This conversation is closed.
Which influences the direction of human development more… charisma or diplomacy?
Leaders have many names. I think ultimately they're labeled based on an emotional perspective. A male autocratic leader is patriarchal in societies that revere order over independence, but oppressive in societies that value the inverse.
Diplomacy is the art of conducting negotiations. Charisma is the art of persuasion. One is based upon the reordering of existing paradigms, while the other invents a communal perspective. Both have altered the path of history.
Which encapsulates your personal approach to life?