This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
All languages opens doors to knowledge, not just English. Walker's claim is linguistically homogenizing and dangerously imperialistic.
All languages open doors to new knowledge and it is the narrow-mindedness of monolinguals to think their language (our, in the case of English) is somehow the unique key to knowledge. Much knowledge is lost in the homogenization of the world's tongues - knowledge that is not catalogued in books as well as knowledge that is. Many of the great scientists, philosophers and literary giants of the past wrote not in English but in Greek,German, Russian, French, Spanish, and so on... and we know of their work because of translation NOT because they thought or wrote in English.
Julie Ann 10+
English, in comparison, appears to be a cold, mechanical language stripped down to the bare necessities. I suggest, a language that is well-suited for science and technology - external to the self, so to speak. Do you think this is a fair assessment? It is a generalization, of course, because there is always a co-mingling of the arts and sciences in any civilization, but I think there is usually dominance of one over the other.
To carry this further, if we assume that at any point in the development of a civilization, the things that co-exist are the things that attract each other, can we surmise that in this technological era, English is the language that is best-suited and may explain, in part, the proliferation of the language. I am sure you and other TEDsters can poke many holes in this, but do you think there is a valid concept here? I hope I articulated this well enough. Cheers.
Heather Lotherington
I was at one time also a fluent speaker of a creolized language that I have not regularly used in 30 years or so, and I did find that it was better oriented to social than academic work. This is because creolized languages are very new languages in terms of evolution, and have not been around long enough to have developed a sufficient vocabulary for expressing fine details of science or arts, etc., and--very often--are not given the chance to develop this vocabulary because they are outlawed or looked down upon.
As a linguist, I must say no to what you have proposed, though it is an interesting idea. All languages have their ups and downs, their quirks, easy bits and hard bits, but all can express what the humans who speak these languages fluently wish to express. Otherwise the languages would have to evolve (as all languages do) to be able to do so. English doesn't sound as romantic as Italian or French to Anglo ears, but perhaps it does to a baby who does not have our social biases. Some languages have greater academic currency than others because they have been encoded in school materials, political media or industrial pursuits--they are more powerful, not intrinsically more suitable.
Languages can be spoken by different cultures (English, French or Arabic, for example), so it is not really possible to link language and (1) culture closely for all languages, though this works well for aboriginal groups. Is that what you meant by older cultures?
Matt Hintzke
Heather Lotherington
Homophones are not unique to English. Chinese uses tones to distinguish between 5 or more words of the same phonetic construction. If you know French grammar, you have to spell your way out of hell to say words that in speech sound the same. This is not novel.
Debra Smith 200+
Another TED talk supports your ideas:
http://www.ted.com/talks/patricia_ryan_ideas_in_all_languages_not_just_english.html
Heather Lotherington
Salim Solaiman 50+
Why English is so widespread now and translation in to English make wealth of knowledge open to wider population ?
Well answers is really linked with collonial imperialism of British empire really...... economics is changing at quicker pace & most things are market driven now.... .....so in future it may be some other langauge which can displace English ..... who knows it can be Chinese..........
Ed Schulte 50+
the people of your Continent Taught the British how to using their Language so that they would no longer be such NON-elequent barbarians :-((( ...(excluding Shakespeare of course ;-)) ...
.and I thank you for it every time I watch BBC's "DOHA debate" and 'World Debate' where the British do a reasonable job of playing Devil's Advocate between people who have made the English language come alive !!! Keep up the good work!!
Salim Solaiman 50+
Well guess Shakespearean English was more closer to mass people in England than that of Elite English of imperial power center which was my novice knowledge now confirmed Heather below. We collonial people were exposed to may be the Elite English , but for me strength of language lies in the version with which mass communicates.
What's your thoughts?
Heather Lotherington
I agree with Salim. Chinese is used by more people on earth than any other language. Never mind the archaic encoding system used for writing. There may come a day when we all will be dying to learn Chinese so we, too, can get in on the trade of the 21st century. I have been at this for awhile, but my written Chinese consists of pitifully few characters. Ah well, the future is hard to predict.
Salim Solaiman 50+
It's great you know some.
Well I feel imeprialism is associated with spread of language it's not only how many people talk in that language. We are in the era of neo-imperialism , which can be termed "imperialism of emerging economy". But here the rules of the game is a bit different. In earlier time Imperialists used to invade , now in this imperialist is not going to invade rather mature economy (past imperialist due to military power) are coming to them to get juice of hyper growth. So these invadors will not burden invaded country with their language , rather invador is learning the language of invaded country. In that way being passive in invasion , the growth of economy taking the role of neo-imperialist.
From that perspective I feel , chinese might emerge as a major language....thats my daring view to expert like you :)