This conversation is closed.
Can we test some innovation in these conversations?
Here, in this forum, we have lot of smart and educated people. I like e-meeting them, BUT can you really read 170 answers to a simple or complex question, such as 'should anyone be allowed to upload videos, to TED?
Many answers really are YES or NO and repeat reasons we already seen.
So - what about 1) adding a voting button YES or NO or ..
2) Every N (10, 50 ..) answers will be summarized
(by for and con person)
3) only id a new argument appears, it will be given 2000 characters - to explain
4) and again - we all can vote - that arguments is indeed new
Come on - this is a brainstorming thread : What else can we do to make this dialog more efficient, less repetitive ??