a favour by bringing this circumstance into your life?"

        Well, it doesn't. That is one of the advantages of looking at things from a different point of view. I can choose to let go of thoughts, attitudes, and actions that are not working in my current situation.

        Does that mean that I always do that. No. Sometimes, even though I know that there are different options, I choose to hold on to an less productive course simply because there is some emotional satisfaction.

        There are some good things about holding a grudge. For one, if I perceive someone as a threat, holding a grudge keeps that threat at the top of my mind and will hopefully allow me to avoid a recurrence of a harmful event.

        When the threat no longer exists, is there any utility to holding on to a grudge? There must be, otherwise why would anyone hold a grudge? Look at the number of books, plays, movies, etc. that are based upon the theme of grudges and revenge. If you begin with Homer and read a book a day, would you be able to get through all of them?

        So there must be benefits to a grudge that outweigh the logic. If nothing else a good irate grudge can keep away boredom!
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Here's to all the antidotes to boredom! Thanks Jim!
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: I agree Jim, that we will hold on to any thought, feeling, idea, opinion or behavior as long as it serves us in some way. Asking myself the question..."how does this serve me", has helped me let go of some thoughts, feelings or behaviors that I prefer not to have. When we realize that it often serves the ego (which I think a grudge is) we can sometimes let go of it.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: One thought I hold onto is by C.S, Lewis that I learned in a master's of education course when I read a quote something to the effect that ' we must never forget what it felt like not to know.'

          He was speaking in terms of being a skilled teacher and how to share information. I try never to forget and leave people behind.
  • thumb
    Jun 10 2011: Forgiveness is the answer to the child's dream of a miracle by which what is broken is made whole again, what is soiled is made clean again. Dag Hammarskjold

    Forgiveness is a virtue of the brave. Indira Gandhi

    Forgiveness is the economy of the heart... forgiveness saves the expense of anger, the cost of hatred, the waste of spirits. Hannah More

    Forgiveness is the fragrance that the violet sheds on the heel that has crushed it. Mark Twain

    Forgiveness is the key to action and freedom. Hannah Arendt
  • thumb
    Jun 10 2011: '
    Learning to forgive is 'the PhD" of being human. True or False?
    Absolutely true. Why? Because there's no universal answer for the additional questions you pose. Knowing what is when is indeed like "the PhD of being human" (figuratively speaking of course).

    I mean just for example...
    It is necessary to forgive? - IMHO, if it hurts YOU that the other begs for forgiveness, forgiveness is a must. Whether your threshold is just is another matter.

    Is it right to forgive? - Depends... some acts are unworthy of forgiveness, though mind you, that doesn't mean that they should be punished as severely.

    Who deserves forgiveness? Who doesn't deserve forgiveness? - It's not so much about "who" the person rather than their record and the issue at hand.

    Does a person have to ask for forgiveness to deserve it? - Depends on the issue.

    Can you accept being forgiven when you have hurt someone? - If I have asked for it, of course. If I haven't... depending on the issue, I might feel weird.

    What does forgiving do for the person who forgives? - Depends on the issue. It could alleviate anger or cause disturbance.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Thanks Vasil for weighing in on the issues!

      Your take on the PhD is great!
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: another voice for wisdom and hope and lovely to see you here Vasil
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: Hi Vasil...........Glad to see you here. "Deserving of Forgiveness"It is my belief that no one deserves forgiveness. forgiveness is grace. It is unmerited. Your friend Helen
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: forgiveness is grace..right you are Helen..right there with you.
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: "forgiveness is grace"
        I'm not sure I get that phrase... Being able to forgive is a virtue IMHO, but "grace"? Do you mean by that "a good thing to do"? I'd agree, but then unless there is a criteria for it, it becomes worthless, hence the idea of someone being "worthy" (i.e. deserving) of forgiveness for a certain thing.
        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: Hi Vasil, Helen speaks from a Christian tradition where grace = the unmerited favour of God, clemensy or mercy.
        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: Vasil....................Forgiveness is not something that is given as a reward that is solely driven by a particular judgement of the person who is be forgiven. For instance if you have done something reprehensible, in order for you to live in peace with must forgive yourself. You must forgive those who would harm you because a grudge is a heavy burden to lug around. When you understand that the perp has reasons that pertain to his ego and compulsions that you are not involved personally with, then your own ego is not assaulted and you can forgive. Did I make my thoughts clear ???
          Grace can be defined as generosity of spirit.
        • thumb
          Jun 12 2011: @ Debra..God has no hands but ours. We ourselves can offer grace. I believe that people are made in the image of God and you cannot see "grace" but that has a human face. :)
        • thumb
          Jun 12 2011: I love the reminder that we are the active ingredient. Thank you!
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Oh. You're talking about... err... self forgiveness... when people forgive themselves.

        Yeah... I suppose I agree then. Forgiveness from another one is deserved, but self forgiveness comes from within, sometimes without forgiveness from the other, and sometimes long after the forgiveness from the other, if ever.
        • thumb
          Jun 12 2011: Vasil..................If forgiveness is deserved then everyone is deserving of it by virtue of
          being human. Could you agree to that ?
        • Jun 13 2011: Helen and Vasil
          Thanks for this part of the conversation. Helen I certainly believe in the part about grace. I believe however we are always caught in the dialectic of "deserving or not deserving" grace and forgiveness. I believe in one true sense if we base it on "deserve" we are all up a creek. If however, we can learn to be accept grace and be grace-full...then we can forgive.

          Vasil, if we could ever learn to be agents of that would change the world.
      • thumb
        Jun 12 2011: In general, yes... But certain acts are not deserving of forgiveness. For example, on a more extreme note, I would've never forgiven Bin Laden about 9/11, unless it was proven that he's not the one responsible. Bin Laden himself may have deserved forgiveness for other acts... but not for 9/11.

        I simply place a clear distinction between the person and his actions, and actions are the thing that is being forgiven, not the person. It's simply because the person is responsible for his actions that our language ties "forgiving the act" with "forgiving the person".
        • thumb
          Jun 12 2011: Vasil...............I would agree that we are not what we do. That is not the ultimate value of a person. But we are responsible for what we do and therefore need forgiveness (because we are the actor)..Now speaking of Bin Laden, the problem with that is not the forgiveness that I offer but the fact that he is convinced he does not need forgiveness and therefore I am peaceful and he is not. He and people like him need to be removed from society and if conversion to peacefulness is possible ??? Ok if not then incarceration is the answer.
      • thumb
        Jun 13 2011: Respetabilissima Signora Helen your point of view is real. It has their own weight and we feel very comforted with your words. The relativism and all that modern confussions are devastated the criteria with the false sense of freedom to all for anything, and the worst part is the general idea of missunderstood the Grazia Divina. The human justice is imperfect but you are one very bright person in your criteria. We are very gratefull with the sense of peace in your words: "people like him need to be removed from society".
        • thumb
          Jun 13 2011: Thank you ,sir. I looked up your profile and I have been to your country and your lovely City, Napoli. So Beautiful.....To find a soulmate across the ocean is one heck of a good feeling. I look forward to the day when we all agree to this view. I wish I could speak Italian, it is such a beautiful language and I cannot say how much I have enjoyed Luciano Pavarotti and Andrea Bocelli.
  • Jun 9 2011: I'd say forgiveness might be more the MA, not the PhD...

    Forgiveness is great - understanding and the ability to work around problems ultimately requiring forgiveness would be the PhD in my eyes...

    Rating forgiveness higher makes it sound like car insurance is the 'PhD' of driving - since it takes care of the aftermath of an accident... Shouldn't the PhD be not causing an accident to begin with?

    That said - forgiveness does rank very high... I just wouldn't give it the highest importance... I just can't bring myself to say apologizing for conflict ranks higher than circumventing conflict...
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Benedikt! What a great perspective!

      Thanks for sharing your wisdom with us. Funny but I always thought of it as a master's class in being human too but a PhD seemed catchier for the title.

      What a great point that you make: "I just can't bring myself to say apologizing for conflict ranks higher than circumventing conflict..."

      What if, though, the conflict was not of your own making? What if we are talking about the real tough stuff like a violent crime against you by a stranger?

      Is that still doable?
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: lovely and important distinction benedict..and I agree..a much more valuable life skill!!!!
  • Jun 9 2011: I analyze forgiveness like a formula for healing both sides. Forgiveness = understanding the situation + compassion - ego. Is that correct?
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Carole, I want to get out infront of your question and make it clear that I am NO expert and no one to judge anyone else's process of forgiveness.

      I do think the equation is terrifc though.

      There is no doubt that ego can be greatly implicated but as all of us are at different places in working with our own ego, that is hard to define as well.

      The question that remains in me from many situations is 'what if you do not have access to enough information or insight to understand? Does that negate of prevent forgiveness?
      • Jun 9 2011: It may have to do with information, not sure. It does have to do with truly understanding not the motives, or the reasons for the other person's action, but understanding in the sense of real comprehension of self-the other-and how forgiveness can step in.

        Jim is that what you were trying to say with conversation?
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: When I ask about understanding, I am referring to the situations in this world that just make no sense.

          I am convinced and believe that we can learn to forgive in the absense of 'getting it' and that the attempt to 'get it' can swamp some people in a state that reminds me of PTSD.
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011:!! Great point debra and pretty much what I have been trying to sya but you have said it so simply and practically.

          WE can;t need to get it to get over it.

          It's hard enough just to get over it.

          well said.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Michael I missed something profound in your response above when I read it the first time.

          "It does have to do with truly understanding not the motives, or the reasons for the other person's action, but understanding in the sense of real comprehension of self-the other-and how forgiveness can step in."


          Real comprehension of the SELF in relation or in juxtaposition to THE OTHER.

          This seems to me to be a profound clue to freeing oneself from prisons of torment.

          I have seen people continue to suffer from events that occurred decades before long after the victimizer was dead.
      • Jun 9 2011: Personally I am more convinced now than ever, there are lots of things out there I will never "get". Yes, there are things beyond understanding. But yes, forgiveness can come without getting it.
      • Jun 10 2011: Debra, well analyzed by you. If in that case, I think it very much depends on whether if one is ready to forgive regardless of availability of information. If we look at the root word of forgive, it breaks down into "for" and "give". We ask, "for what purpose?", usually when you give forgiveness, you are the one healing yourself first without knowing whether the other side can accept your forgiveness or also heal from your forgiveness. If other side forgive well and good if not, you are the one to gain from giving forgiveness. More often than not, we do have enough information of the situation to get into a dispute or misunderstanding to open to forgiveness, I think. That's what I feel about forgiveness in general.
      • Jun 10 2011: Debra
        I do believe that is right. We can never understand the use the metaphor above. We can sometimes "under-stand" our own selves and try to understand the other.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: OK, Michael,

          I am sensing that you are exposing something pretty profound here about 'under-standing' our own selves.

          If you've got more- I'm asking for it!
    • Jun 9 2011: I think so Carole...that's a hard formula though, face it.
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: Very complicated subject.... Some quick thoughts:

    Forgiveness is a form of respect.

    Forgiveness needs a partner. It's something like yin/yang

    "To err is human. To forgive divine....." True? Do we reach divinity by forgiving?

    In order to forgive someone or some group, there must be understanding of what you are "forgiving" that takes place. Perhaps the conversation that preceeds the forgiving is the hardest part.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Jim, Thanks for the insights.

      Why do you believe that forgiving needs a partner? Can it happen without the yin or the yang?

      I think you are referring to forgiveness in the context of an ongoing relationship and that is an important skill in life.
      How do you begin those tough conversations that lead to forgiveness? Do you have to reach a place emotionally before tackling it?

      "In order to forgive someone or some group, there must be understanding of what you are "forgiving" that takes" Can you elaborate more on this? I do not quite understand.
    • Jun 9 2011: Jim, I think you are right about that understanding part, and that like carole says above is a part of the equation. It isn't really an intellectual understanding though, more like a deep seated knowledge.

      Debra, I think the conversation can and should begin with one's self....ok...yes, conversing with your own understanding.
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: Michael, great point. Any 'talking to' has to start with oneself because when you get to 'the other' it has to be a conversation 'with' to be productive.
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: To err is human, to forgive is divine - Alexander Pope.

    I truly believe in this.Forgiveness strengthens relationships.Forgiveness gives us hope for a better future.So, to answer your questions

    1)It is necessary to forgive
    2)It is never wrong to forgive anyone who has hurt you in the past.
    3)Everyone no matter how bad the situation was.
    4) Everyone deserves forgiveness
    5)Normally,yes but this does not apply to all types of situation
    6)If it strengthens the relationship between I and the other person,yes.
    7)It heals your broken heart
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Muhamad! I love the way you finish with the recognition that a heart is broken. In this whole process, I think it is a key element that many forget. Something is broken and we need healing.
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: here are something about forgiveness

    just realised that i posted it twice sorry for that . and Debra , do you think there are some people who forgive easier than others ?
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Amily! You are an amazing research person!
      These links have lots of information. Thank you!

      I am posting a segment from it : :"Introduction of a New Model of Forgiveness: Measurement & Intervention"C. R. Snyder, Ph.D., in the Department of Psychology at the University of Kansas, proposes to test a basic "forgiveness-linkage" model. This will demonstrate the psychometric properties and the construct validity of this Forgiveness Scale. A three-year program is designed to test the "forgiveness-linkage" model using college students and non-students. The ability of the scale to predict life outcomes as they relate to relationships, work, health, and aging will also be explored. Research References
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Amily, I missed your question the first time I read it. I am sorry.

      To answer: Yes, for some people forgiveness appears to be an easier task. I think it may have to do with the depth of the psychological injury and whether you have suffered repeated injuries. It makes sense that one might become more fearful and more self-protective.

      Maybe the experience of trauma it is like an earthquake. Some earthquakes are mild and just rattle the house. and life goes on. Some houses are built to withstand earthquakes - their foundation and their building codes are reinforced. If cracks appear you plaster over the cracks and move on without being fearful of earthquakes in every minute. Other earthquakes are far worse and collapse the building of your life. In those cases you must integrate the events into your whole world view in order to build a new 'house' to live in.

      So, I think people are a bit like houses. The strong ones look at damage and just repair and move on. Those who are either more broken or more frequently injured may need to take more time to find a way forward.

      I hope that made some sense. If not, or if you want more clarification please just ask.
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: Debra, i re-edited the post this morning so thats why.

        yes . it makes senses that it has something to do with how big and how frequent the" Earthquake" is. A really good analogy of the house and earthquakes which remiands me of the major earthquakes i have been thru and exactlly takes time to live in a house again.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: It just hurts me so much when people with houses that have collapsed are not treated kindly or judged.

          Much of the research work that I have done helps me to realize that there is a phenomenon called 'blaming the victim'.

          People feel some fear in the presence of other people's tragedies and pain. They do not know what to do or think. Sometimes when the cogntive dissonance gets too great they hide their fear from their own mind behind anger at the victim.

          This can lead to various behaviours. One is to tell yourself that you are simply a far smarter and far more equipped person who could never be caught in an earthquake and even if you were you would survive it much better.

          While I understand the motivation I still have the urge to protect the hurting people from the emotional machinations of others.
        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: Debra..very true what you said ( and worth a ted Conversation in istelf..the way people in need of compassion and help are abandoned by friends and family who become paralysed with their own vulnerability)

          Certainly having friends and loved one's blaming the victim for the transgression would drive anyone even deeper into woundedness. The victim then has to come back from even deeper woundedness to forgive both the transgressor and those who blamed the victim for the transgression.. That would put almost anyone out of order for quite some time..and possibly lead to even more alienation form support... a downward spiral..
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: Amily, I love this quote from your link..seems to explain so much of the dynamic in this conversation

      ".Each time we witness an act of forgiveness, we marvel at its power to heal, to break a seemingly unending cycle of pain. Forgiveness is something virtually all Americans aspire to -- 94% surveyed in a nationwide Gallup poll said it was important to forgive -- but it is not something we frequently offer. (In the same survey, only 48% said they usually tried to forgive others.) Perhaps this is because forgiveness is something we don't fully understand. Perhaps, as Friedrich Nietzsche did, we associate forgiveness with weakness. Or perhaps we view forgiveness as an almost saintly quality that imbues only the very special and most certainly cannot be learned. "

      This particular essay goes on to point out that forgivess is even pre-human..found in apes..Interesting in that it suggests why forgiveness is essential not only for the health and vitality of the indvidual but for the health and viatlity of community..if everyone held on to grudges, woundedness and resentment for every would erode and undermine culture and community.
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Thanks so much for delving into the reference and drawing out this quote for all of us, Lindsay. I notice that you often do the work to bring the wisdom within our grasp and I appreciate that.

        This is a particularly meaningful quote in this context but it is your own summary last paragraph that ties so many things together.
  • thumb
    Jun 8 2011: Forgiveness at least the way I see it is more of a step than the peak. If one choose not to forgive, which is within one right, then one will always carry an emotional anchor with them. Forgiveness allow us to let go of that emotional block, which is empowering, but i would not consider it the pinnacle of human development. I believe that is when we learn to integrate our experience joyous, horrid, traumatic, stigmatizing, whatever, with a sense of self that is the best version we can be, that is, for me at least, the crown of human experience. When we can benefit from our tormentors, that is when we have arrived. Easier said than done though.
    • Jun 8 2011: Very wise Anthony
    • thumb
      Jun 8 2011: Anthony, I love the point you are making about forgiveness being part of a process of integration.

      Is it limited to integrating the narative of your life or is it something more?
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: I'm assuming your question is referring to is about learning or being inspired by others to live a life less cluttered by negative emotion. It think that is wonderful. That is what we are here for, to help each other live better.
  • thumb
    Jun 8 2011: I think forgiveness is very beautiful indeed.

    It is a high moral value, and it is imo a recognition of our own imperfections, (and of others).

    Forgiveness is however connected to repent, except in those cases where you accept that the person who has done the wrong is incapable of understanding what he did wrong...

    Nobody 'deserves' forgiveness, it is a gratitude one can get from a fellow human.
    And the choice of not accepting the forgiveness is a non-choice: one is forgiven or one is not. It cannot be undone by the receiver.

    If one accepts forgiveness, one is (partly) released of the burden of guilt. Allowing the person to get on with his life, and try and be a better person.
    • thumb
      Jun 8 2011: Christophe, a sincere thank you for your well considered answer.

      I would like to ask you about your assertion that forgiveness is connected with repentence. From where do you think that idea arose? Am I not freed from a prison of pain by releasing someone that I hold a grudge against? Whether they ever know it or not, whether they repent or not, what good does nursing that pain do for me?

      Is forgiving the same as forgetting what the person did? Or is it the same as being wiser than to put yourself at their mercy again?
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: A lot of questions... I'll try and respond
        (I'll go through them in order)
        1) From my Catholic education, I learned that when one sinned (now, I'd say "when a person feels he has done wrong"), he should realize what he/she did, and show repent (I did wrong, I realize, and I want to take responsibility for what I've done)... In the traditional logic, forgiveness ought to be granted.
        => so I think these ideas come (culturally) from catholicism or Christianity.

        2) I think that is somewhat true. Forgiving gives the forgiver the option to move on, and not to be bounded by the harm that has been dealt to him. It does act as a relief (but then you truly need to forgive)

        3) If you forgive, you have let go... if you still have hardship or pain, you did not forgive truly. As you mention, forgiveness must (I realize now) indeed be connected with a 'letting go' of things (maybe that's why repent can make it easier for the person who is (or willing to) forgive.
        (Maybe sometimes forgiveness is conditional, hence repent. maybe that is not true forgiveness... I'm not sure about that)

        4) NO! Forgiving is not forgetting... it means a letting go of the blame/guild process, and the recognition of human error. Forgetting is as if it did not happen. Forgiving is realizing it did happen, and you consciously forgive... One can remember what happened (one should!) and keep to the forgiving (i.e. realizing what happened and not be grudge-full or burdened by it no more)

        5) I think so... not sure. But it is a form of acceptance... even so, you can still put yourself at the forgiven person's mercy... and are allowed to. If you believe the person indeed has received the forgiveness (by showing repent), you can truly do so. If you forgave and did not see repent (clearly), you can still be cautious, as you realize the receiver did not understand the process, and you would be foolish to put yourself at mercy of someone who can not handle that.
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: What a generous sharing! Thank you, Christophe for answering my quesitons.

          There is a very foundational and traditional concept of forgiveness that comes from faith but that does not mean that the goodness of the idea of forgiving is exclusive to people of faith. Everyone needs to be released from the prisons of pain caused by injustices done by others. Sometimes we are our own jailers when the person who did the act has long forgotten it.

          To your point about letting go: One of the most common things I have seen is that people are committed to forgiving and then they pick it back up and feel the exquisite pain of the injury again and again. I do not know why this is the road many people must travel but they only seem to find peace when they put it down for good.

          People need absolute freedom to travel this road at their own pace and in their own way without judgement. Forgetting a childhood rape for example, is never going to happen but some people find great comfort in forgiving and taking back their lives from abusers.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: a fabulous exchange Debra and Christophe..a really good plain valnilla abc's of forgivess..excellent.
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: Debra..............Forgiving is not forgetting. It is understanding that enables forgiveness.
        My life coach tells me this...."When you understand it all there may be nothing to forgive".
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: I once heard the same phrase in French... "tout savoir, c'est tout pardoner"
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: An internatinonal language of forgiveness!
          Doesn't that give hope for humanity?
          What a great point Helen! Thanks for joining in.

          Your thought really illuminates another part of this thing. The thing that we are carrying around and sufferingfrom could have other interpretations, other perspectives, other explanations.

          What do we do with the hurts and grudges we can never understand?
  • thumb
    Jun 15 2011: @ Debra, allow me to say this: In my work, I find that people really do have answers to the deepest questions that they ask, sometimes they just dont see it. I found the best explanation for my concept of life in your statement: " I asked, as I remember you saying, 'Why me?' and... some part of me asked myself 'Why not me? It was like a stream of cold clear water through my brain... Suddenly I felt a surge of relief that they were safe and' why not me ' made a sense. In all the random events of the universe it did not seem the most impossible of turns so I came very quickly to terms with it and the doctors and medical people were convinced I was in some sort of denial" You just blew me away! Here's why.

    What made some 'voice' in your subconscious speak to you? And do we assume that the same voice didnt speak to the other patients? It did. That voice speaks to all of us, and you choose to listen, and "awaken". Others choose not to listen. In my view, that entire experience was your lesson which you prepared for yourself, so enable you grasp some reality about life that you needed to have, and move on the the next level of your learning. You could just as asily have chosen to ignore the voice, and turned into another victim. But you didn't, and their lies the biggest difference to how two people react to any situation. I want to bet that after your experience you become different in some major way, if not in terms of world view then in terms of your self view. Once you learn something about your real self, there is no turning back. And that to me is the purpose of all 'suffering'. In all pain lies a lesson for each one of us, just as in all death lies a gift for those left behind. It just takes time, patience and understanding for the lesson to come through.

    Again, I struggle to put into words the image and feeling that your words created in me. I can only say that I was really happy to read them. Thank you!
  • thumb
    Jun 15 2011: Well, Bob is right. When I apologized here on TED when I first began posting on Ted. I took responsibility for my actions and I said I did not want to engage with people in that way by being sarcastic, or judgemental and that I would hereafter engage politely and courteously. I have kept that promise and changed my attitude. The particular person I did not approach. Since that person posted another hook after my apology. So yes there can be forgiveness without reconciliation because sometimes it is not possible. I was so happy when someone from Canada posted to me "God bless you, Helen."
  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 14 2011: Ed, if we take it to a practical example of a person in the panic state and confusion of an event - the 'clenched self' state can you tell me exactly what you feel your responsibilty to or role in that person's life is? While my afflictions may not be a smooth gliding horse do I have any moral responsibiity to help a person with a 'run away horse'?

      I am wondering if there is a mindset at work here which makes your responsibility to your own spiritual enlightenment and observer status more critical than helping another person in distress? Is the 'other' entirely responsible for his own path and if so is the role of helper somehow a defective spiritual state in this enlightened world view?
  • thumb
    Jun 14 2011: Let's say for a moment that, from here on out, all of our teachers would be trained to teach forgiveness. How would that change the world i 20 years out???
    • thumb
      Jun 14 2011: Jim I think we are in agreement that education does not teach the most crucial things even though teachers are trying hard. I have never understood why we focus so much on smething like sex ed (not that I'm saying to eliminate it ) without ever first teaching kids basic skills of interacting- like forgiveness and apology.
  • thumb
    Jun 14 2011: I have had the honor of working with children during my career as a parent and teacher, and so I have a perspective that maybe others have not experienced or at least thought of.

    On occasion, one child will do another child harm. They do it in all kinds of ways. Children, truth be told, can be cruel!!! It is almost always the case, when incidents occur that involve forgiveness of a child by a child, that an adult steps in (as they should) to mediate the process. It is often the case, however, that the mediator (adult) immediately insists that the child at fault apologize. Typically, nothing is expected of the victim. If you watch closely, most often neither the “forgiver” nor the "forgivee" are at all sincere about their part in the forgiveness process.

    In following this great discussion it occurs to me that, just like almost everything else we want to see happen in life, education is the key. In this case, maybe parents, educators and others in the role of mediating forgiveness between two children go about it a little differently. Maybe the focus/emphasis should be as much on the ability of a person to forgive as on being forgiven. It makes perfect sense when you think about it, doesn't it? Or not?
    • thumb
      Jun 14 2011: Absolutely, This is another very important point. All of the 'anger' of a social group is focused on the perpetrator (who in reality is just another human being who made a bad - or even rotten- choice). The person who was injured is rather invisbile in our court systems or in our normal day to day processes. The really insidious part is that a person who does not process this well can go a variety of directions- only a few of them good. They can be so impressed by the incident that they decide to identify with the victimizer- an outcome none of us can afford in a society that happens far more often than we realize or they can be crushed at the other extreme. Evaluating their state of mind and helpng them into a better process is a better way of handling it for all concerned.
      • thumb
        Jun 14 2011: And in the case of children, how can we educate them to forgive as well as to teach the perpetrator (?) to "say you're sorry"? In my mind, it almost always comes back to education.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: It's not enough to teach the offender to simply say they are sorry. Whether it is children, or adult offenders, they need to know why they are saying the words. While mediating with adult offenders, I always asked them the questions..."Can you imagine how this would feel if it was done to you?" If it's possible, ask the victim to tell the offender how it it impacted his/her life. The offenders have often been victims. A large majority of incarcerated men have been physically, sexually, emotionally assaulted as children. The only way the cycle is going to be broken is for ALL parties to start realizing the ramifications of their actions. We can try to "evaluate their state of mind" all we want. They are not going to change, until they learn how to evaluate themselves.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: That's why you are in the right place for you Jim- for some it is a calling.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Colleen this is an important sentence from your last entry:

          The only way the cycle is going to be broken is for ALL parties to start realizing the ramifications of their actions. We can try to "evaluate their state of mind" all we want. They are not going to change, until they learn how to evaluate themselves.

          I absolutley agree. However, my point all along and in this instance too is that you cannot make a cake without the ingredients. We all want and need people to evaluate themselves- both victims and perpetrators but I think -IF THEY KNEW HOW TO DO IT THEY WOULD HAVE DONE IT ALREADY!

          You have helped me clarify my point and my thinking again. We could demand, insist, belittle, abandon or meditate on it for an eternity but if they do not have the 'light' it is not going to happen. That is where the humanity and the caring of everyone else comes into play.

          Andrea on the FREEDOM question brought in some great insight about this and I'm going there now to bring some of it back because it is very relevant here.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Kids have "the light" when they come to this earth school. Circumstances in their precious little vulnerable lives cause them to cover up their own light. We need to empower kids to know they have choices regarding their behaviors.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Andrea wrote these words in the context of Freedom but i think they work to illustrate how much we need each other in learning and living and forgiving as well. Same human process!
          "A friend brought Beth the snail with potted wild violets. Which left her initially overwhelmed wondering how she’d care for it from her imprisoned physical state. Engaging solutions, Beth noticed what they brought. Namely, life she hadn’t perceived possible at that point.

          Caring for the snail, she began appreciating it as exemplary of life. She took responsibility (James’ term) for her access by meeting the snails needs. In these ways she constructed even while accessing this little freedom, on her own. And as you note, now engages others by sharing her story of discovery.

          I contend this access (hers first, ours vicariously) was abetted exogenously. Her friend co-created her freedom.

          While others brought bouquets of cut flowers in attempts to cheer her, this friend brought living things from woods -- where Beth once sought solace. The cut flowers withered and died, leaving Beth the problem of disposing them, if not a reminder of her vulnerability.

          The simple organic gifts (violets and snail) offered potentials she could engage and nurture. (And bring to mind comments by Tim and Birdia.)

          Thus her friend provided opportunity for Beth to reach a life-sustaining potential, by building a self-healing “in-situ” ecosystem. A powerful reminder and impetus to embrace her heretofore unperceived self-agency in accessing this freedom, even while she was otherwise physically dependent on others.

          Engaging this she discovered her capacity to build a "mini-culture" in an otherwise stifling place. This free-space was unmistakably (if unintentionally) co-created by her friend.
        • Jun 14 2011: Jim
          I think you are right that education is key. Sometimes it may come back to begin to teach again simple common courtesies. I am not talking about the 15 minute film on "Being Courteous" but maybe it wasn't so bad after all. Teaching people to forgive and to accept forgiveness would not be so bad.

          Yes we need to break the cycle. I so totally agree with that and that everyone in the cycle needs to understand it. Sounds strange, but at some level that includes us all! The other point that is true is that being cyclical we need to teach it as such. We have too much "linear-think" going on. We want to blame someone, so we keep going back until we find one who isn't a victim, but victimizes. We need to start realizing that many problems like this are all wrapped up in a systems approach not a linear cause and effect approach.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: We absolutley have found common ground in this statement that I have transferred from your last post:

          We need to start realizing that many problems like this are all wrapped up in a systems approach not a linear cause and effect approach.

          That is a vital piece of the puzzle!
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Michael and Debra,
          When you say it is a "systems approach" are you not putting it "out there" somewhere?

          To me, it doesn't sound at all strange to say "that includes us all". There is a quote by Ernest Holmes in "Science of Mind" that I love, because it reminds me of reality. "One of the great difficulties in the new order of thought is that we are likely to indulge in too much theory and too little practice". We need to stop talking about "it" and BE "it".
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Colleen, again - its the same sense that I get of you assuming you have plugged the lessons in and I haven't. Is it really worthwhile for me to say 'look what I have done?' and compare it in any way given that there is still so much more for all to do?
        • thumb
          Jun 15 2011: That is YOUR is not MINE. My comment says it "INCLUDES US ALL"..."WE need" to do it. Are you going to call me passive agressive again? Or what label will you use this time?
        • thumb
          Jun 15 2011: No, it was not passive aggressive. All I have to work with is my perception. Is that your pain body speaking or do you have another name for it? If it is manifesting what is the next step?How forgiven or accepted was I if you are on alert for it again?

          In fact a systems approach means not 'out there' but out there, in here and all around.
        • thumb
          Jun 15 2011: My "pain body speaking"?
          No Debra, I speak from my heart. I don't like to label myself and I'm not particularly fond of someone else labeling me either, as we've discussed previously.
          I told you, there was/is nothing to forgive because I didn't blame or judge you in any way. You are always accepted in my heart. Labels are not.
        • Jun 15 2011: Colleen
          Actually taking a systems approach to looking at problems can lead to very specific focussing on what the real problem is. Also, it looks at problems as a whole. Now speaking about our court system, violators and people violated, that becomes a huge problem! Again, in this perspective larger society has to have a place in the system. I also believe firmly that a systems approach can show you where the real leverage in the system exists.

          On on one-on-one approach it helps to look at all sides of the cyclical nature of most things. As I said we are way to linear think. Cause and effect are not necessarily close to each in time or space, things don't happen in the direct sequences we sometimes look for. Helping both the violator and the violated to see what is happening around them could have a profound effect.

          I think forgiveness is one of those parts of that cyclical nature of things. It demands that people encounter their responsibility in the situation. Not that the one violated is responsible for the act against him, but in the sense that everyone owns up to the situation. Forgiveness says in spite of the hurt I received I forgive your actions.
        • thumb
          Jun 15 2011: I agree Michael,
          That's why I volunteered in the shelter and family center, dept. of corrections, facilitating several programs, evaluating and advocating with children in state custody, facilitated self-empowerment workshops and support groups, volunteered in a terminal care facility, and guest lectured at the univ. for years on these topics...thanks for the reminders:>)
      • Comment deleted

    • Comment deleted

      • thumb
        Jun 15 2011: Hi Ed,
        Living with 5 of my own day in and day out from conception to adulthood gave me a good chance to see them and love them in all their complexity and it took a total investment of my life to nurture them as people to go out into the world to be constructive people who care about others as well as themselves. Some people are equipped to invest in others while some have a different focus.

        Each person is entitled to their own beliefs and practices.

        One key function that I wanted my kids to own as they went into the world is forgiveness. Another is the ability to remember that they were a member of the human race with rights and obligations. While their personal development was important it should not be done at the expense of or in neglect of human beings surrounding them.
  • thumb
    Jun 14 2011: Greetings all. I would like to respond to the various questions/comments raised on my contribution- which by the way, are all absolutely wonderful. And I mean that! I will try to remain true to my intention, which is to remain very simple, but hopefully not simplistic, and to respect that all we all have opinions (a way to understand life that allows meaning, purpose and direction). I therefore speak only of my intepretation of life that works for me. Have I as Ronald experienced the very painful situations raised by Debra? No. And perhaps even what I have experienced would pale in comparison with the next person. Would my approach be different if I had? Perhaps. Maybe I would also see life differently if I had been born a woman, but that I really cannot prove. I struggle to answer without appearing either completelty out of touch with reality, insensitve, apologetic, or just plain pathetically brainwashed. I just have my own understanding, and this is it:
    1. As humanity we have in the past chosen to learn who we are through pain. Sad, perhaps and tough too.
    2. We all have a soul that needs to learn, heal, grow and so far it has been confined to learning through pain & fear.
    3. We all experience all aspects of reality, healthy/ unhealthy, rich/poor, thief/saint/ murderer/victim. I've been a slave as well as a slave master, male & female, lived a long life, died many 'past' lives.
    4. I planned all the experiences that I face today. There is a reason for everything, otherwise the universe is just plain chaotic, things happening and colliding by pure chance. I may not understand it as a child, or as a grieving father, but the fact that I don't understand something now does not, at least to me, mean it is pointless.

    I know all these, at the core of my heart, to be true but modern science demands that I MUST prove it otherwise it is all in my mind. However, I am on Ted Conversations to share and learn. I only ask that my truth be accepted as mine, for now.
    • thumb
      Jun 14 2011: Ronald, I really appreciate this response because it is so direct and such a clear statement of your premises. Your reactions to all things and in particular the concept of acceptance is very consistent with your world view. I would have nothing to add to the thinking of one who believes that the victimization and cruelty in this world are a function of the person's own choosing. I would tip my figurative hat and walk on.
  • Jun 14 2011: I am not really convinced how to fairly compare one apology against another, because I personally appreciate the main idea as being so much more important, the process of apology, as being a 1st step into admission of guilt to further request for forgiveness. At times we might hear some lousy apologies, and some good apologies, do we have to concentrate how good the apology is or would be better to understand and concentrate on the facts? And if someone apologizes to us, no matter how good or bad the apology is, for me the main point is if he or she really understands why is apologizing.
  • Jun 14 2011: This is a huge topic you have turned your initial question into Debra - my mind boggles. Without going into God's forgiveness, and I do believe in God; forgiveness can be a very difficult thing and not to forgive is liike hating. Hating is not healthy for us emotionall or mentally and affects our outlook on life and innocent people( colateral damage). From personal experience forgiving can be uplifting - the casting aside of a burden, whether forgiving another or accepting forgiveness. It cleans the slate - a new start. I know there are some things that are extremely difficult to deal with and it needs time to come to terms with the hurt and start the healing and forgiveness which must be unconditional.
    As to the PhD - love - unconditional love is the real PhD of human development.
    • thumb
      Jun 14 2011: Thank you William- Here is to new starts for all!
    • Jun 14 2011: Good post William. That kind of love does get us to the point of forgiveness. We all need a clean slate sometimes.
  • thumb
    Jun 14 2011: I would like to add a definition of repentence. I used to think it meant for me to don the figurative ashes and sackcloth type of repentence. And now I think that repentence is a turning around. I was fortunate to visit the Rodin Museum in Paris some years ago and I stood before his statue of "Le Penseur" Awesome and I won dered what he might be considering. I realized that the statue represented man in a reverie and later on changed my definition of repentence...Just wanted to share that. Thank you.
    • thumb
      Jun 14 2011: Helen, I really like that. You keep bringing the discussion back to the idea that we do the hurting too. It is not always others who need forgiving or techniques for changing.
      Once you have hurt someone and you understand that a conscious decision to do it better is a good start and that begins with turning around and engaging differently.
      • thumb
        Jun 14 2011: Debra....Yup, ur rite (that is texas talk) When I first came to TED I posted my belief in God and I encountered somemilitant, agressive atheists who posted some things that really pissed (I did not say that) me off and so I asked one of them if they really had to work at it or did it come easy to be insulting. Well, it escalated and the admin stepped. I apologized and said I did not want to engage with people that way. So I have changed even from then to now. We discover IT bit by bit.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: That's good straight Texas talk and I love the lesson in it!
          Thanks- mea culpa is an important thiing to say and know.
  • thumb
    Jun 14 2011: Carissima Debra and al Ted participants, you are invited to our new conversation about joy de vivre. Welcome to this new trend without the edge of therapy or any "how to handle trauma"...just share your happy and beautifull experiences. Travel, food, friends, love, gardening, arts, music, performances, culture, dreams. Nice things are welcome. We want to show some of the mediterranen way of live. We make a toast for the things as they are, not the way we want them to be.

  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 14 2011: Ed! How great! Thanks for coming back.

      What i really appreciate about this post is how clear it makes it that it is an inward journey. There are many times when people say the expression 'its nothing' when someone says thanks or apologizes. I think that comes close to what you are sharing. You are saying that the greater the understanding and compassion the less need there is to even feel offense. It is a nicer place to live.

      But Ed do you still apologize when you step on someone's foot? I do. Not because I did it on purpose but because I am sad that I hurt them. If we see signs of hurt in anyone else it is not inconsistent with good manners or compassion to try to make it right.

      PS- I think we have an acquaintence in real life in common.
      • Comment deleted

        • Jun 14 2011: Ed
          Sorry to disagree a bit, but everyone judges...sometimes it is discernment of the moment, sometimes it is decision on right or wrong, sometimes it is condemnation.

          Tell me about this energy field and how it makes real people in real situations be more ready to forgive. I mean it would be really cool, but who sees it and knows it? How do you use it? And most importantly, show me it is real...ah but you say I am asking for reason where none exists, no I am asking for proof where none exists.

          The new heavens and new earth reference is interesting, how are we getting there? I would say you "consciousness stream" isn't helping much. I mean after all it has been around a while and I don't see many effects.

          We need real live people, doing real live love towards others in concrete ways to be able to have a world where forgiveness is the norm. We need concrete demonstrations of love to those who are unlovely.

          Let's try that.
    • thumb
      Jun 14 2011: a wonderful closing..thank you ed
  • thumb
    Jun 13 2011: Alo Debra, in the last moment I return. My feelings about are well and nice. I'm gratefull with you and your bright proposals. My regards to you and all TED frinds.
    • thumb
      Jun 13 2011: Well Jaime Lubin, You really know how to brighten my day! Welcome back! I have missed you! Can you give us some wisdom about how to forgive?
      • thumb
        Jun 14 2011: I just share some ideas. Forgive is hard and simple at the same time. We have the memory and is like a darkbird sometimes. if we can control memory we can forgive, I'll tell you this because is my experience. Not forget, just know how to handle the memory, then you can or not forgive.
        • thumb
          Jun 14 2011: Jaime and Kathy, I am awe struck at how many facets this issue of forgiveness has! You bring up another- managing memory. I think this is also an important point.

          In really traumatic incidents this turns into flashbacks which come unbidden and unwanted to your mind and highjack your attention. If this is severe it is actually a symptom of PTSD. In normal hurts and offenses of life it can happen in a mild form. Replaying, resifting and reconsidering the events in the woulda, shoulda, coulda mode can drive oneself crazy.

          So acknowledging Jaime's 'black bird' and learning to shoo it off its roost is a good thing. Don't 'try not to think about it' because that makes it worse. Just let it come and land and acknowledge it and deliberately then turn your thinking to something else.

          I love the way that Kathy speaks of letting your heart forget the pain. It does feel like your heart is deeply involved. In a weird way we do have to give ourselves permission to let go of the pain. Often that is because we have been wearing it like a shield.
  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 12 2011: I wish I could decline the title and assure all that I am simply a student here even though I have usurpt the place of TA.- even though I acknowledge the love with which it was first conferred.

      Ed, thanks so much again for engaging.
      I understand that it is going back to speak a language you and others have left behind to try to speak to me on this level. I appreciate and am grateful for the effot and even the sacrifice involved.

      I enjoy the Tolle quotes vey much and I even suggest that I understand them and know them.

      My plea is for those who have not or cannot open their eyelids.

      For those who operate in a world of ghastly hurt and oppressions the language of forgiveness is vital.I see injured people whose eyes are closed in pain but whose ears are still working. In that case words may work. The concepts of forgiveness are the forefathers and foremothers of the concepts that many spiritual traditions advocate.

      I think these concepts are worthy of respect and of sharing for people at any stage. If one is beyond them- don't use them - but at least recognize that they are the staircase that led you higher. People who have attained 'enlightenment' should be able to pick up the tools of a bygone era to offer triage, first aid and help even if you are certain the person is not as knowledgable. That is what doctors, nurses and surgeons do every day for the body.What help is it to have people fluttering around who are not modeling something better but who are declaring that people with greater wounds do it 'their way'?
    • thumb
      Jun 12 2011: Ed, Beloved,and you are a beloved here at sanctuary, my touchstone I am beginning to feel like St. Valentinethe martyr here at Ted. f I didn't take Ted Conversations so seriously I would post his classic image pierced with arrows instead of my own Sanat Fe portrait.

      .Lovely to have your voice, your gentle spirit and your vast wisdom in the conversation. We have laid out much to think about and draw from even if we leave it still somehow not understood..or perhaps not really desired...I am not sure which..

      Please come and visit me in my new conversation which is really about Keatings work and Wilbers
      "" Has culture evolved beyond belief systems "

      just posted a few minutes ago and grows directly out of many conversations here at TED and the very very painful struggle many here in this community have with ideas like fear, ego, freedom, forgiveness, radical empathy.. . I am hoping we can point through this conversation to the need to get past "belief systems" and on to the eternal wisdoms which see us forward

      If we are pierced by the same arrow we can sing as one for wisdom until we can sing no more.

      .Peace & Many Blessings

  • Jun 12 2011: Firstly; If you compare between forgiving and not forgiving, then you get nothing to worsen the problem in case of not forgiving, therefore, it is a need to forgive for the sake of yourself, not only for the sake of keeping another human happy.

    Secondly; forgiveness is one of the characteristics of God; it is difficult to do; but if you managed, you are partially God
    • thumb
      Jun 12 2011: Dear Shokrullah,

      Somehow these words -when spoken by someone who is living in Afghanistan as I have learned from the "A Taste of Afganistan' question thread where you have posted such meaningful insights - touch me even more deeply.

      and you remind me again as someone has already quoted "To err is human- to forgive divine.'

      Thanks so much for sharing with us!
      • Jun 12 2011: As student to this wonderful community of TED; it gives me this feeling that; it is true that human is made of same body.

        Forgiving; feeling; understanding; helping, and respecting each other are what I believe as one of those short definitions of human.

        There is no difference between a human living in Afghanistan and a Human Living in West; it is a matter of what opportunities and motivation are provided to grow and learn. Afghans are thirsty to learn. So I am learning from you and Ted community.

        Thanks to a website like and thanks to members like you.
    • thumb
      Jun 13 2011: Dear Shokrullah,
      As a student in this world, I believe you speak very wise words. I believe we are all more the same than different, all connected, and when we realize this, feeling, understanding, helping, respecting each other are the natural things to do. I recognize all of us as teachers and students in the adventure of life, all here to support each other on the life journey. Thank you for being a part of the journey:>)
  • Comment deleted

  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 12 2011: Hi Ed,If I were to guess at my place in the universe, I feel like I am- by choice- stationed at a threshold, a door step or the edge of a circle and I stay at the edge hoping that I can extend my hand into the darkness and tenderly usher people from the cold, the dark, the pain and the lostness into an embrace and draw them further into safety. The embrace has no relgion, no name, no identification beyond caring and identifying one human being to another. It is a choice to Hear a cry and say 'you're not alone'.

      Because most people use words, I use words. The people who are satisfied and safe are not my focus- their wordlessness might be a sign of great advancement but it could be a sign of deep indifference but it doesn't matter if they are not blocking my outstretched arms.

      I will err on the side of caring. Those who reach their silence appear that they do not need anything. My focus is and always will be upon being on soft and caring person in a tough world with a sign that says:"In this moment -I KNOW its safter that way (big arrow) so follow your own light now that you see it".

      In this process I grow, I love and I learn and often the lessons are around forgiveness.
      • thumb
        Jun 12 2011: Dear Ed,
        "How does one unfurl the clenched self of fear and woundedness that prevents the seeing" reminds me of another Rumi quote:

        "I have lived on the lip of insanity
        Wanting to know reasons
        Knocking at the door
        It opens
        I've been knocking from the inside"
        • thumb
          Jun 12 2011: I think the passages that people choose to quote to identify where they believe another is standing tell a lot especially if you fear that it is a place from which you have just escaped. Passive aggressiveness is one coping mechanism when one does not feel that they have the empowerment to be plain spoken . It is really hard to have true compassion when you are convinced that another is insane. Maybe that is why so many people choose to blame the victim in situations where forgiveness can lead to healing or turn away pretending that if they were only 'more enlightened' there would be no pain.

          PS The Guest House is a more hospitible place to be and to love from.
      • Comment deleted

        • thumb
          Jun 12 2011: I went back and reread your post about the "Guest House'. I missed something important the first time around. You posted it in an engineering workplace as your 'Personal safety policy'. I love that.

          Almost as much as I love the Afghani gesture you shared. So in this you have taught me some of the virtue you find in silence - with a gesture you communicate acceptance and kindness and understanding. I like that common ground.

          You offer me the illustration of the prodigal son and in return I offer the NT story of the precious one lost sheep (without trying to slant this to anyone spiritual tradition). The shepherd uses all his resources and his strength to recover just one sheep when he could have kept meditating. Instead he continued his spiritual practice while looking for and rescuing the sheep- so two gained from his enlightenment.
      • thumb
        Jun 12 2011: Dear Debra,
        I did not choose the Rumi passage to "identify" where "another is standing", nor did I suggest that "another is insane". The quote says: "I have lived on the lip of insanity...wanting to know reasons". I, Colleen Steen, have lived in that place of confusion, as I was dealing with a very violent abusive father, 24yr. abusive marriage, cancer and near fatal head injury. I often asked "why...why...why me". I was knocking from the inside, trying to find answers and free myself from the ego and judgement. When I could follow my "why me" question, with "why not me", I began to understand and heal. If you need to label it "passive aggressive", so be it.
        • thumb
          Jun 12 2011: Thank you Colleen for your forgiveness or more consistent with your message your acceptance.

          The phrase was mine and the question was for third parties.
      • thumb
        Jun 14 2011: Yes Debra...more consistent with my message is acceptance. I didn't blame or judge, so there is nothing to forgive:>)
    • thumb
      Jun 12 2011: Ed Thanks for the guest house..a favorite rumi..we should have it as the invovaction for all these tough tonavigate discussion..fear, ego, forgiveness. me it means everything still and wait to learn
  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: Kathy! You always bring your A game and we benefit! Well said!
  • thumb
    Jun 11 2011: Carisima Debra : E questa conversa comme un "Giocare a essere Dio per scribere "The ten Commandaments"?

    From Eckhart Tolle Noi possiamo vedere un schizzo da la "sua" saggezza: (lo stesso che Baghavad Gita )

    "So do not be concerned with the fruit of your action- just give attention to the action itself"

    E bello que questa conversazione 'e un spechio dove possiamo vedere un po di nostra capacita per la compasione, adesso tanto scomparsa e perdutta tra tanti pseudospiritual garbich.

    Vi ringraziamo la tua acuta e tagliente proposta.
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: Ringraziarla per ritornare a ci Conte, all'Amore e al perdono sono delle cose che possono crescere ed è sviluppato. Ho cominciato questa conversazione in modo che potrei imparare dagli altri e dall'azione che ho imparato. Che so rimane la società: l'aiuto dove lei può. Amare sempre.
  • thumb
    Jun 11 2011: Sometimes, we don't mean to do something harmful, but the pain stop us to forgive others. Forgivenes, I think, is a kind of power to forgive someone else, AFTER we admit/understand the painful things we did and say sorry to others.
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: Hello Bear Jin, We are glad to have your valuable insights too.

      Are you saying that by being aware of how we hurt others, it becomes easier for us to forgive?
      Or are you pointing out that we usually have added some portion to the problem with our own behaviours?

      Both are worthwhile points!
  • thumb
    Jun 11 2011: I think it's simple, it's not about learning to forgive, you can't learn it because then it would become something not inherent of the human being, I think since we are born as humans we are able to feel compassion, connection and forgiveness, it's not about "learning how to forgive" then it would be too logicand rational to be true, it's about feeling it, in your deep heart, just then it becomes true and lasts.
    It's just what I think.
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: Vanessa, I love the intutiveness of your viewpoint. You suggest that forgiveness is a natural human quality that makes realtionships work- that it comes from a kind and open heart.

      I think this is exactly the way it is when the event is small and human and not on the scale of trauma.

      Thanks for joining us. Please come back and share more anytime!
  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Hi Ed,

      I do not understand the IOW.

      I like the Tolle quote.

      It starts with the concept of 'seeing that it has no purpose'.

      How does one unfurl the clenched self of fear and woundedness that prevents the 'seeing'?
      Do we just ignore the people in this state?
      • Comment deleted

        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: Hi Ed, I am assuming you meant me and just got the name wrong.
          Thanks for sharing more about Tolle I have read and more than enjoyed his books.

          Compassion is what is needed in all situations including in our own attempts to share a world view. If one has the gift of compassion and Be-ingness it is allso likely that they could see that the 'other' was still at a point of development where your ways were not yet working for others.

          When I asked if we should just ignore- I was asking in the third person when we are the witness to injustice and pain. I did not make myself clear.

          I repeat my question to you seeking the light that you see more clearly by:

          How does one unfurl the clenched self of fear and woundedness that prevents the 'seeing'?It seems to me to be the intersection between the enlightened soul who sees what you are advocating and the person who still functions in the world where forgiveness is needed.

          For a real life example: Please see the sincere heart felt questions of Carol Lyc (responding to Cornelia) below and if you can -please address her questions.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: a thousand white roses to you ed schulte
  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Interesting contribution relating holding a grudge to a survival mechanism.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Mohammad, I welcome another insightful voice!

      Thanks for joining us and sharing these concepts. Understanding the reason for behaviours often helps us understand more. We choose behaviour that we think work. We hold onto them because they seem to work....or at least we do not know any other way.

      It does make sense in war torn places to hold a grudge against the guy who killed your brother- he might just come for you!

      Is the practice of forgiveness, though, common to most faiths? If so - what survival benefit does it confur?

      We would all be delighted if you wanted to add any more insights Mohammad Bin Iftikhar.
  • thumb
    Jun 10 2011: Carissima Debra volentieri Io racconto questa piccola storia per illustrare che la giustizia umana e molto imperfetta. E non importa da vero la giustificazione...senza pietà non si pu fare di niente. Ieri, oggi , domani e lo stesso. Compassione, benevolenza, sapere ascoltare, empatia, un cuore ardente....non si ha bisogno di più per essere perdonato e per perdonare.
    Cosa ne pensi? Sara molto gradevole saperte in corso di perdonare ed essere perdonata. Tutti noi abbiamo bisogno d un'anima pulita e un cuore pieno di pieta humana, per potere aspettare la giustizia Divina.

    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: google trasnlation of Conte's post:

      Dearest Debra glad I told this little story to illustrate that human justice is very imperfect. And no matter the justification of a true ... without pity one can not do anything. Yesterday, today, tomorrow and the same. Compassion, kindness, to listen, empathy, a flaming heart .... you do not need more to be forgiven and to forgive.
      What do you think? It will be very pleasant saperte going to forgive and be forgiven. We all need clean of soul and a heart full of pity humana, in order to wait for divine justice
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: Thank you Conte,

        Compassion, kindness, to listen, to empathize, a caring heart - all the qualities that we need more of.

        We need not only to forgive but to be tender hearted and aware of the ways we transgress.
        The human conscience is highly under rated and listening to it is even more under rated.
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: Carissime Debra e Lindsay adesso ha finito una bellissima performance di Enrico Rava musicista di jazz, e buon amico da noi. In pranzo abbiamo parlato di voi e il nostro caro Padre Delacourt ha detto che voi siete salvatori degli americani per la vostra intelligenzzia. Acanto a me c'e`la Contessa Di Val D'Aosta e Ticino che e una vera simpatica donna, ellegantissima e molto furba chi consiglia a la Baronessa per la sua collezioni Channel. Lo sa tutto di moda e d'amore. Ha perso cinque mariti, 'e comme una vedova profesionale e vuole partecipare a TED. Fu amica vicinissima di Coco e ha una grande memoria. Parla di tutto a tutti. Adesso faremo una passegiatta sulla spiagga. Grazie a voi due. Ci sentiamo perdonatti.
  • Jun 10 2011: It may not be the ultimate virtue, but it's up there in the top two or three.
    How can people get along without forgiveness?
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Hi Richard, Good question.

      Would you be willing to share in generalities the biggest thing you've ever had to forgive? How did you manage it?
  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Thanks so much for sharing this simple and beautifully direct poem. I think it is a wake up call for all the silly grudges that we nurse that suck up so much energy. What we do in the small things is practice for what we wil be able to do in the big things- sort of like lifting weights.

      Forgiveness is a part of many religious traditions and spiritual practices.

      I am not sure that I believe that unforgiveness is transmuted into physical disease even though it is well worn maxim. There is strong evidence that life challenging situations that undermine our mental models of the world can suppress the immune system.leading to disease and that is why I think it is so vital to support rather than condemn people in their process to find and give forgiveness.
      • Comment deleted

        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Just a clarification that I you may already be aware of - cervical cancer is caused by sexual activity through passing of the human papilloma virus. That is why there is the new vacine for young girls and many are even recommending it for young guys. With its use cervical cancer can eventually become a thing of the past.Early sexual abuse is a predictor of many bad outcomes for people but beyond early sexual activity with multiple partners as a source of infection it is not thought to be a direct cause of cervical cancer. There is nothing psychosomatic in this instance of disease.

      • Comment deleted

        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: I do think that going on to fruitful lives is very likely to be possible after forgiving.
          I wonder how we could make it easier or how we could put the tools for them to be able to forgive into the palms of their hands if they can't find the tools themselves.

          I also think though, that this is one reason why we need to take care with others. A child who is tempermentally sensitive or and introvert may have less abiltiy to integrate the experience and find a life afterwards.

          In other words, I think it is likely that some people are more easily crushed or that their 'houses' to repeat a metaphor I used in another post, are not as earthquake proof- so support and counslling are important for recovery leading to forgiveness = freedom for the abused.
  • thumb
    Jun 10 2011: One who was negatively impacted can only forgive the person who has cause that negative impact.
    Wondering about tyrants who caused havoc to humankind , do they deserve forgiveness?
    if yes who will forgive them?
    Will that forgiveness will encourage the rise of other tyrants in future?
    Forgiveness is a humane quality , think it should be applied to humane human.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: HI Salim, Thanks for being part of this exploration of the issues.

      It is tough to deal with forgiveness when we deal with it one on one but when we look at it in a cumulative sense of nations against nation or ideological followers against the followers of another is is magnified in its seeming impossibility.

      What do you think of the progams in places like South Africa where victimizers faces their victims in a court of reconsiliation rather than going to jail. Do you think it brings healing? Do you think it is worth while?
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: It's always pleasure to be in exploration with thought provoking issues you come up with.
        South African initiative definitely a good one and it will work if the victimizer really wants forgiveness which I think in most cases something wrong happens in the heat of the moment.

        I see it's easier at individual level rather national level as at that macro level lot of politics different interest groups are involved in our current system with which bigger population of nation or country may have a different opinion.

        The other point individuals finally creates the cumulative sense, so practice in individual can help to create that collective good will. It seems yo me bottom up approaches are more sustainable and acceptable but may take long time. "it's better late than never"
        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: Salim, thanks for returning!

          As to the tyrants in your original post: I think they should be stopped first, jailed second and forgiven ..... to quote the medicine needed (or if and when possible.) On another thread I stated the things like slavery and the Holocaust and I'll add tyrants need to be burned into our collective memory- so that we are vigilant that it never happens to anyone again.
          But where ever possible the greatest reaction to any of the horrors is to reclaim the ability to have full lives. That is part of what I believe is the gift of forgiveness.

          I think that your statement 'it's better late than never' applies to many forms of forgiveness.
          We can experience the freedom of giving up a grudge many years later when the other person doesn't even remember us.
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Debra and Salim,
        This is in response to your question/discussion regarding victims facing the offender/victimizer.
        I served on a Reparative Board, which is part of the court system created to re-direct offenders rather than sending them to correctional facilities. We evaluated what are considered minor crimes like breaking and entering, property damage, DUI, etc. The victim had the choice to participate or not, and many times they chose not to because they felt that seeing the offender would victimize them again.

        My observations in the years I served was that it was very successful when both parties where open to the process. There were times when the victim and offender became friends, or the victim became a mentor for the offender. One person who damaged public property was given the task of working with the town crew (community service was always a componant) and was so good at the job they hired him after the community service was finished.

        There are many levels of victimization, many levels of understanding and willingness to participate, and in my perception, the process of forgiveness and repair happens to the best of the ability of the participants depending on where they are with the process and how it is facilitated.
        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: Colleen, This is a great contribution toward the whole scope of the issues! Thanks so much.

          Reparative boards seem to me to be a great step forward in our system of justice. I think it helps both parties to see that the 'other' is just a human being worthy of consideration and of understanding.

          That is great work that you did there!
        • thumb
          Jun 13 2011: Hi Colleen
          Thanks for bringing insights from your experience, which is great !! As otherwise we will be talking theoretically only (yes everything starts from theory and I am happy to discuss theory as well).

          I feel , the first step should be taken from the offender, to get thing working in that way ? Whats your observation ?
          Secondly , how we can created that kind of environment in the society , so that offender takes that first step and also the victim welcomes that.
      • thumb
        Jun 13 2011: Dear Salim,Theoretically is a good way to learn, and it's also good to learn from personal experience, which is my prefered way of learning:>)

        Ideally, the first step would be taken by an offender, when/if the offender understands the impact of his/her offense. Maybe we will get there some day? The program I was involved in, was court ordered. The victim was contacted by one of us on the board who were mediators/facilitators. Since I was involved early in the program, it was not well known, so sometimes it was difficult for the victim to accept. Often, it would take several phone conversations before the meeting could be set up. Both parties were prepared as much as possible for the interaction. The victim was assured of safety, and the offender was advised that if this process didn't work he/she was going back to court and sentenced. So, there were usually some hurdles to navigate in the process. The program has now been operating for several years, there have been some successes, more people are aware of it, and it's not quite as difficult to get victims to participate.

        This brings us to your next question, which is a good one! How can we create that kind of environment in society so the offender takes the first step and victim welcomes that? PRACTICE.If the offender knew before the offense how it might impact the victim, perhaps there would not be an offense. I think I'm jumping ahead a bit with that idea! I really think it is about practices that will change the paradigm, and the practices need to come from many different segments of society. We have tended to seperate ourselves from each other, as well as seperate different aspects of life, so we have lost touch with the interconnectedness of the whole. We need to reconnect all the dots.
        • thumb
          Jun 13 2011: Another great addition, Colleen!
    • thumb
      Jun 11 2011: Carisimi Signora Debra e Signore Salim, una regola di strategia profonda per la güerra chi fa tanto male, dice che "Perdona a toui nemici, questa benevolenza gli tornerai in pazzi".

      Il popolo suferente perdona, la madre chi ha perso a suoi figli perdona, il amico que muore perdona giusto prima da morire, il bambino maltratatto perdona, la dona violentatta perdona, l'amico arrabiatto perdona, Il amministratore perdona il pago dall affito?
      Adesso ricordo a Camus quando parla di la Divina disponibilittà del condenatto a morte.

      Pieta e perdon e la vita. Non piu.

      Cose pensate voi.?
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Dear Conte,
        I cannot really find a translation that I understand this time.

        Are you advising us that it is enough to go on with life after an evil event like war and to leave the past in the past?
        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: Cara Debra I'll do my best with my spaghetti western. ...That I said is:

          In startegy for war one rule or conseil is: "Forgive your enemy, that turn him mad".

          The people who suffer forgives, the mother that lost his son in wat, forgives, the friend that dies in war, forgive just before he dies, the batten child forgives, the angry friend forgives and the landlord forgives the pay of the rent.?
          I remember Albert Camus quiote " The Divine will that is in a death condemned"

          Mercy and love are life. Nothing more. And here I just remember the life or our Lord Jesus Christ. The maximum example.

          What do you think?
        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: Debra one more thing. In the Godspell, (Luc 23.24) in the final seven words from Our Lord JesusChrist in the agony. He claims to his Father to forgive them because they dont know what the did.
          In the hermeneutics or exegesis in Theological Superior Studies, we analized the word one by one, but not in a translation from the King James Bible, but from their original words written in arameo (tecnhical data 4Q246, the original are lost but we have the very first translation in greek or "koine"). The main thing here is the word "KNOW". If the very same Lord Jesus Christ ask to forgive their enemies...what can we do?: Judge or forgive? Is that the example for our PhD, as you called this attitud to forgive? I see your academic metaphor (PhD) too far from the real dimension of our human scale in the hope of eternity and trascendence. We all born completly done just we have to discover time to time, and we can't accept the very realm of thruth from our soul and intuition. This is because we failled as believers of ourselves. Well this is s a consensus statement from all our friends here in the Baronessa's island, specially from the Father Delacourt. Our friend and confesor.

          Veramente grazie per la sua forza di vivere. Possiamo sentirla fino qui. (And of course I'm not advice any to anybody. Its not my duty.)
        • Jun 13 2011: Conte
          Thank you for you words. In the case of Jesus, they did not know, in an sense "what they were doing." But yes, he prayed Father forgive them. When the most hostile attack with words, fists or crosses, forgiveess is the greatest reality, and the most difficult perspective.
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Ahh Conte, You always bring something fresh.

        We have an expression a bit like yours- 'The best revenge is to live well.' In other words it advises that we let go of the offense and invest the energy into our own lives and happiness.
        I agree that mercy and love are life. Well said.

        The decision to forgive costs us something but the decision not to forgive costs us so much more.

        I find that some of the diverse spiritual traditions come together in your statement that "We all born completly done just we have to discover time to time, and we can't accept the very realm of truth from our soul and intuition. This is because we failled as believers of ourselves"

        I thank you for these kind words and I send them back to you!

        Veramente grazie per la sua forza di vivere. Possiamo sentirla fino qui!
        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: Cara Debra here in our very ancient culture we don't have time to revenge. In all our families are tragedies from the exercise of the cold art of revenge that comes from thousand years ago. We are peasants with an heritage to continue our lignaggio. Its a noble compromise with our people. We share the heavy work in the land and soil and the fruits are per tutti. I'm widow from seven years,My beloved wife The Contessa Maria Clara Di Monferrato pass away in a car accident. My sons and daughter are my joy. I spend my time in the Vatican archives with our beloved Father Delacourt and share my joy with a very few lovable friends specially the Baronessa Di ValTaranto and The Contessa Di Val D' Aosta. We dont detente any right to revenge for nothing. And we live our lives with the vera forza dal cuore. For us the discover of all you in TED conversations is a acomplished promise to buonavita, tertulia e imparanzza senza fine. Grazie a tutti.
      • thumb
        Jun 13 2011: Dear Conte,

        My deepest and sincerest condolensces for the loss of your precious wife.
        Seven years is a long time but your life appears to be rich and full with your studies, your friends and your children. I have only been to Italy once when I ws a young woman and loved every moment. It sounds like you have discovered the real richness of life that comes with forgiving and being forgiven.
  • thumb
    Jun 10 2011: When I hear this word "forgiveness", it comes to me reflections about forgiving people who committed injury to others. Is "forgiveness" an absolut concept, with wide and universal application, or maybe is a relative one, which is only applicable under certain restrictions defined by... who? society? myself? people full of goodwill? judges?

    In my own life, I consider this term a relative concept that I can only apply to people who deserves forgiveness. Criteria of how to evaluate who is eligible or who is not is if this person has consciousness of what he/she has committed against some fair cause. If that person shows evidence of possessing no consciousness, I think he/she doesn't deserve forgiveness, but pity instead. But, if that person evidences being in use of consciousness, he/she has to show a proof of real repentance for deserving forgiveness from anyone.

    Beyond practical matters, forgiveness is a beautiful concept that seeks to put us closer each other. Its aim is to start with a common ground for developing a love link between two o more human beings. Love is the ultimate goal in this life, as Rabindranath Tagore says long time ago. Forgiveness turns this way into a useful tool for building a healthy and an integrated Humankind.

    Therefore, I think "forgiveness" is not the "PhD" of any human being. Instead, it represents a longing of goodwill that has to be put in action everyday and with anyone, if possible. It does not reflect the higher a soul has been developed, because even evil people sometimes bring "forgiveness", maybe as a kind of an early goodwill residual included in any people who decided not to be a "good person" anymore.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Ramiro, nice to see you and read your words.

      "Therefore, I think "forgiveness" is not the "PhD" of any human being. Instead, it represents a longing of goodwill that has to be put in action everyday and with anyone, if possible."

      Do you have any practical advice on how you find your way to forgiveness in these practical situations?
      • thumb
        Jun 11 2011: Alas! I wrote a long document answering your proposal, but now it's gone. Something went wrong with my internet signal on the way. In spite of it, I promise you to answer again later when I'm home again. Greetings for you, and thanks so much for letting me taking part of this excellent debate, dear Debra.
        • thumb
          Jun 11 2011: I'll really look forward to your reposting!
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: Carissimi tutti, questa conversa sul perdon also parla di forgive ourselves. Not in the sense of a psichological stratagema to justify our errors, but a communitarian action to forgive to all the people...fairwar is the best example to this. Everybody has the right to defend the family, integrity, country, property, life above all. We forgive the invasor? Maybe yes, but in the meanwhile we fight him with all our strenght.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Dear Conte,

      You are expanding these thoughts into the area of international affairs.
      That is an exciting avenue to consider as well - especially if you believe that nations do on the macro scale what individuals do on the micro scale.

      So you seem to assert that conflict is inevitable in life- and we are pushed to defend some things we hold dear like family, integrity, property and country ( by any means necessary?). Further, that there is no need to feel apologetic for acts of war under these circumstances. It sounds sort of like the Marquis of Queensbury rules.

      I cannot help but wonder, do we not at some point see what the effects of our actions on others caused, feel regret and feel compassion? Is there not a point where we let those feelings be communicated to the people who suffered our indignant rage?

      What about when the overpowering rage or invasion was against us? Is there not a point where we should expect or hope for another human being to feel some mercy , compassion and extend a hand in apology or restitution?
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: Debra, I love your questions and feel by answering them, my opinion of forgiveness will be illuminated.

    "It is necessary to forgive?"
    I find forgiveness to be a more altruistic form of tolerance, so yes for a social benefit and self benefit.

    "Is it right to forgive?"
    Always, but does not mean you have to forget.

    "Who deserves forgiveness?"
    All deserve it, by earning it.

    "Who doesn't deserve forgiveness?"
    Those who perform great evil consciously.

    "Does a person have to ask for forgiveness to deserve it?"
    A person has to work for forgiveness to deserve it, asking for it is just a dictation that your are ready to fix what has been wronged, otherwise words are cheap.

    "Can you accept being forgiven when you have hurt someone?"
    Forgiving isn't about acceptance, it is about doing what is right. If I can't accept their forgiveness I can't do what is right by letting them do what is right. Kind of vague...

    "What does forgiving do for the person who forgives?"
    Less stress simply. Less worries about others and more on self; it is not bad to be selfish, it is bad to be so selfish it takes away from others.

    Forgiveness is a disciplined practice to me, and only those of high moral and ethical considerations can be those who are examples of what tolerance and understanding can do for social interactions.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Nicholas, I am really happy to see you here.

      I am not sure whether or not you have time to read some of the other responses but a lot of these posts have to do with the kind of events where people do great damage and never ask for forgiveness.

      If the person in no way earns or asks for forgiveness is there any point in forgiving them?
      Many here feel that the whole point in that case is to release yourself from the pain and burden of letting the event and the person continue to hurt you through your own mental replays etc.

      Can you tell me how you see this situation?
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: "If the person in no way earns or asks for forgiveness is there any point in forgiving them?"

        Apathy is a tough practice. It requires you to dis-attached yourself from worrying about what others do and say. So yes, many people here are correct.

        Also, what is right is indeed objective, but to me doing right is not harming others and/or helping others.
      • Jun 10 2011: I do not think that the question of forgiveness is one that can be answered without looking at the context of the specific underlying event causing the question of forgiveness.
        I think that it is in the human nature to, when great damage has been done, try to understand why it happened and part of this is to understand what drove people to cause pain, if it will occur again (think a case of robbery, burglary, physical abuse) and so on. Knowing the context opens up for greater understanding of the event and the underlying issues (social, economic welfare of a perpetrator, abusive parents, feelings of regret) which in turn can lead to forgiveness. In my view forgiveness without any context is artificial.
        Forgiveness can definitely be a powerful tool for closure of emotions such as anger, pain and suffering and may also produce feelings of remorse and shame and to reintegrate the perpetrator in the community again.
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: Hi Debra........She did convince me that everyone is saying they are likable is sumthin' else.
  • Jun 9 2011: Forgive the analogy, it is more like you taking a laxative and expecting the other person to give a shit. In the end, you get cleaned out which is the important thing.

     I am more thought than emotion; therefore, it is a matter of logic for why it happened. I cannot resolve the emotion if I don't understand the mental process the person applied. You don't forgive or ask forgiveness of inanimate objects. Therefore, thought plays a huge role in the process. I just have issues with people whom cannot admit they are to blame and need to ask for forgiveness. It is pretty simple to understand your part in any situation from the other person's perspective; not that we need to accept their perspective as the truth. Yet, you are a better person if you can exhibit this behavior and request forgiveness from their perspective.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Well Jonathan, You made me laugh out loud!

      Are there times when someone has done something, seems oblivious or willfully ignorant of it and you decide to forgive them anyways?
      If you can't forgive them- how long can you stay angry about it?
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Jonathan Too funny.and so perfect...I can't imagine having an ocasion to quote you.exactly..but too good not to share..somehow.

      Thnak you..
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: One of the most important parts of forgiveness is that we let go of all the distortions of anger,resentment hurt, injury, rage.whatever kit and kaboodle it is that we have attached to the offenders actions. We just offer it up and let go of its hold on us unconditionally

    .We can always be free of its hold on us its dirtortion in our lives just by giving it up. Part of that giving up is saying, it is not mine to judge you or to meter your punishment. All I can do for my part is not be bound and distorted by your actions. Which is not the same as saying what you did is ok or what you did makes it possible to continue as your friend, your business partner, your companion..your spouse..if it's your parent or your sibling it doesn't mean you can just continue as if that act, whatever it was, never happened..all actions ( and that includes words) have consequences. Each person has to accept the consequences of their own actions

    .That part of forgiveness and the freedom it gives, the restorative centering it allows within us, is always available to us whether the other person gives anything in return or an apology..or even the courtesy of listening to what their actions cost you. ( as in restortaive justice).

    But If as a condition to letting go of all those distortionsin our lives, we require an explanation or apology from the offender, we will never be free; we become co-responsble for all that kit and kaboodle...we then become responsble for what it costs us and those around us to keep carrying all that baggage around and having it spill over unfruitfully into the lives of those around us.
    Easy ? No... not easy. requires an enornmous act of courage, an alinement of heart and will and mind, determination for our own sake so that we can have our best available in every momen tfor the sake of those we love and respect and want in our lives for whom we have to be our best available self in every moment.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: forgiveness without expectation
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: It is certainly a challenge to be our best self in every circumstance - to deal forthrightly with people, to act with integrity and honesty at all times. It is also tough to realize that our form of enlightenment might not be the only kind.
      We are addressing forgiveness in this conversation in all its forms from partial to full, from one side to reconsiliation. They are all important steps, stages and growth.

      I wonder how we can be certain that the 'consequences' of people's actions is not just another form of punishment. For example: a simple occurance on an site like this one-rejecting or not responding to direct address or someones' comment.

      Krisztian said earlier today on another thread that banishment or exile is the most severe form of punishment in some cases worse than death. I wonder if there is a parallele in ignoring people and yet i routinely see people refuse to engage the people who do not conform to their way of thinking or speaking. I would judge that to be unenlightened and unkind. Honest confrontation would be a more humane approach according to my value system. Is that evidence of forgiveness or of harbouring ill feelings and acting upon them in a hypocritical fashion?
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: I am glad you agree that this best self thing is a worthy goal you not agree then that nurturing woundedness makes that impossible?

        Mine is a widely used model of forgiveness..not faith based, but supported and taught by many faiths, not necessarily rooted in spiritual practice but a teaching of many wisdom traditions. For me it was just my ad hoc put together myself way of sorting out forgiveness which coincidentally happened to have been discovered by many going back thousands and thousands of years

        Part I of my model,as I said above doesn't mean continuing to enage the offender and that might not be worthwhile if they are folk who aren't amemnable to change..whose thinking and speech is s toxic. It also doesn't preclude that possibility..if both parties are willing to engage productively in the healing rocess..all the better.If both parties engage

        My point was simply that it may not be fruitful or productive to require that to happen and we always have the choice of just doing plain vanilla part I..let go of the brokenness and move on.I don't really see any fruitful possibilities of engaging your point on whether the offenders accepting the consequences of their actions is the same as the other person punishing. That kind of thought process just doesn't jibe with mine in any way..there is no point of interesection.

        To me it is just simple.If my part I says non engagement with the offender..its not a judgment..its a choice I make for myself about the quality of my own life. The really useful part of this practice is that if you adopt it as a practice..acting from someplace other than ego and woundedness. the forgiveness is instantantaneous in that moment. So you don't end up building new baggage of jealousy, resentment, envy, .anger hurt just doesn't enter the picture. All is met with equanimity in the moment. When the moment is over..its all over....this kind of forgiveness just becomes a way of living very practical. Very fruitful
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: I really appreciate your constructive editing of your last post. Your opinon is welcome here.
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: Forgiving is accepting, even if you do not agree with the action taken. Boiling it down to reasons the person had for taking the action and trying to understand the motivations involved and then accepting the action for what it was. Many people cannot accept things others do, I have a problem with propaganda spread by the news, I cannot accept it and do not forgive it. Does that make me a human with an associate’s degree? I would argue that the makes me closer to a PhD. On the other hand, if my dog gets into the garbage and I reprimand it, it accepts it and forgives me within a short time; does that make my dog a human?

    Forgiving is not purely a human trait.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: What an interesting take on this issue, Dain.

      This is why i love TED conversations. They make me consider things I have never thought about before.

      I think that you are right on when you speak of acceptance and it might be exactly what Ronald and Colleen are meaning in other words. Maybe animals are the PhDs? Not sufficiently self aware to feel the impact on self?

      I do think that your dog would remember and act differently if you beat him though. Would he have the same trust and love for you? Would something not have changed in your relationship?

      I wonder how many people who find forgiveness not worthy of mention or consideration have experienced the real hardships of life that some of the people who struggle with the issues of forgiveness have had- childhood rape, murdered loved ones, etc.

      I remember a man who did not believe that headaches existed because he had never had one.
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: Carissima Debra

    Forgive: (for give); perdon (per don) . Non si puo ofrire quello che non si ha....perdonare e una Grazia Superiore, perche si da senza aspettare niente. Ma chi e il judice? ¿Il dolore, la sufferenza, il rencore? Forgive e comme aviccinarsi a la Divinità. Came closer to Divinity.

    Please forgive my lenguage confussione.

    Auguri a tutti e qui parliamo da tante cose che non c'e tempo abbastanza.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Sono sempre felice di vederti qui!
      Nessuna scusa è necessario. E 'un privilegio di sentire i vostri pensieri e intuizioni. Sono d'accordo che a perdonare ci rende più simili a Lui, o almeno nel nostro più alto sé migliore.
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: Carissima Debra qui una piccola storia che vogliamo share with al of you. The story was related some minutes ago by Father Delacourt, our beloved Jesuit friend. In the crusades war, some christian baron took prisioner an arab califa. Among they were noble chivalry laws to follow, like be mercyfull. So the baron tell the arab califa that if he could escape from the castle laberinth he could live. Well the arab goes away so easily....times goes and in other battle the same arab took prisioner the same christian baron, and in a gentle gesture he offers the same to the baron: escape from the arab laberinth...the baron gratefull accept the challenge, then the califa order to his soldiers to take the baron to the midlle o the desert, the baron couldnt escape from that open and wide laberinth. (please excuse my english, is so awfull but i expect to be more or less clear, and Archibald is unavoidable because he is very busy with all the visitors and friends.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Again, I welcome you here!

          I love this illustration and its nuances!

          It is a complex and challenging moral lesson.

          One man give mercy and facilitates escape. The other gives a counterfeit mercy from which there is no escape- only certain death disguised as reciprocity.

          Was that your intention of telling the story?
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: Can any one think of one instance where forgiveness would be a bad thing? A part of me wants to say there must be...
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Personally, I cannot but I have heard people in pain say that forgiving someone would empower them to do the crime/ hurt/ offense to someone else. They also sometimes express that forgiving would take away some of their shield of self-protection.
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: I hate to sound so morose, but what if someone took the life of someone you loved dearly?

        I'm just trying to see where the limits of forgiveness might be for some...
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: These are the types of situations that are at the challenging end of the spectrum. In grief work it is in the category of 'complicated grief'. Both suicide and murder are hard to overcome but some people manage to do so. Did you get a chance to view Wongmo's examples below?
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: No, but I will, thanks for the reminder!!!
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: Debra,

        the wounded self is always fully exposed and completely vulnerable,and usually wearing a red speedo,it has no protection, no shield. It is the forgiveness,,the closing of the wound that is the shield and the protection of self, the healer of self

        the wounded self that won't forgive is waiting for someone, usually the transgressor to come and take the wondedness back..waiting for some exetrnal other to take the woundedness away it gets inextricably entangled with the person who "caused it".

        but we are the guradians of self. only we can safe guard it. and holding on to woundednes is not safeguarding self.
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: this is a topic that everyone lives with.I think forgiveness means to pardon oneselfs not others as many already mentioned and also it means it dosent justify any wrongdoings that others do to us.

    ohh here's a link about forgiveness
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Amily!

      That is a great link. Thank you so much!
      Here is an excerpt from it:

      What it (forgiveness) is not:

      Time passing/ignoring the effects of the wrongdoing.
      Nothing that bad happened. It was only this one time. It won't happen again.
      The person did this wasn't really their responsibility.
      She/he deserves to know they have wronged me.
      "Forgiving" with a sense of moral superiority.
      Seeking Justice or Compensation
      Forgiveness is not a quid pro quo deal--it doesn't demand compensation first.

      It is also a very important point for fleshing out this idea. Many people do not want to consider forgiving someone because it might be taken to mean that the hurtful action is condoned for justified.

      Thanks, Amily!
  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: I want and will be grateful for all you can share. This is an important concept and for some of us a life lesson.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Wongmo, Thank you so much for your posting.

      I often find that remembering how often I have hurt others and have needed forgiveness helps plow up the ground of my hardened heart when it comes to forgiving.

      Can you help me understand the concept of radiating light from your heart to their's? Is it a metaphor or a physical event in your experience?
      • Comment deleted

        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: Wongmo, it is a big world, and people have experienced many things that I have not so I want to be respectful before I put their experiences in a box that conforms to my world view.

          I too equate love and light- just wasn't sure if some people got the actual rays!
    • Jun 9 2011: Very beautiful meditation wongmo, thank you.
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: Yes, Michael,

        You refocus me on what is important here!
        Wongmo, that should have been the first thing I said to you. It was a very beautiful and meaningful meditation. I will keep it, consider it and use it.

        Sorry to be so 'task oriented'.
  • thumb
    Jun 9 2011: I agree - especially when applied to the self. (sounds corny, I know).

    Many times I've dwelt on the stupid, idiotic, selfish, ignorant things I've done and mistakes I've made and can't let it go, cringing at the memory. All unproductive and pointless, really. It's something of a notable relief to finally let it go.
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Forgiving oneself can be the hardest battle on the battlefield of forgiveness especially if we have old voices from past authority figures still echoing.

      Many good people recognize that cringing feeling of remembering a careless and hurtful word or thoughtless action. It is a good thing when we can let them go and forgive ourselves for things we would never have held against others.

      Thanks for illuminating this for us Scott.
  • Jun 8 2011: Debra
    Forgiveness ranks right up there....

    It is necessary to forgive?
    Yes. The grace we receive is the grace we get. It doesn't stop the hurt, but it might help. Sometimes it does anyway. It doesn't change what happened, but it opens up a new road. New roads mean new possibilities.

    Is it right to forgive?
    Yes, it is right, hard, horrid, unbalanced, crushing, liberating, eye opening and grace-full

    Who deserves forgiveness?
    No one.

    Who doesn't deserve forgiveness?

    If it comes down to the question of deserving we are all up a creek. Not that we are so innately bad or evil, but because we just flat out don't deserve the forgiveness we get.

    Does a person have to ask for forgiveness to deserve it?
    No. Read through the words of Amazing wait

    Can you accept being forgiven when you have hurt someone?
    Sometimes, that is the hardest thing of all.

    What does forgiving do for the person who forgives?

    It finally sets you free; at least of your own torment.
    • thumb
      Jun 8 2011: Michael, I am really grateful to have a traditional view represented here.

      Thanks for including the video of Amazing Grace. It was a lovely rendition.

      Can you tell me more about how it sets you free of your own torment?

      Is forgiving a form of sacrifice? Is it a form of surrender? What would you say it is at its core?
      • Jun 9 2011: Debra
        I think that forgiving someone allows you to recognize something about yourself, about the other person and about the circumstance. Face it in bad situations many times there is torment. There is a pulling apart of the self. It just hurts. I believe one way to start healing that hurt is to say I forgive you. But it is the forgiver that has the power to release the other, to end the torment and hurt. That is what is so cool.

        Yes, it is a form of sacrifice (now there's a word a lot of people don't like); make it easy, comfortable or sweet, but not sacrifice. Yes, it is surrender also. "La pasion"....not sexual passion, but la pasion...the deep welling up of emotion and feeling, and hurt and surrender. Not surrender to blind fate, what will be will be, but surrender of self. Passion, real passion, moves people.

        This is a hard subject. Thanks for asking the right questions.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: micahel can you make that a little more accessible to those who are not o faith or do not have a spiritual practice? By surrender do you just mean "giving it up"..Letting it go"..all that hurt and torment..not clinging to it any more?
      • Jun 10 2011: Lindsay
        First let me say something in general about one of your posts above and then answer your question. While faith and non-faith people share widely different positions on many things, I believe that there is usually (unfortunately, not always) room for dialogue on commonly held values. That is real community...that is real freedom and real forgiveness. This dialogue on shared values is what is seriously lacking in the "culture war" world we live in. We won't all agree, but we can and should step forward together where those values are shared. And then do something about making those values a reality in our world.

        Surrender and sacrifice are such common ground values, especially when it comes to forgiveness. Sacrifice does mean laying it all down, with no hope of ever getting it back. It means in terms of forgiveness that I am willing to do just that, lay out my forgiving heart and soul, with no thought or hope of reciprocity, but with the hope that laying it all down will bring forgiveness. Surrender means that I willfully give up my self: pride, hurt, all that I am,for the practice of forgiveness.

        It does not mean surrender to fate, to the way things are; sacrifice of self-identity or anything of the kind.

        It is not so much not clinging to the offense, but not clinging to "me" in order that "us" might still be a possibility. See, I believe in life and sometimes you don't get there except through surrender and sacrifice.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Thank you Michael for that post..and yes I understand..those are idaes and values formmy practice as well. And I agree we are often all speaking about the same thing..moving in the same direction and just don't recognize it because our language is so different.
      • Jun 10 2011: Ahhh, but the language difference does imply different worldviews. We can and should dialogue across those worldviews. In studying worldview however, there are two things that are seemingly contradictory. Each worldview is just that, and therefore equal in nature. However, one adopts a worldview that explains how the world works because it does a better job of doing that. When we speak from our worldview, that is implicit. But the former thing about worldviews being equal is also implicit. It isn't a contradiction, but a tough dialectic.

        Back to suffering and sacrifice. It does come to the point where you have to experience those in real life to understand
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: lovely michael..a dialectic..opposition that goes somewhere.

          .Were you in the conversation s on fear, ego, radical empathy, freedom?

          There are many of us here ta Ted in spiritual practice ..more tutn up every day....we all immediately recognize one another.

          Ideas that are bread and butter to that freedom is inherent or that forgiveness is about letting go of the control the event has over our lives even if spoken in "common language".."plain english" are met with great resistence and even anger her in Ted Conversations.

          These ideas are not understood or even welcome..they are disturbing somehow to folk with very different "operating systems"..which is to say..most folk.

          When we find and recognize ":each other" in a conversation like this. and .of course we would all naturally gravitate to a conversation on forgiveness..that recognition just seems to escalate this great unsettlement these ideas bring to most people.

          I am totally mystified that there is so much angts and reaction to the idea that forgiveness is firta nd most imoortantly not letting someelses horrbile actc rob th ewolrd of your light..of your possibility working in the world.

          I am here to prove that doesn't have to be so. I can see you are too.

          A Thousand white roses to you
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Michael , my friend and wise fellow traveler, a thousand white roses and a thumbs up..a wonderful exploration of forgiveness and pretty much in alinement with mine.

      I wonder why it is so hard fto get this across..

      You know ,of coutrse, that most folk don't get this at all..and have no idea how to do it.

      So what is the obligation of those who get it to those who don't?

      How can forgoveness as you think of it and I think of it be taiught..outside of spiritual practice..outside of faith? I happened to und it on my own..just lucky I guess..a natural born critical thinker and i believe with all my heart it does not require faith or psiritual practice to have a life practice of forgiving.

      But it's not always clear how to facilitate that.
      • Jun 9 2011: Lindsay
        Mine does come from a deep faith commitment. But it comes from one who has been forgiven more often than not.

        Forgiving is healing.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: "Who deserves Forgiveness?"
      The misinformed deserve forgiveness. People who have been purposefully lead to false information in order to incite them to commit actions. These people falling victim to belief of propaganda surely deserve forgiveness?
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: Thomas, You are always bringing forward an important part of the puzzle or something we have missed. Thinking deeply and cutting through the clutter is really your forte.

        Yes, the people you cite deserve forgiveness but in that context how do we minimize the pain that they cause?

        I really think it would add something great if you could put more meat on these bones.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: The best way to minimize the damage would be to cut out the source of the propaganda, the quicker the better.
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: I know what tou mean by "deserve firgiveness" mean are rhings too horrible to forgive. If your view of forgiveness includesonly releasing all of its hold on yourself , the more horrible it is the more urgent it is for protection of self to somehow release it. ( I'm thinking here of rape, incest, abuse..especially in early childhood) .That part must get done for the wholeness and well being of self.

          Can anyone truly be free of something so horrible.very very difficult..a sort of constant work a sort of constant struggle to not let what happened overshadow your whole life and rob you of your happiness and fulfillment. And actually sometimes more itolerable for perpetrators ( I am thinking here of soldiers in war who are part of horrific things)

          What to do with the horror of what happened? I think that's why many victims of unpseakably horrible things become advocates and motivational speakers or statrt support groups for others.Sometimes working somehow to protect others from the horros we ourselves edured can be a very important part of completing forgiveness..really fending of all damage to self completely.
    • thumb
      Jun 10 2011: Lindsay, By "deserve forgiveness" it doesn't imply any sort of severity just implies an offense, which in this case was motivated by a misunderstanding bred through propaganda. And again it's not necessary to forgive an offender to get past an offense, it is however a common sign that the offense has been overcome.
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: " it is not necessary to forgive and offender to get past an offense'.
        How do you get past the offense then Thomas? Is it just a matter of forgetting it?
        • thumb
          Jun 10 2011: Yes, you move on. Don't let something affect you if you don't like the way it does. Don't look back at it or focus on it, realize you can't change the past so there is no reason to bother.
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: Yes thomas..a good insight and I agree with you.
  • thumb
    Jun 8 2011: Hi Debra. I'm having trouble really comprehending what is being talked about here.

    So starting with wikipedia:

    "Forgiveness is typically defined as the process of concluding resentment, indignation or anger as a result of a perceived offense, difference or mistake, or ceasing to demand punishment or restitution."

    I can see the point of wanting to get beyond the anger (that can be self defeating). But if someone screws you, why would you let go of the resentment? Isn't that merely a defense mechanism against letting it happen again?
    • thumb
      Jun 8 2011: The reason many people feel that forgiveness is a good thing - and remember this is open for discussion as a debate because there are perspectives like the one you are suggesting- is that holding it is damaging to oneself.

      Thanks for adding a definiiton. That's always helpful in my view as a starting place. (So often like in our discussion about greed people do not know what the word is actually defined as and people are talking about two different things.)

      If I hold resentment against someone who for example hurt me physically and emotionally years ago- that person still has some power over me. I want to be rid of it. Below I quoted and expression by an unknown author to the effect that ' refusing to forgive someone is like drinking poison and expecting the other person to die."
      Bad move.

      If we are holding on to negative feelings about a person or event releasing them brings us peace and doesn't do a thing to or for the other person. It like putting down a burden you've been carrying around wasting your own energy. It feels good.

      Now I am not suggesting that a woman forgives her rapist and then starts to date him or that you lend money to someone who stole from you. You are older and wiser than you were when you had the experience. Forgiving means laying down the toxic burden and with a clearer mind living your life as though that person is irrelevant.
    • thumb
      Jun 8 2011: You just triggered a memory when you spoke about the defense mechanism!

      For many years I was not successful at forgiving at all. I tended to replay hurts and shy away from people who had hurt me. One day as an undergrad, I walked up to join a conversation with a 'friend' who was chatting with a prof for one of my classes before a seminar. I clomped up and I assumed that it was obvious that i was there as I waited for an invititation to join the conversation. My 'friend' was a woman that i had gone out of my way to help. She missed many classes due to child care issues and I shared my notes and tutored her without charge. I was wrong about her realizing I was there and I watched the poor prof be caught in the terrible posiiton of her bashing me about being stupid. (I had confided to her after and exam that I had not expected a particular question). It was only when I realized how awkward the situation was and turned to leave that she became aware of my presence. Later, she lied about what she had said in an attempt at repair

      I agonized with hurt feelings for awhile and then I came up with something that has helped my ever since. I call it "putting people in China". I imagine that there are a million wonderful people in China that I will never meet and I pick the problem person up in my mnd and place them in 'China'. That opens up a new place in my life and heart for someone else. The incident is behind me.

      As ridiculous as this sounds, I can then interact with the offending person as though they were a brand new person -as politely and without angst as if I had never met them before -holding no resentment toward them but knowing enough not to open up to them in ways that they can hurt me.

      It is a game that I played to get past the awkward interchanges with people who had revealed their nasty side and it allowed me to continue to deal with people as me- an open and caring person without hypocricy or ulcers.

      I learned a truer form of forgiveness later.
      • thumb
        Jun 10 2011: I like your china practice..really just a different version o saying the same thing..that different prcatices have different language..

        this is have a practice

        it works.

        my sister (you remind me of her in many ways) had a similar version..To protect herself against "the slings and arrows of outreageous fortune" she would imagine herself inside a beuatiful inpenetrable bubble. Same as your china thing.

        Perfectly serviceable cut on forgivenessas long as putting those people in china really includes sending along with them all the anger , angst, pain etc. their transgtession has caused..
    • thumb
      Jun 9 2011: Tim...That would only happen if you understood why they did what they did. You know some people who don't feel ok about themselves have a lot of defense mechanisms. They are more interested in protecting themselves than actually personally hurting you.
  • Comment deleted

    • thumb
      Jun 8 2011: Nafissa, I always enjoy your responses.

      Here are my questions for you:

      How does one get from the point of injury to the point where they are able to understand that forgiving frees oneself?
      Where do all the bad feelings go?
      Is it an instant choice? A process? A sacrifice or a surrender?
  • Jun 8 2011: Hi Debra, I think that there are two ingredients that are necessarily required for forgiveness - a certain level of understanding why the person did whatever they did, and a certain level of empathy (or sympathy?). The other thing is that some actions are easier to forgive than others. So, it is much easier to forgive a cheating spouse than it is to forgive someone who deliberately killed a child. In the latter case, I am not sure it is necessary for the family of that child to forgive. I think they may come to terms with it, eventually accept it but they can be forgiven for not forgiving.
    • thumb
      Jun 8 2011: Hey Julie Ann, Thanks for joining in!

      What if we could never relate to or understand why someone did what they did?

      How do you empathize in horrendous circumstances?

      I am very happy you made the point that someone who has had something terrible happen to them should not be judged on the basis of whether they have 'forgiven' or not forgiven. I think it is a journey that some people need to take and one that it not possible for everyone. Do you agree?
      • Jun 8 2011: Hi Debra, I think those are the circumstances under which forgiveness becomes very difficult, if not impossible, as in extreme and tragic circumstances. The tenets of wisdom might implore you to forgive in order to release yourself from suffering, but that suffering must pale in comparison to the grief caused by the loss. I don't think forgiveness is necessary under these circumstances.
        For the more simple, common occurrences such as a friend's betrayal, I think these are just lessons to be learned. I like your "send them to China method" except now that you are going to China you might meet them again :-). Better send them to Siberia now - bit further north.
        • thumb
          Jun 8 2011: Hahhahaaaaaaaaaa!
          You are so sharp Julie Ann! You caught that!
          Don't think I haven't seen the irony in that! It makes me wonder what lessons of humility and maturity I have yet to learn!!

          Addition: I often wonder where I am still blind and what I have yet to truly 'get'.
      • Jun 9 2011: "It makes me wonder what lessons of humility and maturity I have yet to learn!!"

        We mess up, learn from it, move on, and repeat - the other life cycle :-)
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: Carissima Julie Ann....just two quotes from Heirich Heine.

          "Experience is a good scholl, but the fees are high."

          "God will forgive me: that's his business."
      • Jun 9 2011: I love them both, particularly the second! Grazie.
    • Comment deleted

      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: It was the mothers of 9/11 video that sparked my questions on this thread. Thanks so much for bringing these examples to us Wongmo.

        I am humbled and beyond touched at the humanity of people who overcome such horrendous events and find ways to love and transcent their pain. I can see that they are bigger than I am now in some vital way.
        • Jun 9 2011: Wongmo "maybe we don't know our own potential until an actual situation arises."
          So true my friend, so true.
      • Jun 9 2011: Hi Wongmo "Can we ever understand what motivates [WHY] a murder, rape, incest, pedophilia? Doubt it very much ... its far too complex and twisted ... doubt they are sure themselves."

        I think the point of my posts was to express this very idea.

        With regards to your other examples, I am not sure that reconciliation and forgiveness are the same thing. There are many examples of reconciliation in Rwanda, for example. I am not sure that all of this is forgiveness.

        Another thing to keep in mind is that as individuals, we are all at different levels of spirituality or logic - whichever we choose to fall back on. Each person sees an event in a different light- we analyse events differently. So, while some can say they forgive the murderer of their child, others cannot. They may come to terms with it - a reconciliation within themselves through which they do not harbour hate, but that is not forgiveness. I don't think the ones who cannot forgive are any less righteous than those who can. Do you see my point? We do not all have to react the same way.
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: wisdom always from your corner Wongmo.

        .I agree that reconciliation is a very ppowerful tool when it can be engaged for the primary benefit of the victim ( I use that word make a point) and as a corollary where it might lead to a change in habit or attitude that woukd protect others.

        The process is called restorative jusrtice, I believe..and I beleive that can work between and among any persons whose relationships are damaged by an act that creates vcitims. It's being used to great effect with bullies in scool situations and possibly preventing untold number sof future victims by the habitual acts and thinking of that same transgressor.

        It takes enough courage and struggle for a victim just to leap over th e almost inevitable budren of anger rage.humiliation..alll that baggage and just get on with their own lives without distortion. To anyone who can do that much..a thousand white roses.I don't think we can expect victims to participate in restorative justice or require them to..but infinite white roses to those who can do that

        .I think restorative justice is possible also between family and friends. I think its a model we should encourage and hold up and high so everyone is aware of it. But, if a victim can only magage just to get on with life without the entanglements and distortions of bitterness, rage etc. kudos a thousand kudos still for foul.
  • thumb
    Jun 8 2011: Forgiveness is grand, but premature forgiveness can be counterintuitive.
    • thumb
      Jun 8 2011: Hi Thomas,

      Glad you are here. Can you share more about your thoughts? How and when is forgiveness premature?
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: If someone commits a negative act against a benevolent soul that instantly forgives them then the actor has no reservation about committing said act again. Forgiveness should come when understanding is either reached about the effects of the action or when it is clear that that understanding will not be reached.
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: Thomas, I'm happy you answered that for me.

          We have all seen kind souls would were being exploited. Often it happens in close relationships and it is hard for people who love a person to watch.

          Perhaps it is possible to gain understanding of a person and their tactics and yet to stand strong against allowing them to repeat the behaviour. That's tough for many people to master, thought and frustrating for the person who watches it happen over and over.
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: Thomas, Just for the sake of clarity let's consider that the forgiver is a victim.of an act or pattern of action. Are you saying that the victim has a duty to reform the transgressor? To lay it out for t hem so they won't do it again?
          What kind of model is that?
          Resentment, anger, bitterness, revenge, rage..those are all terrible budrens to carry..that's what forgiveness is..saying I won't carry those things,, I won't let that distort my life, my potential, my possibilities going forward from this moment If a victim can find therei way there they have doen well and nore than most could hope for I would say.

          And let's for the sake of clarity call the transgressor, the perpetrator.. ( oh oh am I chaneling James Walker?????) Does the victim owe any duty to the perpetrator? If the victim can step over the messy entanglements of rage etc. and continue in equanimty..wel done I say..for them and for all they engage in the world..beause sadly it will show all over like a red speedo...spill out in atoxic way that harms others if they can't get there.

          .Even if the perpetrator begs for guidance and really needs it they have to work it out for themselves..or find help elsewhere..they can't demand or expect it from their victims.

          Drawn to extremes to make a point which I hope was made and well received and speaks respectfully and in freidnship to your point..
      • thumb
        Jun 9 2011: Lindsay, In the case of a random transgressor if the victim would choose to forgive then it would not matter the time. Being that most likely the victim will not see their transgressor again. In the case that the forgiver is personally close or in some type of mentoring role for the transgressor then the path of forgiveness is a factor of consideration. In the first scenario it is forgiveness for personal gain wherethat the second scenario is forgiveness for the aid of others.

        Secondly I don't not feel the need or association between my feelings and forgiveness. Other than forgiveness out judging revenge. Still I do not feel the need to forgive so that I may heal fully from some atrocity. If there is a blatant act of disrespect I do not need to forgive those who disrespected so that I may feel peace. My nirvana being reached would be more dependent on being forgiven my transgressions more so then forgiving others'. While some situations are best forgiven and forgotten some are in need of more then that.
        • thumb
          Jun 9 2011: Some really important thoughts here, Thomas. Thanks so much for introducing them.

          Forgiveness is not always a wrenching thing. It can simply be a practical matter of day to day functioning.

          I love- LOVE- the focus that your are putting on the importance of being forgiven when we transgress.

          This is a vital and fertile area for discussion!